Mixing
Handle data while filming with rPI [closed]
We will buy the BMPCC4k (This means 500GB/hour on a ssd), as we are a low/no-budget production, we can't have someone handling data.
I had the idea to use a rPI3+ to use for this.
But I'm not sure if the rPI is able to handle this, he would be powered by a powerbank (20'000mAh).
When I insert the SSD, the hole SSD should be copied to a 4TB HDD.
So I have 4 questions:
Can the rPI Power an external HDD (2.5" 4TB) + external SSD (Samsung T5 500GB) form the USB Power Source
What's the average file transfer speed of the rPi from USB to USB?
Is there a software which allready can do this (Preferable with a data validation)
Which is the best OS to use for this? I'm only familiar with Raspbian, but can adapt.
pi-3b+ data-transfer
asked Jan 6 at 12:54
Timothy Lukas H.Timothy Lukas H.
94
closed as too broad by Steve Robillard, Ingo, Milliways, Dmitry Grigoryev, Darth Vader♦ Jan 12 at 22:38
Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
We will buy the BMPCC4k (This means 500GB/hour on a ssd), as we are a low/no-budget production, we can't have someone handling data.
I had the idea to use a rPI3+ to use for this.
But I'm not sure if the rPI is able to handle this, he would be powered by a powerbank (20'000mAh).
When I insert the SSD, the hole SSD should be copied to a 4TB HDD.
So I have 4 questions:
Can the rPI Power an external HDD (2.5" 4TB) + external SSD (Samsung T5 500GB) form the USB Power Source
What's the average file transfer speed of the rPi from USB to USB?
Is there a software which allready can do this (Preferable with a data validation)
Which is the best OS to use for this? I'm only familiar with Raspbian, but can adapt.
pi-3b+ data-transfer
asked Jan 6 at 12:54
Timothy Lukas H.Timothy Lukas H.
94
closed as too broad by Steve Robillard, Ingo, Milliways, Dmitry Grigoryev, Darth Vader♦ Jan 12 at 22:38
Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
You won't be able to run the Pi and two drives from a powerbank. You might not even be able to run the Pi off it predictably. If you can, it will never last the seven hours Ghanima indicates it would take to transfer the data.
– goldilocks♦
Jan 6 at 14:57
The idea might be feasible if you are not strictly limited to Raspberry. Not an answer because I never tried it and because it is not Raspberry, but there exist other brands of single board computers, inspired by the Raspberry success. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_single-board_computers and for example some ODROID models seem to support USB 3.0 and are currently available. No idea about the real world performance though.
– szulat
Jan 7 at 14:58
@szulat Ouh yeah. I was thinking about building a PCB myself to do it, but as it's quite critical that the data is safe, this isn't really an option for me. But I will take a look at the other SBCs :)
– Timothy Lukas H.
Jan 7 at 15:05
add a comment |
We will buy the BMPCC4k (This means 500GB/hour on a ssd), as we are a low/no-budget production, we can't have someone handling data.
I had the idea to use a rPI3+ to use for this.
But I'm not sure if the rPI is able to handle this, he would be powered by a powerbank (20'000mAh).
When I insert the SSD, the hole SSD should be copied to a 4TB HDD.
So I have 4 questions:
Can the rPI Power an external HDD (2.5" 4TB) + external SSD (Samsung T5 500GB) form the USB Power Source
What's the average file transfer speed of the rPi from USB to USB?
Is there a software which allready can do this (Preferable with a data validation)
Which is the best OS to use for this? I'm only familiar with Raspbian, but can adapt.
pi-3b+ data-transfer
asked Jan 6 at 12:54
Timothy Lukas H.Timothy Lukas H.
94
We will buy the BMPCC4k (This means 500GB/hour on a ssd), as we are a low/no-budget production, we can't have someone handling data.
I had the idea to use a rPI3+ to use for this.
But I'm not sure if the rPI is able to handle this, he would be powered by a powerbank (20'000mAh).
When I insert the SSD, the hole SSD should be copied to a 4TB HDD.
So I have 4 questions:
Can the rPI Power an external HDD (2.5" 4TB) + external SSD (Samsung T5 500GB) form the USB Power Source
What's the average file transfer speed of the rPi from USB to USB?
Is there a software which allready can do this (Preferable with a data validation)
Which is the best OS to use for this? I'm only familiar with Raspbian, but can adapt.
pi-3b+ data-transfer
pi-3b+ data-transfer
asked Jan 6 at 12:54
Timothy Lukas H.Timothy Lukas H.
94
asked Jan 6 at 12:54
Timothy Lukas H.Timothy Lukas H.
94
asked Jan 6 at 12:54
Timothy Lukas H.Timothy Lukas H.
94
asked Jan 6 at 12:54
Timothy Lukas H.Timothy Lukas H.
94
asked Jan 6 at 12:54
Timothy Lukas H.Timothy Lukas H.
94
94
closed as too broad by Steve Robillard, Ingo, Milliways, Dmitry Grigoryev, Darth Vader♦ Jan 12 at 22:38
Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as too broad by Steve Robillard, Ingo, Milliways, Dmitry Grigoryev, Darth Vader♦ Jan 12 at 22:38
Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
You won't be able to run the Pi and two drives from a powerbank. You might not even be able to run the Pi off it predictably. If you can, it will never last the seven hours Ghanima indicates it would take to transfer the data.
– goldilocks♦
Jan 6 at 14:57
The idea might be feasible if you are not strictly limited to Raspberry. Not an answer because I never tried it and because it is not Raspberry, but there exist other brands of single board computers, inspired by the Raspberry success. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_single-board_computers and for example some ODROID models seem to support USB 3.0 and are currently available. No idea about the real world performance though.
– szulat
Jan 7 at 14:58
@szulat Ouh yeah. I was thinking about building a PCB myself to do it, but as it's quite critical that the data is safe, this isn't really an option for me. But I will take a look at the other SBCs :)
– Timothy Lukas H.
Jan 7 at 15:05
add a comment |
You won't be able to run the Pi and two drives from a powerbank. You might not even be able to run the Pi off it predictably. If you can, it will never last the seven hours Ghanima indicates it would take to transfer the data.
– goldilocks♦
Jan 6 at 14:57
The idea might be feasible if you are not strictly limited to Raspberry. Not an answer because I never tried it and because it is not Raspberry, but there exist other brands of single board computers, inspired by the Raspberry success. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_single-board_computers and for example some ODROID models seem to support USB 3.0 and are currently available. No idea about the real world performance though.
– szulat
Jan 7 at 14:58
@szulat Ouh yeah. I was thinking about building a PCB myself to do it, but as it's quite critical that the data is safe, this isn't really an option for me. But I will take a look at the other SBCs :)
– Timothy Lukas H.
Jan 7 at 15:05
You won't be able to run the Pi and two drives from a powerbank. You might not even be able to run the Pi off it predictably. If you can, it will never last the seven hours Ghanima indicates it would take to transfer the data.
– goldilocks♦
Jan 6 at 14:57
You won't be able to run the Pi and two drives from a powerbank. You might not even be able to run the Pi off it predictably. If you can, it will never last the seven hours Ghanima indicates it would take to transfer the data.
– goldilocks♦
Jan 6 at 14:57
The idea might be feasible if you are not strictly limited to Raspberry. Not an answer because I never tried it and because it is not Raspberry, but there exist other brands of single board computers, inspired by the Raspberry success. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_single-board_computers and for example some ODROID models seem to support USB 3.0 and are currently available. No idea about the real world performance though.
– szulat
Jan 7 at 14:58
The idea might be feasible if you are not strictly limited to Raspberry. Not an answer because I never tried it and because it is not Raspberry, but there exist other brands of single board computers, inspired by the Raspberry success. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_single-board_computers and for example some ODROID models seem to support USB 3.0 and are currently available. No idea about the real world performance though.
– szulat
Jan 7 at 14:58
@szulat Ouh yeah. I was thinking about building a PCB myself to do it, but as it's quite critical that the data is safe, this isn't really an option for me. But I will take a look at the other SBCs :)
– Timothy Lukas H.
Jan 7 at 15:05
@szulat Ouh yeah. I was thinking about building a PCB myself to do it, but as it's quite critical that the data is safe, this isn't really an option for me. But I will take a look at the other SBCs :)
– Timothy Lukas H.
Jan 7 at 15:05
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The Raspberry Pi (all models) feature USB 2.0 ("Hi-Speed") only; which has a net data transfer of 40 MB/s at best (1); real life performance might even be less (2). Share that data rate between inbound (SSD) and outbound (HDD) traffic will yield 20 MB/s. So for 500 GB per hour that transfer is going to take about 25,000 seconds - which I believe are significantly more seconds than one hour has (about seven hours).
I doubt that this is a feasible approach if you intend to copy data during the production day. You'll need to look for faster systems that provide USB 3.x; preferable 3.1 or higher - dubbed "SuperSpeed +" - for a data rate in the GB/s range (Wikipedia#USB).
(1) USB 2.0 has a maximum signaling rate of 480 Mbit/s which is equivivalent to 60 MB/s ((Wikipedia#USB)). This results in a net data rate of 40 MB/s (de.Wikipedia#USB) due to protocol overhead and what-not.
(2) e.g. "SSD read test (reading 3.2GB) using a Pi3B came in at 35MB/s" (source)
answered Jan 6 at 14:25
Ghanima♦Ghanima
12.2k94078
Thank you! It really seems this won't do it. It's 500GB/hour of footage. Not hpur of filming. But we'll probabbly film more than an hour/day :/
– Timothy Lukas H.
Jan 6 at 18:16
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The Raspberry Pi (all models) feature USB 2.0 ("Hi-Speed") only; which has a net data transfer of 40 MB/s at best (1); real life performance might even be less (2). Share that data rate between inbound (SSD) and outbound (HDD) traffic will yield 20 MB/s. So for 500 GB per hour that transfer is going to take about 25,000 seconds - which I believe are significantly more seconds than one hour has (about seven hours).
I doubt that this is a feasible approach if you intend to copy data during the production day. You'll need to look for faster systems that provide USB 3.x; preferable 3.1 or higher - dubbed "SuperSpeed +" - for a data rate in the GB/s range (Wikipedia#USB).
(1) USB 2.0 has a maximum signaling rate of 480 Mbit/s which is equivivalent to 60 MB/s ((Wikipedia#USB)). This results in a net data rate of 40 MB/s (de.Wikipedia#USB) due to protocol overhead and what-not.
(2) e.g. "SSD read test (reading 3.2GB) using a Pi3B came in at 35MB/s" (source)
answered Jan 6 at 14:25
Ghanima♦Ghanima
12.2k94078
Thank you! It really seems this won't do it. It's 500GB/hour of footage. Not hpur of filming. But we'll probabbly film more than an hour/day :/
– Timothy Lukas H.
Jan 6 at 18:16
add a comment |
The Raspberry Pi (all models) feature USB 2.0 ("Hi-Speed") only; which has a net data transfer of 40 MB/s at best (1); real life performance might even be less (2). Share that data rate between inbound (SSD) and outbound (HDD) traffic will yield 20 MB/s. So for 500 GB per hour that transfer is going to take about 25,000 seconds - which I believe are significantly more seconds than one hour has (about seven hours).
I doubt that this is a feasible approach if you intend to copy data during the production day. You'll need to look for faster systems that provide USB 3.x; preferable 3.1 or higher - dubbed "SuperSpeed +" - for a data rate in the GB/s range (Wikipedia#USB).
(1) USB 2.0 has a maximum signaling rate of 480 Mbit/s which is equivivalent to 60 MB/s ((Wikipedia#USB)). This results in a net data rate of 40 MB/s (de.Wikipedia#USB) due to protocol overhead and what-not.
(2) e.g. "SSD read test (reading 3.2GB) using a Pi3B came in at 35MB/s" (source)
answered Jan 6 at 14:25
Ghanima♦Ghanima
12.2k94078
Thank you! It really seems this won't do it. It's 500GB/hour of footage. Not hpur of filming. But we'll probabbly film more than an hour/day :/
– Timothy Lukas H.
Jan 6 at 18:16
add a comment |
The Raspberry Pi (all models) feature USB 2.0 ("Hi-Speed") only; which has a net data transfer of 40 MB/s at best (1); real life performance might even be less (2). Share that data rate between inbound (SSD) and outbound (HDD) traffic will yield 20 MB/s. So for 500 GB per hour that transfer is going to take about 25,000 seconds - which I believe are significantly more seconds than one hour has (about seven hours).
I doubt that this is a feasible approach if you intend to copy data during the production day. You'll need to look for faster systems that provide USB 3.x; preferable 3.1 or higher - dubbed "SuperSpeed +" - for a data rate in the GB/s range (Wikipedia#USB).
(1) USB 2.0 has a maximum signaling rate of 480 Mbit/s which is equivivalent to 60 MB/s ((Wikipedia#USB)). This results in a net data rate of 40 MB/s (de.Wikipedia#USB) due to protocol overhead and what-not.
(2) e.g. "SSD read test (reading 3.2GB) using a Pi3B came in at 35MB/s" (source)
answered Jan 6 at 14:25
Ghanima♦Ghanima
12.2k94078
The Raspberry Pi (all models) feature USB 2.0 ("Hi-Speed") only; which has a net data transfer of 40 MB/s at best (1); real life performance might even be less (2). Share that data rate between inbound (SSD) and outbound (HDD) traffic will yield 20 MB/s. So for 500 GB per hour that transfer is going to take about 25,000 seconds - which I believe are significantly more seconds than one hour has (about seven hours).
I doubt that this is a feasible approach if you intend to copy data during the production day. You'll need to look for faster systems that provide USB 3.x; preferable 3.1 or higher - dubbed "SuperSpeed +" - for a data rate in the GB/s range (Wikipedia#USB).
(1) USB 2.0 has a maximum signaling rate of 480 Mbit/s which is equivivalent to 60 MB/s ((Wikipedia#USB)). This results in a net data rate of 40 MB/s (de.Wikipedia#USB) due to protocol overhead and what-not.
(2) e.g. "SSD read test (reading 3.2GB) using a Pi3B came in at 35MB/s" (source)
answered Jan 6 at 14:25
Ghanima♦Ghanima
12.2k94078
edited Jan 6 at 14:46
answered Jan 6 at 14:25
Ghanima♦Ghanima
12.2k94078
answered Jan 6 at 14:25
Ghanima♦Ghanima
12.2k94078
answered Jan 6 at 14:25
Ghanima♦Ghanima
12.2k94078
12.2k94078
Thank you! It really seems this won't do it. It's 500GB/hour of footage. Not hpur of filming. But we'll probabbly film more than an hour/day :/
– Timothy Lukas H.
Jan 6 at 18:16
add a comment |
Thank you! It really seems this won't do it. It's 500GB/hour of footage. Not hpur of filming. But we'll probabbly film more than an hour/day :/
– Timothy Lukas H.
Jan 6 at 18:16
Thank you! It really seems this won't do it. It's 500GB/hour of footage. Not hpur of filming. But we'll probabbly film more than an hour/day :/
– Timothy Lukas H.
Jan 6 at 18:16
Thank you! It really seems this won't do it. It's 500GB/hour of footage. Not hpur of filming. But we'll probabbly film more than an hour/day :/
– Timothy Lukas H.
Jan 6 at 18:16
add a comment |
You won't be able to run the Pi and two drives from a powerbank. You might not even be able to run the Pi off it predictably. If you can, it will never last the seven hours Ghanima indicates it would take to transfer the data.
– goldilocks♦
Jan 6 at 14:57
The idea might be feasible if you are not strictly limited to Raspberry. Not an answer because I never tried it and because it is not Raspberry, but there exist other brands of single board computers, inspired by the Raspberry success. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_single-board_computers and for example some ODROID models seem to support USB 3.0 and are currently available. No idea about the real world performance though.
– szulat
Jan 7 at 14:58
@szulat Ouh yeah. I was thinking about building a PCB myself to do it, but as it's quite critical that the data is safe, this isn't really an option for me. But I will take a look at the other SBCs :)
– Timothy Lukas H.
Jan 7 at 15:05