$x^2-3$ is separable over $mathbb Q$ but not separable over $F_2$












0












$begingroup$


$x^2-3=(x-sqrt{3})(x+sqrt{3})$ over $mathbb Q$, so that part makes sense.



Now, when it says $x^2-3$ is a polynomial over $F_2$, I imagine it means all the coefficients are calculated mod $3$, so $p(x)=x^2-3=x^2$ in $F_2$.



$x^2$ doesn't have a second solution other than $0$ in $F_2={0,1,2}$, but how do I know there is not some algebraic extension that it will have two roots in?



Also, is this discussion so far accurate?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Because a polynomial of degree $n$ has at most $n$ Distinct roots counting multaplicities. Moreover, any field is integral domain, so $x^n = 0$ if and only if $x=0$ in any field extension of any ground field.
    $endgroup$
    – Adam Higgins
    Jan 30 at 0:54






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Also, $F_2 = {0,1}$, not ${0,1,2}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Adam Higgins
    Jan 30 at 0:55












  • $begingroup$
    Thus, if you have a polynomial $f$ of degree $n$ over a field $K$ that has $n$-roots in $K$ counting multaplicities, then if $K’$ is any exntesion of $K$, then if an element of $kin K’$ is a root of $f$, then $kin K$.
    $endgroup$
    – Adam Higgins
    Jan 30 at 0:57


















0












$begingroup$


$x^2-3=(x-sqrt{3})(x+sqrt{3})$ over $mathbb Q$, so that part makes sense.



Now, when it says $x^2-3$ is a polynomial over $F_2$, I imagine it means all the coefficients are calculated mod $3$, so $p(x)=x^2-3=x^2$ in $F_2$.



$x^2$ doesn't have a second solution other than $0$ in $F_2={0,1,2}$, but how do I know there is not some algebraic extension that it will have two roots in?



Also, is this discussion so far accurate?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Because a polynomial of degree $n$ has at most $n$ Distinct roots counting multaplicities. Moreover, any field is integral domain, so $x^n = 0$ if and only if $x=0$ in any field extension of any ground field.
    $endgroup$
    – Adam Higgins
    Jan 30 at 0:54






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Also, $F_2 = {0,1}$, not ${0,1,2}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Adam Higgins
    Jan 30 at 0:55












  • $begingroup$
    Thus, if you have a polynomial $f$ of degree $n$ over a field $K$ that has $n$-roots in $K$ counting multaplicities, then if $K’$ is any exntesion of $K$, then if an element of $kin K’$ is a root of $f$, then $kin K$.
    $endgroup$
    – Adam Higgins
    Jan 30 at 0:57
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


$x^2-3=(x-sqrt{3})(x+sqrt{3})$ over $mathbb Q$, so that part makes sense.



Now, when it says $x^2-3$ is a polynomial over $F_2$, I imagine it means all the coefficients are calculated mod $3$, so $p(x)=x^2-3=x^2$ in $F_2$.



$x^2$ doesn't have a second solution other than $0$ in $F_2={0,1,2}$, but how do I know there is not some algebraic extension that it will have two roots in?



Also, is this discussion so far accurate?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




$x^2-3=(x-sqrt{3})(x+sqrt{3})$ over $mathbb Q$, so that part makes sense.



Now, when it says $x^2-3$ is a polynomial over $F_2$, I imagine it means all the coefficients are calculated mod $3$, so $p(x)=x^2-3=x^2$ in $F_2$.



$x^2$ doesn't have a second solution other than $0$ in $F_2={0,1,2}$, but how do I know there is not some algebraic extension that it will have two roots in?



Also, is this discussion so far accurate?







polynomials field-theory galois-theory finite-fields separable-extension






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 3 at 15:07









J. W. Tanner

4,2561320




4,2561320










asked Jan 30 at 0:41









MikeMike

783415




783415








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Because a polynomial of degree $n$ has at most $n$ Distinct roots counting multaplicities. Moreover, any field is integral domain, so $x^n = 0$ if and only if $x=0$ in any field extension of any ground field.
    $endgroup$
    – Adam Higgins
    Jan 30 at 0:54






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Also, $F_2 = {0,1}$, not ${0,1,2}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Adam Higgins
    Jan 30 at 0:55












  • $begingroup$
    Thus, if you have a polynomial $f$ of degree $n$ over a field $K$ that has $n$-roots in $K$ counting multaplicities, then if $K’$ is any exntesion of $K$, then if an element of $kin K’$ is a root of $f$, then $kin K$.
    $endgroup$
    – Adam Higgins
    Jan 30 at 0:57
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Because a polynomial of degree $n$ has at most $n$ Distinct roots counting multaplicities. Moreover, any field is integral domain, so $x^n = 0$ if and only if $x=0$ in any field extension of any ground field.
    $endgroup$
    – Adam Higgins
    Jan 30 at 0:54






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Also, $F_2 = {0,1}$, not ${0,1,2}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Adam Higgins
    Jan 30 at 0:55












  • $begingroup$
    Thus, if you have a polynomial $f$ of degree $n$ over a field $K$ that has $n$-roots in $K$ counting multaplicities, then if $K’$ is any exntesion of $K$, then if an element of $kin K’$ is a root of $f$, then $kin K$.
    $endgroup$
    – Adam Higgins
    Jan 30 at 0:57










1




1




$begingroup$
Because a polynomial of degree $n$ has at most $n$ Distinct roots counting multaplicities. Moreover, any field is integral domain, so $x^n = 0$ if and only if $x=0$ in any field extension of any ground field.
$endgroup$
– Adam Higgins
Jan 30 at 0:54




$begingroup$
Because a polynomial of degree $n$ has at most $n$ Distinct roots counting multaplicities. Moreover, any field is integral domain, so $x^n = 0$ if and only if $x=0$ in any field extension of any ground field.
$endgroup$
– Adam Higgins
Jan 30 at 0:54




2




2




$begingroup$
Also, $F_2 = {0,1}$, not ${0,1,2}$.
$endgroup$
– Adam Higgins
Jan 30 at 0:55






$begingroup$
Also, $F_2 = {0,1}$, not ${0,1,2}$.
$endgroup$
– Adam Higgins
Jan 30 at 0:55














$begingroup$
Thus, if you have a polynomial $f$ of degree $n$ over a field $K$ that has $n$-roots in $K$ counting multaplicities, then if $K’$ is any exntesion of $K$, then if an element of $kin K’$ is a root of $f$, then $kin K$.
$endgroup$
– Adam Higgins
Jan 30 at 0:57






$begingroup$
Thus, if you have a polynomial $f$ of degree $n$ over a field $K$ that has $n$-roots in $K$ counting multaplicities, then if $K’$ is any exntesion of $K$, then if an element of $kin K’$ is a root of $f$, then $kin K$.
$endgroup$
– Adam Higgins
Jan 30 at 0:57












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

$X^2-3$ in $F_2$ means that the coefficients are calculated $mod$ $2$ and not $mod$ $3$.



So $x^2-3=x^2+1=(x+1)^2$ mod $2$. You cannot have an extension with two different roots since the factorization over a field is unique. If you assume that the coefficient of higher degree of factors of degree $>1$ is $1$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3092943%2fx2-3-is-separable-over-mathbb-q-but-not-separable-over-f-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    $X^2-3$ in $F_2$ means that the coefficients are calculated $mod$ $2$ and not $mod$ $3$.



    So $x^2-3=x^2+1=(x+1)^2$ mod $2$. You cannot have an extension with two different roots since the factorization over a field is unique. If you assume that the coefficient of higher degree of factors of degree $>1$ is $1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      $X^2-3$ in $F_2$ means that the coefficients are calculated $mod$ $2$ and not $mod$ $3$.



      So $x^2-3=x^2+1=(x+1)^2$ mod $2$. You cannot have an extension with two different roots since the factorization over a field is unique. If you assume that the coefficient of higher degree of factors of degree $>1$ is $1$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        $X^2-3$ in $F_2$ means that the coefficients are calculated $mod$ $2$ and not $mod$ $3$.



        So $x^2-3=x^2+1=(x+1)^2$ mod $2$. You cannot have an extension with two different roots since the factorization over a field is unique. If you assume that the coefficient of higher degree of factors of degree $>1$ is $1$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        $X^2-3$ in $F_2$ means that the coefficients are calculated $mod$ $2$ and not $mod$ $3$.



        So $x^2-3=x^2+1=(x+1)^2$ mod $2$. You cannot have an extension with two different roots since the factorization over a field is unique. If you assume that the coefficient of higher degree of factors of degree $>1$ is $1$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 30 at 0:54









        Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide

        60.1k11446




        60.1k11446






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3092943%2fx2-3-is-separable-over-mathbb-q-but-not-separable-over-f-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

            Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

            A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$