How to collect code coverage for spawned sub-processes using Jest?












3














I am writing integration tests for a CLI. All the unit tests are written using Jest as out-of-the-box it produces code coverage without any configuration, but unfortunately it does not instrument sub-processes, for example executed via Node's spawn and fork commands.



I have tried to introduce nyc into the mix as suggested in this comment on a GitHub issue however it has not worked for me.



I have played with various configurations (based on the initial aforementioned suggestion and also ideas from these issues: 1, 2), however either I get no coverage statistics at all or only coverage for my unit tests, not the integration tests that spawn sub-processes.



The relevant parts of my package.json which configures nyc and Jest:



"scripts": {
"test": "cross-env NODE_ENV=test nyc --clean jest --coverage",
},
"jest": {
"verbose": true,
"testURL": "http://localhost/",
"globalSetup": "./jest.setup.js",
"transform": {
"^.+\.js$": "babel-jest"
},
"collectCoverage": false
},
"nyc": {
"include": [
"packages/*/src/**/*.js"
],
"reporter": [
"html"
]
},


I am using execa to run the sub-processes and do so as follows:



await execa("nyc --reporter none node", args);









share|improve this question





























    3














    I am writing integration tests for a CLI. All the unit tests are written using Jest as out-of-the-box it produces code coverage without any configuration, but unfortunately it does not instrument sub-processes, for example executed via Node's spawn and fork commands.



    I have tried to introduce nyc into the mix as suggested in this comment on a GitHub issue however it has not worked for me.



    I have played with various configurations (based on the initial aforementioned suggestion and also ideas from these issues: 1, 2), however either I get no coverage statistics at all or only coverage for my unit tests, not the integration tests that spawn sub-processes.



    The relevant parts of my package.json which configures nyc and Jest:



    "scripts": {
    "test": "cross-env NODE_ENV=test nyc --clean jest --coverage",
    },
    "jest": {
    "verbose": true,
    "testURL": "http://localhost/",
    "globalSetup": "./jest.setup.js",
    "transform": {
    "^.+\.js$": "babel-jest"
    },
    "collectCoverage": false
    },
    "nyc": {
    "include": [
    "packages/*/src/**/*.js"
    ],
    "reporter": [
    "html"
    ]
    },


    I am using execa to run the sub-processes and do so as follows:



    await execa("nyc --reporter none node", args);









    share|improve this question



























      3












      3








      3







      I am writing integration tests for a CLI. All the unit tests are written using Jest as out-of-the-box it produces code coverage without any configuration, but unfortunately it does not instrument sub-processes, for example executed via Node's spawn and fork commands.



      I have tried to introduce nyc into the mix as suggested in this comment on a GitHub issue however it has not worked for me.



      I have played with various configurations (based on the initial aforementioned suggestion and also ideas from these issues: 1, 2), however either I get no coverage statistics at all or only coverage for my unit tests, not the integration tests that spawn sub-processes.



      The relevant parts of my package.json which configures nyc and Jest:



      "scripts": {
      "test": "cross-env NODE_ENV=test nyc --clean jest --coverage",
      },
      "jest": {
      "verbose": true,
      "testURL": "http://localhost/",
      "globalSetup": "./jest.setup.js",
      "transform": {
      "^.+\.js$": "babel-jest"
      },
      "collectCoverage": false
      },
      "nyc": {
      "include": [
      "packages/*/src/**/*.js"
      ],
      "reporter": [
      "html"
      ]
      },


      I am using execa to run the sub-processes and do so as follows:



      await execa("nyc --reporter none node", args);









      share|improve this question















      I am writing integration tests for a CLI. All the unit tests are written using Jest as out-of-the-box it produces code coverage without any configuration, but unfortunately it does not instrument sub-processes, for example executed via Node's spawn and fork commands.



      I have tried to introduce nyc into the mix as suggested in this comment on a GitHub issue however it has not worked for me.



      I have played with various configurations (based on the initial aforementioned suggestion and also ideas from these issues: 1, 2), however either I get no coverage statistics at all or only coverage for my unit tests, not the integration tests that spawn sub-processes.



      The relevant parts of my package.json which configures nyc and Jest:



      "scripts": {
      "test": "cross-env NODE_ENV=test nyc --clean jest --coverage",
      },
      "jest": {
      "verbose": true,
      "testURL": "http://localhost/",
      "globalSetup": "./jest.setup.js",
      "transform": {
      "^.+\.js$": "babel-jest"
      },
      "collectCoverage": false
      },
      "nyc": {
      "include": [
      "packages/*/src/**/*.js"
      ],
      "reporter": [
      "html"
      ]
      },


      I am using execa to run the sub-processes and do so as follows:



      await execa("nyc --reporter none node", args);






      node.js jestjs istanbul nyc






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Dec 3 '18 at 13:44

























      asked Nov 19 '18 at 11:55









      sdgluck

      9,66112548




      9,66112548





























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53374120%2fhow-to-collect-code-coverage-for-spawned-sub-processes-using-jest%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53374120%2fhow-to-collect-code-coverage-for-spawned-sub-processes-using-jest%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

          SQL update select statement

          'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules