Showing convexity of a set in $mathbb{C}^k$
$begingroup$
Let $mathcal{H}$ be an infinite dimensional separable Hilbert Space and $Tinmathscr{B(mathcal{H})}$. Suppose $$mu_k(T):=left{
begin{pmatrix}
lambda_1 \
lambda_2 \
vdots \
lambda_k
end{pmatrix}inmathbb{C}^k: PTP=
begin{pmatrix}
lambda_1 & 0 & cdots & 0 \
0 & lambda_2 &cdots & 0 \
vdots & vdots & ddots\
0 & 0 & cdots & lambda_k \
end{pmatrix}, text{ for some orthogonal projection $P$ of rank } k right}$$
Is $mu_k(T)$ convex in $mathbb{C}^k$?
Comments: I can only see that $mu_k(T)$ is non-empty but I could not construct desired projection of rank k to show convexity of $mu_k(T).$
Any hint/comment regarding convexity of $mu_k(T)$ is highly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
functional-analysis analysis operator-theory operator-algebras matrix-analysis
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $mathcal{H}$ be an infinite dimensional separable Hilbert Space and $Tinmathscr{B(mathcal{H})}$. Suppose $$mu_k(T):=left{
begin{pmatrix}
lambda_1 \
lambda_2 \
vdots \
lambda_k
end{pmatrix}inmathbb{C}^k: PTP=
begin{pmatrix}
lambda_1 & 0 & cdots & 0 \
0 & lambda_2 &cdots & 0 \
vdots & vdots & ddots\
0 & 0 & cdots & lambda_k \
end{pmatrix}, text{ for some orthogonal projection $P$ of rank } k right}$$
Is $mu_k(T)$ convex in $mathbb{C}^k$?
Comments: I can only see that $mu_k(T)$ is non-empty but I could not construct desired projection of rank k to show convexity of $mu_k(T).$
Any hint/comment regarding convexity of $mu_k(T)$ is highly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
functional-analysis analysis operator-theory operator-algebras matrix-analysis
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Well, I don't know, but the spectrum needs not be convex. These sets look like a kind of spectrum so probably they are not convex as well.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 22 at 9:38
1
$begingroup$
It's not clear how your set is defined. What's a matrix in $B(H)$? Do you want $PTP=sum_jlambda Q_j$ for fixed pairwise orthogonal rank-one projections, or for any such family of projections?
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Jan 23 at 1:52
1
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro: it looks like a numerical range, and those are usually convex.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Jan 23 at 19:40
1
$begingroup$
Something seems off in your definition; if $P$ is a rank-$k$ projection (acting on $mathcal H$) then $PTPinmathcal B(mathcal H)$ but the right-hand side is a matrix. I assume you want $P$ to be some sort of compression (?), i.e. for the standard basis $(hat e_i)_{i=1}^k$ in $mathbb C^k$ and an arbitrary orthonormal system $(e_i)_{i=1}^k$ in $mathcal H$ define $$P:mathbb C^ktomathcal Hquad hat e_imapsto e_i$$ for all $i=1,ldots,k$ (plus linear extension onto all of $mathbb C^k$). This way $P^dagger TPinmathbb C^{ktimes k}$ with fixed basis.
$endgroup$
– Frederik vom Ende
Jan 24 at 15:01
1
$begingroup$
(2/2) In that case, the object in question is close to (but slightly more general than) the rank-$k$ numerical range. Maybe this connection alone is of use to you already?
$endgroup$
– Frederik vom Ende
Jan 24 at 15:06
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $mathcal{H}$ be an infinite dimensional separable Hilbert Space and $Tinmathscr{B(mathcal{H})}$. Suppose $$mu_k(T):=left{
begin{pmatrix}
lambda_1 \
lambda_2 \
vdots \
lambda_k
end{pmatrix}inmathbb{C}^k: PTP=
begin{pmatrix}
lambda_1 & 0 & cdots & 0 \
0 & lambda_2 &cdots & 0 \
vdots & vdots & ddots\
0 & 0 & cdots & lambda_k \
end{pmatrix}, text{ for some orthogonal projection $P$ of rank } k right}$$
Is $mu_k(T)$ convex in $mathbb{C}^k$?
Comments: I can only see that $mu_k(T)$ is non-empty but I could not construct desired projection of rank k to show convexity of $mu_k(T).$
Any hint/comment regarding convexity of $mu_k(T)$ is highly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
functional-analysis analysis operator-theory operator-algebras matrix-analysis
$endgroup$
Let $mathcal{H}$ be an infinite dimensional separable Hilbert Space and $Tinmathscr{B(mathcal{H})}$. Suppose $$mu_k(T):=left{
begin{pmatrix}
lambda_1 \
lambda_2 \
vdots \
lambda_k
end{pmatrix}inmathbb{C}^k: PTP=
begin{pmatrix}
lambda_1 & 0 & cdots & 0 \
0 & lambda_2 &cdots & 0 \
vdots & vdots & ddots\
0 & 0 & cdots & lambda_k \
end{pmatrix}, text{ for some orthogonal projection $P$ of rank } k right}$$
Is $mu_k(T)$ convex in $mathbb{C}^k$?
Comments: I can only see that $mu_k(T)$ is non-empty but I could not construct desired projection of rank k to show convexity of $mu_k(T).$
Any hint/comment regarding convexity of $mu_k(T)$ is highly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
functional-analysis analysis operator-theory operator-algebras matrix-analysis
functional-analysis analysis operator-theory operator-algebras matrix-analysis
asked Jan 22 at 9:34
PikuPiku
685
685
$begingroup$
Well, I don't know, but the spectrum needs not be convex. These sets look like a kind of spectrum so probably they are not convex as well.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 22 at 9:38
1
$begingroup$
It's not clear how your set is defined. What's a matrix in $B(H)$? Do you want $PTP=sum_jlambda Q_j$ for fixed pairwise orthogonal rank-one projections, or for any such family of projections?
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Jan 23 at 1:52
1
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro: it looks like a numerical range, and those are usually convex.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Jan 23 at 19:40
1
$begingroup$
Something seems off in your definition; if $P$ is a rank-$k$ projection (acting on $mathcal H$) then $PTPinmathcal B(mathcal H)$ but the right-hand side is a matrix. I assume you want $P$ to be some sort of compression (?), i.e. for the standard basis $(hat e_i)_{i=1}^k$ in $mathbb C^k$ and an arbitrary orthonormal system $(e_i)_{i=1}^k$ in $mathcal H$ define $$P:mathbb C^ktomathcal Hquad hat e_imapsto e_i$$ for all $i=1,ldots,k$ (plus linear extension onto all of $mathbb C^k$). This way $P^dagger TPinmathbb C^{ktimes k}$ with fixed basis.
$endgroup$
– Frederik vom Ende
Jan 24 at 15:01
1
$begingroup$
(2/2) In that case, the object in question is close to (but slightly more general than) the rank-$k$ numerical range. Maybe this connection alone is of use to you already?
$endgroup$
– Frederik vom Ende
Jan 24 at 15:06
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Well, I don't know, but the spectrum needs not be convex. These sets look like a kind of spectrum so probably they are not convex as well.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 22 at 9:38
1
$begingroup$
It's not clear how your set is defined. What's a matrix in $B(H)$? Do you want $PTP=sum_jlambda Q_j$ for fixed pairwise orthogonal rank-one projections, or for any such family of projections?
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Jan 23 at 1:52
1
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro: it looks like a numerical range, and those are usually convex.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Jan 23 at 19:40
1
$begingroup$
Something seems off in your definition; if $P$ is a rank-$k$ projection (acting on $mathcal H$) then $PTPinmathcal B(mathcal H)$ but the right-hand side is a matrix. I assume you want $P$ to be some sort of compression (?), i.e. for the standard basis $(hat e_i)_{i=1}^k$ in $mathbb C^k$ and an arbitrary orthonormal system $(e_i)_{i=1}^k$ in $mathcal H$ define $$P:mathbb C^ktomathcal Hquad hat e_imapsto e_i$$ for all $i=1,ldots,k$ (plus linear extension onto all of $mathbb C^k$). This way $P^dagger TPinmathbb C^{ktimes k}$ with fixed basis.
$endgroup$
– Frederik vom Ende
Jan 24 at 15:01
1
$begingroup$
(2/2) In that case, the object in question is close to (but slightly more general than) the rank-$k$ numerical range. Maybe this connection alone is of use to you already?
$endgroup$
– Frederik vom Ende
Jan 24 at 15:06
$begingroup$
Well, I don't know, but the spectrum needs not be convex. These sets look like a kind of spectrum so probably they are not convex as well.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 22 at 9:38
$begingroup$
Well, I don't know, but the spectrum needs not be convex. These sets look like a kind of spectrum so probably they are not convex as well.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 22 at 9:38
1
1
$begingroup$
It's not clear how your set is defined. What's a matrix in $B(H)$? Do you want $PTP=sum_jlambda Q_j$ for fixed pairwise orthogonal rank-one projections, or for any such family of projections?
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Jan 23 at 1:52
$begingroup$
It's not clear how your set is defined. What's a matrix in $B(H)$? Do you want $PTP=sum_jlambda Q_j$ for fixed pairwise orthogonal rank-one projections, or for any such family of projections?
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Jan 23 at 1:52
1
1
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro: it looks like a numerical range, and those are usually convex.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Jan 23 at 19:40
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro: it looks like a numerical range, and those are usually convex.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Jan 23 at 19:40
1
1
$begingroup$
Something seems off in your definition; if $P$ is a rank-$k$ projection (acting on $mathcal H$) then $PTPinmathcal B(mathcal H)$ but the right-hand side is a matrix. I assume you want $P$ to be some sort of compression (?), i.e. for the standard basis $(hat e_i)_{i=1}^k$ in $mathbb C^k$ and an arbitrary orthonormal system $(e_i)_{i=1}^k$ in $mathcal H$ define $$P:mathbb C^ktomathcal Hquad hat e_imapsto e_i$$ for all $i=1,ldots,k$ (plus linear extension onto all of $mathbb C^k$). This way $P^dagger TPinmathbb C^{ktimes k}$ with fixed basis.
$endgroup$
– Frederik vom Ende
Jan 24 at 15:01
$begingroup$
Something seems off in your definition; if $P$ is a rank-$k$ projection (acting on $mathcal H$) then $PTPinmathcal B(mathcal H)$ but the right-hand side is a matrix. I assume you want $P$ to be some sort of compression (?), i.e. for the standard basis $(hat e_i)_{i=1}^k$ in $mathbb C^k$ and an arbitrary orthonormal system $(e_i)_{i=1}^k$ in $mathcal H$ define $$P:mathbb C^ktomathcal Hquad hat e_imapsto e_i$$ for all $i=1,ldots,k$ (plus linear extension onto all of $mathbb C^k$). This way $P^dagger TPinmathbb C^{ktimes k}$ with fixed basis.
$endgroup$
– Frederik vom Ende
Jan 24 at 15:01
1
1
$begingroup$
(2/2) In that case, the object in question is close to (but slightly more general than) the rank-$k$ numerical range. Maybe this connection alone is of use to you already?
$endgroup$
– Frederik vom Ende
Jan 24 at 15:06
$begingroup$
(2/2) In that case, the object in question is close to (but slightly more general than) the rank-$k$ numerical range. Maybe this connection alone is of use to you already?
$endgroup$
– Frederik vom Ende
Jan 24 at 15:06
|
show 3 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082930%2fshowing-convexity-of-a-set-in-mathbbck%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082930%2fshowing-convexity-of-a-set-in-mathbbck%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Well, I don't know, but the spectrum needs not be convex. These sets look like a kind of spectrum so probably they are not convex as well.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 22 at 9:38
1
$begingroup$
It's not clear how your set is defined. What's a matrix in $B(H)$? Do you want $PTP=sum_jlambda Q_j$ for fixed pairwise orthogonal rank-one projections, or for any such family of projections?
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Jan 23 at 1:52
1
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro: it looks like a numerical range, and those are usually convex.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Jan 23 at 19:40
1
$begingroup$
Something seems off in your definition; if $P$ is a rank-$k$ projection (acting on $mathcal H$) then $PTPinmathcal B(mathcal H)$ but the right-hand side is a matrix. I assume you want $P$ to be some sort of compression (?), i.e. for the standard basis $(hat e_i)_{i=1}^k$ in $mathbb C^k$ and an arbitrary orthonormal system $(e_i)_{i=1}^k$ in $mathcal H$ define $$P:mathbb C^ktomathcal Hquad hat e_imapsto e_i$$ for all $i=1,ldots,k$ (plus linear extension onto all of $mathbb C^k$). This way $P^dagger TPinmathbb C^{ktimes k}$ with fixed basis.
$endgroup$
– Frederik vom Ende
Jan 24 at 15:01
1
$begingroup$
(2/2) In that case, the object in question is close to (but slightly more general than) the rank-$k$ numerical range. Maybe this connection alone is of use to you already?
$endgroup$
– Frederik vom Ende
Jan 24 at 15:06