the truth of $bigcap_n L^1(mu_n)=L^1(mu)$ where the measures $mu_n$ converge to $mu$












2












$begingroup$


Let $mu_n$ be a sequence of positive measures on a measurable space $(X,M)$ converging to a measure $mu$,i.e. $lim_{nrightarrow infty} mu_n(A)=mu(A)$ for any measurable set $A$. I want to check if $L^1(mu)=bigcap_n L^1(mu_n)$.



1) First suppose that $mu_n$ is an increasing sequence of measures. I think in this case the relation above does not hold. Here is my counterexample. Let $mu_n:= ngamma$ where $gamma$ is the counting measure on $mathbb R$. Let $phi:= chi_{{0}}$. Then $int phi dmu_n=mu_n({0})=n$ for all $n$ so that $phiin bigcap_n (L^1(mu_n))$, but $int phi dmu=infty$ so that $phinotin L^1(mu)$. Is this correct? Is there any better counterexample?



2) Now suppose that $mu_n$ is decreasing. I think for this case as well the relation above is wrong. Again take $u_n$ as in the case above. We have $0=int dmu_n$ for each $n$ but $infty= int dmu$. Hence $chi_{mathbb R}$ is a counterexample. Is this correct? What about any better counterexample?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @kimchilover they converge pointwise.
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 22:40










  • $begingroup$
    @kimchilover yes exactly. I should have written it out
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 22:42










  • $begingroup$
    I edited my question. Thanks for your reminding me @kimchilover
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 22:46










  • $begingroup$
    In (1), what is $mu$, and why do you think $mu_n$ converges to it, given your calculation that $mu_n({0})=n$?
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    Feb 1 at 22:49










  • $begingroup$
    @kimchilover In (1) the measure $mu$ takes $0$ on the null set and takes $infty$ otherwise
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 23:01


















2












$begingroup$


Let $mu_n$ be a sequence of positive measures on a measurable space $(X,M)$ converging to a measure $mu$,i.e. $lim_{nrightarrow infty} mu_n(A)=mu(A)$ for any measurable set $A$. I want to check if $L^1(mu)=bigcap_n L^1(mu_n)$.



1) First suppose that $mu_n$ is an increasing sequence of measures. I think in this case the relation above does not hold. Here is my counterexample. Let $mu_n:= ngamma$ where $gamma$ is the counting measure on $mathbb R$. Let $phi:= chi_{{0}}$. Then $int phi dmu_n=mu_n({0})=n$ for all $n$ so that $phiin bigcap_n (L^1(mu_n))$, but $int phi dmu=infty$ so that $phinotin L^1(mu)$. Is this correct? Is there any better counterexample?



2) Now suppose that $mu_n$ is decreasing. I think for this case as well the relation above is wrong. Again take $u_n$ as in the case above. We have $0=int dmu_n$ for each $n$ but $infty= int dmu$. Hence $chi_{mathbb R}$ is a counterexample. Is this correct? What about any better counterexample?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @kimchilover they converge pointwise.
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 22:40










  • $begingroup$
    @kimchilover yes exactly. I should have written it out
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 22:42










  • $begingroup$
    I edited my question. Thanks for your reminding me @kimchilover
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 22:46










  • $begingroup$
    In (1), what is $mu$, and why do you think $mu_n$ converges to it, given your calculation that $mu_n({0})=n$?
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    Feb 1 at 22:49










  • $begingroup$
    @kimchilover In (1) the measure $mu$ takes $0$ on the null set and takes $infty$ otherwise
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 23:01
















2












2








2





$begingroup$


Let $mu_n$ be a sequence of positive measures on a measurable space $(X,M)$ converging to a measure $mu$,i.e. $lim_{nrightarrow infty} mu_n(A)=mu(A)$ for any measurable set $A$. I want to check if $L^1(mu)=bigcap_n L^1(mu_n)$.



1) First suppose that $mu_n$ is an increasing sequence of measures. I think in this case the relation above does not hold. Here is my counterexample. Let $mu_n:= ngamma$ where $gamma$ is the counting measure on $mathbb R$. Let $phi:= chi_{{0}}$. Then $int phi dmu_n=mu_n({0})=n$ for all $n$ so that $phiin bigcap_n (L^1(mu_n))$, but $int phi dmu=infty$ so that $phinotin L^1(mu)$. Is this correct? Is there any better counterexample?



2) Now suppose that $mu_n$ is decreasing. I think for this case as well the relation above is wrong. Again take $u_n$ as in the case above. We have $0=int dmu_n$ for each $n$ but $infty= int dmu$. Hence $chi_{mathbb R}$ is a counterexample. Is this correct? What about any better counterexample?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $mu_n$ be a sequence of positive measures on a measurable space $(X,M)$ converging to a measure $mu$,i.e. $lim_{nrightarrow infty} mu_n(A)=mu(A)$ for any measurable set $A$. I want to check if $L^1(mu)=bigcap_n L^1(mu_n)$.



1) First suppose that $mu_n$ is an increasing sequence of measures. I think in this case the relation above does not hold. Here is my counterexample. Let $mu_n:= ngamma$ where $gamma$ is the counting measure on $mathbb R$. Let $phi:= chi_{{0}}$. Then $int phi dmu_n=mu_n({0})=n$ for all $n$ so that $phiin bigcap_n (L^1(mu_n))$, but $int phi dmu=infty$ so that $phinotin L^1(mu)$. Is this correct? Is there any better counterexample?



2) Now suppose that $mu_n$ is decreasing. I think for this case as well the relation above is wrong. Again take $u_n$ as in the case above. We have $0=int dmu_n$ for each $n$ but $infty= int dmu$. Hence $chi_{mathbb R}$ is a counterexample. Is this correct? What about any better counterexample?







real-analysis measure-theory proof-verification






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 1 at 22:45







User12239

















asked Feb 1 at 22:25









User12239User12239

364216




364216












  • $begingroup$
    @kimchilover they converge pointwise.
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 22:40










  • $begingroup$
    @kimchilover yes exactly. I should have written it out
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 22:42










  • $begingroup$
    I edited my question. Thanks for your reminding me @kimchilover
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 22:46










  • $begingroup$
    In (1), what is $mu$, and why do you think $mu_n$ converges to it, given your calculation that $mu_n({0})=n$?
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    Feb 1 at 22:49










  • $begingroup$
    @kimchilover In (1) the measure $mu$ takes $0$ on the null set and takes $infty$ otherwise
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 23:01




















  • $begingroup$
    @kimchilover they converge pointwise.
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 22:40










  • $begingroup$
    @kimchilover yes exactly. I should have written it out
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 22:42










  • $begingroup$
    I edited my question. Thanks for your reminding me @kimchilover
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 22:46










  • $begingroup$
    In (1), what is $mu$, and why do you think $mu_n$ converges to it, given your calculation that $mu_n({0})=n$?
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    Feb 1 at 22:49










  • $begingroup$
    @kimchilover In (1) the measure $mu$ takes $0$ on the null set and takes $infty$ otherwise
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 23:01


















$begingroup$
@kimchilover they converge pointwise.
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:40




$begingroup$
@kimchilover they converge pointwise.
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:40












$begingroup$
@kimchilover yes exactly. I should have written it out
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:42




$begingroup$
@kimchilover yes exactly. I should have written it out
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:42












$begingroup$
I edited my question. Thanks for your reminding me @kimchilover
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:46




$begingroup$
I edited my question. Thanks for your reminding me @kimchilover
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:46












$begingroup$
In (1), what is $mu$, and why do you think $mu_n$ converges to it, given your calculation that $mu_n({0})=n$?
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 1 at 22:49




$begingroup$
In (1), what is $mu$, and why do you think $mu_n$ converges to it, given your calculation that $mu_n({0})=n$?
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 1 at 22:49












$begingroup$
@kimchilover In (1) the measure $mu$ takes $0$ on the null set and takes $infty$ otherwise
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 23:01






$begingroup$
@kimchilover In (1) the measure $mu$ takes $0$ on the null set and takes $infty$ otherwise
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 23:01












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

The answer is clearly no in general.



To see this, pick an arbitrary measure $nu$ such that $L^1(nu) subsetneq L^1(mu)$. Now replace $mu_1$ by $nu$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for for this general fact
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 23:30












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096802%2fthe-truth-of-bigcap-n-l1-mu-n-l1-mu-where-the-measures-mu-n-converge%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

The answer is clearly no in general.



To see this, pick an arbitrary measure $nu$ such that $L^1(nu) subsetneq L^1(mu)$. Now replace $mu_1$ by $nu$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for for this general fact
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 23:30
















3












$begingroup$

The answer is clearly no in general.



To see this, pick an arbitrary measure $nu$ such that $L^1(nu) subsetneq L^1(mu)$. Now replace $mu_1$ by $nu$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for for this general fact
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 23:30














3












3








3





$begingroup$

The answer is clearly no in general.



To see this, pick an arbitrary measure $nu$ such that $L^1(nu) subsetneq L^1(mu)$. Now replace $mu_1$ by $nu$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The answer is clearly no in general.



To see this, pick an arbitrary measure $nu$ such that $L^1(nu) subsetneq L^1(mu)$. Now replace $mu_1$ by $nu$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Feb 1 at 22:52









N. S.N. S.

105k7115210




105k7115210












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for for this general fact
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 23:30


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for for this general fact
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Feb 1 at 23:30
















$begingroup$
Thank you for for this general fact
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 23:30




$begingroup$
Thank you for for this general fact
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 23:30


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096802%2fthe-truth-of-bigcap-n-l1-mu-n-l1-mu-where-the-measures-mu-n-converge%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith