Proving electrostatic analogy for root locus
$begingroup$
My teacher told us that there is a provable mathematical analogy between root locus and the lines of force generated by electric charges, where every pole can be associated to a positive charge and every zero can be associated to a negative charge.
This sometimes aids is the sketching of the locus when no other rule seems to be of any help (basically using the fact that poles are attracted to the zero that is closer to them, as positive charges do with negative charges).
However I haven't found references to this analogy on the net, thus I was wondering, out of curiosity, how such a relation could be proved: I'd be glad if you could give me some hint on that.
Thank you for your help in advance.
roots control-theory locus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My teacher told us that there is a provable mathematical analogy between root locus and the lines of force generated by electric charges, where every pole can be associated to a positive charge and every zero can be associated to a negative charge.
This sometimes aids is the sketching of the locus when no other rule seems to be of any help (basically using the fact that poles are attracted to the zero that is closer to them, as positive charges do with negative charges).
However I haven't found references to this analogy on the net, thus I was wondering, out of curiosity, how such a relation could be proved: I'd be glad if you could give me some hint on that.
Thank you for your help in advance.
roots control-theory locus
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I am not sure if this is actually true. For example when you put the poles and zeros onto a straight line the root locus plot does not have to stay on that line, while it should for static charges. Unless maybe they have some initial velocity.
$endgroup$
– Kwin van der Veen
Jan 30 at 5:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My teacher told us that there is a provable mathematical analogy between root locus and the lines of force generated by electric charges, where every pole can be associated to a positive charge and every zero can be associated to a negative charge.
This sometimes aids is the sketching of the locus when no other rule seems to be of any help (basically using the fact that poles are attracted to the zero that is closer to them, as positive charges do with negative charges).
However I haven't found references to this analogy on the net, thus I was wondering, out of curiosity, how such a relation could be proved: I'd be glad if you could give me some hint on that.
Thank you for your help in advance.
roots control-theory locus
$endgroup$
My teacher told us that there is a provable mathematical analogy between root locus and the lines of force generated by electric charges, where every pole can be associated to a positive charge and every zero can be associated to a negative charge.
This sometimes aids is the sketching of the locus when no other rule seems to be of any help (basically using the fact that poles are attracted to the zero that is closer to them, as positive charges do with negative charges).
However I haven't found references to this analogy on the net, thus I was wondering, out of curiosity, how such a relation could be proved: I'd be glad if you could give me some hint on that.
Thank you for your help in advance.
roots control-theory locus
roots control-theory locus
asked Jan 30 at 0:59
LucenLucen
111
111
1
$begingroup$
I am not sure if this is actually true. For example when you put the poles and zeros onto a straight line the root locus plot does not have to stay on that line, while it should for static charges. Unless maybe they have some initial velocity.
$endgroup$
– Kwin van der Veen
Jan 30 at 5:43
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I am not sure if this is actually true. For example when you put the poles and zeros onto a straight line the root locus plot does not have to stay on that line, while it should for static charges. Unless maybe they have some initial velocity.
$endgroup$
– Kwin van der Veen
Jan 30 at 5:43
1
1
$begingroup$
I am not sure if this is actually true. For example when you put the poles and zeros onto a straight line the root locus plot does not have to stay on that line, while it should for static charges. Unless maybe they have some initial velocity.
$endgroup$
– Kwin van der Veen
Jan 30 at 5:43
$begingroup$
I am not sure if this is actually true. For example when you put the poles and zeros onto a straight line the root locus plot does not have to stay on that line, while it should for static charges. Unless maybe they have some initial velocity.
$endgroup$
– Kwin van der Veen
Jan 30 at 5:43
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3092956%2fproving-electrostatic-analogy-for-root-locus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3092956%2fproving-electrostatic-analogy-for-root-locus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
I am not sure if this is actually true. For example when you put the poles and zeros onto a straight line the root locus plot does not have to stay on that line, while it should for static charges. Unless maybe they have some initial velocity.
$endgroup$
– Kwin van der Veen
Jan 30 at 5:43