Proving electrostatic analogy for root locus












2












$begingroup$


My teacher told us that there is a provable mathematical analogy between root locus and the lines of force generated by electric charges, where every pole can be associated to a positive charge and every zero can be associated to a negative charge.

This sometimes aids is the sketching of the locus when no other rule seems to be of any help (basically using the fact that poles are attracted to the zero that is closer to them, as positive charges do with negative charges).

However I haven't found references to this analogy on the net, thus I was wondering, out of curiosity, how such a relation could be proved: I'd be glad if you could give me some hint on that.

Thank you for your help in advance.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am not sure if this is actually true. For example when you put the poles and zeros onto a straight line the root locus plot does not have to stay on that line, while it should for static charges. Unless maybe they have some initial velocity.
    $endgroup$
    – Kwin van der Veen
    Jan 30 at 5:43
















2












$begingroup$


My teacher told us that there is a provable mathematical analogy between root locus and the lines of force generated by electric charges, where every pole can be associated to a positive charge and every zero can be associated to a negative charge.

This sometimes aids is the sketching of the locus when no other rule seems to be of any help (basically using the fact that poles are attracted to the zero that is closer to them, as positive charges do with negative charges).

However I haven't found references to this analogy on the net, thus I was wondering, out of curiosity, how such a relation could be proved: I'd be glad if you could give me some hint on that.

Thank you for your help in advance.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am not sure if this is actually true. For example when you put the poles and zeros onto a straight line the root locus plot does not have to stay on that line, while it should for static charges. Unless maybe they have some initial velocity.
    $endgroup$
    – Kwin van der Veen
    Jan 30 at 5:43














2












2








2





$begingroup$


My teacher told us that there is a provable mathematical analogy between root locus and the lines of force generated by electric charges, where every pole can be associated to a positive charge and every zero can be associated to a negative charge.

This sometimes aids is the sketching of the locus when no other rule seems to be of any help (basically using the fact that poles are attracted to the zero that is closer to them, as positive charges do with negative charges).

However I haven't found references to this analogy on the net, thus I was wondering, out of curiosity, how such a relation could be proved: I'd be glad if you could give me some hint on that.

Thank you for your help in advance.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




My teacher told us that there is a provable mathematical analogy between root locus and the lines of force generated by electric charges, where every pole can be associated to a positive charge and every zero can be associated to a negative charge.

This sometimes aids is the sketching of the locus when no other rule seems to be of any help (basically using the fact that poles are attracted to the zero that is closer to them, as positive charges do with negative charges).

However I haven't found references to this analogy on the net, thus I was wondering, out of curiosity, how such a relation could be proved: I'd be glad if you could give me some hint on that.

Thank you for your help in advance.







roots control-theory locus






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 30 at 0:59









LucenLucen

111




111








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am not sure if this is actually true. For example when you put the poles and zeros onto a straight line the root locus plot does not have to stay on that line, while it should for static charges. Unless maybe they have some initial velocity.
    $endgroup$
    – Kwin van der Veen
    Jan 30 at 5:43














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am not sure if this is actually true. For example when you put the poles and zeros onto a straight line the root locus plot does not have to stay on that line, while it should for static charges. Unless maybe they have some initial velocity.
    $endgroup$
    – Kwin van der Veen
    Jan 30 at 5:43








1




1




$begingroup$
I am not sure if this is actually true. For example when you put the poles and zeros onto a straight line the root locus plot does not have to stay on that line, while it should for static charges. Unless maybe they have some initial velocity.
$endgroup$
– Kwin van der Veen
Jan 30 at 5:43




$begingroup$
I am not sure if this is actually true. For example when you put the poles and zeros onto a straight line the root locus plot does not have to stay on that line, while it should for static charges. Unless maybe they have some initial velocity.
$endgroup$
– Kwin van der Veen
Jan 30 at 5:43










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3092956%2fproving-electrostatic-analogy-for-root-locus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3092956%2fproving-electrostatic-analogy-for-root-locus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]