Writing the roots of a polynomial with varying coefficients as continuous functions?
$begingroup$
Consider the monic polynomial
$$p_{zeta}(z) = z^n + a_{n-1}(zeta)z^{n-1} + dots + a_0(zeta), $$
where the $a_{i}$'s are continuous functions defined over $mathbb{C}$. As is well known, the roots of this polynomial depend 'continuously' on the $a_{i}$'s in some sense. However, I was wondering if a stronger statement holds: is it possible to pick continuous functions $f_1, dots, f_n$, at least locally, such that the roots of $p_{zeta}(z)$ are exactly $f_1(zeta), dots, f_n(zeta)$, counting multiplicities?
Edit: Note this is easily answered in the affirmative around a $zeta_0$ such that $p_{zeta_0}(z)$ has $n$ distinct roots. The real difficulty is in dealing with the case where $p_{zeta}(z)$ has repeated roots.
complex-analysis analysis algebraic-geometry polynomials roots
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the monic polynomial
$$p_{zeta}(z) = z^n + a_{n-1}(zeta)z^{n-1} + dots + a_0(zeta), $$
where the $a_{i}$'s are continuous functions defined over $mathbb{C}$. As is well known, the roots of this polynomial depend 'continuously' on the $a_{i}$'s in some sense. However, I was wondering if a stronger statement holds: is it possible to pick continuous functions $f_1, dots, f_n$, at least locally, such that the roots of $p_{zeta}(z)$ are exactly $f_1(zeta), dots, f_n(zeta)$, counting multiplicities?
Edit: Note this is easily answered in the affirmative around a $zeta_0$ such that $p_{zeta_0}(z)$ has $n$ distinct roots. The real difficulty is in dealing with the case where $p_{zeta}(z)$ has repeated roots.
complex-analysis analysis algebraic-geometry polynomials roots
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This could be related math.stackexchange.com/questions/63196/…
$endgroup$
– PhoemueX
Sep 21 '14 at 21:03
$begingroup$
Isn't this just a combination of the well-known "roots depend continously on the coefficients" and the fact that continuous functions are closed under composition?
$endgroup$
– Martin Brandenburg
Sep 21 '14 at 21:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the monic polynomial
$$p_{zeta}(z) = z^n + a_{n-1}(zeta)z^{n-1} + dots + a_0(zeta), $$
where the $a_{i}$'s are continuous functions defined over $mathbb{C}$. As is well known, the roots of this polynomial depend 'continuously' on the $a_{i}$'s in some sense. However, I was wondering if a stronger statement holds: is it possible to pick continuous functions $f_1, dots, f_n$, at least locally, such that the roots of $p_{zeta}(z)$ are exactly $f_1(zeta), dots, f_n(zeta)$, counting multiplicities?
Edit: Note this is easily answered in the affirmative around a $zeta_0$ such that $p_{zeta_0}(z)$ has $n$ distinct roots. The real difficulty is in dealing with the case where $p_{zeta}(z)$ has repeated roots.
complex-analysis analysis algebraic-geometry polynomials roots
$endgroup$
Consider the monic polynomial
$$p_{zeta}(z) = z^n + a_{n-1}(zeta)z^{n-1} + dots + a_0(zeta), $$
where the $a_{i}$'s are continuous functions defined over $mathbb{C}$. As is well known, the roots of this polynomial depend 'continuously' on the $a_{i}$'s in some sense. However, I was wondering if a stronger statement holds: is it possible to pick continuous functions $f_1, dots, f_n$, at least locally, such that the roots of $p_{zeta}(z)$ are exactly $f_1(zeta), dots, f_n(zeta)$, counting multiplicities?
Edit: Note this is easily answered in the affirmative around a $zeta_0$ such that $p_{zeta_0}(z)$ has $n$ distinct roots. The real difficulty is in dealing with the case where $p_{zeta}(z)$ has repeated roots.
complex-analysis analysis algebraic-geometry polynomials roots
complex-analysis analysis algebraic-geometry polynomials roots
edited Sep 21 '14 at 22:29
user18063
asked Sep 21 '14 at 20:14
user18063user18063
757314
757314
$begingroup$
This could be related math.stackexchange.com/questions/63196/…
$endgroup$
– PhoemueX
Sep 21 '14 at 21:03
$begingroup$
Isn't this just a combination of the well-known "roots depend continously on the coefficients" and the fact that continuous functions are closed under composition?
$endgroup$
– Martin Brandenburg
Sep 21 '14 at 21:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This could be related math.stackexchange.com/questions/63196/…
$endgroup$
– PhoemueX
Sep 21 '14 at 21:03
$begingroup$
Isn't this just a combination of the well-known "roots depend continously on the coefficients" and the fact that continuous functions are closed under composition?
$endgroup$
– Martin Brandenburg
Sep 21 '14 at 21:22
$begingroup$
This could be related math.stackexchange.com/questions/63196/…
$endgroup$
– PhoemueX
Sep 21 '14 at 21:03
$begingroup$
This could be related math.stackexchange.com/questions/63196/…
$endgroup$
– PhoemueX
Sep 21 '14 at 21:03
$begingroup$
Isn't this just a combination of the well-known "roots depend continously on the coefficients" and the fact that continuous functions are closed under composition?
$endgroup$
– Martin Brandenburg
Sep 21 '14 at 21:22
$begingroup$
Isn't this just a combination of the well-known "roots depend continously on the coefficients" and the fact that continuous functions are closed under composition?
$endgroup$
– Martin Brandenburg
Sep 21 '14 at 21:22
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, this is not possible, and the example is $z^2-zeta=0$. Even if you restrict $zeta$ on the unit circle, there are evidently no continuous functions $z_1(zeta)$ and $z_2(zeta)$ defined for all $zeta$ on the unit circle,
and giving the two roots of this equation. Even ONE continuous function $z(zeta)$
on the unit circle, that satisfies $z^2(zeta)=zeta$ evidently does not exist.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f940653%2fwriting-the-roots-of-a-polynomial-with-varying-coefficients-as-continuous-functi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, this is not possible, and the example is $z^2-zeta=0$. Even if you restrict $zeta$ on the unit circle, there are evidently no continuous functions $z_1(zeta)$ and $z_2(zeta)$ defined for all $zeta$ on the unit circle,
and giving the two roots of this equation. Even ONE continuous function $z(zeta)$
on the unit circle, that satisfies $z^2(zeta)=zeta$ evidently does not exist.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, this is not possible, and the example is $z^2-zeta=0$. Even if you restrict $zeta$ on the unit circle, there are evidently no continuous functions $z_1(zeta)$ and $z_2(zeta)$ defined for all $zeta$ on the unit circle,
and giving the two roots of this equation. Even ONE continuous function $z(zeta)$
on the unit circle, that satisfies $z^2(zeta)=zeta$ evidently does not exist.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, this is not possible, and the example is $z^2-zeta=0$. Even if you restrict $zeta$ on the unit circle, there are evidently no continuous functions $z_1(zeta)$ and $z_2(zeta)$ defined for all $zeta$ on the unit circle,
and giving the two roots of this equation. Even ONE continuous function $z(zeta)$
on the unit circle, that satisfies $z^2(zeta)=zeta$ evidently does not exist.
$endgroup$
No, this is not possible, and the example is $z^2-zeta=0$. Even if you restrict $zeta$ on the unit circle, there are evidently no continuous functions $z_1(zeta)$ and $z_2(zeta)$ defined for all $zeta$ on the unit circle,
and giving the two roots of this equation. Even ONE continuous function $z(zeta)$
on the unit circle, that satisfies $z^2(zeta)=zeta$ evidently does not exist.
edited Apr 1 '15 at 2:40
answered Mar 29 '15 at 17:29
Alexandre EremenkoAlexandre Eremenko
2,455921
2,455921
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f940653%2fwriting-the-roots-of-a-polynomial-with-varying-coefficients-as-continuous-functi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown


$begingroup$
This could be related math.stackexchange.com/questions/63196/…
$endgroup$
– PhoemueX
Sep 21 '14 at 21:03
$begingroup$
Isn't this just a combination of the well-known "roots depend continously on the coefficients" and the fact that continuous functions are closed under composition?
$endgroup$
– Martin Brandenburg
Sep 21 '14 at 21:22