Projecting vector field from $mathbb{R}^n$ to $T^n$
$begingroup$
Let $T^n = S^1 times ...times S^1$. $T^n$ is Lie group and the map $pi:mathbb{R}^n to T^n$ defined by $pi(x_1,..x_n) = (e^{ix_1},..,e^{ix_n})$ gives a homomorphism between the additive group to multiplicative group $T^n$.
which vector fields on $mathbb{R}^n$ project to vector fields on
$T^n$ under $dpi$,
I'm having a hard time understanding this question.
I don't have good background in differentiable manifolds; I have the definition that a vector field $X$ on a Lie group $G$ is a linear map $X: C^{infty}(G) to C^{infty}(G)$ s.t $X(fg) = fX(g) + gX(f)$.
My question:
What is formally meant by $dpi$ and how does it send a vector field to another?
I know that if $X$ is a vector field on $mathbb{R}^n$, and $x in mathbb{R}^n$ then we have a tangent vector $X_x: C^{infty}(mathbb{R}^n) to mathbb{R}$ where $X_x(f) = (Xf)(x)$. Then $dpi_x(X_x)(f) = X_x(f circ pi)$ is a tangent vector itself.
That is, $dpi_x : T_xmathbb{R}^n to T_{pi(x)}T^n$. So how does $dpi$ operate on vector fields, and what do I need to check in this case?
Thanks!
manifolds lie-groups smooth-manifolds vector-fields
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $T^n = S^1 times ...times S^1$. $T^n$ is Lie group and the map $pi:mathbb{R}^n to T^n$ defined by $pi(x_1,..x_n) = (e^{ix_1},..,e^{ix_n})$ gives a homomorphism between the additive group to multiplicative group $T^n$.
which vector fields on $mathbb{R}^n$ project to vector fields on
$T^n$ under $dpi$,
I'm having a hard time understanding this question.
I don't have good background in differentiable manifolds; I have the definition that a vector field $X$ on a Lie group $G$ is a linear map $X: C^{infty}(G) to C^{infty}(G)$ s.t $X(fg) = fX(g) + gX(f)$.
My question:
What is formally meant by $dpi$ and how does it send a vector field to another?
I know that if $X$ is a vector field on $mathbb{R}^n$, and $x in mathbb{R}^n$ then we have a tangent vector $X_x: C^{infty}(mathbb{R}^n) to mathbb{R}$ where $X_x(f) = (Xf)(x)$. Then $dpi_x(X_x)(f) = X_x(f circ pi)$ is a tangent vector itself.
That is, $dpi_x : T_xmathbb{R}^n to T_{pi(x)}T^n$. So how does $dpi$ operate on vector fields, and what do I need to check in this case?
Thanks!
manifolds lie-groups smooth-manifolds vector-fields
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This question is more easily understood if you think of vector fields as sections of the tangent bundle; do you know this point of view ?
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 26 at 13:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $T^n = S^1 times ...times S^1$. $T^n$ is Lie group and the map $pi:mathbb{R}^n to T^n$ defined by $pi(x_1,..x_n) = (e^{ix_1},..,e^{ix_n})$ gives a homomorphism between the additive group to multiplicative group $T^n$.
which vector fields on $mathbb{R}^n$ project to vector fields on
$T^n$ under $dpi$,
I'm having a hard time understanding this question.
I don't have good background in differentiable manifolds; I have the definition that a vector field $X$ on a Lie group $G$ is a linear map $X: C^{infty}(G) to C^{infty}(G)$ s.t $X(fg) = fX(g) + gX(f)$.
My question:
What is formally meant by $dpi$ and how does it send a vector field to another?
I know that if $X$ is a vector field on $mathbb{R}^n$, and $x in mathbb{R}^n$ then we have a tangent vector $X_x: C^{infty}(mathbb{R}^n) to mathbb{R}$ where $X_x(f) = (Xf)(x)$. Then $dpi_x(X_x)(f) = X_x(f circ pi)$ is a tangent vector itself.
That is, $dpi_x : T_xmathbb{R}^n to T_{pi(x)}T^n$. So how does $dpi$ operate on vector fields, and what do I need to check in this case?
Thanks!
manifolds lie-groups smooth-manifolds vector-fields
$endgroup$
Let $T^n = S^1 times ...times S^1$. $T^n$ is Lie group and the map $pi:mathbb{R}^n to T^n$ defined by $pi(x_1,..x_n) = (e^{ix_1},..,e^{ix_n})$ gives a homomorphism between the additive group to multiplicative group $T^n$.
which vector fields on $mathbb{R}^n$ project to vector fields on
$T^n$ under $dpi$,
I'm having a hard time understanding this question.
I don't have good background in differentiable manifolds; I have the definition that a vector field $X$ on a Lie group $G$ is a linear map $X: C^{infty}(G) to C^{infty}(G)$ s.t $X(fg) = fX(g) + gX(f)$.
My question:
What is formally meant by $dpi$ and how does it send a vector field to another?
I know that if $X$ is a vector field on $mathbb{R}^n$, and $x in mathbb{R}^n$ then we have a tangent vector $X_x: C^{infty}(mathbb{R}^n) to mathbb{R}$ where $X_x(f) = (Xf)(x)$. Then $dpi_x(X_x)(f) = X_x(f circ pi)$ is a tangent vector itself.
That is, $dpi_x : T_xmathbb{R}^n to T_{pi(x)}T^n$. So how does $dpi$ operate on vector fields, and what do I need to check in this case?
Thanks!
manifolds lie-groups smooth-manifolds vector-fields
manifolds lie-groups smooth-manifolds vector-fields
edited Jan 26 at 12:53
Mariah
asked Jan 21 at 21:41
MariahMariah
1,5561718
1,5561718
$begingroup$
This question is more easily understood if you think of vector fields as sections of the tangent bundle; do you know this point of view ?
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 26 at 13:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question is more easily understood if you think of vector fields as sections of the tangent bundle; do you know this point of view ?
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 26 at 13:25
$begingroup$
This question is more easily understood if you think of vector fields as sections of the tangent bundle; do you know this point of view ?
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 26 at 13:25
$begingroup$
This question is more easily understood if you think of vector fields as sections of the tangent bundle; do you know this point of view ?
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 26 at 13:25
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Functions on $mathbb{T}^n$ give functions on $mathbb{R}^n$, i.e. you have a natural map (precomposing by $pi$) $pi^*: C^infty(mathbb{T}^n)to C^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$.
The question is : for which $X: C^infty(mathbb{R}^n)to C^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ is there $tilde{X} : C^infty(mathbb{T}^n)to C^infty(mathbb{T}^n)$ making the obvious diagram commute; that is such that $Xcirc pi^* = pi^*circ tilde{X}$ ?
Phrasing the question as "which vector fields on $mathbb{R}^n$ project to vector fields on $mathbb{T}^n$ under $mathrm{d}pi$ ?" suggests that the author was thinking of vector fields in terms of sections of the tangent bundle instead of as derivations of the function algebra.
Indeed, for a manifold $M$ you have a tangent bundle $p:TMto M$, and a smooth map $f:Mto N$ induces $mathrm{d}f : TMto TN$ defined by $mathrm{d}f (v,x) = mathrm{d}f_x(v)$. We call a vector field on $M$(this is where the terminology comes from by the way) a section of $p$, that is a map $s: Mto TM$ such that $pcirc s= id_M$. This last condition simply means that for all $x$, $s(x)in T_xM$, that is $s$ is a smooth map that associates to each point a tangent vector.
Now if you are given a vector field $X$ according to this second definition, you get a derivation of $C^infty(M)$ the following way : given $f:Mto mathbb{R}$, define $mathcal{L}_Xf : Mto mathbb{R}$ by $mathcal{L}_Xf (x) = mathrm{d}f(X(x),x)$. This is clearly a smooth function, and since you have a natural identification $Tmathbb{R}cong mathbb{Rtimes R}$, under this natural identification, you get that $mathcal{L}_Xf : Mto mathbb{R}$ is smooth, and it's a standard fact that $mathcal{L}_X$ is a derivation of $C^infty(M)$, it's called the Lie derivative along $X$.
Ok now it's a theorem that the map $mathcal{L}: Gamma(M,TM) to mathrm{Der}(C^infty(M))$ is a Lie algebra isomorphism (well actually, a vector space isomorphism, which allows you to give $Gamma(M,TM)$ the structure of Lie algebra deduced from the one on $mathrm{Der}(C^infty(M))$); where $Gamma(M,TM)$ denotes the sections of the tangent bundle, and $mathrm{Der}(A)$ is the Lie algebra of derivations of the algebra $A$.
This allows you to see a vector field as either a derivation (as you defined it) or as a section of the tangent bundle. Now with the point of view of sections, the question becomes easier to understand with this phrasing.
Indeed you have a diagram $require{AMScd} begin{CD}
Tmathbb{R}^n @>{mathrm{d}pi}>> Tmathbb{T}^n\ @V{p}VV @VV{p}V\
mathbb{R}^n @>>{pi}> mathbb{T}^n
end{CD}$ where $mathrm{d}pi$ appears explicitly. Now if you are given a section $X$ on the right side, you may be interested in finding out when there is a section $tilde{X}$ on the left side which makes this commute :
$require{AMScd} begin{CD}
mathbb{R}^n @>{pi}>> mathbb{T}^n\ @V{X}VV @VV{tilde{X}}V\
Tmathbb{R}^n @>>{mathrm{d}pi}> Tmathbb{T}^n
end{CD}$, that is "when is there $tilde{X}$ that lifts $mathrm{d}pi circ X$; that is the projection of $X$ under $mathrm{d}pi$".
So "project under $mathrm{d}pi$" now makes sense !
So you're asking for $tilde{X}$ such that $mathrm{d}picirc X = tilde{X}circ pi$. By some usual manifold nonsense, this is the same as saying that for any $f:mathbb{T}^n to mathbb{R}$, and any $xinmathbb{R}^n$, $mathrm{d}f_{pi(x)}circ mathrm{d}pi_x(X(x)) = mathrm{d}f_{pi(x)}(tilde{X}(pi(x)))$; but the LHS is just $mathrm{d}(fcircpi)_x(X(x)) = mathcal{L}_X(fcircpi)(x)$ and the RHS is just $(mathcal{L}_{tilde{X}}f)(pi(x))$.
Asking that they're equal for all $f,x$, is just asking that $mathcal{L}_Xcircpi^* = pi^*circmathcal{L}_{tilde{X}}$; which, if you use the identification between sections and derivations, is exactly the equation I gave at the very beginning.
Now I don't know if you also wanted a hint to solve the question, but I think it's way easier to understand what's happening with vector fields seen as sections rather than as derivations, it's way more geometric and the condition for a vector field to project to another one under $mathrm{d}pi$ becomes clear.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082459%2fprojecting-vector-field-from-mathbbrn-to-tn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Functions on $mathbb{T}^n$ give functions on $mathbb{R}^n$, i.e. you have a natural map (precomposing by $pi$) $pi^*: C^infty(mathbb{T}^n)to C^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$.
The question is : for which $X: C^infty(mathbb{R}^n)to C^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ is there $tilde{X} : C^infty(mathbb{T}^n)to C^infty(mathbb{T}^n)$ making the obvious diagram commute; that is such that $Xcirc pi^* = pi^*circ tilde{X}$ ?
Phrasing the question as "which vector fields on $mathbb{R}^n$ project to vector fields on $mathbb{T}^n$ under $mathrm{d}pi$ ?" suggests that the author was thinking of vector fields in terms of sections of the tangent bundle instead of as derivations of the function algebra.
Indeed, for a manifold $M$ you have a tangent bundle $p:TMto M$, and a smooth map $f:Mto N$ induces $mathrm{d}f : TMto TN$ defined by $mathrm{d}f (v,x) = mathrm{d}f_x(v)$. We call a vector field on $M$(this is where the terminology comes from by the way) a section of $p$, that is a map $s: Mto TM$ such that $pcirc s= id_M$. This last condition simply means that for all $x$, $s(x)in T_xM$, that is $s$ is a smooth map that associates to each point a tangent vector.
Now if you are given a vector field $X$ according to this second definition, you get a derivation of $C^infty(M)$ the following way : given $f:Mto mathbb{R}$, define $mathcal{L}_Xf : Mto mathbb{R}$ by $mathcal{L}_Xf (x) = mathrm{d}f(X(x),x)$. This is clearly a smooth function, and since you have a natural identification $Tmathbb{R}cong mathbb{Rtimes R}$, under this natural identification, you get that $mathcal{L}_Xf : Mto mathbb{R}$ is smooth, and it's a standard fact that $mathcal{L}_X$ is a derivation of $C^infty(M)$, it's called the Lie derivative along $X$.
Ok now it's a theorem that the map $mathcal{L}: Gamma(M,TM) to mathrm{Der}(C^infty(M))$ is a Lie algebra isomorphism (well actually, a vector space isomorphism, which allows you to give $Gamma(M,TM)$ the structure of Lie algebra deduced from the one on $mathrm{Der}(C^infty(M))$); where $Gamma(M,TM)$ denotes the sections of the tangent bundle, and $mathrm{Der}(A)$ is the Lie algebra of derivations of the algebra $A$.
This allows you to see a vector field as either a derivation (as you defined it) or as a section of the tangent bundle. Now with the point of view of sections, the question becomes easier to understand with this phrasing.
Indeed you have a diagram $require{AMScd} begin{CD}
Tmathbb{R}^n @>{mathrm{d}pi}>> Tmathbb{T}^n\ @V{p}VV @VV{p}V\
mathbb{R}^n @>>{pi}> mathbb{T}^n
end{CD}$ where $mathrm{d}pi$ appears explicitly. Now if you are given a section $X$ on the right side, you may be interested in finding out when there is a section $tilde{X}$ on the left side which makes this commute :
$require{AMScd} begin{CD}
mathbb{R}^n @>{pi}>> mathbb{T}^n\ @V{X}VV @VV{tilde{X}}V\
Tmathbb{R}^n @>>{mathrm{d}pi}> Tmathbb{T}^n
end{CD}$, that is "when is there $tilde{X}$ that lifts $mathrm{d}pi circ X$; that is the projection of $X$ under $mathrm{d}pi$".
So "project under $mathrm{d}pi$" now makes sense !
So you're asking for $tilde{X}$ such that $mathrm{d}picirc X = tilde{X}circ pi$. By some usual manifold nonsense, this is the same as saying that for any $f:mathbb{T}^n to mathbb{R}$, and any $xinmathbb{R}^n$, $mathrm{d}f_{pi(x)}circ mathrm{d}pi_x(X(x)) = mathrm{d}f_{pi(x)}(tilde{X}(pi(x)))$; but the LHS is just $mathrm{d}(fcircpi)_x(X(x)) = mathcal{L}_X(fcircpi)(x)$ and the RHS is just $(mathcal{L}_{tilde{X}}f)(pi(x))$.
Asking that they're equal for all $f,x$, is just asking that $mathcal{L}_Xcircpi^* = pi^*circmathcal{L}_{tilde{X}}$; which, if you use the identification between sections and derivations, is exactly the equation I gave at the very beginning.
Now I don't know if you also wanted a hint to solve the question, but I think it's way easier to understand what's happening with vector fields seen as sections rather than as derivations, it's way more geometric and the condition for a vector field to project to another one under $mathrm{d}pi$ becomes clear.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Functions on $mathbb{T}^n$ give functions on $mathbb{R}^n$, i.e. you have a natural map (precomposing by $pi$) $pi^*: C^infty(mathbb{T}^n)to C^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$.
The question is : for which $X: C^infty(mathbb{R}^n)to C^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ is there $tilde{X} : C^infty(mathbb{T}^n)to C^infty(mathbb{T}^n)$ making the obvious diagram commute; that is such that $Xcirc pi^* = pi^*circ tilde{X}$ ?
Phrasing the question as "which vector fields on $mathbb{R}^n$ project to vector fields on $mathbb{T}^n$ under $mathrm{d}pi$ ?" suggests that the author was thinking of vector fields in terms of sections of the tangent bundle instead of as derivations of the function algebra.
Indeed, for a manifold $M$ you have a tangent bundle $p:TMto M$, and a smooth map $f:Mto N$ induces $mathrm{d}f : TMto TN$ defined by $mathrm{d}f (v,x) = mathrm{d}f_x(v)$. We call a vector field on $M$(this is where the terminology comes from by the way) a section of $p$, that is a map $s: Mto TM$ such that $pcirc s= id_M$. This last condition simply means that for all $x$, $s(x)in T_xM$, that is $s$ is a smooth map that associates to each point a tangent vector.
Now if you are given a vector field $X$ according to this second definition, you get a derivation of $C^infty(M)$ the following way : given $f:Mto mathbb{R}$, define $mathcal{L}_Xf : Mto mathbb{R}$ by $mathcal{L}_Xf (x) = mathrm{d}f(X(x),x)$. This is clearly a smooth function, and since you have a natural identification $Tmathbb{R}cong mathbb{Rtimes R}$, under this natural identification, you get that $mathcal{L}_Xf : Mto mathbb{R}$ is smooth, and it's a standard fact that $mathcal{L}_X$ is a derivation of $C^infty(M)$, it's called the Lie derivative along $X$.
Ok now it's a theorem that the map $mathcal{L}: Gamma(M,TM) to mathrm{Der}(C^infty(M))$ is a Lie algebra isomorphism (well actually, a vector space isomorphism, which allows you to give $Gamma(M,TM)$ the structure of Lie algebra deduced from the one on $mathrm{Der}(C^infty(M))$); where $Gamma(M,TM)$ denotes the sections of the tangent bundle, and $mathrm{Der}(A)$ is the Lie algebra of derivations of the algebra $A$.
This allows you to see a vector field as either a derivation (as you defined it) or as a section of the tangent bundle. Now with the point of view of sections, the question becomes easier to understand with this phrasing.
Indeed you have a diagram $require{AMScd} begin{CD}
Tmathbb{R}^n @>{mathrm{d}pi}>> Tmathbb{T}^n\ @V{p}VV @VV{p}V\
mathbb{R}^n @>>{pi}> mathbb{T}^n
end{CD}$ where $mathrm{d}pi$ appears explicitly. Now if you are given a section $X$ on the right side, you may be interested in finding out when there is a section $tilde{X}$ on the left side which makes this commute :
$require{AMScd} begin{CD}
mathbb{R}^n @>{pi}>> mathbb{T}^n\ @V{X}VV @VV{tilde{X}}V\
Tmathbb{R}^n @>>{mathrm{d}pi}> Tmathbb{T}^n
end{CD}$, that is "when is there $tilde{X}$ that lifts $mathrm{d}pi circ X$; that is the projection of $X$ under $mathrm{d}pi$".
So "project under $mathrm{d}pi$" now makes sense !
So you're asking for $tilde{X}$ such that $mathrm{d}picirc X = tilde{X}circ pi$. By some usual manifold nonsense, this is the same as saying that for any $f:mathbb{T}^n to mathbb{R}$, and any $xinmathbb{R}^n$, $mathrm{d}f_{pi(x)}circ mathrm{d}pi_x(X(x)) = mathrm{d}f_{pi(x)}(tilde{X}(pi(x)))$; but the LHS is just $mathrm{d}(fcircpi)_x(X(x)) = mathcal{L}_X(fcircpi)(x)$ and the RHS is just $(mathcal{L}_{tilde{X}}f)(pi(x))$.
Asking that they're equal for all $f,x$, is just asking that $mathcal{L}_Xcircpi^* = pi^*circmathcal{L}_{tilde{X}}$; which, if you use the identification between sections and derivations, is exactly the equation I gave at the very beginning.
Now I don't know if you also wanted a hint to solve the question, but I think it's way easier to understand what's happening with vector fields seen as sections rather than as derivations, it's way more geometric and the condition for a vector field to project to another one under $mathrm{d}pi$ becomes clear.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Functions on $mathbb{T}^n$ give functions on $mathbb{R}^n$, i.e. you have a natural map (precomposing by $pi$) $pi^*: C^infty(mathbb{T}^n)to C^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$.
The question is : for which $X: C^infty(mathbb{R}^n)to C^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ is there $tilde{X} : C^infty(mathbb{T}^n)to C^infty(mathbb{T}^n)$ making the obvious diagram commute; that is such that $Xcirc pi^* = pi^*circ tilde{X}$ ?
Phrasing the question as "which vector fields on $mathbb{R}^n$ project to vector fields on $mathbb{T}^n$ under $mathrm{d}pi$ ?" suggests that the author was thinking of vector fields in terms of sections of the tangent bundle instead of as derivations of the function algebra.
Indeed, for a manifold $M$ you have a tangent bundle $p:TMto M$, and a smooth map $f:Mto N$ induces $mathrm{d}f : TMto TN$ defined by $mathrm{d}f (v,x) = mathrm{d}f_x(v)$. We call a vector field on $M$(this is where the terminology comes from by the way) a section of $p$, that is a map $s: Mto TM$ such that $pcirc s= id_M$. This last condition simply means that for all $x$, $s(x)in T_xM$, that is $s$ is a smooth map that associates to each point a tangent vector.
Now if you are given a vector field $X$ according to this second definition, you get a derivation of $C^infty(M)$ the following way : given $f:Mto mathbb{R}$, define $mathcal{L}_Xf : Mto mathbb{R}$ by $mathcal{L}_Xf (x) = mathrm{d}f(X(x),x)$. This is clearly a smooth function, and since you have a natural identification $Tmathbb{R}cong mathbb{Rtimes R}$, under this natural identification, you get that $mathcal{L}_Xf : Mto mathbb{R}$ is smooth, and it's a standard fact that $mathcal{L}_X$ is a derivation of $C^infty(M)$, it's called the Lie derivative along $X$.
Ok now it's a theorem that the map $mathcal{L}: Gamma(M,TM) to mathrm{Der}(C^infty(M))$ is a Lie algebra isomorphism (well actually, a vector space isomorphism, which allows you to give $Gamma(M,TM)$ the structure of Lie algebra deduced from the one on $mathrm{Der}(C^infty(M))$); where $Gamma(M,TM)$ denotes the sections of the tangent bundle, and $mathrm{Der}(A)$ is the Lie algebra of derivations of the algebra $A$.
This allows you to see a vector field as either a derivation (as you defined it) or as a section of the tangent bundle. Now with the point of view of sections, the question becomes easier to understand with this phrasing.
Indeed you have a diagram $require{AMScd} begin{CD}
Tmathbb{R}^n @>{mathrm{d}pi}>> Tmathbb{T}^n\ @V{p}VV @VV{p}V\
mathbb{R}^n @>>{pi}> mathbb{T}^n
end{CD}$ where $mathrm{d}pi$ appears explicitly. Now if you are given a section $X$ on the right side, you may be interested in finding out when there is a section $tilde{X}$ on the left side which makes this commute :
$require{AMScd} begin{CD}
mathbb{R}^n @>{pi}>> mathbb{T}^n\ @V{X}VV @VV{tilde{X}}V\
Tmathbb{R}^n @>>{mathrm{d}pi}> Tmathbb{T}^n
end{CD}$, that is "when is there $tilde{X}$ that lifts $mathrm{d}pi circ X$; that is the projection of $X$ under $mathrm{d}pi$".
So "project under $mathrm{d}pi$" now makes sense !
So you're asking for $tilde{X}$ such that $mathrm{d}picirc X = tilde{X}circ pi$. By some usual manifold nonsense, this is the same as saying that for any $f:mathbb{T}^n to mathbb{R}$, and any $xinmathbb{R}^n$, $mathrm{d}f_{pi(x)}circ mathrm{d}pi_x(X(x)) = mathrm{d}f_{pi(x)}(tilde{X}(pi(x)))$; but the LHS is just $mathrm{d}(fcircpi)_x(X(x)) = mathcal{L}_X(fcircpi)(x)$ and the RHS is just $(mathcal{L}_{tilde{X}}f)(pi(x))$.
Asking that they're equal for all $f,x$, is just asking that $mathcal{L}_Xcircpi^* = pi^*circmathcal{L}_{tilde{X}}$; which, if you use the identification between sections and derivations, is exactly the equation I gave at the very beginning.
Now I don't know if you also wanted a hint to solve the question, but I think it's way easier to understand what's happening with vector fields seen as sections rather than as derivations, it's way more geometric and the condition for a vector field to project to another one under $mathrm{d}pi$ becomes clear.
$endgroup$
Functions on $mathbb{T}^n$ give functions on $mathbb{R}^n$, i.e. you have a natural map (precomposing by $pi$) $pi^*: C^infty(mathbb{T}^n)to C^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$.
The question is : for which $X: C^infty(mathbb{R}^n)to C^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ is there $tilde{X} : C^infty(mathbb{T}^n)to C^infty(mathbb{T}^n)$ making the obvious diagram commute; that is such that $Xcirc pi^* = pi^*circ tilde{X}$ ?
Phrasing the question as "which vector fields on $mathbb{R}^n$ project to vector fields on $mathbb{T}^n$ under $mathrm{d}pi$ ?" suggests that the author was thinking of vector fields in terms of sections of the tangent bundle instead of as derivations of the function algebra.
Indeed, for a manifold $M$ you have a tangent bundle $p:TMto M$, and a smooth map $f:Mto N$ induces $mathrm{d}f : TMto TN$ defined by $mathrm{d}f (v,x) = mathrm{d}f_x(v)$. We call a vector field on $M$(this is where the terminology comes from by the way) a section of $p$, that is a map $s: Mto TM$ such that $pcirc s= id_M$. This last condition simply means that for all $x$, $s(x)in T_xM$, that is $s$ is a smooth map that associates to each point a tangent vector.
Now if you are given a vector field $X$ according to this second definition, you get a derivation of $C^infty(M)$ the following way : given $f:Mto mathbb{R}$, define $mathcal{L}_Xf : Mto mathbb{R}$ by $mathcal{L}_Xf (x) = mathrm{d}f(X(x),x)$. This is clearly a smooth function, and since you have a natural identification $Tmathbb{R}cong mathbb{Rtimes R}$, under this natural identification, you get that $mathcal{L}_Xf : Mto mathbb{R}$ is smooth, and it's a standard fact that $mathcal{L}_X$ is a derivation of $C^infty(M)$, it's called the Lie derivative along $X$.
Ok now it's a theorem that the map $mathcal{L}: Gamma(M,TM) to mathrm{Der}(C^infty(M))$ is a Lie algebra isomorphism (well actually, a vector space isomorphism, which allows you to give $Gamma(M,TM)$ the structure of Lie algebra deduced from the one on $mathrm{Der}(C^infty(M))$); where $Gamma(M,TM)$ denotes the sections of the tangent bundle, and $mathrm{Der}(A)$ is the Lie algebra of derivations of the algebra $A$.
This allows you to see a vector field as either a derivation (as you defined it) or as a section of the tangent bundle. Now with the point of view of sections, the question becomes easier to understand with this phrasing.
Indeed you have a diagram $require{AMScd} begin{CD}
Tmathbb{R}^n @>{mathrm{d}pi}>> Tmathbb{T}^n\ @V{p}VV @VV{p}V\
mathbb{R}^n @>>{pi}> mathbb{T}^n
end{CD}$ where $mathrm{d}pi$ appears explicitly. Now if you are given a section $X$ on the right side, you may be interested in finding out when there is a section $tilde{X}$ on the left side which makes this commute :
$require{AMScd} begin{CD}
mathbb{R}^n @>{pi}>> mathbb{T}^n\ @V{X}VV @VV{tilde{X}}V\
Tmathbb{R}^n @>>{mathrm{d}pi}> Tmathbb{T}^n
end{CD}$, that is "when is there $tilde{X}$ that lifts $mathrm{d}pi circ X$; that is the projection of $X$ under $mathrm{d}pi$".
So "project under $mathrm{d}pi$" now makes sense !
So you're asking for $tilde{X}$ such that $mathrm{d}picirc X = tilde{X}circ pi$. By some usual manifold nonsense, this is the same as saying that for any $f:mathbb{T}^n to mathbb{R}$, and any $xinmathbb{R}^n$, $mathrm{d}f_{pi(x)}circ mathrm{d}pi_x(X(x)) = mathrm{d}f_{pi(x)}(tilde{X}(pi(x)))$; but the LHS is just $mathrm{d}(fcircpi)_x(X(x)) = mathcal{L}_X(fcircpi)(x)$ and the RHS is just $(mathcal{L}_{tilde{X}}f)(pi(x))$.
Asking that they're equal for all $f,x$, is just asking that $mathcal{L}_Xcircpi^* = pi^*circmathcal{L}_{tilde{X}}$; which, if you use the identification between sections and derivations, is exactly the equation I gave at the very beginning.
Now I don't know if you also wanted a hint to solve the question, but I think it's way easier to understand what's happening with vector fields seen as sections rather than as derivations, it's way more geometric and the condition for a vector field to project to another one under $mathrm{d}pi$ becomes clear.
answered Jan 26 at 15:09
MaxMax
15.1k11143
15.1k11143
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082459%2fprojecting-vector-field-from-mathbbrn-to-tn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
This question is more easily understood if you think of vector fields as sections of the tangent bundle; do you know this point of view ?
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 26 at 13:25