Making a larger sum












3















I have the following code, and the sum sign isn't tall enough, the fraction sticks out from the top and bottom, how do I correct this?



documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$$sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!}$$
end{document}


Thanks in advance.










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    Try using [ displaystylesum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ].

    – Levy
    Feb 1 at 15:59






  • 1





    Don't use $$...$$ for equations. tex.stackexchange.com/q/503

    – user36296
    Feb 1 at 16:00








  • 5





    That's how the summation sign is expected to be. Don't worry.

    – egreg
    Feb 1 at 16:08






  • 2





    @Levy Isn't [ ] already display style?

    – Teepeemm
    Feb 1 at 16:09











  • @Teepeemm yes it is! You code compiled properly here. I thought it could be of some help using that to archive what you needed.

    – Levy
    Feb 1 at 16:11


















3















I have the following code, and the sum sign isn't tall enough, the fraction sticks out from the top and bottom, how do I correct this?



documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$$sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!}$$
end{document}


Thanks in advance.










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    Try using [ displaystylesum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ].

    – Levy
    Feb 1 at 15:59






  • 1





    Don't use $$...$$ for equations. tex.stackexchange.com/q/503

    – user36296
    Feb 1 at 16:00








  • 5





    That's how the summation sign is expected to be. Don't worry.

    – egreg
    Feb 1 at 16:08






  • 2





    @Levy Isn't [ ] already display style?

    – Teepeemm
    Feb 1 at 16:09











  • @Teepeemm yes it is! You code compiled properly here. I thought it could be of some help using that to archive what you needed.

    – Levy
    Feb 1 at 16:11
















3












3








3








I have the following code, and the sum sign isn't tall enough, the fraction sticks out from the top and bottom, how do I correct this?



documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$$sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!}$$
end{document}


Thanks in advance.










share|improve this question














I have the following code, and the sum sign isn't tall enough, the fraction sticks out from the top and bottom, how do I correct this?



documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$$sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!}$$
end{document}


Thanks in advance.







math-mode






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Feb 1 at 15:57







user174579















  • 1





    Try using [ displaystylesum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ].

    – Levy
    Feb 1 at 15:59






  • 1





    Don't use $$...$$ for equations. tex.stackexchange.com/q/503

    – user36296
    Feb 1 at 16:00








  • 5





    That's how the summation sign is expected to be. Don't worry.

    – egreg
    Feb 1 at 16:08






  • 2





    @Levy Isn't [ ] already display style?

    – Teepeemm
    Feb 1 at 16:09











  • @Teepeemm yes it is! You code compiled properly here. I thought it could be of some help using that to archive what you needed.

    – Levy
    Feb 1 at 16:11
















  • 1





    Try using [ displaystylesum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ].

    – Levy
    Feb 1 at 15:59






  • 1





    Don't use $$...$$ for equations. tex.stackexchange.com/q/503

    – user36296
    Feb 1 at 16:00








  • 5





    That's how the summation sign is expected to be. Don't worry.

    – egreg
    Feb 1 at 16:08






  • 2





    @Levy Isn't [ ] already display style?

    – Teepeemm
    Feb 1 at 16:09











  • @Teepeemm yes it is! You code compiled properly here. I thought it could be of some help using that to archive what you needed.

    – Levy
    Feb 1 at 16:11










1




1





Try using [ displaystylesum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ].

– Levy
Feb 1 at 15:59





Try using [ displaystylesum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ].

– Levy
Feb 1 at 15:59




1




1





Don't use $$...$$ for equations. tex.stackexchange.com/q/503

– user36296
Feb 1 at 16:00







Don't use $$...$$ for equations. tex.stackexchange.com/q/503

– user36296
Feb 1 at 16:00






5




5





That's how the summation sign is expected to be. Don't worry.

– egreg
Feb 1 at 16:08





That's how the summation sign is expected to be. Don't worry.

– egreg
Feb 1 at 16:08




2




2





@Levy Isn't [ ] already display style?

– Teepeemm
Feb 1 at 16:09





@Levy Isn't [ ] already display style?

– Teepeemm
Feb 1 at 16:09













@Teepeemm yes it is! You code compiled properly here. I thought it could be of some help using that to archive what you needed.

– Levy
Feb 1 at 16:11







@Teepeemm yes it is! You code compiled properly here. I thought it could be of some help using that to archive what you needed.

– Levy
Feb 1 at 16:11












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6














You may try with the relsize package:



documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{relsize}

begin{document}

[ sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
[ mathlarger{sum}_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer































    4














    Various packages let you draw larger-than-normal sum (and prod and int and ...) symbols. Here are the choices offered by the mtpro2 math font package. The red one is produced by sum in display-style math mode. (Aside: The full mtpro2 package is not free of charge; however, it's lite subset -- which is all that's needed to create the following screenshot -- is indeed free. It can be downloaded from this site.



    enter image description here



    That said, it would be extremely unusual, to put it mildly, to ever require anything larger than xlsum. Speaking for myself, the symbols drawn by XLsum, XXLsum, and XXXLsum are beyond any conceivable (but still legitimate) typographic need.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{xcolor}
    usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}
    begin{document}
    $vcenter{hbox{$Sigma$}} % just for reference
    sum % appearance in text-style (inline) math mode
    displaystyle textcolor{red}{sum} % appearance in display-style math mode
    xlsum
    XLsum XXLsum XXXLsum$
    end{document}





    share|improve this answer


























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "85"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472904%2fmaking-a-larger-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown
























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      6














      You may try with the relsize package:



      documentclass[12pt]{article}
      usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
      usepackage{amsmath}
      usepackage{relsize}

      begin{document}

      [ sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
      [ mathlarger{sum}_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]

      end{document}


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer




























        6














        You may try with the relsize package:



        documentclass[12pt]{article}
        usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
        usepackage{amsmath}
        usepackage{relsize}

        begin{document}

        [ sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
        [ mathlarger{sum}_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]

        end{document}


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer


























          6












          6








          6







          You may try with the relsize package:



          documentclass[12pt]{article}
          usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{relsize}

          begin{document}

          [ sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
          [ mathlarger{sum}_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]

          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer













          You may try with the relsize package:



          documentclass[12pt]{article}
          usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{relsize}

          begin{document}

          [ sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]
          [ mathlarger{sum}_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{1}{k!} ]

          end{document}


          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Feb 1 at 16:18









          BernardBernard

          176k778210




          176k778210























              4














              Various packages let you draw larger-than-normal sum (and prod and int and ...) symbols. Here are the choices offered by the mtpro2 math font package. The red one is produced by sum in display-style math mode. (Aside: The full mtpro2 package is not free of charge; however, it's lite subset -- which is all that's needed to create the following screenshot -- is indeed free. It can be downloaded from this site.



              enter image description here



              That said, it would be extremely unusual, to put it mildly, to ever require anything larger than xlsum. Speaking for myself, the symbols drawn by XLsum, XXLsum, and XXXLsum are beyond any conceivable (but still legitimate) typographic need.



              documentclass{article}
              usepackage{xcolor}
              usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}
              begin{document}
              $vcenter{hbox{$Sigma$}} % just for reference
              sum % appearance in text-style (inline) math mode
              displaystyle textcolor{red}{sum} % appearance in display-style math mode
              xlsum
              XLsum XXLsum XXXLsum$
              end{document}





              share|improve this answer






























                4














                Various packages let you draw larger-than-normal sum (and prod and int and ...) symbols. Here are the choices offered by the mtpro2 math font package. The red one is produced by sum in display-style math mode. (Aside: The full mtpro2 package is not free of charge; however, it's lite subset -- which is all that's needed to create the following screenshot -- is indeed free. It can be downloaded from this site.



                enter image description here



                That said, it would be extremely unusual, to put it mildly, to ever require anything larger than xlsum. Speaking for myself, the symbols drawn by XLsum, XXLsum, and XXXLsum are beyond any conceivable (but still legitimate) typographic need.



                documentclass{article}
                usepackage{xcolor}
                usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}
                begin{document}
                $vcenter{hbox{$Sigma$}} % just for reference
                sum % appearance in text-style (inline) math mode
                displaystyle textcolor{red}{sum} % appearance in display-style math mode
                xlsum
                XLsum XXLsum XXXLsum$
                end{document}





                share|improve this answer




























                  4












                  4








                  4







                  Various packages let you draw larger-than-normal sum (and prod and int and ...) symbols. Here are the choices offered by the mtpro2 math font package. The red one is produced by sum in display-style math mode. (Aside: The full mtpro2 package is not free of charge; however, it's lite subset -- which is all that's needed to create the following screenshot -- is indeed free. It can be downloaded from this site.



                  enter image description here



                  That said, it would be extremely unusual, to put it mildly, to ever require anything larger than xlsum. Speaking for myself, the symbols drawn by XLsum, XXLsum, and XXXLsum are beyond any conceivable (but still legitimate) typographic need.



                  documentclass{article}
                  usepackage{xcolor}
                  usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}
                  begin{document}
                  $vcenter{hbox{$Sigma$}} % just for reference
                  sum % appearance in text-style (inline) math mode
                  displaystyle textcolor{red}{sum} % appearance in display-style math mode
                  xlsum
                  XLsum XXLsum XXXLsum$
                  end{document}





                  share|improve this answer















                  Various packages let you draw larger-than-normal sum (and prod and int and ...) symbols. Here are the choices offered by the mtpro2 math font package. The red one is produced by sum in display-style math mode. (Aside: The full mtpro2 package is not free of charge; however, it's lite subset -- which is all that's needed to create the following screenshot -- is indeed free. It can be downloaded from this site.



                  enter image description here



                  That said, it would be extremely unusual, to put it mildly, to ever require anything larger than xlsum. Speaking for myself, the symbols drawn by XLsum, XXLsum, and XXXLsum are beyond any conceivable (but still legitimate) typographic need.



                  documentclass{article}
                  usepackage{xcolor}
                  usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}
                  begin{document}
                  $vcenter{hbox{$Sigma$}} % just for reference
                  sum % appearance in text-style (inline) math mode
                  displaystyle textcolor{red}{sum} % appearance in display-style math mode
                  xlsum
                  XLsum XXLsum XXXLsum$
                  end{document}






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Feb 1 at 20:38

























                  answered Feb 1 at 20:32









                  MicoMico

                  286k32391779




                  286k32391779






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472904%2fmaking-a-larger-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                      How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                      in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith