Limit of the $r$-norm $(sum_{i=0}^n (y_1,x_i)-(y_2,x_i))^r )^{1/r}$ as $r to infty$ is $ max_i...












-1












$begingroup$


In a book I was reading about data mining they wrote
$$
lim_{r to infty} left(sum_{i=0}^n (y_1,x_i)-(y_2,x_i))^r right)^{1/r}
$$

is equal to
$$
max_{ i=1,2,...,n} left|(y_1,x_i)-(y_2,x_i)right|
$$

This is of course logical since the biggest outcome will dominate the equation but I wonder how did they prove it?
Thank you a lot










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    My laptop is not working and that's the most thing I can do with my mobile :( sorry, can you edit it if possible
    $endgroup$
    – Basil Bassam
    Oct 22 '18 at 8:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    With your formatting, it's a bit tricky to figure out the correct equation, see if I guessed correctly
    $endgroup$
    – Matti P.
    Oct 22 '18 at 8:07










  • $begingroup$
    It is correct thank you very much
    $endgroup$
    – Basil Bassam
    Oct 22 '18 at 8:10










  • $begingroup$
    Any ideas how to prove this?
    $endgroup$
    – Basil Bassam
    Oct 22 '18 at 8:15










  • $begingroup$
    By the way, should the sum be inside the ()^(1/r) ? That way it would make more sense ...
    $endgroup$
    – Matti P.
    Oct 22 '18 at 8:20
















-1












$begingroup$


In a book I was reading about data mining they wrote
$$
lim_{r to infty} left(sum_{i=0}^n (y_1,x_i)-(y_2,x_i))^r right)^{1/r}
$$

is equal to
$$
max_{ i=1,2,...,n} left|(y_1,x_i)-(y_2,x_i)right|
$$

This is of course logical since the biggest outcome will dominate the equation but I wonder how did they prove it?
Thank you a lot










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    My laptop is not working and that's the most thing I can do with my mobile :( sorry, can you edit it if possible
    $endgroup$
    – Basil Bassam
    Oct 22 '18 at 8:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    With your formatting, it's a bit tricky to figure out the correct equation, see if I guessed correctly
    $endgroup$
    – Matti P.
    Oct 22 '18 at 8:07










  • $begingroup$
    It is correct thank you very much
    $endgroup$
    – Basil Bassam
    Oct 22 '18 at 8:10










  • $begingroup$
    Any ideas how to prove this?
    $endgroup$
    – Basil Bassam
    Oct 22 '18 at 8:15










  • $begingroup$
    By the way, should the sum be inside the ()^(1/r) ? That way it would make more sense ...
    $endgroup$
    – Matti P.
    Oct 22 '18 at 8:20














-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$


In a book I was reading about data mining they wrote
$$
lim_{r to infty} left(sum_{i=0}^n (y_1,x_i)-(y_2,x_i))^r right)^{1/r}
$$

is equal to
$$
max_{ i=1,2,...,n} left|(y_1,x_i)-(y_2,x_i)right|
$$

This is of course logical since the biggest outcome will dominate the equation but I wonder how did they prove it?
Thank you a lot










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




In a book I was reading about data mining they wrote
$$
lim_{r to infty} left(sum_{i=0}^n (y_1,x_i)-(y_2,x_i))^r right)^{1/r}
$$

is equal to
$$
max_{ i=1,2,...,n} left|(y_1,x_i)-(y_2,x_i)right|
$$

This is of course logical since the biggest outcome will dominate the equation but I wonder how did they prove it?
Thank you a lot







limits norm






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 6 at 18:15









Lord_Farin

15.5k636108




15.5k636108










asked Oct 22 '18 at 7:57









Basil BassamBasil Bassam

337




337












  • $begingroup$
    My laptop is not working and that's the most thing I can do with my mobile :( sorry, can you edit it if possible
    $endgroup$
    – Basil Bassam
    Oct 22 '18 at 8:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    With your formatting, it's a bit tricky to figure out the correct equation, see if I guessed correctly
    $endgroup$
    – Matti P.
    Oct 22 '18 at 8:07










  • $begingroup$
    It is correct thank you very much
    $endgroup$
    – Basil Bassam
    Oct 22 '18 at 8:10










  • $begingroup$
    Any ideas how to prove this?
    $endgroup$
    – Basil Bassam
    Oct 22 '18 at 8:15










  • $begingroup$
    By the way, should the sum be inside the ()^(1/r) ? That way it would make more sense ...
    $endgroup$
    – Matti P.
    Oct 22 '18 at 8:20


















  • $begingroup$
    My laptop is not working and that's the most thing I can do with my mobile :( sorry, can you edit it if possible
    $endgroup$
    – Basil Bassam
    Oct 22 '18 at 8:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    With your formatting, it's a bit tricky to figure out the correct equation, see if I guessed correctly
    $endgroup$
    – Matti P.
    Oct 22 '18 at 8:07










  • $begingroup$
    It is correct thank you very much
    $endgroup$
    – Basil Bassam
    Oct 22 '18 at 8:10










  • $begingroup$
    Any ideas how to prove this?
    $endgroup$
    – Basil Bassam
    Oct 22 '18 at 8:15










  • $begingroup$
    By the way, should the sum be inside the ()^(1/r) ? That way it would make more sense ...
    $endgroup$
    – Matti P.
    Oct 22 '18 at 8:20
















$begingroup$
My laptop is not working and that's the most thing I can do with my mobile :( sorry, can you edit it if possible
$endgroup$
– Basil Bassam
Oct 22 '18 at 8:01




$begingroup$
My laptop is not working and that's the most thing I can do with my mobile :( sorry, can you edit it if possible
$endgroup$
– Basil Bassam
Oct 22 '18 at 8:01




1




1




$begingroup$
With your formatting, it's a bit tricky to figure out the correct equation, see if I guessed correctly
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Oct 22 '18 at 8:07




$begingroup$
With your formatting, it's a bit tricky to figure out the correct equation, see if I guessed correctly
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Oct 22 '18 at 8:07












$begingroup$
It is correct thank you very much
$endgroup$
– Basil Bassam
Oct 22 '18 at 8:10




$begingroup$
It is correct thank you very much
$endgroup$
– Basil Bassam
Oct 22 '18 at 8:10












$begingroup$
Any ideas how to prove this?
$endgroup$
– Basil Bassam
Oct 22 '18 at 8:15




$begingroup$
Any ideas how to prove this?
$endgroup$
– Basil Bassam
Oct 22 '18 at 8:15












$begingroup$
By the way, should the sum be inside the ()^(1/r) ? That way it would make more sense ...
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Oct 22 '18 at 8:20




$begingroup$
By the way, should the sum be inside the ()^(1/r) ? That way it would make more sense ...
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Oct 22 '18 at 8:20










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Essentially we are considering a list of numbers $a_i$ and the $L_{infty}$ norm:
$$
L_{infty} = lim_{r to infty} left[ sum_{i} a_i^r right]^{1/r}
$$

Some entries in $a_i$ are smaller and some are larger. When you put all the entries to a large power (for example $r=100$), the differences become even more pronounced. Values that are close to $1$ remain close to $1$, but larger values get pushed towards infinity. So when you sum these up, the sum is basically only the sum of the large numbers, because a very large number plus a very small number is approximately equal to the large number. And remember that pushing the exponent up makes these differences even more pronounced.



Therefore, it's relatively intuitive that the value in the end turns out to be just the maximum absolute value in the list
$$
L_{infty} = lim_{r to infty} left[ sum_{i} a_i^r right]^{1/r} = max_i left| a_i right|
$$

As an example, let's take
$$
a = [0.2, 1.5, 2, 7, 25] qquad text{and} qquad r = 10
$$

then
$$
a^r approx [1.024 times 10^{-7} ,quad 57.6, quad 1024 282times 10^6,quad 95times 10^{12}]
$$

The first entries pale in comparison to the last one, and the sum is
$$
sum a_i^r approx 9.5368 times 10^{13} Rightarrow sqrt[10]{sum a_i^r} approx 25
$$

which is the maximum of the values.



This was not a rigorous proof, but surely you'll understand the intuition.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2965692%2flimit-of-the-r-norm-sum-i-0n-y-1-x-i-y-2-x-ir-1-r-as-r-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Essentially we are considering a list of numbers $a_i$ and the $L_{infty}$ norm:
    $$
    L_{infty} = lim_{r to infty} left[ sum_{i} a_i^r right]^{1/r}
    $$

    Some entries in $a_i$ are smaller and some are larger. When you put all the entries to a large power (for example $r=100$), the differences become even more pronounced. Values that are close to $1$ remain close to $1$, but larger values get pushed towards infinity. So when you sum these up, the sum is basically only the sum of the large numbers, because a very large number plus a very small number is approximately equal to the large number. And remember that pushing the exponent up makes these differences even more pronounced.



    Therefore, it's relatively intuitive that the value in the end turns out to be just the maximum absolute value in the list
    $$
    L_{infty} = lim_{r to infty} left[ sum_{i} a_i^r right]^{1/r} = max_i left| a_i right|
    $$

    As an example, let's take
    $$
    a = [0.2, 1.5, 2, 7, 25] qquad text{and} qquad r = 10
    $$

    then
    $$
    a^r approx [1.024 times 10^{-7} ,quad 57.6, quad 1024 282times 10^6,quad 95times 10^{12}]
    $$

    The first entries pale in comparison to the last one, and the sum is
    $$
    sum a_i^r approx 9.5368 times 10^{13} Rightarrow sqrt[10]{sum a_i^r} approx 25
    $$

    which is the maximum of the values.



    This was not a rigorous proof, but surely you'll understand the intuition.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Essentially we are considering a list of numbers $a_i$ and the $L_{infty}$ norm:
      $$
      L_{infty} = lim_{r to infty} left[ sum_{i} a_i^r right]^{1/r}
      $$

      Some entries in $a_i$ are smaller and some are larger. When you put all the entries to a large power (for example $r=100$), the differences become even more pronounced. Values that are close to $1$ remain close to $1$, but larger values get pushed towards infinity. So when you sum these up, the sum is basically only the sum of the large numbers, because a very large number plus a very small number is approximately equal to the large number. And remember that pushing the exponent up makes these differences even more pronounced.



      Therefore, it's relatively intuitive that the value in the end turns out to be just the maximum absolute value in the list
      $$
      L_{infty} = lim_{r to infty} left[ sum_{i} a_i^r right]^{1/r} = max_i left| a_i right|
      $$

      As an example, let's take
      $$
      a = [0.2, 1.5, 2, 7, 25] qquad text{and} qquad r = 10
      $$

      then
      $$
      a^r approx [1.024 times 10^{-7} ,quad 57.6, quad 1024 282times 10^6,quad 95times 10^{12}]
      $$

      The first entries pale in comparison to the last one, and the sum is
      $$
      sum a_i^r approx 9.5368 times 10^{13} Rightarrow sqrt[10]{sum a_i^r} approx 25
      $$

      which is the maximum of the values.



      This was not a rigorous proof, but surely you'll understand the intuition.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Essentially we are considering a list of numbers $a_i$ and the $L_{infty}$ norm:
        $$
        L_{infty} = lim_{r to infty} left[ sum_{i} a_i^r right]^{1/r}
        $$

        Some entries in $a_i$ are smaller and some are larger. When you put all the entries to a large power (for example $r=100$), the differences become even more pronounced. Values that are close to $1$ remain close to $1$, but larger values get pushed towards infinity. So when you sum these up, the sum is basically only the sum of the large numbers, because a very large number plus a very small number is approximately equal to the large number. And remember that pushing the exponent up makes these differences even more pronounced.



        Therefore, it's relatively intuitive that the value in the end turns out to be just the maximum absolute value in the list
        $$
        L_{infty} = lim_{r to infty} left[ sum_{i} a_i^r right]^{1/r} = max_i left| a_i right|
        $$

        As an example, let's take
        $$
        a = [0.2, 1.5, 2, 7, 25] qquad text{and} qquad r = 10
        $$

        then
        $$
        a^r approx [1.024 times 10^{-7} ,quad 57.6, quad 1024 282times 10^6,quad 95times 10^{12}]
        $$

        The first entries pale in comparison to the last one, and the sum is
        $$
        sum a_i^r approx 9.5368 times 10^{13} Rightarrow sqrt[10]{sum a_i^r} approx 25
        $$

        which is the maximum of the values.



        This was not a rigorous proof, but surely you'll understand the intuition.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Essentially we are considering a list of numbers $a_i$ and the $L_{infty}$ norm:
        $$
        L_{infty} = lim_{r to infty} left[ sum_{i} a_i^r right]^{1/r}
        $$

        Some entries in $a_i$ are smaller and some are larger. When you put all the entries to a large power (for example $r=100$), the differences become even more pronounced. Values that are close to $1$ remain close to $1$, but larger values get pushed towards infinity. So when you sum these up, the sum is basically only the sum of the large numbers, because a very large number plus a very small number is approximately equal to the large number. And remember that pushing the exponent up makes these differences even more pronounced.



        Therefore, it's relatively intuitive that the value in the end turns out to be just the maximum absolute value in the list
        $$
        L_{infty} = lim_{r to infty} left[ sum_{i} a_i^r right]^{1/r} = max_i left| a_i right|
        $$

        As an example, let's take
        $$
        a = [0.2, 1.5, 2, 7, 25] qquad text{and} qquad r = 10
        $$

        then
        $$
        a^r approx [1.024 times 10^{-7} ,quad 57.6, quad 1024 282times 10^6,quad 95times 10^{12}]
        $$

        The first entries pale in comparison to the last one, and the sum is
        $$
        sum a_i^r approx 9.5368 times 10^{13} Rightarrow sqrt[10]{sum a_i^r} approx 25
        $$

        which is the maximum of the values.



        This was not a rigorous proof, but surely you'll understand the intuition.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Oct 22 '18 at 8:43

























        answered Oct 22 '18 at 8:33









        Matti P.Matti P.

        1,881413




        1,881413






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2965692%2flimit-of-the-r-norm-sum-i-0n-y-1-x-i-y-2-x-ir-1-r-as-r-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

            ts Property 'filter' does not exist on type '{}'

            mat-slide-toggle shouldn't change it's state when I click cancel in confirmation window