Mixing
Transclusion : apply style to ng-content
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I am facing an issue regarding how to style trasncluded content.
When reading through the documentation, it is said that there are custom selectors that can do the job. And they do ! But it is also said
The shadow-piercing descendant combinator is deprecated and support is being removed from major browsers and tools. As such we plan to drop support in Angular (for all 3 of /deep/, >>> and ::ng-deep). Until then ::ng-deep should be preferred for a broader compatibility with the tools.
This means that, because it is deprecated, those selectors should not be used.
As I am facing this issue right now, I would like to know the alternative provided to style the transcluded content.
I have asked on an old question but it doesn't seem to work for non-shadow DOM encapsulation.
Here is a stackblitz with a very minimal reproduction of the issue.
css
angular typescript transclusion asked Jan 3 at 12:57
trichetrichetrichetriche
30k53062
add a comment |
I am facing an issue regarding how to style trasncluded content.
When reading through the documentation, it is said that there are custom selectors that can do the job. And they do ! But it is also said
The shadow-piercing descendant combinator is deprecated and support is being removed from major browsers and tools. As such we plan to drop support in Angular (for all 3 of /deep/, >>> and ::ng-deep). Until then ::ng-deep should be preferred for a broader compatibility with the tools.
This means that, because it is deprecated, those selectors should not be used.
As I am facing this issue right now, I would like to know the alternative provided to style the transcluded content.
I have asked on an old question but it doesn't seem to work for non-shadow DOM encapsulation.
Here is a stackblitz with a very minimal reproduction of the issue.
css
angular typescript transclusion asked Jan 3 at 12:57
trichetrichetrichetriche
30k53062
1
My understanding is that you can keep using::ng-deepuntil Angular provides more info about an alternative. You can see the comment by vicb in issue #17867: "Closing this as we have no plan to remove ::ng-deep in a near future. It will be first deprecated and at this time we will provide docs about migration. Then, some time later only it will be removed."
– ConnorsFan
Jan 3 at 15:44
add a comment |
I am facing an issue regarding how to style trasncluded content.
When reading through the documentation, it is said that there are custom selectors that can do the job. And they do ! But it is also said
The shadow-piercing descendant combinator is deprecated and support is being removed from major browsers and tools. As such we plan to drop support in Angular (for all 3 of /deep/, >>> and ::ng-deep). Until then ::ng-deep should be preferred for a broader compatibility with the tools.
This means that, because it is deprecated, those selectors should not be used.
As I am facing this issue right now, I would like to know the alternative provided to style the transcluded content.
I have asked on an old question but it doesn't seem to work for non-shadow DOM encapsulation.
Here is a stackblitz with a very minimal reproduction of the issue.
css
angular typescript transclusion asked Jan 3 at 12:57
trichetrichetrichetriche
30k53062
I am facing an issue regarding how to style trasncluded content.
When reading through the documentation, it is said that there are custom selectors that can do the job. And they do ! But it is also said
The shadow-piercing descendant combinator is deprecated and support is being removed from major browsers and tools. As such we plan to drop support in Angular (for all 3 of /deep/, >>> and ::ng-deep). Until then ::ng-deep should be preferred for a broader compatibility with the tools.
This means that, because it is deprecated, those selectors should not be used.
As I am facing this issue right now, I would like to know the alternative provided to style the transcluded content.
I have asked on an old question but it doesn't seem to work for non-shadow DOM encapsulation.
Here is a stackblitz with a very minimal reproduction of the issue.
css
angular typescript transclusion css
angular typescript transclusion asked Jan 3 at 12:57
trichetrichetrichetriche
30k53062
asked Jan 3 at 12:57
trichetrichetrichetriche
30k53062
asked Jan 3 at 12:57
trichetrichetrichetriche
30k53062
asked Jan 3 at 12:57
trichetrichetrichetriche
30k53062
asked Jan 3 at 12:57
trichetrichetrichetriche
30k53062
30k53062
1
My understanding is that you can keep using::ng-deepuntil Angular provides more info about an alternative. You can see the comment by vicb in issue #17867: "Closing this as we have no plan to remove ::ng-deep in a near future. It will be first deprecated and at this time we will provide docs about migration. Then, some time later only it will be removed."
– ConnorsFan
Jan 3 at 15:44
add a comment |
1
My understanding is that you can keep using::ng-deepuntil Angular provides more info about an alternative. You can see the comment by vicb in issue #17867: "Closing this as we have no plan to remove ::ng-deep in a near future. It will be first deprecated and at this time we will provide docs about migration. Then, some time later only it will be removed."
– ConnorsFan
Jan 3 at 15:44
1
1
My understanding is that you can keep using
::ng-deep until Angular provides more info about an alternative. You can see the comment by vicb in issue #17867: "Closing this as we have no plan to remove ::ng-deep in a near future. It will be first deprecated and at this time we will provide docs about migration. Then, some time later only it will be removed."– ConnorsFan
Jan 3 at 15:44
My understanding is that you can keep using
::ng-deep until Angular provides more info about an alternative. You can see the comment by vicb in issue #17867: "Closing this as we have no plan to remove ::ng-deep in a near future. It will be first deprecated and at this time we will provide docs about migration. Then, some time later only it will be removed."– ConnorsFan
Jan 3 at 15:44
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54022773%2ftransclusion-apply-style-to-ng-content%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54022773%2ftransclusion-apply-style-to-ng-content%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
My understanding is that you can keep using
::ng-deepuntil Angular provides more info about an alternative. You can see the comment by vicb in issue #17867: "Closing this as we have no plan to remove ::ng-deep in a near future. It will be first deprecated and at this time we will provide docs about migration. Then, some time later only it will be removed."– ConnorsFan
Jan 3 at 15:44