Why the number of pints is proportional to the square of the height of a statue?












0












$begingroup$


The main question:




If 1 pint of paint is needed to paint a statue 6 ft. high, then the
number of pints it will take to paint (to the same thickness) 540
statues similar to the original but only 1 ft. high, is
(A)
90
(B) 72
(C) 45
(D) 30
(E) 15




The matter I can not understand:

In the answer it is said that the number of pints is proportional to the square of height. Can anyone explain me why it is proportional to the square of height?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    The main question:




    If 1 pint of paint is needed to paint a statue 6 ft. high, then the
    number of pints it will take to paint (to the same thickness) 540
    statues similar to the original but only 1 ft. high, is
    (A)
    90
    (B) 72
    (C) 45
    (D) 30
    (E) 15




    The matter I can not understand:

    In the answer it is said that the number of pints is proportional to the square of height. Can anyone explain me why it is proportional to the square of height?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      The main question:




      If 1 pint of paint is needed to paint a statue 6 ft. high, then the
      number of pints it will take to paint (to the same thickness) 540
      statues similar to the original but only 1 ft. high, is
      (A)
      90
      (B) 72
      (C) 45
      (D) 30
      (E) 15




      The matter I can not understand:

      In the answer it is said that the number of pints is proportional to the square of height. Can anyone explain me why it is proportional to the square of height?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The main question:




      If 1 pint of paint is needed to paint a statue 6 ft. high, then the
      number of pints it will take to paint (to the same thickness) 540
      statues similar to the original but only 1 ft. high, is
      (A)
      90
      (B) 72
      (C) 45
      (D) 30
      (E) 15




      The matter I can not understand:

      In the answer it is said that the number of pints is proportional to the square of height. Can anyone explain me why it is proportional to the square of height?







      algebra-precalculus geometry word-problem






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Feb 12 at 0:00









      J. W. Tanner

      4,7721420




      4,7721420










      asked Feb 2 at 3:58









      ShromiShromi

      3289




      3289






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Consider a small square area, say of side $x$, of any portion of a given figure. With a figure that is similar, this area would be stretched or compressed by a certain factor, say $s$, in both the width & height. Since the area of the original square is the product of its side lengths, $x^2$, the area of the similar square area would be $sx times sx = s^2 x^2$. Adding up all these small areas gives that the new surface area would be proportional to original surface area by the square of the scaling factor. In your particular case it would be $s = frac{1}{6}$, i.e., the new height of $1$ divided by the original height of $6$, so (as Rhys Hughes has stated in his answer) the proportional area value would be the square of it, i.e., $frac{1}{36}$.



          For example, consider an original height of $h_0$ and an area of $A_0$. Then for a new height $h$, the area would be $A = A_0left(frac{h}{h_0}right)^2 = left(frac{A_0}{h_0^2}right)h^2$. As $A_0$ and $h_0$ are known, constant values, we can let $k = frac{A_0}{h_0^2}$ be a constant, giving that



          $$A = kh^2 tag{1}label{eq1}$$



          showing that the area is proportional (with a constant of proportionality of $k$ as given) to the square of the height. Similarly, as the amount of paint is proportional to the area, we get



          $$P = kh^2 tag{21}label{eq2}$$



          where $k = frac{P_0}{h_0^2}$ and $P_0$ is the amount of paint required for the original object.



          Note the number of pints is also proportional to the square of the width, but as only the heights are provided, this alternate fact is not needed or used.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            It means that if the number of pints needed is $P$ and the height of the statue is $H$, then:



            $$P=kH^2$$ for some constant $k$. You should be able to see that $k=frac{1}{36}$ in this case.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              could you please explain why it is $H^2$
              $endgroup$
              – Shromi
              Feb 2 at 5:46










            • $begingroup$
              Because it's proportional to the square of the height, i.e. $H^2$
              $endgroup$
              – Rhys Hughes
              Feb 2 at 11:54










            • $begingroup$
              My question is why it is proportional to the $H^2$? Why not only $H$?
              $endgroup$
              – Shromi
              Feb 2 at 13:26






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Surface area (amount of paint needed) is proportional to the square of the height. Volume (if you had to fill it with water) would be proportional to the cube of the height.
              $endgroup$
              – J. W. Tanner
              Feb 11 at 23:48












            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097013%2fwhy-the-number-of-pints-is-proportional-to-the-square-of-the-height-of-a-statue%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Consider a small square area, say of side $x$, of any portion of a given figure. With a figure that is similar, this area would be stretched or compressed by a certain factor, say $s$, in both the width & height. Since the area of the original square is the product of its side lengths, $x^2$, the area of the similar square area would be $sx times sx = s^2 x^2$. Adding up all these small areas gives that the new surface area would be proportional to original surface area by the square of the scaling factor. In your particular case it would be $s = frac{1}{6}$, i.e., the new height of $1$ divided by the original height of $6$, so (as Rhys Hughes has stated in his answer) the proportional area value would be the square of it, i.e., $frac{1}{36}$.



            For example, consider an original height of $h_0$ and an area of $A_0$. Then for a new height $h$, the area would be $A = A_0left(frac{h}{h_0}right)^2 = left(frac{A_0}{h_0^2}right)h^2$. As $A_0$ and $h_0$ are known, constant values, we can let $k = frac{A_0}{h_0^2}$ be a constant, giving that



            $$A = kh^2 tag{1}label{eq1}$$



            showing that the area is proportional (with a constant of proportionality of $k$ as given) to the square of the height. Similarly, as the amount of paint is proportional to the area, we get



            $$P = kh^2 tag{21}label{eq2}$$



            where $k = frac{P_0}{h_0^2}$ and $P_0$ is the amount of paint required for the original object.



            Note the number of pints is also proportional to the square of the width, but as only the heights are provided, this alternate fact is not needed or used.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              Consider a small square area, say of side $x$, of any portion of a given figure. With a figure that is similar, this area would be stretched or compressed by a certain factor, say $s$, in both the width & height. Since the area of the original square is the product of its side lengths, $x^2$, the area of the similar square area would be $sx times sx = s^2 x^2$. Adding up all these small areas gives that the new surface area would be proportional to original surface area by the square of the scaling factor. In your particular case it would be $s = frac{1}{6}$, i.e., the new height of $1$ divided by the original height of $6$, so (as Rhys Hughes has stated in his answer) the proportional area value would be the square of it, i.e., $frac{1}{36}$.



              For example, consider an original height of $h_0$ and an area of $A_0$. Then for a new height $h$, the area would be $A = A_0left(frac{h}{h_0}right)^2 = left(frac{A_0}{h_0^2}right)h^2$. As $A_0$ and $h_0$ are known, constant values, we can let $k = frac{A_0}{h_0^2}$ be a constant, giving that



              $$A = kh^2 tag{1}label{eq1}$$



              showing that the area is proportional (with a constant of proportionality of $k$ as given) to the square of the height. Similarly, as the amount of paint is proportional to the area, we get



              $$P = kh^2 tag{21}label{eq2}$$



              where $k = frac{P_0}{h_0^2}$ and $P_0$ is the amount of paint required for the original object.



              Note the number of pints is also proportional to the square of the width, but as only the heights are provided, this alternate fact is not needed or used.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                Consider a small square area, say of side $x$, of any portion of a given figure. With a figure that is similar, this area would be stretched or compressed by a certain factor, say $s$, in both the width & height. Since the area of the original square is the product of its side lengths, $x^2$, the area of the similar square area would be $sx times sx = s^2 x^2$. Adding up all these small areas gives that the new surface area would be proportional to original surface area by the square of the scaling factor. In your particular case it would be $s = frac{1}{6}$, i.e., the new height of $1$ divided by the original height of $6$, so (as Rhys Hughes has stated in his answer) the proportional area value would be the square of it, i.e., $frac{1}{36}$.



                For example, consider an original height of $h_0$ and an area of $A_0$. Then for a new height $h$, the area would be $A = A_0left(frac{h}{h_0}right)^2 = left(frac{A_0}{h_0^2}right)h^2$. As $A_0$ and $h_0$ are known, constant values, we can let $k = frac{A_0}{h_0^2}$ be a constant, giving that



                $$A = kh^2 tag{1}label{eq1}$$



                showing that the area is proportional (with a constant of proportionality of $k$ as given) to the square of the height. Similarly, as the amount of paint is proportional to the area, we get



                $$P = kh^2 tag{21}label{eq2}$$



                where $k = frac{P_0}{h_0^2}$ and $P_0$ is the amount of paint required for the original object.



                Note the number of pints is also proportional to the square of the width, but as only the heights are provided, this alternate fact is not needed or used.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Consider a small square area, say of side $x$, of any portion of a given figure. With a figure that is similar, this area would be stretched or compressed by a certain factor, say $s$, in both the width & height. Since the area of the original square is the product of its side lengths, $x^2$, the area of the similar square area would be $sx times sx = s^2 x^2$. Adding up all these small areas gives that the new surface area would be proportional to original surface area by the square of the scaling factor. In your particular case it would be $s = frac{1}{6}$, i.e., the new height of $1$ divided by the original height of $6$, so (as Rhys Hughes has stated in his answer) the proportional area value would be the square of it, i.e., $frac{1}{36}$.



                For example, consider an original height of $h_0$ and an area of $A_0$. Then for a new height $h$, the area would be $A = A_0left(frac{h}{h_0}right)^2 = left(frac{A_0}{h_0^2}right)h^2$. As $A_0$ and $h_0$ are known, constant values, we can let $k = frac{A_0}{h_0^2}$ be a constant, giving that



                $$A = kh^2 tag{1}label{eq1}$$



                showing that the area is proportional (with a constant of proportionality of $k$ as given) to the square of the height. Similarly, as the amount of paint is proportional to the area, we get



                $$P = kh^2 tag{21}label{eq2}$$



                where $k = frac{P_0}{h_0^2}$ and $P_0$ is the amount of paint required for the original object.



                Note the number of pints is also proportional to the square of the width, but as only the heights are provided, this alternate fact is not needed or used.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Feb 2 at 6:14

























                answered Feb 2 at 4:08









                John OmielanJohn Omielan

                4,9692218




                4,9692218























                    0












                    $begingroup$

                    It means that if the number of pints needed is $P$ and the height of the statue is $H$, then:



                    $$P=kH^2$$ for some constant $k$. You should be able to see that $k=frac{1}{36}$ in this case.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$









                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      could you please explain why it is $H^2$
                      $endgroup$
                      – Shromi
                      Feb 2 at 5:46










                    • $begingroup$
                      Because it's proportional to the square of the height, i.e. $H^2$
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rhys Hughes
                      Feb 2 at 11:54










                    • $begingroup$
                      My question is why it is proportional to the $H^2$? Why not only $H$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Shromi
                      Feb 2 at 13:26






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      Surface area (amount of paint needed) is proportional to the square of the height. Volume (if you had to fill it with water) would be proportional to the cube of the height.
                      $endgroup$
                      – J. W. Tanner
                      Feb 11 at 23:48
















                    0












                    $begingroup$

                    It means that if the number of pints needed is $P$ and the height of the statue is $H$, then:



                    $$P=kH^2$$ for some constant $k$. You should be able to see that $k=frac{1}{36}$ in this case.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$









                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      could you please explain why it is $H^2$
                      $endgroup$
                      – Shromi
                      Feb 2 at 5:46










                    • $begingroup$
                      Because it's proportional to the square of the height, i.e. $H^2$
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rhys Hughes
                      Feb 2 at 11:54










                    • $begingroup$
                      My question is why it is proportional to the $H^2$? Why not only $H$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Shromi
                      Feb 2 at 13:26






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      Surface area (amount of paint needed) is proportional to the square of the height. Volume (if you had to fill it with water) would be proportional to the cube of the height.
                      $endgroup$
                      – J. W. Tanner
                      Feb 11 at 23:48














                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    It means that if the number of pints needed is $P$ and the height of the statue is $H$, then:



                    $$P=kH^2$$ for some constant $k$. You should be able to see that $k=frac{1}{36}$ in this case.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    It means that if the number of pints needed is $P$ and the height of the statue is $H$, then:



                    $$P=kH^2$$ for some constant $k$. You should be able to see that $k=frac{1}{36}$ in this case.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Feb 2 at 4:08









                    Rhys HughesRhys Hughes

                    7,0501630




                    7,0501630








                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      could you please explain why it is $H^2$
                      $endgroup$
                      – Shromi
                      Feb 2 at 5:46










                    • $begingroup$
                      Because it's proportional to the square of the height, i.e. $H^2$
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rhys Hughes
                      Feb 2 at 11:54










                    • $begingroup$
                      My question is why it is proportional to the $H^2$? Why not only $H$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Shromi
                      Feb 2 at 13:26






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      Surface area (amount of paint needed) is proportional to the square of the height. Volume (if you had to fill it with water) would be proportional to the cube of the height.
                      $endgroup$
                      – J. W. Tanner
                      Feb 11 at 23:48














                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      could you please explain why it is $H^2$
                      $endgroup$
                      – Shromi
                      Feb 2 at 5:46










                    • $begingroup$
                      Because it's proportional to the square of the height, i.e. $H^2$
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rhys Hughes
                      Feb 2 at 11:54










                    • $begingroup$
                      My question is why it is proportional to the $H^2$? Why not only $H$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Shromi
                      Feb 2 at 13:26






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      Surface area (amount of paint needed) is proportional to the square of the height. Volume (if you had to fill it with water) would be proportional to the cube of the height.
                      $endgroup$
                      – J. W. Tanner
                      Feb 11 at 23:48








                    1




                    1




                    $begingroup$
                    could you please explain why it is $H^2$
                    $endgroup$
                    – Shromi
                    Feb 2 at 5:46




                    $begingroup$
                    could you please explain why it is $H^2$
                    $endgroup$
                    – Shromi
                    Feb 2 at 5:46












                    $begingroup$
                    Because it's proportional to the square of the height, i.e. $H^2$
                    $endgroup$
                    – Rhys Hughes
                    Feb 2 at 11:54




                    $begingroup$
                    Because it's proportional to the square of the height, i.e. $H^2$
                    $endgroup$
                    – Rhys Hughes
                    Feb 2 at 11:54












                    $begingroup$
                    My question is why it is proportional to the $H^2$? Why not only $H$?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Shromi
                    Feb 2 at 13:26




                    $begingroup$
                    My question is why it is proportional to the $H^2$? Why not only $H$?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Shromi
                    Feb 2 at 13:26




                    1




                    1




                    $begingroup$
                    Surface area (amount of paint needed) is proportional to the square of the height. Volume (if you had to fill it with water) would be proportional to the cube of the height.
                    $endgroup$
                    – J. W. Tanner
                    Feb 11 at 23:48




                    $begingroup$
                    Surface area (amount of paint needed) is proportional to the square of the height. Volume (if you had to fill it with water) would be proportional to the cube of the height.
                    $endgroup$
                    – J. W. Tanner
                    Feb 11 at 23:48


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097013%2fwhy-the-number-of-pints-is-proportional-to-the-square-of-the-height-of-a-statue%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

                    Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

                    A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$