the truth of $bigcap_n L^1(mu_n)=L^1(mu)$ where the measures $mu_n$ converge to $mu$
$begingroup$
Let $mu_n$ be a sequence of positive measures on a measurable space $(X,M)$ converging to a measure $mu$,i.e. $lim_{nrightarrow infty} mu_n(A)=mu(A)$ for any measurable set $A$. I want to check if $L^1(mu)=bigcap_n L^1(mu_n)$.
1) First suppose that $mu_n$ is an increasing sequence of measures. I think in this case the relation above does not hold. Here is my counterexample. Let $mu_n:= ngamma$ where $gamma$ is the counting measure on $mathbb R$. Let $phi:= chi_{{0}}$. Then $int phi dmu_n=mu_n({0})=n$ for all $n$ so that $phiin bigcap_n (L^1(mu_n))$, but $int phi dmu=infty$ so that $phinotin L^1(mu)$. Is this correct? Is there any better counterexample?
2) Now suppose that $mu_n$ is decreasing. I think for this case as well the relation above is wrong. Again take $u_n$ as in the case above. We have $0=int dmu_n$ for each $n$ but $infty= int dmu$. Hence $chi_{mathbb R}$ is a counterexample. Is this correct? What about any better counterexample?
real-analysis measure-theory proof-verification
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Let $mu_n$ be a sequence of positive measures on a measurable space $(X,M)$ converging to a measure $mu$,i.e. $lim_{nrightarrow infty} mu_n(A)=mu(A)$ for any measurable set $A$. I want to check if $L^1(mu)=bigcap_n L^1(mu_n)$.
1) First suppose that $mu_n$ is an increasing sequence of measures. I think in this case the relation above does not hold. Here is my counterexample. Let $mu_n:= ngamma$ where $gamma$ is the counting measure on $mathbb R$. Let $phi:= chi_{{0}}$. Then $int phi dmu_n=mu_n({0})=n$ for all $n$ so that $phiin bigcap_n (L^1(mu_n))$, but $int phi dmu=infty$ so that $phinotin L^1(mu)$. Is this correct? Is there any better counterexample?
2) Now suppose that $mu_n$ is decreasing. I think for this case as well the relation above is wrong. Again take $u_n$ as in the case above. We have $0=int dmu_n$ for each $n$ but $infty= int dmu$. Hence $chi_{mathbb R}$ is a counterexample. Is this correct? What about any better counterexample?
real-analysis measure-theory proof-verification
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@kimchilover they converge pointwise.
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:40
$begingroup$
@kimchilover yes exactly. I should have written it out
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:42
$begingroup$
I edited my question. Thanks for your reminding me @kimchilover
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:46
$begingroup$
In (1), what is $mu$, and why do you think $mu_n$ converges to it, given your calculation that $mu_n({0})=n$?
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 1 at 22:49
$begingroup$
@kimchilover In (1) the measure $mu$ takes $0$ on the null set and takes $infty$ otherwise
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 23:01
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Let $mu_n$ be a sequence of positive measures on a measurable space $(X,M)$ converging to a measure $mu$,i.e. $lim_{nrightarrow infty} mu_n(A)=mu(A)$ for any measurable set $A$. I want to check if $L^1(mu)=bigcap_n L^1(mu_n)$.
1) First suppose that $mu_n$ is an increasing sequence of measures. I think in this case the relation above does not hold. Here is my counterexample. Let $mu_n:= ngamma$ where $gamma$ is the counting measure on $mathbb R$. Let $phi:= chi_{{0}}$. Then $int phi dmu_n=mu_n({0})=n$ for all $n$ so that $phiin bigcap_n (L^1(mu_n))$, but $int phi dmu=infty$ so that $phinotin L^1(mu)$. Is this correct? Is there any better counterexample?
2) Now suppose that $mu_n$ is decreasing. I think for this case as well the relation above is wrong. Again take $u_n$ as in the case above. We have $0=int dmu_n$ for each $n$ but $infty= int dmu$. Hence $chi_{mathbb R}$ is a counterexample. Is this correct? What about any better counterexample?
real-analysis measure-theory proof-verification
$endgroup$
Let $mu_n$ be a sequence of positive measures on a measurable space $(X,M)$ converging to a measure $mu$,i.e. $lim_{nrightarrow infty} mu_n(A)=mu(A)$ for any measurable set $A$. I want to check if $L^1(mu)=bigcap_n L^1(mu_n)$.
1) First suppose that $mu_n$ is an increasing sequence of measures. I think in this case the relation above does not hold. Here is my counterexample. Let $mu_n:= ngamma$ where $gamma$ is the counting measure on $mathbb R$. Let $phi:= chi_{{0}}$. Then $int phi dmu_n=mu_n({0})=n$ for all $n$ so that $phiin bigcap_n (L^1(mu_n))$, but $int phi dmu=infty$ so that $phinotin L^1(mu)$. Is this correct? Is there any better counterexample?
2) Now suppose that $mu_n$ is decreasing. I think for this case as well the relation above is wrong. Again take $u_n$ as in the case above. We have $0=int dmu_n$ for each $n$ but $infty= int dmu$. Hence $chi_{mathbb R}$ is a counterexample. Is this correct? What about any better counterexample?
real-analysis measure-theory proof-verification
real-analysis measure-theory proof-verification
edited Feb 1 at 22:45
User12239
asked Feb 1 at 22:25
User12239User12239
364216
364216
$begingroup$
@kimchilover they converge pointwise.
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:40
$begingroup$
@kimchilover yes exactly. I should have written it out
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:42
$begingroup$
I edited my question. Thanks for your reminding me @kimchilover
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:46
$begingroup$
In (1), what is $mu$, and why do you think $mu_n$ converges to it, given your calculation that $mu_n({0})=n$?
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 1 at 22:49
$begingroup$
@kimchilover In (1) the measure $mu$ takes $0$ on the null set and takes $infty$ otherwise
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 23:01
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
@kimchilover they converge pointwise.
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:40
$begingroup$
@kimchilover yes exactly. I should have written it out
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:42
$begingroup$
I edited my question. Thanks for your reminding me @kimchilover
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:46
$begingroup$
In (1), what is $mu$, and why do you think $mu_n$ converges to it, given your calculation that $mu_n({0})=n$?
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 1 at 22:49
$begingroup$
@kimchilover In (1) the measure $mu$ takes $0$ on the null set and takes $infty$ otherwise
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 23:01
$begingroup$
@kimchilover they converge pointwise.
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:40
$begingroup$
@kimchilover they converge pointwise.
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:40
$begingroup$
@kimchilover yes exactly. I should have written it out
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:42
$begingroup$
@kimchilover yes exactly. I should have written it out
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:42
$begingroup$
I edited my question. Thanks for your reminding me @kimchilover
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:46
$begingroup$
I edited my question. Thanks for your reminding me @kimchilover
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:46
$begingroup$
In (1), what is $mu$, and why do you think $mu_n$ converges to it, given your calculation that $mu_n({0})=n$?
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 1 at 22:49
$begingroup$
In (1), what is $mu$, and why do you think $mu_n$ converges to it, given your calculation that $mu_n({0})=n$?
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 1 at 22:49
$begingroup$
@kimchilover In (1) the measure $mu$ takes $0$ on the null set and takes $infty$ otherwise
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 23:01
$begingroup$
@kimchilover In (1) the measure $mu$ takes $0$ on the null set and takes $infty$ otherwise
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 23:01
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The answer is clearly no in general.
To see this, pick an arbitrary measure $nu$ such that $L^1(nu) subsetneq L^1(mu)$. Now replace $mu_1$ by $nu$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for for this general fact
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 23:30
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096802%2fthe-truth-of-bigcap-n-l1-mu-n-l1-mu-where-the-measures-mu-n-converge%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The answer is clearly no in general.
To see this, pick an arbitrary measure $nu$ such that $L^1(nu) subsetneq L^1(mu)$. Now replace $mu_1$ by $nu$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for for this general fact
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 23:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is clearly no in general.
To see this, pick an arbitrary measure $nu$ such that $L^1(nu) subsetneq L^1(mu)$. Now replace $mu_1$ by $nu$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for for this general fact
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 23:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is clearly no in general.
To see this, pick an arbitrary measure $nu$ such that $L^1(nu) subsetneq L^1(mu)$. Now replace $mu_1$ by $nu$.
$endgroup$
The answer is clearly no in general.
To see this, pick an arbitrary measure $nu$ such that $L^1(nu) subsetneq L^1(mu)$. Now replace $mu_1$ by $nu$.
answered Feb 1 at 22:52
N. S.N. S.
105k7115210
105k7115210
$begingroup$
Thank you for for this general fact
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 23:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you for for this general fact
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 23:30
$begingroup$
Thank you for for this general fact
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 23:30
$begingroup$
Thank you for for this general fact
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 23:30
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096802%2fthe-truth-of-bigcap-n-l1-mu-n-l1-mu-where-the-measures-mu-n-converge%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
@kimchilover they converge pointwise.
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:40
$begingroup$
@kimchilover yes exactly. I should have written it out
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:42
$begingroup$
I edited my question. Thanks for your reminding me @kimchilover
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 22:46
$begingroup$
In (1), what is $mu$, and why do you think $mu_n$ converges to it, given your calculation that $mu_n({0})=n$?
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 1 at 22:49
$begingroup$
@kimchilover In (1) the measure $mu$ takes $0$ on the null set and takes $infty$ otherwise
$endgroup$
– User12239
Feb 1 at 23:01