Isomorphism between localizations of graded ring $S_{(P)} cong [S_{(f)}]_{PS_f cap S_{(f)}}$












1














I know that if $S$ is a graded ring, and $f$ is a homogeneous element of positive degree, then there is a bijection between the homogeneous prime ideals of the localization $S_f$ and the prime ideals of $S_{(f)}$, the subring of $S_f$ comprising the homogeneous elements of degree $0$ such as from this MSE question. How can I prove that this bijection gives rise to an isomorphism of the following rings: for a homogenous prime ideal $P$ of $S$ with $f notin P$, there is an isomorphism



$$S_{(P)} cong [S_{(f)}]_{P S_f cap S_{(f)}}.$$



Is this true? If yes, what is this isomorphism?
In other words, how do I lift the bijection between prime ideals mentioned above, to elements in the prime ideals related by this bijection. Here $S_{(P)}$ is the subring of degree $0$ elements of the localization $S_{P}$ like always.










share|cite|improve this question





























    1














    I know that if $S$ is a graded ring, and $f$ is a homogeneous element of positive degree, then there is a bijection between the homogeneous prime ideals of the localization $S_f$ and the prime ideals of $S_{(f)}$, the subring of $S_f$ comprising the homogeneous elements of degree $0$ such as from this MSE question. How can I prove that this bijection gives rise to an isomorphism of the following rings: for a homogenous prime ideal $P$ of $S$ with $f notin P$, there is an isomorphism



    $$S_{(P)} cong [S_{(f)}]_{P S_f cap S_{(f)}}.$$



    Is this true? If yes, what is this isomorphism?
    In other words, how do I lift the bijection between prime ideals mentioned above, to elements in the prime ideals related by this bijection. Here $S_{(P)}$ is the subring of degree $0$ elements of the localization $S_{P}$ like always.










    share|cite|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1


      1





      I know that if $S$ is a graded ring, and $f$ is a homogeneous element of positive degree, then there is a bijection between the homogeneous prime ideals of the localization $S_f$ and the prime ideals of $S_{(f)}$, the subring of $S_f$ comprising the homogeneous elements of degree $0$ such as from this MSE question. How can I prove that this bijection gives rise to an isomorphism of the following rings: for a homogenous prime ideal $P$ of $S$ with $f notin P$, there is an isomorphism



      $$S_{(P)} cong [S_{(f)}]_{P S_f cap S_{(f)}}.$$



      Is this true? If yes, what is this isomorphism?
      In other words, how do I lift the bijection between prime ideals mentioned above, to elements in the prime ideals related by this bijection. Here $S_{(P)}$ is the subring of degree $0$ elements of the localization $S_{P}$ like always.










      share|cite|improve this question















      I know that if $S$ is a graded ring, and $f$ is a homogeneous element of positive degree, then there is a bijection between the homogeneous prime ideals of the localization $S_f$ and the prime ideals of $S_{(f)}$, the subring of $S_f$ comprising the homogeneous elements of degree $0$ such as from this MSE question. How can I prove that this bijection gives rise to an isomorphism of the following rings: for a homogenous prime ideal $P$ of $S$ with $f notin P$, there is an isomorphism



      $$S_{(P)} cong [S_{(f)}]_{P S_f cap S_{(f)}}.$$



      Is this true? If yes, what is this isomorphism?
      In other words, how do I lift the bijection between prime ideals mentioned above, to elements in the prime ideals related by this bijection. Here $S_{(P)}$ is the subring of degree $0$ elements of the localization $S_{P}$ like always.







      algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra localization graded-rings






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 20 '18 at 15:03









      user26857

      39.2k123983




      39.2k123983










      asked Nov 19 '18 at 23:59









      ramanujan_dirac

      266210




      266210






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          I suspect you may need that $S$ is generated in degree 1, but perhaps I'm missing a way to fix the following argument.



          Since $P$ is a homogeneous prime and $S$ is generated in degree 1, there is an element $lambda$ of degree one such that $lambdanotin P$.
          Let $phi : S_{(P)}to [S_{(f)}]_{PS_fcap S_{(f)}}$ be defined by $$phileft(frac{s}{r}right)=frac{slambda^k/f^n}{rlambda^k/f^n},$$
          where $n$ is large enough that $ndeg f ge deg s$ and $k$ is such that $deg s + k = n deg f$. To see that this is well defined, observe that if
          $frac{s}{r} = frac{s'}{r'}$, then there is $hnotin P$ such that $h(r's-rs')=0$, and for appropriate choices of $ell,j,k,n,m,o$, we have
          $$frac{hlambda^ell}{f^o}left(frac{r'lambda^j}{f^m}frac{slambda^k}{f^n}-frac{s'lambda^j}{f^m}frac{rlambda^k}{f^n}right)=frac{lambda^{ell+j+k}}{f^{o+m+n}}(h(r's-s'r))=0.$$
          Thus $phi(s/r)=phi(s'/r')$.



          To see that $phi$ is the desired isomorphism, note $PS_f$ is the set of elements $a$ of $S_f$ such that $af^nin P$ for some $n$. Thus if $s/f^mnotin PS_f$ with $sin S_{mdeg f}$, and if $rin S_{ndeg f}$, and if $ell=max{n,m}$ we can define the inverse by
          $$psileft(frac{r/f^n}{s/f^m}right)=frac{rf^{ell-n}}{sf^{ell-m}},$$
          which works since we know $sf^{ell-m}notin P$, since $s/f^m notin PS_f$, and
          both numerator and denominator have degree $ell deg f$.



          It shouldn't be hard to verify that $psi$ is also well defined and $phi$ and $psi$ are inverses.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for the answer @jgon. I believe the extra hypothesis is not necessary, but I am not able to prove it otherwise. So I will wait a couple more days to see if I get any more answers before accepting your excellent answer.
            – ramanujan_dirac
            Nov 22 '18 at 5:32











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005720%2fisomorphism-between-localizations-of-graded-ring-s-p-cong-s-f-ps-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          I suspect you may need that $S$ is generated in degree 1, but perhaps I'm missing a way to fix the following argument.



          Since $P$ is a homogeneous prime and $S$ is generated in degree 1, there is an element $lambda$ of degree one such that $lambdanotin P$.
          Let $phi : S_{(P)}to [S_{(f)}]_{PS_fcap S_{(f)}}$ be defined by $$phileft(frac{s}{r}right)=frac{slambda^k/f^n}{rlambda^k/f^n},$$
          where $n$ is large enough that $ndeg f ge deg s$ and $k$ is such that $deg s + k = n deg f$. To see that this is well defined, observe that if
          $frac{s}{r} = frac{s'}{r'}$, then there is $hnotin P$ such that $h(r's-rs')=0$, and for appropriate choices of $ell,j,k,n,m,o$, we have
          $$frac{hlambda^ell}{f^o}left(frac{r'lambda^j}{f^m}frac{slambda^k}{f^n}-frac{s'lambda^j}{f^m}frac{rlambda^k}{f^n}right)=frac{lambda^{ell+j+k}}{f^{o+m+n}}(h(r's-s'r))=0.$$
          Thus $phi(s/r)=phi(s'/r')$.



          To see that $phi$ is the desired isomorphism, note $PS_f$ is the set of elements $a$ of $S_f$ such that $af^nin P$ for some $n$. Thus if $s/f^mnotin PS_f$ with $sin S_{mdeg f}$, and if $rin S_{ndeg f}$, and if $ell=max{n,m}$ we can define the inverse by
          $$psileft(frac{r/f^n}{s/f^m}right)=frac{rf^{ell-n}}{sf^{ell-m}},$$
          which works since we know $sf^{ell-m}notin P$, since $s/f^m notin PS_f$, and
          both numerator and denominator have degree $ell deg f$.



          It shouldn't be hard to verify that $psi$ is also well defined and $phi$ and $psi$ are inverses.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for the answer @jgon. I believe the extra hypothesis is not necessary, but I am not able to prove it otherwise. So I will wait a couple more days to see if I get any more answers before accepting your excellent answer.
            – ramanujan_dirac
            Nov 22 '18 at 5:32
















          3














          I suspect you may need that $S$ is generated in degree 1, but perhaps I'm missing a way to fix the following argument.



          Since $P$ is a homogeneous prime and $S$ is generated in degree 1, there is an element $lambda$ of degree one such that $lambdanotin P$.
          Let $phi : S_{(P)}to [S_{(f)}]_{PS_fcap S_{(f)}}$ be defined by $$phileft(frac{s}{r}right)=frac{slambda^k/f^n}{rlambda^k/f^n},$$
          where $n$ is large enough that $ndeg f ge deg s$ and $k$ is such that $deg s + k = n deg f$. To see that this is well defined, observe that if
          $frac{s}{r} = frac{s'}{r'}$, then there is $hnotin P$ such that $h(r's-rs')=0$, and for appropriate choices of $ell,j,k,n,m,o$, we have
          $$frac{hlambda^ell}{f^o}left(frac{r'lambda^j}{f^m}frac{slambda^k}{f^n}-frac{s'lambda^j}{f^m}frac{rlambda^k}{f^n}right)=frac{lambda^{ell+j+k}}{f^{o+m+n}}(h(r's-s'r))=0.$$
          Thus $phi(s/r)=phi(s'/r')$.



          To see that $phi$ is the desired isomorphism, note $PS_f$ is the set of elements $a$ of $S_f$ such that $af^nin P$ for some $n$. Thus if $s/f^mnotin PS_f$ with $sin S_{mdeg f}$, and if $rin S_{ndeg f}$, and if $ell=max{n,m}$ we can define the inverse by
          $$psileft(frac{r/f^n}{s/f^m}right)=frac{rf^{ell-n}}{sf^{ell-m}},$$
          which works since we know $sf^{ell-m}notin P$, since $s/f^m notin PS_f$, and
          both numerator and denominator have degree $ell deg f$.



          It shouldn't be hard to verify that $psi$ is also well defined and $phi$ and $psi$ are inverses.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for the answer @jgon. I believe the extra hypothesis is not necessary, but I am not able to prove it otherwise. So I will wait a couple more days to see if I get any more answers before accepting your excellent answer.
            – ramanujan_dirac
            Nov 22 '18 at 5:32














          3












          3








          3






          I suspect you may need that $S$ is generated in degree 1, but perhaps I'm missing a way to fix the following argument.



          Since $P$ is a homogeneous prime and $S$ is generated in degree 1, there is an element $lambda$ of degree one such that $lambdanotin P$.
          Let $phi : S_{(P)}to [S_{(f)}]_{PS_fcap S_{(f)}}$ be defined by $$phileft(frac{s}{r}right)=frac{slambda^k/f^n}{rlambda^k/f^n},$$
          where $n$ is large enough that $ndeg f ge deg s$ and $k$ is such that $deg s + k = n deg f$. To see that this is well defined, observe that if
          $frac{s}{r} = frac{s'}{r'}$, then there is $hnotin P$ such that $h(r's-rs')=0$, and for appropriate choices of $ell,j,k,n,m,o$, we have
          $$frac{hlambda^ell}{f^o}left(frac{r'lambda^j}{f^m}frac{slambda^k}{f^n}-frac{s'lambda^j}{f^m}frac{rlambda^k}{f^n}right)=frac{lambda^{ell+j+k}}{f^{o+m+n}}(h(r's-s'r))=0.$$
          Thus $phi(s/r)=phi(s'/r')$.



          To see that $phi$ is the desired isomorphism, note $PS_f$ is the set of elements $a$ of $S_f$ such that $af^nin P$ for some $n$. Thus if $s/f^mnotin PS_f$ with $sin S_{mdeg f}$, and if $rin S_{ndeg f}$, and if $ell=max{n,m}$ we can define the inverse by
          $$psileft(frac{r/f^n}{s/f^m}right)=frac{rf^{ell-n}}{sf^{ell-m}},$$
          which works since we know $sf^{ell-m}notin P$, since $s/f^m notin PS_f$, and
          both numerator and denominator have degree $ell deg f$.



          It shouldn't be hard to verify that $psi$ is also well defined and $phi$ and $psi$ are inverses.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          I suspect you may need that $S$ is generated in degree 1, but perhaps I'm missing a way to fix the following argument.



          Since $P$ is a homogeneous prime and $S$ is generated in degree 1, there is an element $lambda$ of degree one such that $lambdanotin P$.
          Let $phi : S_{(P)}to [S_{(f)}]_{PS_fcap S_{(f)}}$ be defined by $$phileft(frac{s}{r}right)=frac{slambda^k/f^n}{rlambda^k/f^n},$$
          where $n$ is large enough that $ndeg f ge deg s$ and $k$ is such that $deg s + k = n deg f$. To see that this is well defined, observe that if
          $frac{s}{r} = frac{s'}{r'}$, then there is $hnotin P$ such that $h(r's-rs')=0$, and for appropriate choices of $ell,j,k,n,m,o$, we have
          $$frac{hlambda^ell}{f^o}left(frac{r'lambda^j}{f^m}frac{slambda^k}{f^n}-frac{s'lambda^j}{f^m}frac{rlambda^k}{f^n}right)=frac{lambda^{ell+j+k}}{f^{o+m+n}}(h(r's-s'r))=0.$$
          Thus $phi(s/r)=phi(s'/r')$.



          To see that $phi$ is the desired isomorphism, note $PS_f$ is the set of elements $a$ of $S_f$ such that $af^nin P$ for some $n$. Thus if $s/f^mnotin PS_f$ with $sin S_{mdeg f}$, and if $rin S_{ndeg f}$, and if $ell=max{n,m}$ we can define the inverse by
          $$psileft(frac{r/f^n}{s/f^m}right)=frac{rf^{ell-n}}{sf^{ell-m}},$$
          which works since we know $sf^{ell-m}notin P$, since $s/f^m notin PS_f$, and
          both numerator and denominator have degree $ell deg f$.



          It shouldn't be hard to verify that $psi$ is also well defined and $phi$ and $psi$ are inverses.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 20 '18 at 22:56









          jgon

          12.8k21940




          12.8k21940












          • Thanks for the answer @jgon. I believe the extra hypothesis is not necessary, but I am not able to prove it otherwise. So I will wait a couple more days to see if I get any more answers before accepting your excellent answer.
            – ramanujan_dirac
            Nov 22 '18 at 5:32


















          • Thanks for the answer @jgon. I believe the extra hypothesis is not necessary, but I am not able to prove it otherwise. So I will wait a couple more days to see if I get any more answers before accepting your excellent answer.
            – ramanujan_dirac
            Nov 22 '18 at 5:32
















          Thanks for the answer @jgon. I believe the extra hypothesis is not necessary, but I am not able to prove it otherwise. So I will wait a couple more days to see if I get any more answers before accepting your excellent answer.
          – ramanujan_dirac
          Nov 22 '18 at 5:32




          Thanks for the answer @jgon. I believe the extra hypothesis is not necessary, but I am not able to prove it otherwise. So I will wait a couple more days to see if I get any more answers before accepting your excellent answer.
          – ramanujan_dirac
          Nov 22 '18 at 5:32


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005720%2fisomorphism-between-localizations-of-graded-ring-s-p-cong-s-f-ps-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

          Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

          A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$