Mixing
Existence of a $C_c^{infty}$ function $Phi$ s.t. $int nabla Phi neq 0.$
Let $Omegasubseteq mathbb R^n$ be open , bounded and connected set with $mathcal{L^n}(Omega)>0$. Let $Omega=Omega_1cupOmega_2$ where $Omega_1capOmega_2=emptyset$ with $mathcal{L^n}(Omega_1)>0$ and $mathcal{L^n}(Omega_2)>0.$ Prove that $exists$ $Phiin C_c^{infty}(Omega)$ such that $displaystyle int_{Omega_1}nablaPhi(x)dxneq 0.$
Here $Phi$ is real valued function and $C_c^{infty}(Omega)$ consists of all $C^{infty}(Omega)$ functions which have compact support in $Omega.$
I tried to show by contradiction and wished to have $mathcal{L^n}(Omega_1)=0 $ but couldn't be able to do that.
Any help is appreciated. Thank you.
lebesgue-measure smooth-functions
edited Nov 21 '18 at 5:00
Kemono Chen
2,621437
asked Nov 21 '18 at 4:02
nurun nesha
9812623
add a comment |
Let $Omegasubseteq mathbb R^n$ be open , bounded and connected set with $mathcal{L^n}(Omega)>0$. Let $Omega=Omega_1cupOmega_2$ where $Omega_1capOmega_2=emptyset$ with $mathcal{L^n}(Omega_1)>0$ and $mathcal{L^n}(Omega_2)>0.$ Prove that $exists$ $Phiin C_c^{infty}(Omega)$ such that $displaystyle int_{Omega_1}nablaPhi(x)dxneq 0.$
Here $Phi$ is real valued function and $C_c^{infty}(Omega)$ consists of all $C^{infty}(Omega)$ functions which have compact support in $Omega.$
I tried to show by contradiction and wished to have $mathcal{L^n}(Omega_1)=0 $ but couldn't be able to do that.
Any help is appreciated. Thank you.
lebesgue-measure smooth-functions
edited Nov 21 '18 at 5:00
Kemono Chen
2,621437
asked Nov 21 '18 at 4:02
nurun nesha
9812623
add a comment |
Let $Omegasubseteq mathbb R^n$ be open , bounded and connected set with $mathcal{L^n}(Omega)>0$. Let $Omega=Omega_1cupOmega_2$ where $Omega_1capOmega_2=emptyset$ with $mathcal{L^n}(Omega_1)>0$ and $mathcal{L^n}(Omega_2)>0.$ Prove that $exists$ $Phiin C_c^{infty}(Omega)$ such that $displaystyle int_{Omega_1}nablaPhi(x)dxneq 0.$
Here $Phi$ is real valued function and $C_c^{infty}(Omega)$ consists of all $C^{infty}(Omega)$ functions which have compact support in $Omega.$
I tried to show by contradiction and wished to have $mathcal{L^n}(Omega_1)=0 $ but couldn't be able to do that.
Any help is appreciated. Thank you.
lebesgue-measure smooth-functions
edited Nov 21 '18 at 5:00
Kemono Chen
2,621437
asked Nov 21 '18 at 4:02
nurun nesha
9812623
Let $Omegasubseteq mathbb R^n$ be open , bounded and connected set with $mathcal{L^n}(Omega)>0$. Let $Omega=Omega_1cupOmega_2$ where $Omega_1capOmega_2=emptyset$ with $mathcal{L^n}(Omega_1)>0$ and $mathcal{L^n}(Omega_2)>0.$ Prove that $exists$ $Phiin C_c^{infty}(Omega)$ such that $displaystyle int_{Omega_1}nablaPhi(x)dxneq 0.$
Here $Phi$ is real valued function and $C_c^{infty}(Omega)$ consists of all $C^{infty}(Omega)$ functions which have compact support in $Omega.$
I tried to show by contradiction and wished to have $mathcal{L^n}(Omega_1)=0 $ but couldn't be able to do that.
Any help is appreciated. Thank you.
lebesgue-measure smooth-functions
lebesgue-measure smooth-functions
edited Nov 21 '18 at 5:00
Kemono Chen
2,621437
asked Nov 21 '18 at 4:02
nurun nesha
9812623
edited Nov 21 '18 at 5:00
Kemono Chen
2,621437
asked Nov 21 '18 at 4:02
nurun nesha
9812623
edited Nov 21 '18 at 5:00
Kemono Chen
2,621437
edited Nov 21 '18 at 5:00
Kemono Chen
2,621437
edited Nov 21 '18 at 5:00
Kemono Chen
2,621437
2,621437
asked Nov 21 '18 at 4:02
nurun nesha
9812623
asked Nov 21 '18 at 4:02
nurun nesha
9812623
asked Nov 21 '18 at 4:02
nurun nesha
9812623
9812623
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Hint: Assuming $Omega_1$ and $Omega_2$ are measurable, then there exists compact set $Fsubset Omega_1$ such that $mathcal{L}^n(F)+varepsilon=mathcal{L}^n(Omega_1)$. Likewise, there exists open set $Gsupset Omega_1$ such that $mathcal{L}^n(G)-varepsilon=mathcal{L}^n(Omega_1)$. Hence $mathcal{L}^n(GcapOmega_2)$ is small.
Then by smooth Urysohn's lemma there exists $Phi$ smooth such that $Phi equiv 1$ on $F$ and $Phiequiv 0$ on $G^c$.
answered Nov 21 '18 at 5:20
Jacky Chong
17.8k21128
If we take $Omega=(0,2)=(0,1]cup(1,2)=Omega_1 cup Omega_2$ then $G^c$ will not contain $Omega_2$
– nurun nesha
Nov 21 '18 at 5:43
@nurunnesha Yes. I made the correction.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 21 '18 at 5:46
But we need $int_{Omega_1} nabla Phi neq 0.$ So will we have to construct this $Phi$ on $Omega_1setminus F$ in such a way that $nabla Phi$ does not vanish there?
– nurun nesha
Nov 21 '18 at 6:01
@nurunnesha Well. $Phi$ needs to transition from $1$ to $0$ so $nablaPhi$ will not be small. You could also make $F$ smaller.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 21 '18 at 6:04
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007248%2fexistence-of-a-c-c-infty-function-phi-s-t-int-nabla-phi-neq-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Hint: Assuming $Omega_1$ and $Omega_2$ are measurable, then there exists compact set $Fsubset Omega_1$ such that $mathcal{L}^n(F)+varepsilon=mathcal{L}^n(Omega_1)$. Likewise, there exists open set $Gsupset Omega_1$ such that $mathcal{L}^n(G)-varepsilon=mathcal{L}^n(Omega_1)$. Hence $mathcal{L}^n(GcapOmega_2)$ is small.
Then by smooth Urysohn's lemma there exists $Phi$ smooth such that $Phi equiv 1$ on $F$ and $Phiequiv 0$ on $G^c$.
answered Nov 21 '18 at 5:20
Jacky Chong
17.8k21128
If we take $Omega=(0,2)=(0,1]cup(1,2)=Omega_1 cup Omega_2$ then $G^c$ will not contain $Omega_2$
– nurun nesha
Nov 21 '18 at 5:43
@nurunnesha Yes. I made the correction.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 21 '18 at 5:46
But we need $int_{Omega_1} nabla Phi neq 0.$ So will we have to construct this $Phi$ on $Omega_1setminus F$ in such a way that $nabla Phi$ does not vanish there?
– nurun nesha
Nov 21 '18 at 6:01
@nurunnesha Well. $Phi$ needs to transition from $1$ to $0$ so $nablaPhi$ will not be small. You could also make $F$ smaller.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 21 '18 at 6:04
add a comment |
Hint: Assuming $Omega_1$ and $Omega_2$ are measurable, then there exists compact set $Fsubset Omega_1$ such that $mathcal{L}^n(F)+varepsilon=mathcal{L}^n(Omega_1)$. Likewise, there exists open set $Gsupset Omega_1$ such that $mathcal{L}^n(G)-varepsilon=mathcal{L}^n(Omega_1)$. Hence $mathcal{L}^n(GcapOmega_2)$ is small.
Then by smooth Urysohn's lemma there exists $Phi$ smooth such that $Phi equiv 1$ on $F$ and $Phiequiv 0$ on $G^c$.
answered Nov 21 '18 at 5:20
Jacky Chong
17.8k21128
If we take $Omega=(0,2)=(0,1]cup(1,2)=Omega_1 cup Omega_2$ then $G^c$ will not contain $Omega_2$
– nurun nesha
Nov 21 '18 at 5:43
@nurunnesha Yes. I made the correction.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 21 '18 at 5:46
But we need $int_{Omega_1} nabla Phi neq 0.$ So will we have to construct this $Phi$ on $Omega_1setminus F$ in such a way that $nabla Phi$ does not vanish there?
– nurun nesha
Nov 21 '18 at 6:01
@nurunnesha Well. $Phi$ needs to transition from $1$ to $0$ so $nablaPhi$ will not be small. You could also make $F$ smaller.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 21 '18 at 6:04
add a comment |
Hint: Assuming $Omega_1$ and $Omega_2$ are measurable, then there exists compact set $Fsubset Omega_1$ such that $mathcal{L}^n(F)+varepsilon=mathcal{L}^n(Omega_1)$. Likewise, there exists open set $Gsupset Omega_1$ such that $mathcal{L}^n(G)-varepsilon=mathcal{L}^n(Omega_1)$. Hence $mathcal{L}^n(GcapOmega_2)$ is small.
Then by smooth Urysohn's lemma there exists $Phi$ smooth such that $Phi equiv 1$ on $F$ and $Phiequiv 0$ on $G^c$.
answered Nov 21 '18 at 5:20
Jacky Chong
17.8k21128
Hint: Assuming $Omega_1$ and $Omega_2$ are measurable, then there exists compact set $Fsubset Omega_1$ such that $mathcal{L}^n(F)+varepsilon=mathcal{L}^n(Omega_1)$. Likewise, there exists open set $Gsupset Omega_1$ such that $mathcal{L}^n(G)-varepsilon=mathcal{L}^n(Omega_1)$. Hence $mathcal{L}^n(GcapOmega_2)$ is small.
Then by smooth Urysohn's lemma there exists $Phi$ smooth such that $Phi equiv 1$ on $F$ and $Phiequiv 0$ on $G^c$.
answered Nov 21 '18 at 5:20
Jacky Chong
17.8k21128
edited Nov 21 '18 at 5:46
answered Nov 21 '18 at 5:20
Jacky Chong
17.8k21128
answered Nov 21 '18 at 5:20
Jacky Chong
17.8k21128
answered Nov 21 '18 at 5:20
Jacky Chong
17.8k21128
17.8k21128
If we take $Omega=(0,2)=(0,1]cup(1,2)=Omega_1 cup Omega_2$ then $G^c$ will not contain $Omega_2$
– nurun nesha
Nov 21 '18 at 5:43
@nurunnesha Yes. I made the correction.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 21 '18 at 5:46
But we need $int_{Omega_1} nabla Phi neq 0.$ So will we have to construct this $Phi$ on $Omega_1setminus F$ in such a way that $nabla Phi$ does not vanish there?
– nurun nesha
Nov 21 '18 at 6:01
@nurunnesha Well. $Phi$ needs to transition from $1$ to $0$ so $nablaPhi$ will not be small. You could also make $F$ smaller.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 21 '18 at 6:04
add a comment |
If we take $Omega=(0,2)=(0,1]cup(1,2)=Omega_1 cup Omega_2$ then $G^c$ will not contain $Omega_2$
– nurun nesha
Nov 21 '18 at 5:43
@nurunnesha Yes. I made the correction.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 21 '18 at 5:46
But we need $int_{Omega_1} nabla Phi neq 0.$ So will we have to construct this $Phi$ on $Omega_1setminus F$ in such a way that $nabla Phi$ does not vanish there?
– nurun nesha
Nov 21 '18 at 6:01
@nurunnesha Well. $Phi$ needs to transition from $1$ to $0$ so $nablaPhi$ will not be small. You could also make $F$ smaller.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 21 '18 at 6:04
If we take $Omega=(0,2)=(0,1]cup(1,2)=Omega_1 cup Omega_2$ then $G^c$ will not contain $Omega_2$
– nurun nesha
Nov 21 '18 at 5:43
If we take $Omega=(0,2)=(0,1]cup(1,2)=Omega_1 cup Omega_2$ then $G^c$ will not contain $Omega_2$
– nurun nesha
Nov 21 '18 at 5:43
@nurunnesha Yes. I made the correction.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 21 '18 at 5:46
@nurunnesha Yes. I made the correction.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 21 '18 at 5:46
But we need $int_{Omega_1} nabla Phi neq 0.$ So will we have to construct this $Phi$ on $Omega_1setminus F$ in such a way that $nabla Phi$ does not vanish there?
– nurun nesha
Nov 21 '18 at 6:01
But we need $int_{Omega_1} nabla Phi neq 0.$ So will we have to construct this $Phi$ on $Omega_1setminus F$ in such a way that $nabla Phi$ does not vanish there?
– nurun nesha
Nov 21 '18 at 6:01
@nurunnesha Well. $Phi$ needs to transition from $1$ to $0$ so $nablaPhi$ will not be small. You could also make $F$ smaller.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 21 '18 at 6:04
@nurunnesha Well. $Phi$ needs to transition from $1$ to $0$ so $nablaPhi$ will not be small. You could also make $F$ smaller.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 21 '18 at 6:04
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007248%2fexistence-of-a-c-c-infty-function-phi-s-t-int-nabla-phi-neq-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
