Prove that a pointwise converging sequence, bounded in $L^p$, converge uniformly in $L^q$, using Egorov's...












0















Let $p > 1$, $E$ be a measurable subset of $mathbb{R}^n$ with finite
Lebesgue measure $mu$, ${f_n}_{nin N}$ be a sequence of measurable
functions $f_n : E → mathbb{R}$, bounded in $L^p(E)$, and pointwise converging to $f : E → mathbb{R}$.



Prove that ${f_n}_{n∈N}$ converges to $f$ in
$L^q(E)$ for all $q ∈(1, p)$.




All the hypothesis of Egorov's theorem are satisfied, then $forallε > 0$ $exists N_ε ⊆ Ω$ measurable such that $mu(N_ε) ≤ ε$ and such that the sequence $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$ in $Ω setminus N_ε$.



Any hint on how to start the exercise?










share|cite|improve this question



























    0















    Let $p > 1$, $E$ be a measurable subset of $mathbb{R}^n$ with finite
    Lebesgue measure $mu$, ${f_n}_{nin N}$ be a sequence of measurable
    functions $f_n : E → mathbb{R}$, bounded in $L^p(E)$, and pointwise converging to $f : E → mathbb{R}$.



    Prove that ${f_n}_{n∈N}$ converges to $f$ in
    $L^q(E)$ for all $q ∈(1, p)$.




    All the hypothesis of Egorov's theorem are satisfied, then $forallε > 0$ $exists N_ε ⊆ Ω$ measurable such that $mu(N_ε) ≤ ε$ and such that the sequence $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$ in $Ω setminus N_ε$.



    Any hint on how to start the exercise?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      Let $p > 1$, $E$ be a measurable subset of $mathbb{R}^n$ with finite
      Lebesgue measure $mu$, ${f_n}_{nin N}$ be a sequence of measurable
      functions $f_n : E → mathbb{R}$, bounded in $L^p(E)$, and pointwise converging to $f : E → mathbb{R}$.



      Prove that ${f_n}_{n∈N}$ converges to $f$ in
      $L^q(E)$ for all $q ∈(1, p)$.




      All the hypothesis of Egorov's theorem are satisfied, then $forallε > 0$ $exists N_ε ⊆ Ω$ measurable such that $mu(N_ε) ≤ ε$ and such that the sequence $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$ in $Ω setminus N_ε$.



      Any hint on how to start the exercise?










      share|cite|improve this question














      Let $p > 1$, $E$ be a measurable subset of $mathbb{R}^n$ with finite
      Lebesgue measure $mu$, ${f_n}_{nin N}$ be a sequence of measurable
      functions $f_n : E → mathbb{R}$, bounded in $L^p(E)$, and pointwise converging to $f : E → mathbb{R}$.



      Prove that ${f_n}_{n∈N}$ converges to $f$ in
      $L^q(E)$ for all $q ∈(1, p)$.




      All the hypothesis of Egorov's theorem are satisfied, then $forallε > 0$ $exists N_ε ⊆ Ω$ measurable such that $mu(N_ε) ≤ ε$ and such that the sequence $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$ in $Ω setminus N_ε$.



      Any hint on how to start the exercise?







      functional-analysis convergence






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 19 '18 at 23:49









      sound wave

      1598




      1598






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Here's a hint on how to start. Use Egorov's theorem to split the domain into two parts, one with $epsilon$ measure on which convergence is bad, and one with the majority of the measure on which convergence is good. Then bound the total $q$-norm of the difference of the sequence from the limit by bounding the $q$-norm of the difference on each of these sets.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thanks. I would do this: since the sequence converge almost everywhere, take the set $N_epsilon$ of measure zero where the seq does not converge, and $Esetminus N_epsilon$ where the seq converge. Then from what you wrote I got that we have to bound $||f_n-f||_{L^q(E)}$ with $||f_n-f||_{L^q(N_epsilon)}+||f_n-f||_{L^q(Esetminus N_epsilon)}$. But the first norm is infinite because on $N_epsilon$ the sequence does not converge. Do we need to change the choice of the two sets?
            – sound wave
            Nov 20 '18 at 12:28












          • Could you say what it the $L^q$ norm of $f_n-f$ on the set $Esetminus N_varepsilon$ ?
            – sound wave
            Nov 21 '18 at 14:20













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005711%2fprove-that-a-pointwise-converging-sequence-bounded-in-lp-converge-uniformly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          Here's a hint on how to start. Use Egorov's theorem to split the domain into two parts, one with $epsilon$ measure on which convergence is bad, and one with the majority of the measure on which convergence is good. Then bound the total $q$-norm of the difference of the sequence from the limit by bounding the $q$-norm of the difference on each of these sets.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thanks. I would do this: since the sequence converge almost everywhere, take the set $N_epsilon$ of measure zero where the seq does not converge, and $Esetminus N_epsilon$ where the seq converge. Then from what you wrote I got that we have to bound $||f_n-f||_{L^q(E)}$ with $||f_n-f||_{L^q(N_epsilon)}+||f_n-f||_{L^q(Esetminus N_epsilon)}$. But the first norm is infinite because on $N_epsilon$ the sequence does not converge. Do we need to change the choice of the two sets?
            – sound wave
            Nov 20 '18 at 12:28












          • Could you say what it the $L^q$ norm of $f_n-f$ on the set $Esetminus N_varepsilon$ ?
            – sound wave
            Nov 21 '18 at 14:20


















          1














          Here's a hint on how to start. Use Egorov's theorem to split the domain into two parts, one with $epsilon$ measure on which convergence is bad, and one with the majority of the measure on which convergence is good. Then bound the total $q$-norm of the difference of the sequence from the limit by bounding the $q$-norm of the difference on each of these sets.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thanks. I would do this: since the sequence converge almost everywhere, take the set $N_epsilon$ of measure zero where the seq does not converge, and $Esetminus N_epsilon$ where the seq converge. Then from what you wrote I got that we have to bound $||f_n-f||_{L^q(E)}$ with $||f_n-f||_{L^q(N_epsilon)}+||f_n-f||_{L^q(Esetminus N_epsilon)}$. But the first norm is infinite because on $N_epsilon$ the sequence does not converge. Do we need to change the choice of the two sets?
            – sound wave
            Nov 20 '18 at 12:28












          • Could you say what it the $L^q$ norm of $f_n-f$ on the set $Esetminus N_varepsilon$ ?
            – sound wave
            Nov 21 '18 at 14:20
















          1












          1








          1






          Here's a hint on how to start. Use Egorov's theorem to split the domain into two parts, one with $epsilon$ measure on which convergence is bad, and one with the majority of the measure on which convergence is good. Then bound the total $q$-norm of the difference of the sequence from the limit by bounding the $q$-norm of the difference on each of these sets.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Here's a hint on how to start. Use Egorov's theorem to split the domain into two parts, one with $epsilon$ measure on which convergence is bad, and one with the majority of the measure on which convergence is good. Then bound the total $q$-norm of the difference of the sequence from the limit by bounding the $q$-norm of the difference on each of these sets.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 19 '18 at 23:59









          jgon

          12.8k21940




          12.8k21940












          • Thanks. I would do this: since the sequence converge almost everywhere, take the set $N_epsilon$ of measure zero where the seq does not converge, and $Esetminus N_epsilon$ where the seq converge. Then from what you wrote I got that we have to bound $||f_n-f||_{L^q(E)}$ with $||f_n-f||_{L^q(N_epsilon)}+||f_n-f||_{L^q(Esetminus N_epsilon)}$. But the first norm is infinite because on $N_epsilon$ the sequence does not converge. Do we need to change the choice of the two sets?
            – sound wave
            Nov 20 '18 at 12:28












          • Could you say what it the $L^q$ norm of $f_n-f$ on the set $Esetminus N_varepsilon$ ?
            – sound wave
            Nov 21 '18 at 14:20




















          • Thanks. I would do this: since the sequence converge almost everywhere, take the set $N_epsilon$ of measure zero where the seq does not converge, and $Esetminus N_epsilon$ where the seq converge. Then from what you wrote I got that we have to bound $||f_n-f||_{L^q(E)}$ with $||f_n-f||_{L^q(N_epsilon)}+||f_n-f||_{L^q(Esetminus N_epsilon)}$. But the first norm is infinite because on $N_epsilon$ the sequence does not converge. Do we need to change the choice of the two sets?
            – sound wave
            Nov 20 '18 at 12:28












          • Could you say what it the $L^q$ norm of $f_n-f$ on the set $Esetminus N_varepsilon$ ?
            – sound wave
            Nov 21 '18 at 14:20


















          Thanks. I would do this: since the sequence converge almost everywhere, take the set $N_epsilon$ of measure zero where the seq does not converge, and $Esetminus N_epsilon$ where the seq converge. Then from what you wrote I got that we have to bound $||f_n-f||_{L^q(E)}$ with $||f_n-f||_{L^q(N_epsilon)}+||f_n-f||_{L^q(Esetminus N_epsilon)}$. But the first norm is infinite because on $N_epsilon$ the sequence does not converge. Do we need to change the choice of the two sets?
          – sound wave
          Nov 20 '18 at 12:28






          Thanks. I would do this: since the sequence converge almost everywhere, take the set $N_epsilon$ of measure zero where the seq does not converge, and $Esetminus N_epsilon$ where the seq converge. Then from what you wrote I got that we have to bound $||f_n-f||_{L^q(E)}$ with $||f_n-f||_{L^q(N_epsilon)}+||f_n-f||_{L^q(Esetminus N_epsilon)}$. But the first norm is infinite because on $N_epsilon$ the sequence does not converge. Do we need to change the choice of the two sets?
          – sound wave
          Nov 20 '18 at 12:28














          Could you say what it the $L^q$ norm of $f_n-f$ on the set $Esetminus N_varepsilon$ ?
          – sound wave
          Nov 21 '18 at 14:20






          Could you say what it the $L^q$ norm of $f_n-f$ on the set $Esetminus N_varepsilon$ ?
          – sound wave
          Nov 21 '18 at 14:20




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005711%2fprove-that-a-pointwise-converging-sequence-bounded-in-lp-converge-uniformly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

          Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

          A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$