Is it possible to find 8 non collinear points with their mutual distances being rational?
$begingroup$
Is it possible to find 8 non collinear points with their mutual distances being rational?
This came to my mind after reading this article (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RationalDistances.html)
Note that in my question 4 points can lie on a circle.
But no three points are collinear.
Answers referencing to a article/proof are appreciated.
number-theory coordinate-systems
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it possible to find 8 non collinear points with their mutual distances being rational?
This came to my mind after reading this article (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RationalDistances.html)
Note that in my question 4 points can lie on a circle.
But no three points are collinear.
Answers referencing to a article/proof are appreciated.
number-theory coordinate-systems
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it possible to find 8 non collinear points with their mutual distances being rational?
This came to my mind after reading this article (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RationalDistances.html)
Note that in my question 4 points can lie on a circle.
But no three points are collinear.
Answers referencing to a article/proof are appreciated.
number-theory coordinate-systems
$endgroup$
Is it possible to find 8 non collinear points with their mutual distances being rational?
This came to my mind after reading this article (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RationalDistances.html)
Note that in my question 4 points can lie on a circle.
But no three points are collinear.
Answers referencing to a article/proof are appreciated.
number-theory coordinate-systems
number-theory coordinate-systems
asked Oct 23 '17 at 3:48
Agile_EagleAgile_Eagle
1,44611027
1,44611027
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
On a unit circle, you can produce countably many points so that the mutual distances are rational. That is why they exclude the circle points in their problem.
To explain what happens here: say $z_l= e^{ialpha_k}$, $k = 1,2$. Then
$$|z_1 - z_2| = 2 |sin(frac{alpha_1 - alpha_2}{2})|$$
Let now $alpha_k = 2 beta_k$. Then $|z_1 - z_2| = 2 |sin(beta_1 - beta_2)| = 2 | sin beta_1 cos beta_2 - sin beta_2 cos beta_1|$.
Take now $beta_k$ so that $tan frac{beta_k}{2}$ is rational. Then both
$sin beta_k$, and $cos beta_k$ will be rational. Moreover, the distances between all these points will be rational.
Therefore, for every $sin mathbb{Q}$ consider an angle $beta_s$ with $tan frac{beta_s}{2}= s$. Then the corresponding point on the circle will be
$$P_s= e^{i 2 beta_s} =
left(frac{1 - 6 s^2 + s^4}{(1 + s^2)^2}, frac{4 s (1 -s^2)}{(1 + s^2)^2}right)$$
One can check that
$$d(P_s ,P_t) = frac{4 |(s-t)(1+s t)|}{(1+s^2)(1+t^2)}$$
We are taking squares of rational points on the circle. Their pairwise distances are also rational.
$bf{Added:}$ Check a similar problem on this site at the link.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2485407%2fis-it-possible-to-find-8-non-collinear-points-with-their-mutual-distances-being%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
On a unit circle, you can produce countably many points so that the mutual distances are rational. That is why they exclude the circle points in their problem.
To explain what happens here: say $z_l= e^{ialpha_k}$, $k = 1,2$. Then
$$|z_1 - z_2| = 2 |sin(frac{alpha_1 - alpha_2}{2})|$$
Let now $alpha_k = 2 beta_k$. Then $|z_1 - z_2| = 2 |sin(beta_1 - beta_2)| = 2 | sin beta_1 cos beta_2 - sin beta_2 cos beta_1|$.
Take now $beta_k$ so that $tan frac{beta_k}{2}$ is rational. Then both
$sin beta_k$, and $cos beta_k$ will be rational. Moreover, the distances between all these points will be rational.
Therefore, for every $sin mathbb{Q}$ consider an angle $beta_s$ with $tan frac{beta_s}{2}= s$. Then the corresponding point on the circle will be
$$P_s= e^{i 2 beta_s} =
left(frac{1 - 6 s^2 + s^4}{(1 + s^2)^2}, frac{4 s (1 -s^2)}{(1 + s^2)^2}right)$$
One can check that
$$d(P_s ,P_t) = frac{4 |(s-t)(1+s t)|}{(1+s^2)(1+t^2)}$$
We are taking squares of rational points on the circle. Their pairwise distances are also rational.
$bf{Added:}$ Check a similar problem on this site at the link.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
On a unit circle, you can produce countably many points so that the mutual distances are rational. That is why they exclude the circle points in their problem.
To explain what happens here: say $z_l= e^{ialpha_k}$, $k = 1,2$. Then
$$|z_1 - z_2| = 2 |sin(frac{alpha_1 - alpha_2}{2})|$$
Let now $alpha_k = 2 beta_k$. Then $|z_1 - z_2| = 2 |sin(beta_1 - beta_2)| = 2 | sin beta_1 cos beta_2 - sin beta_2 cos beta_1|$.
Take now $beta_k$ so that $tan frac{beta_k}{2}$ is rational. Then both
$sin beta_k$, and $cos beta_k$ will be rational. Moreover, the distances between all these points will be rational.
Therefore, for every $sin mathbb{Q}$ consider an angle $beta_s$ with $tan frac{beta_s}{2}= s$. Then the corresponding point on the circle will be
$$P_s= e^{i 2 beta_s} =
left(frac{1 - 6 s^2 + s^4}{(1 + s^2)^2}, frac{4 s (1 -s^2)}{(1 + s^2)^2}right)$$
One can check that
$$d(P_s ,P_t) = frac{4 |(s-t)(1+s t)|}{(1+s^2)(1+t^2)}$$
We are taking squares of rational points on the circle. Their pairwise distances are also rational.
$bf{Added:}$ Check a similar problem on this site at the link.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
On a unit circle, you can produce countably many points so that the mutual distances are rational. That is why they exclude the circle points in their problem.
To explain what happens here: say $z_l= e^{ialpha_k}$, $k = 1,2$. Then
$$|z_1 - z_2| = 2 |sin(frac{alpha_1 - alpha_2}{2})|$$
Let now $alpha_k = 2 beta_k$. Then $|z_1 - z_2| = 2 |sin(beta_1 - beta_2)| = 2 | sin beta_1 cos beta_2 - sin beta_2 cos beta_1|$.
Take now $beta_k$ so that $tan frac{beta_k}{2}$ is rational. Then both
$sin beta_k$, and $cos beta_k$ will be rational. Moreover, the distances between all these points will be rational.
Therefore, for every $sin mathbb{Q}$ consider an angle $beta_s$ with $tan frac{beta_s}{2}= s$. Then the corresponding point on the circle will be
$$P_s= e^{i 2 beta_s} =
left(frac{1 - 6 s^2 + s^4}{(1 + s^2)^2}, frac{4 s (1 -s^2)}{(1 + s^2)^2}right)$$
One can check that
$$d(P_s ,P_t) = frac{4 |(s-t)(1+s t)|}{(1+s^2)(1+t^2)}$$
We are taking squares of rational points on the circle. Their pairwise distances are also rational.
$bf{Added:}$ Check a similar problem on this site at the link.
$endgroup$
On a unit circle, you can produce countably many points so that the mutual distances are rational. That is why they exclude the circle points in their problem.
To explain what happens here: say $z_l= e^{ialpha_k}$, $k = 1,2$. Then
$$|z_1 - z_2| = 2 |sin(frac{alpha_1 - alpha_2}{2})|$$
Let now $alpha_k = 2 beta_k$. Then $|z_1 - z_2| = 2 |sin(beta_1 - beta_2)| = 2 | sin beta_1 cos beta_2 - sin beta_2 cos beta_1|$.
Take now $beta_k$ so that $tan frac{beta_k}{2}$ is rational. Then both
$sin beta_k$, and $cos beta_k$ will be rational. Moreover, the distances between all these points will be rational.
Therefore, for every $sin mathbb{Q}$ consider an angle $beta_s$ with $tan frac{beta_s}{2}= s$. Then the corresponding point on the circle will be
$$P_s= e^{i 2 beta_s} =
left(frac{1 - 6 s^2 + s^4}{(1 + s^2)^2}, frac{4 s (1 -s^2)}{(1 + s^2)^2}right)$$
One can check that
$$d(P_s ,P_t) = frac{4 |(s-t)(1+s t)|}{(1+s^2)(1+t^2)}$$
We are taking squares of rational points on the circle. Their pairwise distances are also rational.
$bf{Added:}$ Check a similar problem on this site at the link.
edited Oct 23 '17 at 4:46
answered Oct 23 '17 at 4:23
Orest BucicovschiOrest Bucicovschi
28.5k31746
28.5k31746
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2485407%2fis-it-possible-to-find-8-non-collinear-points-with-their-mutual-distances-being%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown