Some questions regarding the proof of Luroth theorem given by G. Bergman












0














G. Bergman gave a series of exercises leading to the proof of Luroth's Theorem: https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/grad.hndts/Luroth.ps



My concern lays in problem (7) and (8).



$L$ is any intermediate field: $k subsetneq L subset k(t)$, where $t$ is transcendental over $k$. $u=P(t)/Q(t)$ is an element of $L-k$.



Please refer to the pdf file for other details.




Show that if $P(x)-uQ(x)$ is divisible in $L[x]$ by an element of $k[x]$, then this element must divide both $P(x)$ and $Q(x)$.




how to prove it bothers me; my thought is like this: $ {1,u} subset B$, where $B$ is a basis of $L$ over $k$. Then $L[x] = k[u,..][x]$. After we embed $k[x]$ into $L[x]$, $u$ clearly is not divisible by any element from $k[x]$ then $P(x)$ and $Q(x)$ has to be divided by the element respectively. Am I correct?



In addition, is there any theorem leading to such result that if $t$ has an identical minimal polynomial over $k(u)$ and $L$ while $k(u) subset L$, then $L=k(u)$?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • What are $P$ and $Q$? Polynomials in $kleft[xright]$ or in $Lleft[xright]$ ?
    – darij grinberg
    Nov 20 '18 at 4:23










  • Also your last question sounds weird to me. Could it be the $subset$ sign should be $supset$?
    – darij grinberg
    Nov 20 '18 at 4:23










  • i suggest that if possible, you shall read the pdf file. The sign is correct, since $u$ is in $L-k$.
    – Alex Gong
    Nov 20 '18 at 4:48


















0














G. Bergman gave a series of exercises leading to the proof of Luroth's Theorem: https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/grad.hndts/Luroth.ps



My concern lays in problem (7) and (8).



$L$ is any intermediate field: $k subsetneq L subset k(t)$, where $t$ is transcendental over $k$. $u=P(t)/Q(t)$ is an element of $L-k$.



Please refer to the pdf file for other details.




Show that if $P(x)-uQ(x)$ is divisible in $L[x]$ by an element of $k[x]$, then this element must divide both $P(x)$ and $Q(x)$.




how to prove it bothers me; my thought is like this: $ {1,u} subset B$, where $B$ is a basis of $L$ over $k$. Then $L[x] = k[u,..][x]$. After we embed $k[x]$ into $L[x]$, $u$ clearly is not divisible by any element from $k[x]$ then $P(x)$ and $Q(x)$ has to be divided by the element respectively. Am I correct?



In addition, is there any theorem leading to such result that if $t$ has an identical minimal polynomial over $k(u)$ and $L$ while $k(u) subset L$, then $L=k(u)$?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • What are $P$ and $Q$? Polynomials in $kleft[xright]$ or in $Lleft[xright]$ ?
    – darij grinberg
    Nov 20 '18 at 4:23










  • Also your last question sounds weird to me. Could it be the $subset$ sign should be $supset$?
    – darij grinberg
    Nov 20 '18 at 4:23










  • i suggest that if possible, you shall read the pdf file. The sign is correct, since $u$ is in $L-k$.
    – Alex Gong
    Nov 20 '18 at 4:48
















0












0








0







G. Bergman gave a series of exercises leading to the proof of Luroth's Theorem: https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/grad.hndts/Luroth.ps



My concern lays in problem (7) and (8).



$L$ is any intermediate field: $k subsetneq L subset k(t)$, where $t$ is transcendental over $k$. $u=P(t)/Q(t)$ is an element of $L-k$.



Please refer to the pdf file for other details.




Show that if $P(x)-uQ(x)$ is divisible in $L[x]$ by an element of $k[x]$, then this element must divide both $P(x)$ and $Q(x)$.




how to prove it bothers me; my thought is like this: $ {1,u} subset B$, where $B$ is a basis of $L$ over $k$. Then $L[x] = k[u,..][x]$. After we embed $k[x]$ into $L[x]$, $u$ clearly is not divisible by any element from $k[x]$ then $P(x)$ and $Q(x)$ has to be divided by the element respectively. Am I correct?



In addition, is there any theorem leading to such result that if $t$ has an identical minimal polynomial over $k(u)$ and $L$ while $k(u) subset L$, then $L=k(u)$?










share|cite|improve this question















G. Bergman gave a series of exercises leading to the proof of Luroth's Theorem: https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/grad.hndts/Luroth.ps



My concern lays in problem (7) and (8).



$L$ is any intermediate field: $k subsetneq L subset k(t)$, where $t$ is transcendental over $k$. $u=P(t)/Q(t)$ is an element of $L-k$.



Please refer to the pdf file for other details.




Show that if $P(x)-uQ(x)$ is divisible in $L[x]$ by an element of $k[x]$, then this element must divide both $P(x)$ and $Q(x)$.




how to prove it bothers me; my thought is like this: $ {1,u} subset B$, where $B$ is a basis of $L$ over $k$. Then $L[x] = k[u,..][x]$. After we embed $k[x]$ into $L[x]$, $u$ clearly is not divisible by any element from $k[x]$ then $P(x)$ and $Q(x)$ has to be divided by the element respectively. Am I correct?



In addition, is there any theorem leading to such result that if $t$ has an identical minimal polynomial over $k(u)$ and $L$ while $k(u) subset L$, then $L=k(u)$?







abstract-algebra field-theory divisibility extension-field






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 20 '18 at 6:17

























asked Nov 20 '18 at 0:16









Alex Gong

11




11












  • What are $P$ and $Q$? Polynomials in $kleft[xright]$ or in $Lleft[xright]$ ?
    – darij grinberg
    Nov 20 '18 at 4:23










  • Also your last question sounds weird to me. Could it be the $subset$ sign should be $supset$?
    – darij grinberg
    Nov 20 '18 at 4:23










  • i suggest that if possible, you shall read the pdf file. The sign is correct, since $u$ is in $L-k$.
    – Alex Gong
    Nov 20 '18 at 4:48




















  • What are $P$ and $Q$? Polynomials in $kleft[xright]$ or in $Lleft[xright]$ ?
    – darij grinberg
    Nov 20 '18 at 4:23










  • Also your last question sounds weird to me. Could it be the $subset$ sign should be $supset$?
    – darij grinberg
    Nov 20 '18 at 4:23










  • i suggest that if possible, you shall read the pdf file. The sign is correct, since $u$ is in $L-k$.
    – Alex Gong
    Nov 20 '18 at 4:48


















What are $P$ and $Q$? Polynomials in $kleft[xright]$ or in $Lleft[xright]$ ?
– darij grinberg
Nov 20 '18 at 4:23




What are $P$ and $Q$? Polynomials in $kleft[xright]$ or in $Lleft[xright]$ ?
– darij grinberg
Nov 20 '18 at 4:23












Also your last question sounds weird to me. Could it be the $subset$ sign should be $supset$?
– darij grinberg
Nov 20 '18 at 4:23




Also your last question sounds weird to me. Could it be the $subset$ sign should be $supset$?
– darij grinberg
Nov 20 '18 at 4:23












i suggest that if possible, you shall read the pdf file. The sign is correct, since $u$ is in $L-k$.
– Alex Gong
Nov 20 '18 at 4:48






i suggest that if possible, you shall read the pdf file. The sign is correct, since $u$ is in $L-k$.
– Alex Gong
Nov 20 '18 at 4:48

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005735%2fsome-questions-regarding-the-proof-of-luroth-theorem-given-by-g-bergman%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005735%2fsome-questions-regarding-the-proof-of-luroth-theorem-given-by-g-bergman%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$