Is SL(2,C) unimodular
$begingroup$
My question is in the title, do you know if SL(2,C) is an unimodular group or not and how to prove it ?
Thank you.
lie-groups
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My question is in the title, do you know if SL(2,C) is an unimodular group or not and how to prove it ?
Thank you.
lie-groups
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My question is in the title, do you know if SL(2,C) is an unimodular group or not and how to prove it ?
Thank you.
lie-groups
$endgroup$
My question is in the title, do you know if SL(2,C) is an unimodular group or not and how to prove it ?
Thank you.
lie-groups
lie-groups
asked Jan 28 at 16:58


théo jaminthéo jamin
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I found the answer in the article of JÖRG WINKELMANN : "Complex analytic geometry of complex parallelizable manifolds" :
Recall that a locally compact topological group $G$ is called unimodular iff a left-invariant Haar measure is also right-invariant.
Assume $G$ is a locally compact topological group.
Page $5$, J. Winkelmann proved that :
Let $Gamma$ be a cocompact discrete subgroup of $G$. Then $G/Gamma$ admits a $G$ invariant probability measure.
Let $Gamma$ be a discrete subgroup of $G$. Assume that there exists a $G$-invariant probability measure on $G/Gamma$ then $G$ is unimodular.
Finally, the existence of lattices in $SL_2(mathbb{C})$ is given by the existence of compact $3$-dimensional hyperbolic manifold and thus we know that $SL_2(mathbb{C})$ is unimodular.
I hope I did not make mistakes.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This works but is unnecessarily complicated. Instead, use the fact that $G=SL(2,C)$ has no nontrivial characters. Then equip $G$ with a left-invariant volume form and prove that it is also right-invariant.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Feb 1 at 18:41
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3091122%2fis-sl2-c-unimodular%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I found the answer in the article of JÖRG WINKELMANN : "Complex analytic geometry of complex parallelizable manifolds" :
Recall that a locally compact topological group $G$ is called unimodular iff a left-invariant Haar measure is also right-invariant.
Assume $G$ is a locally compact topological group.
Page $5$, J. Winkelmann proved that :
Let $Gamma$ be a cocompact discrete subgroup of $G$. Then $G/Gamma$ admits a $G$ invariant probability measure.
Let $Gamma$ be a discrete subgroup of $G$. Assume that there exists a $G$-invariant probability measure on $G/Gamma$ then $G$ is unimodular.
Finally, the existence of lattices in $SL_2(mathbb{C})$ is given by the existence of compact $3$-dimensional hyperbolic manifold and thus we know that $SL_2(mathbb{C})$ is unimodular.
I hope I did not make mistakes.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This works but is unnecessarily complicated. Instead, use the fact that $G=SL(2,C)$ has no nontrivial characters. Then equip $G$ with a left-invariant volume form and prove that it is also right-invariant.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Feb 1 at 18:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I found the answer in the article of JÖRG WINKELMANN : "Complex analytic geometry of complex parallelizable manifolds" :
Recall that a locally compact topological group $G$ is called unimodular iff a left-invariant Haar measure is also right-invariant.
Assume $G$ is a locally compact topological group.
Page $5$, J. Winkelmann proved that :
Let $Gamma$ be a cocompact discrete subgroup of $G$. Then $G/Gamma$ admits a $G$ invariant probability measure.
Let $Gamma$ be a discrete subgroup of $G$. Assume that there exists a $G$-invariant probability measure on $G/Gamma$ then $G$ is unimodular.
Finally, the existence of lattices in $SL_2(mathbb{C})$ is given by the existence of compact $3$-dimensional hyperbolic manifold and thus we know that $SL_2(mathbb{C})$ is unimodular.
I hope I did not make mistakes.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This works but is unnecessarily complicated. Instead, use the fact that $G=SL(2,C)$ has no nontrivial characters. Then equip $G$ with a left-invariant volume form and prove that it is also right-invariant.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Feb 1 at 18:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I found the answer in the article of JÖRG WINKELMANN : "Complex analytic geometry of complex parallelizable manifolds" :
Recall that a locally compact topological group $G$ is called unimodular iff a left-invariant Haar measure is also right-invariant.
Assume $G$ is a locally compact topological group.
Page $5$, J. Winkelmann proved that :
Let $Gamma$ be a cocompact discrete subgroup of $G$. Then $G/Gamma$ admits a $G$ invariant probability measure.
Let $Gamma$ be a discrete subgroup of $G$. Assume that there exists a $G$-invariant probability measure on $G/Gamma$ then $G$ is unimodular.
Finally, the existence of lattices in $SL_2(mathbb{C})$ is given by the existence of compact $3$-dimensional hyperbolic manifold and thus we know that $SL_2(mathbb{C})$ is unimodular.
I hope I did not make mistakes.
$endgroup$
I found the answer in the article of JÖRG WINKELMANN : "Complex analytic geometry of complex parallelizable manifolds" :
Recall that a locally compact topological group $G$ is called unimodular iff a left-invariant Haar measure is also right-invariant.
Assume $G$ is a locally compact topological group.
Page $5$, J. Winkelmann proved that :
Let $Gamma$ be a cocompact discrete subgroup of $G$. Then $G/Gamma$ admits a $G$ invariant probability measure.
Let $Gamma$ be a discrete subgroup of $G$. Assume that there exists a $G$-invariant probability measure on $G/Gamma$ then $G$ is unimodular.
Finally, the existence of lattices in $SL_2(mathbb{C})$ is given by the existence of compact $3$-dimensional hyperbolic manifold and thus we know that $SL_2(mathbb{C})$ is unimodular.
I hope I did not make mistakes.
answered Jan 30 at 17:05


théo jaminthéo jamin
1
1
$begingroup$
This works but is unnecessarily complicated. Instead, use the fact that $G=SL(2,C)$ has no nontrivial characters. Then equip $G$ with a left-invariant volume form and prove that it is also right-invariant.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Feb 1 at 18:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This works but is unnecessarily complicated. Instead, use the fact that $G=SL(2,C)$ has no nontrivial characters. Then equip $G$ with a left-invariant volume form and prove that it is also right-invariant.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Feb 1 at 18:41
$begingroup$
This works but is unnecessarily complicated. Instead, use the fact that $G=SL(2,C)$ has no nontrivial characters. Then equip $G$ with a left-invariant volume form and prove that it is also right-invariant.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Feb 1 at 18:41
$begingroup$
This works but is unnecessarily complicated. Instead, use the fact that $G=SL(2,C)$ has no nontrivial characters. Then equip $G$ with a left-invariant volume form and prove that it is also right-invariant.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Feb 1 at 18:41
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3091122%2fis-sl2-c-unimodular%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown