Full subcategories of $mathsf{Mod}_R$ which are “almost” abelian












4












$begingroup$


Is there an example of a full subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$ (namely left $R$-modules) which are not abelian categories, but are "almost" abelian -- that is, they satisfy all of the prerequisites of an abelian category (additive + kernels/cokernels) except that the canonical map $coim(f) to im(f)$ is not an isomorphism.



There are of course many examples of those that are, e.g. torsion $R$-modules form a Serre subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$ and coherent $R$-modules form a weak Serre subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    So you would need to choose the subcategory in such a way that at least one of those objects is different from what it was in the original category. That seems tricky.
    $endgroup$
    – Tobias Kildetoft
    Oct 11 '17 at 13:16










  • $begingroup$
    Yep that's exactly right.
    $endgroup$
    – MCT
    Oct 11 '17 at 13:32
















4












$begingroup$


Is there an example of a full subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$ (namely left $R$-modules) which are not abelian categories, but are "almost" abelian -- that is, they satisfy all of the prerequisites of an abelian category (additive + kernels/cokernels) except that the canonical map $coim(f) to im(f)$ is not an isomorphism.



There are of course many examples of those that are, e.g. torsion $R$-modules form a Serre subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$ and coherent $R$-modules form a weak Serre subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    So you would need to choose the subcategory in such a way that at least one of those objects is different from what it was in the original category. That seems tricky.
    $endgroup$
    – Tobias Kildetoft
    Oct 11 '17 at 13:16










  • $begingroup$
    Yep that's exactly right.
    $endgroup$
    – MCT
    Oct 11 '17 at 13:32














4












4








4


2



$begingroup$


Is there an example of a full subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$ (namely left $R$-modules) which are not abelian categories, but are "almost" abelian -- that is, they satisfy all of the prerequisites of an abelian category (additive + kernels/cokernels) except that the canonical map $coim(f) to im(f)$ is not an isomorphism.



There are of course many examples of those that are, e.g. torsion $R$-modules form a Serre subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$ and coherent $R$-modules form a weak Serre subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Is there an example of a full subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$ (namely left $R$-modules) which are not abelian categories, but are "almost" abelian -- that is, they satisfy all of the prerequisites of an abelian category (additive + kernels/cokernels) except that the canonical map $coim(f) to im(f)$ is not an isomorphism.



There are of course many examples of those that are, e.g. torsion $R$-modules form a Serre subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$ and coherent $R$-modules form a weak Serre subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$.







commutative-algebra abelian-categories






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Oct 11 '17 at 13:22







MCT

















asked Oct 11 '17 at 13:11









MCTMCT

14.5k42668




14.5k42668








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    So you would need to choose the subcategory in such a way that at least one of those objects is different from what it was in the original category. That seems tricky.
    $endgroup$
    – Tobias Kildetoft
    Oct 11 '17 at 13:16










  • $begingroup$
    Yep that's exactly right.
    $endgroup$
    – MCT
    Oct 11 '17 at 13:32














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    So you would need to choose the subcategory in such a way that at least one of those objects is different from what it was in the original category. That seems tricky.
    $endgroup$
    – Tobias Kildetoft
    Oct 11 '17 at 13:16










  • $begingroup$
    Yep that's exactly right.
    $endgroup$
    – MCT
    Oct 11 '17 at 13:32








1




1




$begingroup$
So you would need to choose the subcategory in such a way that at least one of those objects is different from what it was in the original category. That seems tricky.
$endgroup$
– Tobias Kildetoft
Oct 11 '17 at 13:16




$begingroup$
So you would need to choose the subcategory in such a way that at least one of those objects is different from what it was in the original category. That seems tricky.
$endgroup$
– Tobias Kildetoft
Oct 11 '17 at 13:16












$begingroup$
Yep that's exactly right.
$endgroup$
– MCT
Oct 11 '17 at 13:32




$begingroup$
Yep that's exactly right.
$endgroup$
– MCT
Oct 11 '17 at 13:32










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

For the case where $R=Bbb Z$ : the full subcategory $mathbf{Ab}_{t-f}$ of torsion-free abelian groups is additive, has kernels (because a subgroup of a torsion-free abelian group is torsion free), and it also has cokernels : given a morphism $f:Ato B$, its cokernel in $mathbf{Ab}_{t-f}$ is the quotient of $frac{B}{f(A)}$ by its torsion subgroup $Tleft(frac{B}{A}right)$, or equivalently the quotient $frac{B}{widehat{f(A)}}$, where
$$widehat{f(A)}={bin Bmid exists min Bbb Zsetminus0 text{ such that } mcdot bin f(A) }.$$
Indeed, any morphism $g:Bto C$ such that $gf=0$ factorizes in $mathbf{Ab}$ through $frac{B}{f(A)}$, and then if $C$ is torsion-free the corresponding morphism $frac{B}{f(A)}to C$ should be $0$ on the torsion of $frac{B}{f(A)}$.



Now this is not an abelian subcategory because for example the inclusion $2Bbb Zto Bbb Z$ has both its kernel and cokernel equal to $0$, but is not an isomorphism.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Great example. You could even take the subcategory to be finitely generated, since the ring is Noetherian the kernel will be the same.
    $endgroup$
    – MCT
    Oct 11 '17 at 13:47












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2467551%2ffull-subcategories-of-mathsfmod-r-which-are-almost-abelian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

For the case where $R=Bbb Z$ : the full subcategory $mathbf{Ab}_{t-f}$ of torsion-free abelian groups is additive, has kernels (because a subgroup of a torsion-free abelian group is torsion free), and it also has cokernels : given a morphism $f:Ato B$, its cokernel in $mathbf{Ab}_{t-f}$ is the quotient of $frac{B}{f(A)}$ by its torsion subgroup $Tleft(frac{B}{A}right)$, or equivalently the quotient $frac{B}{widehat{f(A)}}$, where
$$widehat{f(A)}={bin Bmid exists min Bbb Zsetminus0 text{ such that } mcdot bin f(A) }.$$
Indeed, any morphism $g:Bto C$ such that $gf=0$ factorizes in $mathbf{Ab}$ through $frac{B}{f(A)}$, and then if $C$ is torsion-free the corresponding morphism $frac{B}{f(A)}to C$ should be $0$ on the torsion of $frac{B}{f(A)}$.



Now this is not an abelian subcategory because for example the inclusion $2Bbb Zto Bbb Z$ has both its kernel and cokernel equal to $0$, but is not an isomorphism.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Great example. You could even take the subcategory to be finitely generated, since the ring is Noetherian the kernel will be the same.
    $endgroup$
    – MCT
    Oct 11 '17 at 13:47
















3












$begingroup$

For the case where $R=Bbb Z$ : the full subcategory $mathbf{Ab}_{t-f}$ of torsion-free abelian groups is additive, has kernels (because a subgroup of a torsion-free abelian group is torsion free), and it also has cokernels : given a morphism $f:Ato B$, its cokernel in $mathbf{Ab}_{t-f}$ is the quotient of $frac{B}{f(A)}$ by its torsion subgroup $Tleft(frac{B}{A}right)$, or equivalently the quotient $frac{B}{widehat{f(A)}}$, where
$$widehat{f(A)}={bin Bmid exists min Bbb Zsetminus0 text{ such that } mcdot bin f(A) }.$$
Indeed, any morphism $g:Bto C$ such that $gf=0$ factorizes in $mathbf{Ab}$ through $frac{B}{f(A)}$, and then if $C$ is torsion-free the corresponding morphism $frac{B}{f(A)}to C$ should be $0$ on the torsion of $frac{B}{f(A)}$.



Now this is not an abelian subcategory because for example the inclusion $2Bbb Zto Bbb Z$ has both its kernel and cokernel equal to $0$, but is not an isomorphism.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Great example. You could even take the subcategory to be finitely generated, since the ring is Noetherian the kernel will be the same.
    $endgroup$
    – MCT
    Oct 11 '17 at 13:47














3












3








3





$begingroup$

For the case where $R=Bbb Z$ : the full subcategory $mathbf{Ab}_{t-f}$ of torsion-free abelian groups is additive, has kernels (because a subgroup of a torsion-free abelian group is torsion free), and it also has cokernels : given a morphism $f:Ato B$, its cokernel in $mathbf{Ab}_{t-f}$ is the quotient of $frac{B}{f(A)}$ by its torsion subgroup $Tleft(frac{B}{A}right)$, or equivalently the quotient $frac{B}{widehat{f(A)}}$, where
$$widehat{f(A)}={bin Bmid exists min Bbb Zsetminus0 text{ such that } mcdot bin f(A) }.$$
Indeed, any morphism $g:Bto C$ such that $gf=0$ factorizes in $mathbf{Ab}$ through $frac{B}{f(A)}$, and then if $C$ is torsion-free the corresponding morphism $frac{B}{f(A)}to C$ should be $0$ on the torsion of $frac{B}{f(A)}$.



Now this is not an abelian subcategory because for example the inclusion $2Bbb Zto Bbb Z$ has both its kernel and cokernel equal to $0$, but is not an isomorphism.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



For the case where $R=Bbb Z$ : the full subcategory $mathbf{Ab}_{t-f}$ of torsion-free abelian groups is additive, has kernels (because a subgroup of a torsion-free abelian group is torsion free), and it also has cokernels : given a morphism $f:Ato B$, its cokernel in $mathbf{Ab}_{t-f}$ is the quotient of $frac{B}{f(A)}$ by its torsion subgroup $Tleft(frac{B}{A}right)$, or equivalently the quotient $frac{B}{widehat{f(A)}}$, where
$$widehat{f(A)}={bin Bmid exists min Bbb Zsetminus0 text{ such that } mcdot bin f(A) }.$$
Indeed, any morphism $g:Bto C$ such that $gf=0$ factorizes in $mathbf{Ab}$ through $frac{B}{f(A)}$, and then if $C$ is torsion-free the corresponding morphism $frac{B}{f(A)}to C$ should be $0$ on the torsion of $frac{B}{f(A)}$.



Now this is not an abelian subcategory because for example the inclusion $2Bbb Zto Bbb Z$ has both its kernel and cokernel equal to $0$, but is not an isomorphism.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Feb 1 at 19:08

























answered Oct 11 '17 at 13:40









Arnaud D.Arnaud D.

16.2k52445




16.2k52445












  • $begingroup$
    Great example. You could even take the subcategory to be finitely generated, since the ring is Noetherian the kernel will be the same.
    $endgroup$
    – MCT
    Oct 11 '17 at 13:47


















  • $begingroup$
    Great example. You could even take the subcategory to be finitely generated, since the ring is Noetherian the kernel will be the same.
    $endgroup$
    – MCT
    Oct 11 '17 at 13:47
















$begingroup$
Great example. You could even take the subcategory to be finitely generated, since the ring is Noetherian the kernel will be the same.
$endgroup$
– MCT
Oct 11 '17 at 13:47




$begingroup$
Great example. You could even take the subcategory to be finitely generated, since the ring is Noetherian the kernel will be the same.
$endgroup$
– MCT
Oct 11 '17 at 13:47


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2467551%2ffull-subcategories-of-mathsfmod-r-which-are-almost-abelian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory