Let M be 10*10 matrix such that $M^{4}=0$ and $M^{i} neq 0$ for i=1,2,3 . Then what is the minimum and...












0












$begingroup$


Let $M$ be $10times10$ matrix such that $M^{4}=0$ and $M^{i} neq 0$ for $i=1,2,3$. Then what are the minimum and maximum ranks of the matrix. Where minimum rank and maximum rank is r and R respectively ?



a) R= 7, r=3



b)R= 6, r=4



c)R= 6, r=3



d)R= 7, r=4



think since there $M^{i}$ is not equal to $0$ for three values of $i$ so the minimum rank is $3$ But how to find the maximum rank?
I have not studied it's not part of curriculum that I have to solve without Jordan form.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Alexander Gruber Jan 30 at 1:25


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Alexander Gruber

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















  • $begingroup$
    Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/863063/….
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    Jan 30 at 16:39
















0












$begingroup$


Let $M$ be $10times10$ matrix such that $M^{4}=0$ and $M^{i} neq 0$ for $i=1,2,3$. Then what are the minimum and maximum ranks of the matrix. Where minimum rank and maximum rank is r and R respectively ?



a) R= 7, r=3



b)R= 6, r=4



c)R= 6, r=3



d)R= 7, r=4



think since there $M^{i}$ is not equal to $0$ for three values of $i$ so the minimum rank is $3$ But how to find the maximum rank?
I have not studied it's not part of curriculum that I have to solve without Jordan form.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Alexander Gruber Jan 30 at 1:25


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Alexander Gruber

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















  • $begingroup$
    Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/863063/….
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    Jan 30 at 16:39














0












0








0


1



$begingroup$


Let $M$ be $10times10$ matrix such that $M^{4}=0$ and $M^{i} neq 0$ for $i=1,2,3$. Then what are the minimum and maximum ranks of the matrix. Where minimum rank and maximum rank is r and R respectively ?



a) R= 7, r=3



b)R= 6, r=4



c)R= 6, r=3



d)R= 7, r=4



think since there $M^{i}$ is not equal to $0$ for three values of $i$ so the minimum rank is $3$ But how to find the maximum rank?
I have not studied it's not part of curriculum that I have to solve without Jordan form.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $M$ be $10times10$ matrix such that $M^{4}=0$ and $M^{i} neq 0$ for $i=1,2,3$. Then what are the minimum and maximum ranks of the matrix. Where minimum rank and maximum rank is r and R respectively ?



a) R= 7, r=3



b)R= 6, r=4



c)R= 6, r=3



d)R= 7, r=4



think since there $M^{i}$ is not equal to $0$ for three values of $i$ so the minimum rank is $3$ But how to find the maximum rank?
I have not studied it's not part of curriculum that I have to solve without Jordan form.







linear-algebra matrices linear-transformations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 30 at 3:23







sejy

















asked Jan 30 at 1:16









sejysejy

1589




1589




closed as off-topic by Alexander Gruber Jan 30 at 1:25


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Alexander Gruber

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by Alexander Gruber Jan 30 at 1:25


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Alexander Gruber

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • $begingroup$
    Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/863063/….
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    Jan 30 at 16:39


















  • $begingroup$
    Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/863063/….
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    Jan 30 at 16:39
















$begingroup$
Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/863063/….
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Jan 30 at 16:39




$begingroup$
Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/863063/….
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Jan 30 at 16:39










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Your answer for the minimal rank is correct.



I find it easiest to think of this question in terms of the Jordan form of $M$. Because Because $M$ has minimal polynomial $p(x) = x^4$, we know that $M$ has $0$ as its only eigenvalue, and that the largest Jordan block has size $4$. On the other hand, $dim ker(A) = 10 - operatorname{rank}(A)$ is the total number of Jordan blocks associated with zero.



Thus, our question amounts to finding the Jordan form matrix (with only zero-blocks) that contains the fewest blocks, each block of size at most $4$. Since $M$ must contain at least $10/4 = 2.5$ such blocks, we conclude that the kernel has dimension at least $3$, which is to say that the rank of $M$ is at most $7$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I have not studied it's not part of curriculum that I have to solve without Jordan form .
    $endgroup$
    – sejy
    Jan 30 at 2:10








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @sejy I think you could also make a proof based on Sylvester's rank inequality, that is $$ operatorname{rank}(AB) geq operatorname{rank}(A) + operatorname{rank}(B) - n $$ it would be easier to give you a helpful answer, though, if you edited your question to include more context
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 30 at 2:19










  • $begingroup$
    Now I have written complete question
    $endgroup$
    – sejy
    Jan 30 at 3:33




















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

Your answer for the minimal rank is correct.



I find it easiest to think of this question in terms of the Jordan form of $M$. Because Because $M$ has minimal polynomial $p(x) = x^4$, we know that $M$ has $0$ as its only eigenvalue, and that the largest Jordan block has size $4$. On the other hand, $dim ker(A) = 10 - operatorname{rank}(A)$ is the total number of Jordan blocks associated with zero.



Thus, our question amounts to finding the Jordan form matrix (with only zero-blocks) that contains the fewest blocks, each block of size at most $4$. Since $M$ must contain at least $10/4 = 2.5$ such blocks, we conclude that the kernel has dimension at least $3$, which is to say that the rank of $M$ is at most $7$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I have not studied it's not part of curriculum that I have to solve without Jordan form .
    $endgroup$
    – sejy
    Jan 30 at 2:10








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @sejy I think you could also make a proof based on Sylvester's rank inequality, that is $$ operatorname{rank}(AB) geq operatorname{rank}(A) + operatorname{rank}(B) - n $$ it would be easier to give you a helpful answer, though, if you edited your question to include more context
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 30 at 2:19










  • $begingroup$
    Now I have written complete question
    $endgroup$
    – sejy
    Jan 30 at 3:33


















2












$begingroup$

Your answer for the minimal rank is correct.



I find it easiest to think of this question in terms of the Jordan form of $M$. Because Because $M$ has minimal polynomial $p(x) = x^4$, we know that $M$ has $0$ as its only eigenvalue, and that the largest Jordan block has size $4$. On the other hand, $dim ker(A) = 10 - operatorname{rank}(A)$ is the total number of Jordan blocks associated with zero.



Thus, our question amounts to finding the Jordan form matrix (with only zero-blocks) that contains the fewest blocks, each block of size at most $4$. Since $M$ must contain at least $10/4 = 2.5$ such blocks, we conclude that the kernel has dimension at least $3$, which is to say that the rank of $M$ is at most $7$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I have not studied it's not part of curriculum that I have to solve without Jordan form .
    $endgroup$
    – sejy
    Jan 30 at 2:10








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @sejy I think you could also make a proof based on Sylvester's rank inequality, that is $$ operatorname{rank}(AB) geq operatorname{rank}(A) + operatorname{rank}(B) - n $$ it would be easier to give you a helpful answer, though, if you edited your question to include more context
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 30 at 2:19










  • $begingroup$
    Now I have written complete question
    $endgroup$
    – sejy
    Jan 30 at 3:33
















2












2








2





$begingroup$

Your answer for the minimal rank is correct.



I find it easiest to think of this question in terms of the Jordan form of $M$. Because Because $M$ has minimal polynomial $p(x) = x^4$, we know that $M$ has $0$ as its only eigenvalue, and that the largest Jordan block has size $4$. On the other hand, $dim ker(A) = 10 - operatorname{rank}(A)$ is the total number of Jordan blocks associated with zero.



Thus, our question amounts to finding the Jordan form matrix (with only zero-blocks) that contains the fewest blocks, each block of size at most $4$. Since $M$ must contain at least $10/4 = 2.5$ such blocks, we conclude that the kernel has dimension at least $3$, which is to say that the rank of $M$ is at most $7$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Your answer for the minimal rank is correct.



I find it easiest to think of this question in terms of the Jordan form of $M$. Because Because $M$ has minimal polynomial $p(x) = x^4$, we know that $M$ has $0$ as its only eigenvalue, and that the largest Jordan block has size $4$. On the other hand, $dim ker(A) = 10 - operatorname{rank}(A)$ is the total number of Jordan blocks associated with zero.



Thus, our question amounts to finding the Jordan form matrix (with only zero-blocks) that contains the fewest blocks, each block of size at most $4$. Since $M$ must contain at least $10/4 = 2.5$ such blocks, we conclude that the kernel has dimension at least $3$, which is to say that the rank of $M$ is at most $7$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 30 at 1:25









OmnomnomnomOmnomnomnom

129k793187




129k793187












  • $begingroup$
    I have not studied it's not part of curriculum that I have to solve without Jordan form .
    $endgroup$
    – sejy
    Jan 30 at 2:10








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @sejy I think you could also make a proof based on Sylvester's rank inequality, that is $$ operatorname{rank}(AB) geq operatorname{rank}(A) + operatorname{rank}(B) - n $$ it would be easier to give you a helpful answer, though, if you edited your question to include more context
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 30 at 2:19










  • $begingroup$
    Now I have written complete question
    $endgroup$
    – sejy
    Jan 30 at 3:33




















  • $begingroup$
    I have not studied it's not part of curriculum that I have to solve without Jordan form .
    $endgroup$
    – sejy
    Jan 30 at 2:10








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @sejy I think you could also make a proof based on Sylvester's rank inequality, that is $$ operatorname{rank}(AB) geq operatorname{rank}(A) + operatorname{rank}(B) - n $$ it would be easier to give you a helpful answer, though, if you edited your question to include more context
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 30 at 2:19










  • $begingroup$
    Now I have written complete question
    $endgroup$
    – sejy
    Jan 30 at 3:33


















$begingroup$
I have not studied it's not part of curriculum that I have to solve without Jordan form .
$endgroup$
– sejy
Jan 30 at 2:10






$begingroup$
I have not studied it's not part of curriculum that I have to solve without Jordan form .
$endgroup$
– sejy
Jan 30 at 2:10






2




2




$begingroup$
@sejy I think you could also make a proof based on Sylvester's rank inequality, that is $$ operatorname{rank}(AB) geq operatorname{rank}(A) + operatorname{rank}(B) - n $$ it would be easier to give you a helpful answer, though, if you edited your question to include more context
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Jan 30 at 2:19




$begingroup$
@sejy I think you could also make a proof based on Sylvester's rank inequality, that is $$ operatorname{rank}(AB) geq operatorname{rank}(A) + operatorname{rank}(B) - n $$ it would be easier to give you a helpful answer, though, if you edited your question to include more context
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Jan 30 at 2:19












$begingroup$
Now I have written complete question
$endgroup$
– sejy
Jan 30 at 3:33






$begingroup$
Now I have written complete question
$endgroup$
– sejy
Jan 30 at 3:33





Popular posts from this blog

'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]