Full subcategories of $mathsf{Mod}_R$ which are “almost” abelian
$begingroup$
Is there an example of a full subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$ (namely left $R$-modules) which are not abelian categories, but are "almost" abelian -- that is, they satisfy all of the prerequisites of an abelian category (additive + kernels/cokernels) except that the canonical map $coim(f) to im(f)$ is not an isomorphism.
There are of course many examples of those that are, e.g. torsion $R$-modules form a Serre subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$ and coherent $R$-modules form a weak Serre subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$.
commutative-algebra abelian-categories
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there an example of a full subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$ (namely left $R$-modules) which are not abelian categories, but are "almost" abelian -- that is, they satisfy all of the prerequisites of an abelian category (additive + kernels/cokernels) except that the canonical map $coim(f) to im(f)$ is not an isomorphism.
There are of course many examples of those that are, e.g. torsion $R$-modules form a Serre subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$ and coherent $R$-modules form a weak Serre subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$.
commutative-algebra abelian-categories
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
So you would need to choose the subcategory in such a way that at least one of those objects is different from what it was in the original category. That seems tricky.
$endgroup$
– Tobias Kildetoft
Oct 11 '17 at 13:16
$begingroup$
Yep that's exactly right.
$endgroup$
– MCT
Oct 11 '17 at 13:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there an example of a full subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$ (namely left $R$-modules) which are not abelian categories, but are "almost" abelian -- that is, they satisfy all of the prerequisites of an abelian category (additive + kernels/cokernels) except that the canonical map $coim(f) to im(f)$ is not an isomorphism.
There are of course many examples of those that are, e.g. torsion $R$-modules form a Serre subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$ and coherent $R$-modules form a weak Serre subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$.
commutative-algebra abelian-categories
$endgroup$
Is there an example of a full subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$ (namely left $R$-modules) which are not abelian categories, but are "almost" abelian -- that is, they satisfy all of the prerequisites of an abelian category (additive + kernels/cokernels) except that the canonical map $coim(f) to im(f)$ is not an isomorphism.
There are of course many examples of those that are, e.g. torsion $R$-modules form a Serre subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$ and coherent $R$-modules form a weak Serre subcategory of $mathsf{Mod}_R$.
commutative-algebra abelian-categories
commutative-algebra abelian-categories
edited Oct 11 '17 at 13:22
MCT
asked Oct 11 '17 at 13:11


MCTMCT
14.5k42668
14.5k42668
1
$begingroup$
So you would need to choose the subcategory in such a way that at least one of those objects is different from what it was in the original category. That seems tricky.
$endgroup$
– Tobias Kildetoft
Oct 11 '17 at 13:16
$begingroup$
Yep that's exactly right.
$endgroup$
– MCT
Oct 11 '17 at 13:32
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
So you would need to choose the subcategory in such a way that at least one of those objects is different from what it was in the original category. That seems tricky.
$endgroup$
– Tobias Kildetoft
Oct 11 '17 at 13:16
$begingroup$
Yep that's exactly right.
$endgroup$
– MCT
Oct 11 '17 at 13:32
1
1
$begingroup$
So you would need to choose the subcategory in such a way that at least one of those objects is different from what it was in the original category. That seems tricky.
$endgroup$
– Tobias Kildetoft
Oct 11 '17 at 13:16
$begingroup$
So you would need to choose the subcategory in such a way that at least one of those objects is different from what it was in the original category. That seems tricky.
$endgroup$
– Tobias Kildetoft
Oct 11 '17 at 13:16
$begingroup$
Yep that's exactly right.
$endgroup$
– MCT
Oct 11 '17 at 13:32
$begingroup$
Yep that's exactly right.
$endgroup$
– MCT
Oct 11 '17 at 13:32
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For the case where $R=Bbb Z$ : the full subcategory $mathbf{Ab}_{t-f}$ of torsion-free abelian groups is additive, has kernels (because a subgroup of a torsion-free abelian group is torsion free), and it also has cokernels : given a morphism $f:Ato B$, its cokernel in $mathbf{Ab}_{t-f}$ is the quotient of $frac{B}{f(A)}$ by its torsion subgroup $Tleft(frac{B}{A}right)$, or equivalently the quotient $frac{B}{widehat{f(A)}}$, where
$$widehat{f(A)}={bin Bmid exists min Bbb Zsetminus0 text{ such that } mcdot bin f(A) }.$$
Indeed, any morphism $g:Bto C$ such that $gf=0$ factorizes in $mathbf{Ab}$ through $frac{B}{f(A)}$, and then if $C$ is torsion-free the corresponding morphism $frac{B}{f(A)}to C$ should be $0$ on the torsion of $frac{B}{f(A)}$.
Now this is not an abelian subcategory because for example the inclusion $2Bbb Zto Bbb Z$ has both its kernel and cokernel equal to $0$, but is not an isomorphism.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Great example. You could even take the subcategory to be finitely generated, since the ring is Noetherian the kernel will be the same.
$endgroup$
– MCT
Oct 11 '17 at 13:47
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2467551%2ffull-subcategories-of-mathsfmod-r-which-are-almost-abelian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For the case where $R=Bbb Z$ : the full subcategory $mathbf{Ab}_{t-f}$ of torsion-free abelian groups is additive, has kernels (because a subgroup of a torsion-free abelian group is torsion free), and it also has cokernels : given a morphism $f:Ato B$, its cokernel in $mathbf{Ab}_{t-f}$ is the quotient of $frac{B}{f(A)}$ by its torsion subgroup $Tleft(frac{B}{A}right)$, or equivalently the quotient $frac{B}{widehat{f(A)}}$, where
$$widehat{f(A)}={bin Bmid exists min Bbb Zsetminus0 text{ such that } mcdot bin f(A) }.$$
Indeed, any morphism $g:Bto C$ such that $gf=0$ factorizes in $mathbf{Ab}$ through $frac{B}{f(A)}$, and then if $C$ is torsion-free the corresponding morphism $frac{B}{f(A)}to C$ should be $0$ on the torsion of $frac{B}{f(A)}$.
Now this is not an abelian subcategory because for example the inclusion $2Bbb Zto Bbb Z$ has both its kernel and cokernel equal to $0$, but is not an isomorphism.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Great example. You could even take the subcategory to be finitely generated, since the ring is Noetherian the kernel will be the same.
$endgroup$
– MCT
Oct 11 '17 at 13:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the case where $R=Bbb Z$ : the full subcategory $mathbf{Ab}_{t-f}$ of torsion-free abelian groups is additive, has kernels (because a subgroup of a torsion-free abelian group is torsion free), and it also has cokernels : given a morphism $f:Ato B$, its cokernel in $mathbf{Ab}_{t-f}$ is the quotient of $frac{B}{f(A)}$ by its torsion subgroup $Tleft(frac{B}{A}right)$, or equivalently the quotient $frac{B}{widehat{f(A)}}$, where
$$widehat{f(A)}={bin Bmid exists min Bbb Zsetminus0 text{ such that } mcdot bin f(A) }.$$
Indeed, any morphism $g:Bto C$ such that $gf=0$ factorizes in $mathbf{Ab}$ through $frac{B}{f(A)}$, and then if $C$ is torsion-free the corresponding morphism $frac{B}{f(A)}to C$ should be $0$ on the torsion of $frac{B}{f(A)}$.
Now this is not an abelian subcategory because for example the inclusion $2Bbb Zto Bbb Z$ has both its kernel and cokernel equal to $0$, but is not an isomorphism.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Great example. You could even take the subcategory to be finitely generated, since the ring is Noetherian the kernel will be the same.
$endgroup$
– MCT
Oct 11 '17 at 13:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the case where $R=Bbb Z$ : the full subcategory $mathbf{Ab}_{t-f}$ of torsion-free abelian groups is additive, has kernels (because a subgroup of a torsion-free abelian group is torsion free), and it also has cokernels : given a morphism $f:Ato B$, its cokernel in $mathbf{Ab}_{t-f}$ is the quotient of $frac{B}{f(A)}$ by its torsion subgroup $Tleft(frac{B}{A}right)$, or equivalently the quotient $frac{B}{widehat{f(A)}}$, where
$$widehat{f(A)}={bin Bmid exists min Bbb Zsetminus0 text{ such that } mcdot bin f(A) }.$$
Indeed, any morphism $g:Bto C$ such that $gf=0$ factorizes in $mathbf{Ab}$ through $frac{B}{f(A)}$, and then if $C$ is torsion-free the corresponding morphism $frac{B}{f(A)}to C$ should be $0$ on the torsion of $frac{B}{f(A)}$.
Now this is not an abelian subcategory because for example the inclusion $2Bbb Zto Bbb Z$ has both its kernel and cokernel equal to $0$, but is not an isomorphism.
$endgroup$
For the case where $R=Bbb Z$ : the full subcategory $mathbf{Ab}_{t-f}$ of torsion-free abelian groups is additive, has kernels (because a subgroup of a torsion-free abelian group is torsion free), and it also has cokernels : given a morphism $f:Ato B$, its cokernel in $mathbf{Ab}_{t-f}$ is the quotient of $frac{B}{f(A)}$ by its torsion subgroup $Tleft(frac{B}{A}right)$, or equivalently the quotient $frac{B}{widehat{f(A)}}$, where
$$widehat{f(A)}={bin Bmid exists min Bbb Zsetminus0 text{ such that } mcdot bin f(A) }.$$
Indeed, any morphism $g:Bto C$ such that $gf=0$ factorizes in $mathbf{Ab}$ through $frac{B}{f(A)}$, and then if $C$ is torsion-free the corresponding morphism $frac{B}{f(A)}to C$ should be $0$ on the torsion of $frac{B}{f(A)}$.
Now this is not an abelian subcategory because for example the inclusion $2Bbb Zto Bbb Z$ has both its kernel and cokernel equal to $0$, but is not an isomorphism.
edited Feb 1 at 19:08
answered Oct 11 '17 at 13:40
Arnaud D.Arnaud D.
16.2k52445
16.2k52445
$begingroup$
Great example. You could even take the subcategory to be finitely generated, since the ring is Noetherian the kernel will be the same.
$endgroup$
– MCT
Oct 11 '17 at 13:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Great example. You could even take the subcategory to be finitely generated, since the ring is Noetherian the kernel will be the same.
$endgroup$
– MCT
Oct 11 '17 at 13:47
$begingroup$
Great example. You could even take the subcategory to be finitely generated, since the ring is Noetherian the kernel will be the same.
$endgroup$
– MCT
Oct 11 '17 at 13:47
$begingroup$
Great example. You could even take the subcategory to be finitely generated, since the ring is Noetherian the kernel will be the same.
$endgroup$
– MCT
Oct 11 '17 at 13:47
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2467551%2ffull-subcategories-of-mathsfmod-r-which-are-almost-abelian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
So you would need to choose the subcategory in such a way that at least one of those objects is different from what it was in the original category. That seems tricky.
$endgroup$
– Tobias Kildetoft
Oct 11 '17 at 13:16
$begingroup$
Yep that's exactly right.
$endgroup$
– MCT
Oct 11 '17 at 13:32