Java-to-Kotlin translation bug
Using the latest Kotlin 1.3.10 plugin from the latest IntelliJ IDEA 2018.3, if I translate the following Java code to Kotlin:
BufferedReader br = Files.newBufferedReader(Paths.get("filename"));
String line;
while ((line = br.readLine()) != null)
System.out.println(line);
I get this:
val br = Files.newBufferedReader(Paths.get("filename"))
var line: String
while ((line = br.readLine()) != null)
println(line)
The while ((line = br.nextLine()) != null)
is idiomatic Java, but its automatic translation results in illegal syntax because assignments in Kotlin are not expressions.
Is this a known bug in the Java-to-Kotlin translator?
What's the Kotlin idiomatic syntax equivalent to the above Java code?
kotlin
add a comment |
Using the latest Kotlin 1.3.10 plugin from the latest IntelliJ IDEA 2018.3, if I translate the following Java code to Kotlin:
BufferedReader br = Files.newBufferedReader(Paths.get("filename"));
String line;
while ((line = br.readLine()) != null)
System.out.println(line);
I get this:
val br = Files.newBufferedReader(Paths.get("filename"))
var line: String
while ((line = br.readLine()) != null)
println(line)
The while ((line = br.nextLine()) != null)
is idiomatic Java, but its automatic translation results in illegal syntax because assignments in Kotlin are not expressions.
Is this a known bug in the Java-to-Kotlin translator?
What's the Kotlin idiomatic syntax equivalent to the above Java code?
kotlin
2
youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-25765
– Thomas
Nov 22 '18 at 11:09
I suppose that declaration at an upper level is the only way
– Andrey Ilyunin
Nov 22 '18 at 11:17
1
Partly a duplicate of stackoverflow.com/questions/36879236/…
– Klitos Kyriacou
Nov 22 '18 at 11:24
1
It is a known bug, please vote for youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-6294
– Alexey Belkov
Nov 22 '18 at 12:11
add a comment |
Using the latest Kotlin 1.3.10 plugin from the latest IntelliJ IDEA 2018.3, if I translate the following Java code to Kotlin:
BufferedReader br = Files.newBufferedReader(Paths.get("filename"));
String line;
while ((line = br.readLine()) != null)
System.out.println(line);
I get this:
val br = Files.newBufferedReader(Paths.get("filename"))
var line: String
while ((line = br.readLine()) != null)
println(line)
The while ((line = br.nextLine()) != null)
is idiomatic Java, but its automatic translation results in illegal syntax because assignments in Kotlin are not expressions.
Is this a known bug in the Java-to-Kotlin translator?
What's the Kotlin idiomatic syntax equivalent to the above Java code?
kotlin
Using the latest Kotlin 1.3.10 plugin from the latest IntelliJ IDEA 2018.3, if I translate the following Java code to Kotlin:
BufferedReader br = Files.newBufferedReader(Paths.get("filename"));
String line;
while ((line = br.readLine()) != null)
System.out.println(line);
I get this:
val br = Files.newBufferedReader(Paths.get("filename"))
var line: String
while ((line = br.readLine()) != null)
println(line)
The while ((line = br.nextLine()) != null)
is idiomatic Java, but its automatic translation results in illegal syntax because assignments in Kotlin are not expressions.
Is this a known bug in the Java-to-Kotlin translator?
What's the Kotlin idiomatic syntax equivalent to the above Java code?
kotlin
kotlin
asked Nov 22 '18 at 11:03


DodgyCodeExceptionDodgyCodeException
3,5561424
3,5561424
2
youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-25765
– Thomas
Nov 22 '18 at 11:09
I suppose that declaration at an upper level is the only way
– Andrey Ilyunin
Nov 22 '18 at 11:17
1
Partly a duplicate of stackoverflow.com/questions/36879236/…
– Klitos Kyriacou
Nov 22 '18 at 11:24
1
It is a known bug, please vote for youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-6294
– Alexey Belkov
Nov 22 '18 at 12:11
add a comment |
2
youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-25765
– Thomas
Nov 22 '18 at 11:09
I suppose that declaration at an upper level is the only way
– Andrey Ilyunin
Nov 22 '18 at 11:17
1
Partly a duplicate of stackoverflow.com/questions/36879236/…
– Klitos Kyriacou
Nov 22 '18 at 11:24
1
It is a known bug, please vote for youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-6294
– Alexey Belkov
Nov 22 '18 at 12:11
2
2
youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-25765
– Thomas
Nov 22 '18 at 11:09
youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-25765
– Thomas
Nov 22 '18 at 11:09
I suppose that declaration at an upper level is the only way
– Andrey Ilyunin
Nov 22 '18 at 11:17
I suppose that declaration at an upper level is the only way
– Andrey Ilyunin
Nov 22 '18 at 11:17
1
1
Partly a duplicate of stackoverflow.com/questions/36879236/…
– Klitos Kyriacou
Nov 22 '18 at 11:24
Partly a duplicate of stackoverflow.com/questions/36879236/…
– Klitos Kyriacou
Nov 22 '18 at 11:24
1
1
It is a known bug, please vote for youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-6294
– Alexey Belkov
Nov 22 '18 at 12:11
It is a known bug, please vote for youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-6294
– Alexey Belkov
Nov 22 '18 at 12:11
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I think the comments have answered both of my questions, so let me compile them into a single answer.
Yes, it's a known bug, reported at youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-6294. You can vote for it (if you have a Jetbrains account) to show the developers that you would like it fixed. Thank you Alexey Belkov for bringing this to my attention.
A common way to directly translate it would be:
val br = Files.newBufferedReader(Paths.get("filename"))
var line: String
while (br.readLine().also { line = it} != null)
println(line)
However, a better way in this particular case is:
val br = Files.newBufferedReader(Paths.get("filename"))
br.forEachLine {
println(it)
}
Or just
File("filename").forEachLine {
println(it)
}
(which uses a convenience method, equivalent to Java's convenience method
Files.lines(Path)
).
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53429526%2fjava-to-kotlin-translation-bug%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I think the comments have answered both of my questions, so let me compile them into a single answer.
Yes, it's a known bug, reported at youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-6294. You can vote for it (if you have a Jetbrains account) to show the developers that you would like it fixed. Thank you Alexey Belkov for bringing this to my attention.
A common way to directly translate it would be:
val br = Files.newBufferedReader(Paths.get("filename"))
var line: String
while (br.readLine().also { line = it} != null)
println(line)
However, a better way in this particular case is:
val br = Files.newBufferedReader(Paths.get("filename"))
br.forEachLine {
println(it)
}
Or just
File("filename").forEachLine {
println(it)
}
(which uses a convenience method, equivalent to Java's convenience method
Files.lines(Path)
).
add a comment |
I think the comments have answered both of my questions, so let me compile them into a single answer.
Yes, it's a known bug, reported at youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-6294. You can vote for it (if you have a Jetbrains account) to show the developers that you would like it fixed. Thank you Alexey Belkov for bringing this to my attention.
A common way to directly translate it would be:
val br = Files.newBufferedReader(Paths.get("filename"))
var line: String
while (br.readLine().also { line = it} != null)
println(line)
However, a better way in this particular case is:
val br = Files.newBufferedReader(Paths.get("filename"))
br.forEachLine {
println(it)
}
Or just
File("filename").forEachLine {
println(it)
}
(which uses a convenience method, equivalent to Java's convenience method
Files.lines(Path)
).
add a comment |
I think the comments have answered both of my questions, so let me compile them into a single answer.
Yes, it's a known bug, reported at youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-6294. You can vote for it (if you have a Jetbrains account) to show the developers that you would like it fixed. Thank you Alexey Belkov for bringing this to my attention.
A common way to directly translate it would be:
val br = Files.newBufferedReader(Paths.get("filename"))
var line: String
while (br.readLine().also { line = it} != null)
println(line)
However, a better way in this particular case is:
val br = Files.newBufferedReader(Paths.get("filename"))
br.forEachLine {
println(it)
}
Or just
File("filename").forEachLine {
println(it)
}
(which uses a convenience method, equivalent to Java's convenience method
Files.lines(Path)
).
I think the comments have answered both of my questions, so let me compile them into a single answer.
Yes, it's a known bug, reported at youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-6294. You can vote for it (if you have a Jetbrains account) to show the developers that you would like it fixed. Thank you Alexey Belkov for bringing this to my attention.
A common way to directly translate it would be:
val br = Files.newBufferedReader(Paths.get("filename"))
var line: String
while (br.readLine().also { line = it} != null)
println(line)
However, a better way in this particular case is:
val br = Files.newBufferedReader(Paths.get("filename"))
br.forEachLine {
println(it)
}
Or just
File("filename").forEachLine {
println(it)
}
(which uses a convenience method, equivalent to Java's convenience method
Files.lines(Path)
).
edited Nov 22 '18 at 13:19
answered Nov 22 '18 at 13:12


DodgyCodeExceptionDodgyCodeException
3,5561424
3,5561424
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53429526%2fjava-to-kotlin-translation-bug%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-25765
– Thomas
Nov 22 '18 at 11:09
I suppose that declaration at an upper level is the only way
– Andrey Ilyunin
Nov 22 '18 at 11:17
1
Partly a duplicate of stackoverflow.com/questions/36879236/…
– Klitos Kyriacou
Nov 22 '18 at 11:24
1
It is a known bug, please vote for youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-6294
– Alexey Belkov
Nov 22 '18 at 12:11