Lemma about quasi-coherent modules












0












$begingroup$


I am trying to understand quasi-coherent modules from https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/01BD . Let me state partially the lemma 17.10.5 about the construction of an example of quasi-coherent module.



Let $(X,mathcal{O}_X)$ be ringed space. Let $α:R→Γ(X,mathcal{O}_X)$ be a ring homomorphism from a ring $R$ into the ring of global sections on $X$. Let $M$ be an $R$-module. Choose a presentation $⨁_{j∈J}R→⨁_{i∈I}R→M→0$.



Set $mathcal{F}_2=Coker(⨁_{j∈J}mathcal{O}_X→⨁_{i∈I}mathcal{O}_X)$.
Here the map on the component $mathcal{O}_X$ corresponding to $j∈J$ given by the section $∑_{i}α(r_{ij})$ where the $r_{ij}$ are the matrix coefficients of the map in the presentation of $M$.



It is not clear to me how this map is being defined and especially what is meant by the map of representation.



Thanks in advance!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I am trying to understand quasi-coherent modules from https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/01BD . Let me state partially the lemma 17.10.5 about the construction of an example of quasi-coherent module.



    Let $(X,mathcal{O}_X)$ be ringed space. Let $α:R→Γ(X,mathcal{O}_X)$ be a ring homomorphism from a ring $R$ into the ring of global sections on $X$. Let $M$ be an $R$-module. Choose a presentation $⨁_{j∈J}R→⨁_{i∈I}R→M→0$.



    Set $mathcal{F}_2=Coker(⨁_{j∈J}mathcal{O}_X→⨁_{i∈I}mathcal{O}_X)$.
    Here the map on the component $mathcal{O}_X$ corresponding to $j∈J$ given by the section $∑_{i}α(r_{ij})$ where the $r_{ij}$ are the matrix coefficients of the map in the presentation of $M$.



    It is not clear to me how this map is being defined and especially what is meant by the map of representation.



    Thanks in advance!










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0


      2



      $begingroup$


      I am trying to understand quasi-coherent modules from https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/01BD . Let me state partially the lemma 17.10.5 about the construction of an example of quasi-coherent module.



      Let $(X,mathcal{O}_X)$ be ringed space. Let $α:R→Γ(X,mathcal{O}_X)$ be a ring homomorphism from a ring $R$ into the ring of global sections on $X$. Let $M$ be an $R$-module. Choose a presentation $⨁_{j∈J}R→⨁_{i∈I}R→M→0$.



      Set $mathcal{F}_2=Coker(⨁_{j∈J}mathcal{O}_X→⨁_{i∈I}mathcal{O}_X)$.
      Here the map on the component $mathcal{O}_X$ corresponding to $j∈J$ given by the section $∑_{i}α(r_{ij})$ where the $r_{ij}$ are the matrix coefficients of the map in the presentation of $M$.



      It is not clear to me how this map is being defined and especially what is meant by the map of representation.



      Thanks in advance!










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I am trying to understand quasi-coherent modules from https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/01BD . Let me state partially the lemma 17.10.5 about the construction of an example of quasi-coherent module.



      Let $(X,mathcal{O}_X)$ be ringed space. Let $α:R→Γ(X,mathcal{O}_X)$ be a ring homomorphism from a ring $R$ into the ring of global sections on $X$. Let $M$ be an $R$-module. Choose a presentation $⨁_{j∈J}R→⨁_{i∈I}R→M→0$.



      Set $mathcal{F}_2=Coker(⨁_{j∈J}mathcal{O}_X→⨁_{i∈I}mathcal{O}_X)$.
      Here the map on the component $mathcal{O}_X$ corresponding to $j∈J$ given by the section $∑_{i}α(r_{ij})$ where the $r_{ij}$ are the matrix coefficients of the map in the presentation of $M$.



      It is not clear to me how this map is being defined and especially what is meant by the map of representation.



      Thanks in advance!







      algebraic-geometry quasicoherent-sheaves






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 19 at 15:58









      solgaleosolgaleo

      6911




      6911






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          The map $R^{(J)}to R^{(I)}$ admits a matrix representation $(r_{ij})$ as $R^{(J)}$ and $R^{(I)}$ are free modules. As $I$ and $J$ may not be finite, what we mean by a matrix here is a map $r:Itimes Jto R$, $r(i,j)=r_{ij}$. The map $mathcal{O}_X^{(J)}tomathcal{O}_X^{(I)}$ is given 'component wise' on the copies of the $mathcal{O}_X$'s by $x_jmapstosum_ialpha(r_{ij})$, where $x_jinmathcal{O}_X^{(j)}subsetmathcal{O}_X^{(J)}$. Edit: the $x_j$ is determined by $R^{(J)}=Gamma(X,mathcal{O}_X^{(J)})$. We take the image of the map under the global sections functor.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079495%2flemma-about-quasi-coherent-modules%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            The map $R^{(J)}to R^{(I)}$ admits a matrix representation $(r_{ij})$ as $R^{(J)}$ and $R^{(I)}$ are free modules. As $I$ and $J$ may not be finite, what we mean by a matrix here is a map $r:Itimes Jto R$, $r(i,j)=r_{ij}$. The map $mathcal{O}_X^{(J)}tomathcal{O}_X^{(I)}$ is given 'component wise' on the copies of the $mathcal{O}_X$'s by $x_jmapstosum_ialpha(r_{ij})$, where $x_jinmathcal{O}_X^{(j)}subsetmathcal{O}_X^{(J)}$. Edit: the $x_j$ is determined by $R^{(J)}=Gamma(X,mathcal{O}_X^{(J)})$. We take the image of the map under the global sections functor.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              The map $R^{(J)}to R^{(I)}$ admits a matrix representation $(r_{ij})$ as $R^{(J)}$ and $R^{(I)}$ are free modules. As $I$ and $J$ may not be finite, what we mean by a matrix here is a map $r:Itimes Jto R$, $r(i,j)=r_{ij}$. The map $mathcal{O}_X^{(J)}tomathcal{O}_X^{(I)}$ is given 'component wise' on the copies of the $mathcal{O}_X$'s by $x_jmapstosum_ialpha(r_{ij})$, where $x_jinmathcal{O}_X^{(j)}subsetmathcal{O}_X^{(J)}$. Edit: the $x_j$ is determined by $R^{(J)}=Gamma(X,mathcal{O}_X^{(J)})$. We take the image of the map under the global sections functor.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                The map $R^{(J)}to R^{(I)}$ admits a matrix representation $(r_{ij})$ as $R^{(J)}$ and $R^{(I)}$ are free modules. As $I$ and $J$ may not be finite, what we mean by a matrix here is a map $r:Itimes Jto R$, $r(i,j)=r_{ij}$. The map $mathcal{O}_X^{(J)}tomathcal{O}_X^{(I)}$ is given 'component wise' on the copies of the $mathcal{O}_X$'s by $x_jmapstosum_ialpha(r_{ij})$, where $x_jinmathcal{O}_X^{(j)}subsetmathcal{O}_X^{(J)}$. Edit: the $x_j$ is determined by $R^{(J)}=Gamma(X,mathcal{O}_X^{(J)})$. We take the image of the map under the global sections functor.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                The map $R^{(J)}to R^{(I)}$ admits a matrix representation $(r_{ij})$ as $R^{(J)}$ and $R^{(I)}$ are free modules. As $I$ and $J$ may not be finite, what we mean by a matrix here is a map $r:Itimes Jto R$, $r(i,j)=r_{ij}$. The map $mathcal{O}_X^{(J)}tomathcal{O}_X^{(I)}$ is given 'component wise' on the copies of the $mathcal{O}_X$'s by $x_jmapstosum_ialpha(r_{ij})$, where $x_jinmathcal{O}_X^{(j)}subsetmathcal{O}_X^{(J)}$. Edit: the $x_j$ is determined by $R^{(J)}=Gamma(X,mathcal{O}_X^{(J)})$. We take the image of the map under the global sections functor.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Jan 20 at 21:31

























                answered Jan 20 at 21:18









                Ryan KeletiRyan Keleti

                1719




                1719






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079495%2flemma-about-quasi-coherent-modules%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                    How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                    in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith