Making a larger sum
I have the following code, and the sum sign isn't tall enough, the fraction sticks out from the top and bottom, how do I correct this?
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$$sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!}$$
end{document}
Thanks in advance.
math-mode
|
show 1 more comment
I have the following code, and the sum sign isn't tall enough, the fraction sticks out from the top and bottom, how do I correct this?
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$$sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!}$$
end{document}
Thanks in advance.
math-mode
1
Try using[ displaystylesum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
.
– Levy
Feb 1 at 15:59
1
Don't use$$...$$
for equations. tex.stackexchange.com/q/503
– user36296
Feb 1 at 16:00
5
That's how the summation sign is expected to be. Don't worry.
– egreg
Feb 1 at 16:08
2
@Levy Isn't[ ]
already display style?
– Teepeemm
Feb 1 at 16:09
@Teepeemm yes it is! You code compiled properly here. I thought it could be of some help using that to archive what you needed.
– Levy
Feb 1 at 16:11
|
show 1 more comment
I have the following code, and the sum sign isn't tall enough, the fraction sticks out from the top and bottom, how do I correct this?
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$$sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!}$$
end{document}
Thanks in advance.
math-mode
I have the following code, and the sum sign isn't tall enough, the fraction sticks out from the top and bottom, how do I correct this?
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$$sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!}$$
end{document}
Thanks in advance.
math-mode
math-mode
asked Feb 1 at 15:57
user174579
1
Try using[ displaystylesum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
.
– Levy
Feb 1 at 15:59
1
Don't use$$...$$
for equations. tex.stackexchange.com/q/503
– user36296
Feb 1 at 16:00
5
That's how the summation sign is expected to be. Don't worry.
– egreg
Feb 1 at 16:08
2
@Levy Isn't[ ]
already display style?
– Teepeemm
Feb 1 at 16:09
@Teepeemm yes it is! You code compiled properly here. I thought it could be of some help using that to archive what you needed.
– Levy
Feb 1 at 16:11
|
show 1 more comment
1
Try using[ displaystylesum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
.
– Levy
Feb 1 at 15:59
1
Don't use$$...$$
for equations. tex.stackexchange.com/q/503
– user36296
Feb 1 at 16:00
5
That's how the summation sign is expected to be. Don't worry.
– egreg
Feb 1 at 16:08
2
@Levy Isn't[ ]
already display style?
– Teepeemm
Feb 1 at 16:09
@Teepeemm yes it is! You code compiled properly here. I thought it could be of some help using that to archive what you needed.
– Levy
Feb 1 at 16:11
1
1
Try using
[ displaystylesum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
.– Levy
Feb 1 at 15:59
Try using
[ displaystylesum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
.– Levy
Feb 1 at 15:59
1
1
Don't use
$$...$$
for equations. tex.stackexchange.com/q/503– user36296
Feb 1 at 16:00
Don't use
$$...$$
for equations. tex.stackexchange.com/q/503– user36296
Feb 1 at 16:00
5
5
That's how the summation sign is expected to be. Don't worry.
– egreg
Feb 1 at 16:08
That's how the summation sign is expected to be. Don't worry.
– egreg
Feb 1 at 16:08
2
2
@Levy Isn't
[ ]
already display style?– Teepeemm
Feb 1 at 16:09
@Levy Isn't
[ ]
already display style?– Teepeemm
Feb 1 at 16:09
@Teepeemm yes it is! You code compiled properly here. I thought it could be of some help using that to archive what you needed.
– Levy
Feb 1 at 16:11
@Teepeemm yes it is! You code compiled properly here. I thought it could be of some help using that to archive what you needed.
– Levy
Feb 1 at 16:11
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You may try with the relsize
package:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{relsize}
begin{document}
[ sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
[ mathlarger{sum}_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
end{document}
add a comment |
Various packages let you draw larger-than-normal sum
(and prod
and int
and ...) symbols. Here are the choices offered by the mtpro2
math font package. The red one is produced by sum
in display-style math mode. (Aside: The full mtpro2
package is not free of charge; however, it's lite
subset -- which is all that's needed to create the following screenshot -- is indeed free. It can be downloaded from this site.
That said, it would be extremely unusual, to put it mildly, to ever require anything larger than xlsum
. Speaking for myself, the symbols drawn by XLsum
, XXLsum
, and XXXLsum
are beyond any conceivable (but still legitimate) typographic need.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xcolor}
usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}
begin{document}
$vcenter{hbox{$Sigma$}} % just for reference
sum % appearance in text-style (inline) math mode
displaystyle textcolor{red}{sum} % appearance in display-style math mode
xlsum
XLsum XXLsum XXXLsum$
end{document}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472904%2fmaking-a-larger-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You may try with the relsize
package:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{relsize}
begin{document}
[ sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
[ mathlarger{sum}_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
end{document}
add a comment |
You may try with the relsize
package:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{relsize}
begin{document}
[ sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
[ mathlarger{sum}_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
end{document}
add a comment |
You may try with the relsize
package:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{relsize}
begin{document}
[ sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
[ mathlarger{sum}_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
end{document}
You may try with the relsize
package:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{relsize}
begin{document}
[ sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
[ mathlarger{sum}_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
end{document}
answered Feb 1 at 16:18
BernardBernard
176k778210
176k778210
add a comment |
add a comment |
Various packages let you draw larger-than-normal sum
(and prod
and int
and ...) symbols. Here are the choices offered by the mtpro2
math font package. The red one is produced by sum
in display-style math mode. (Aside: The full mtpro2
package is not free of charge; however, it's lite
subset -- which is all that's needed to create the following screenshot -- is indeed free. It can be downloaded from this site.
That said, it would be extremely unusual, to put it mildly, to ever require anything larger than xlsum
. Speaking for myself, the symbols drawn by XLsum
, XXLsum
, and XXXLsum
are beyond any conceivable (but still legitimate) typographic need.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xcolor}
usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}
begin{document}
$vcenter{hbox{$Sigma$}} % just for reference
sum % appearance in text-style (inline) math mode
displaystyle textcolor{red}{sum} % appearance in display-style math mode
xlsum
XLsum XXLsum XXXLsum$
end{document}
add a comment |
Various packages let you draw larger-than-normal sum
(and prod
and int
and ...) symbols. Here are the choices offered by the mtpro2
math font package. The red one is produced by sum
in display-style math mode. (Aside: The full mtpro2
package is not free of charge; however, it's lite
subset -- which is all that's needed to create the following screenshot -- is indeed free. It can be downloaded from this site.
That said, it would be extremely unusual, to put it mildly, to ever require anything larger than xlsum
. Speaking for myself, the symbols drawn by XLsum
, XXLsum
, and XXXLsum
are beyond any conceivable (but still legitimate) typographic need.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xcolor}
usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}
begin{document}
$vcenter{hbox{$Sigma$}} % just for reference
sum % appearance in text-style (inline) math mode
displaystyle textcolor{red}{sum} % appearance in display-style math mode
xlsum
XLsum XXLsum XXXLsum$
end{document}
add a comment |
Various packages let you draw larger-than-normal sum
(and prod
and int
and ...) symbols. Here are the choices offered by the mtpro2
math font package. The red one is produced by sum
in display-style math mode. (Aside: The full mtpro2
package is not free of charge; however, it's lite
subset -- which is all that's needed to create the following screenshot -- is indeed free. It can be downloaded from this site.
That said, it would be extremely unusual, to put it mildly, to ever require anything larger than xlsum
. Speaking for myself, the symbols drawn by XLsum
, XXLsum
, and XXXLsum
are beyond any conceivable (but still legitimate) typographic need.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xcolor}
usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}
begin{document}
$vcenter{hbox{$Sigma$}} % just for reference
sum % appearance in text-style (inline) math mode
displaystyle textcolor{red}{sum} % appearance in display-style math mode
xlsum
XLsum XXLsum XXXLsum$
end{document}
Various packages let you draw larger-than-normal sum
(and prod
and int
and ...) symbols. Here are the choices offered by the mtpro2
math font package. The red one is produced by sum
in display-style math mode. (Aside: The full mtpro2
package is not free of charge; however, it's lite
subset -- which is all that's needed to create the following screenshot -- is indeed free. It can be downloaded from this site.
That said, it would be extremely unusual, to put it mildly, to ever require anything larger than xlsum
. Speaking for myself, the symbols drawn by XLsum
, XXLsum
, and XXXLsum
are beyond any conceivable (but still legitimate) typographic need.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xcolor}
usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}
begin{document}
$vcenter{hbox{$Sigma$}} % just for reference
sum % appearance in text-style (inline) math mode
displaystyle textcolor{red}{sum} % appearance in display-style math mode
xlsum
XLsum XXLsum XXXLsum$
end{document}
edited Feb 1 at 20:38
answered Feb 1 at 20:32


MicoMico
286k32391779
286k32391779
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472904%2fmaking-a-larger-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Try using
[ displaystylesum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
.– Levy
Feb 1 at 15:59
1
Don't use
$$...$$
for equations. tex.stackexchange.com/q/503– user36296
Feb 1 at 16:00
5
That's how the summation sign is expected to be. Don't worry.
– egreg
Feb 1 at 16:08
2
@Levy Isn't
[ ]
already display style?– Teepeemm
Feb 1 at 16:09
@Teepeemm yes it is! You code compiled properly here. I thought it could be of some help using that to archive what you needed.
– Levy
Feb 1 at 16:11