Existence of a bounded function on the disk with specified values












1












$begingroup$


I am trying to answer the question:



“Does there exist a bounded holomorphic function on the unit disk such that for all $nin mathbb{N}$,
$f(1-frac{1}{n}) = frac{(-1)^n}{n}$?”



My solution goes roughly likes this: using Jensen’s formula we find that any holomorphic function with zeroes at $1-frac{1}{n}$ cannot be bounded, so if there was such a function as the problem desired, it would be the only one, lest the difference between two such functions violate Poisson Jensen. But using some algebra tricks, given any one such function we mess it around to get another. This is a contradiction.



I just want to ask if there is a more straightforward way. Any other ideas are much appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I am trying to answer the question:



    “Does there exist a bounded holomorphic function on the unit disk such that for all $nin mathbb{N}$,
    $f(1-frac{1}{n}) = frac{(-1)^n}{n}$?”



    My solution goes roughly likes this: using Jensen’s formula we find that any holomorphic function with zeroes at $1-frac{1}{n}$ cannot be bounded, so if there was such a function as the problem desired, it would be the only one, lest the difference between two such functions violate Poisson Jensen. But using some algebra tricks, given any one such function we mess it around to get another. This is a contradiction.



    I just want to ask if there is a more straightforward way. Any other ideas are much appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I am trying to answer the question:



      “Does there exist a bounded holomorphic function on the unit disk such that for all $nin mathbb{N}$,
      $f(1-frac{1}{n}) = frac{(-1)^n}{n}$?”



      My solution goes roughly likes this: using Jensen’s formula we find that any holomorphic function with zeroes at $1-frac{1}{n}$ cannot be bounded, so if there was such a function as the problem desired, it would be the only one, lest the difference between two such functions violate Poisson Jensen. But using some algebra tricks, given any one such function we mess it around to get another. This is a contradiction.



      I just want to ask if there is a more straightforward way. Any other ideas are much appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am trying to answer the question:



      “Does there exist a bounded holomorphic function on the unit disk such that for all $nin mathbb{N}$,
      $f(1-frac{1}{n}) = frac{(-1)^n}{n}$?”



      My solution goes roughly likes this: using Jensen’s formula we find that any holomorphic function with zeroes at $1-frac{1}{n}$ cannot be bounded, so if there was such a function as the problem desired, it would be the only one, lest the difference between two such functions violate Poisson Jensen. But using some algebra tricks, given any one such function we mess it around to get another. This is a contradiction.



      I just want to ask if there is a more straightforward way. Any other ideas are much appreciated.







      complex-analysis holomorphic-functions






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 7 at 1:30







      Van Latimer

















      asked Jan 6 at 15:12









      Van LatimerVan Latimer

      321110




      321110






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Here's another way. If we let $g(z) = [f(z)]^2 -(1-z)^2$, then $g$ is bounded on the unit disk and $g(x_n)=0$ for all $x_n = 1-frac{1}{n}$. By Blaschke condition, we must have $g equiv 0$. But this implies $h(z)= frac{f(z)}{1-z}$ is a continuous functions taking values in a disconnected set ${-1,1}$. It says that $h$ must be a constant. This leads to a contradiction to that $h(x_n)=(-1)^n$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I don’t think this is quite right, but it’s given me an idea which I’ll add below.
            $endgroup$
            – Van Latimer
            Jan 7 at 1:15










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, I made a quite silly mistake ... But the method can be applied in the right direction as you suggested.
            $endgroup$
            – Song
            Jan 7 at 3:44










          • $begingroup$
            Right. Thank you so much for the help!
            $endgroup$
            – Van Latimer
            Jan 7 at 18:13





















          0












          $begingroup$

          Playing off of @Song’s answer, $f^2$ agrees with $(1-z)^2$ at all the points $1-frac{1}{n}$, so that since both are bounded, Jensen applied to their difference says they agree everywhere. But then the holomorphic function $frac{f}{1-z}$ has constant modulus and is therefore constant, so that $fequiv z mapsto a(1-z)$ for $a$ equal to $pm 1$, independently of $z$ of course, which is a contradiction.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063975%2fexistence-of-a-bounded-function-on-the-disk-with-specified-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            Here's another way. If we let $g(z) = [f(z)]^2 -(1-z)^2$, then $g$ is bounded on the unit disk and $g(x_n)=0$ for all $x_n = 1-frac{1}{n}$. By Blaschke condition, we must have $g equiv 0$. But this implies $h(z)= frac{f(z)}{1-z}$ is a continuous functions taking values in a disconnected set ${-1,1}$. It says that $h$ must be a constant. This leads to a contradiction to that $h(x_n)=(-1)^n$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              I don’t think this is quite right, but it’s given me an idea which I’ll add below.
              $endgroup$
              – Van Latimer
              Jan 7 at 1:15










            • $begingroup$
              Yes, I made a quite silly mistake ... But the method can be applied in the right direction as you suggested.
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Jan 7 at 3:44










            • $begingroup$
              Right. Thank you so much for the help!
              $endgroup$
              – Van Latimer
              Jan 7 at 18:13


















            1












            $begingroup$

            Here's another way. If we let $g(z) = [f(z)]^2 -(1-z)^2$, then $g$ is bounded on the unit disk and $g(x_n)=0$ for all $x_n = 1-frac{1}{n}$. By Blaschke condition, we must have $g equiv 0$. But this implies $h(z)= frac{f(z)}{1-z}$ is a continuous functions taking values in a disconnected set ${-1,1}$. It says that $h$ must be a constant. This leads to a contradiction to that $h(x_n)=(-1)^n$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              I don’t think this is quite right, but it’s given me an idea which I’ll add below.
              $endgroup$
              – Van Latimer
              Jan 7 at 1:15










            • $begingroup$
              Yes, I made a quite silly mistake ... But the method can be applied in the right direction as you suggested.
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Jan 7 at 3:44










            • $begingroup$
              Right. Thank you so much for the help!
              $endgroup$
              – Van Latimer
              Jan 7 at 18:13
















            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Here's another way. If we let $g(z) = [f(z)]^2 -(1-z)^2$, then $g$ is bounded on the unit disk and $g(x_n)=0$ for all $x_n = 1-frac{1}{n}$. By Blaschke condition, we must have $g equiv 0$. But this implies $h(z)= frac{f(z)}{1-z}$ is a continuous functions taking values in a disconnected set ${-1,1}$. It says that $h$ must be a constant. This leads to a contradiction to that $h(x_n)=(-1)^n$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Here's another way. If we let $g(z) = [f(z)]^2 -(1-z)^2$, then $g$ is bounded on the unit disk and $g(x_n)=0$ for all $x_n = 1-frac{1}{n}$. By Blaschke condition, we must have $g equiv 0$. But this implies $h(z)= frac{f(z)}{1-z}$ is a continuous functions taking values in a disconnected set ${-1,1}$. It says that $h$ must be a constant. This leads to a contradiction to that $h(x_n)=(-1)^n$.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Jan 7 at 3:41

























            answered Jan 6 at 15:26









            SongSong

            10.2k627




            10.2k627












            • $begingroup$
              I don’t think this is quite right, but it’s given me an idea which I’ll add below.
              $endgroup$
              – Van Latimer
              Jan 7 at 1:15










            • $begingroup$
              Yes, I made a quite silly mistake ... But the method can be applied in the right direction as you suggested.
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Jan 7 at 3:44










            • $begingroup$
              Right. Thank you so much for the help!
              $endgroup$
              – Van Latimer
              Jan 7 at 18:13




















            • $begingroup$
              I don’t think this is quite right, but it’s given me an idea which I’ll add below.
              $endgroup$
              – Van Latimer
              Jan 7 at 1:15










            • $begingroup$
              Yes, I made a quite silly mistake ... But the method can be applied in the right direction as you suggested.
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Jan 7 at 3:44










            • $begingroup$
              Right. Thank you so much for the help!
              $endgroup$
              – Van Latimer
              Jan 7 at 18:13


















            $begingroup$
            I don’t think this is quite right, but it’s given me an idea which I’ll add below.
            $endgroup$
            – Van Latimer
            Jan 7 at 1:15




            $begingroup$
            I don’t think this is quite right, but it’s given me an idea which I’ll add below.
            $endgroup$
            – Van Latimer
            Jan 7 at 1:15












            $begingroup$
            Yes, I made a quite silly mistake ... But the method can be applied in the right direction as you suggested.
            $endgroup$
            – Song
            Jan 7 at 3:44




            $begingroup$
            Yes, I made a quite silly mistake ... But the method can be applied in the right direction as you suggested.
            $endgroup$
            – Song
            Jan 7 at 3:44












            $begingroup$
            Right. Thank you so much for the help!
            $endgroup$
            – Van Latimer
            Jan 7 at 18:13






            $begingroup$
            Right. Thank you so much for the help!
            $endgroup$
            – Van Latimer
            Jan 7 at 18:13













            0












            $begingroup$

            Playing off of @Song’s answer, $f^2$ agrees with $(1-z)^2$ at all the points $1-frac{1}{n}$, so that since both are bounded, Jensen applied to their difference says they agree everywhere. But then the holomorphic function $frac{f}{1-z}$ has constant modulus and is therefore constant, so that $fequiv z mapsto a(1-z)$ for $a$ equal to $pm 1$, independently of $z$ of course, which is a contradiction.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              Playing off of @Song’s answer, $f^2$ agrees with $(1-z)^2$ at all the points $1-frac{1}{n}$, so that since both are bounded, Jensen applied to their difference says they agree everywhere. But then the holomorphic function $frac{f}{1-z}$ has constant modulus and is therefore constant, so that $fequiv z mapsto a(1-z)$ for $a$ equal to $pm 1$, independently of $z$ of course, which is a contradiction.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Playing off of @Song’s answer, $f^2$ agrees with $(1-z)^2$ at all the points $1-frac{1}{n}$, so that since both are bounded, Jensen applied to their difference says they agree everywhere. But then the holomorphic function $frac{f}{1-z}$ has constant modulus and is therefore constant, so that $fequiv z mapsto a(1-z)$ for $a$ equal to $pm 1$, independently of $z$ of course, which is a contradiction.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Playing off of @Song’s answer, $f^2$ agrees with $(1-z)^2$ at all the points $1-frac{1}{n}$, so that since both are bounded, Jensen applied to their difference says they agree everywhere. But then the holomorphic function $frac{f}{1-z}$ has constant modulus and is therefore constant, so that $fequiv z mapsto a(1-z)$ for $a$ equal to $pm 1$, independently of $z$ of course, which is a contradiction.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Jan 7 at 1:30

























                answered Jan 7 at 1:20









                Van LatimerVan Latimer

                321110




                321110






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063975%2fexistence-of-a-bounded-function-on-the-disk-with-specified-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                    How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                    Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory