Is it possible to find 8 non collinear points with their mutual distances being rational?












1












$begingroup$


Is it possible to find 8 non collinear points with their mutual distances being rational?



This came to my mind after reading this article (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RationalDistances.html)



Note that in my question 4 points can lie on a circle.



But no three points are collinear.



Answers referencing to a article/proof are appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Is it possible to find 8 non collinear points with their mutual distances being rational?



    This came to my mind after reading this article (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RationalDistances.html)



    Note that in my question 4 points can lie on a circle.



    But no three points are collinear.



    Answers referencing to a article/proof are appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$


      Is it possible to find 8 non collinear points with their mutual distances being rational?



      This came to my mind after reading this article (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RationalDistances.html)



      Note that in my question 4 points can lie on a circle.



      But no three points are collinear.



      Answers referencing to a article/proof are appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Is it possible to find 8 non collinear points with their mutual distances being rational?



      This came to my mind after reading this article (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RationalDistances.html)



      Note that in my question 4 points can lie on a circle.



      But no three points are collinear.



      Answers referencing to a article/proof are appreciated.







      number-theory coordinate-systems






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Oct 23 '17 at 3:48









      Agile_EagleAgile_Eagle

      1,44611027




      1,44611027






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          On a unit circle, you can produce countably many points so that the mutual distances are rational. That is why they exclude the circle points in their problem.



          To explain what happens here: say $z_l= e^{ialpha_k}$, $k = 1,2$. Then
          $$|z_1 - z_2| = 2 |sin(frac{alpha_1 - alpha_2}{2})|$$



          Let now $alpha_k = 2 beta_k$. Then $|z_1 - z_2| = 2 |sin(beta_1 - beta_2)| = 2 | sin beta_1 cos beta_2 - sin beta_2 cos beta_1|$.



          Take now $beta_k$ so that $tan frac{beta_k}{2}$ is rational. Then both
          $sin beta_k$, and $cos beta_k$ will be rational. Moreover, the distances between all these points will be rational.



          Therefore, for every $sin mathbb{Q}$ consider an angle $beta_s$ with $tan frac{beta_s}{2}= s$. Then the corresponding point on the circle will be
          $$P_s= e^{i 2 beta_s} =
          left(frac{1 - 6 s^2 + s^4}{(1 + s^2)^2}, frac{4 s (1 -s^2)}{(1 + s^2)^2}right)$$



          One can check that
          $$d(P_s ,P_t) = frac{4 |(s-t)(1+s t)|}{(1+s^2)(1+t^2)}$$



          We are taking squares of rational points on the circle. Their pairwise distances are also rational.



          $bf{Added:}$ Check a similar problem on this site at the link.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2485407%2fis-it-possible-to-find-8-non-collinear-points-with-their-mutual-distances-being%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            On a unit circle, you can produce countably many points so that the mutual distances are rational. That is why they exclude the circle points in their problem.



            To explain what happens here: say $z_l= e^{ialpha_k}$, $k = 1,2$. Then
            $$|z_1 - z_2| = 2 |sin(frac{alpha_1 - alpha_2}{2})|$$



            Let now $alpha_k = 2 beta_k$. Then $|z_1 - z_2| = 2 |sin(beta_1 - beta_2)| = 2 | sin beta_1 cos beta_2 - sin beta_2 cos beta_1|$.



            Take now $beta_k$ so that $tan frac{beta_k}{2}$ is rational. Then both
            $sin beta_k$, and $cos beta_k$ will be rational. Moreover, the distances between all these points will be rational.



            Therefore, for every $sin mathbb{Q}$ consider an angle $beta_s$ with $tan frac{beta_s}{2}= s$. Then the corresponding point on the circle will be
            $$P_s= e^{i 2 beta_s} =
            left(frac{1 - 6 s^2 + s^4}{(1 + s^2)^2}, frac{4 s (1 -s^2)}{(1 + s^2)^2}right)$$



            One can check that
            $$d(P_s ,P_t) = frac{4 |(s-t)(1+s t)|}{(1+s^2)(1+t^2)}$$



            We are taking squares of rational points on the circle. Their pairwise distances are also rational.



            $bf{Added:}$ Check a similar problem on this site at the link.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              3












              $begingroup$

              On a unit circle, you can produce countably many points so that the mutual distances are rational. That is why they exclude the circle points in their problem.



              To explain what happens here: say $z_l= e^{ialpha_k}$, $k = 1,2$. Then
              $$|z_1 - z_2| = 2 |sin(frac{alpha_1 - alpha_2}{2})|$$



              Let now $alpha_k = 2 beta_k$. Then $|z_1 - z_2| = 2 |sin(beta_1 - beta_2)| = 2 | sin beta_1 cos beta_2 - sin beta_2 cos beta_1|$.



              Take now $beta_k$ so that $tan frac{beta_k}{2}$ is rational. Then both
              $sin beta_k$, and $cos beta_k$ will be rational. Moreover, the distances between all these points will be rational.



              Therefore, for every $sin mathbb{Q}$ consider an angle $beta_s$ with $tan frac{beta_s}{2}= s$. Then the corresponding point on the circle will be
              $$P_s= e^{i 2 beta_s} =
              left(frac{1 - 6 s^2 + s^4}{(1 + s^2)^2}, frac{4 s (1 -s^2)}{(1 + s^2)^2}right)$$



              One can check that
              $$d(P_s ,P_t) = frac{4 |(s-t)(1+s t)|}{(1+s^2)(1+t^2)}$$



              We are taking squares of rational points on the circle. Their pairwise distances are also rational.



              $bf{Added:}$ Check a similar problem on this site at the link.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                On a unit circle, you can produce countably many points so that the mutual distances are rational. That is why they exclude the circle points in their problem.



                To explain what happens here: say $z_l= e^{ialpha_k}$, $k = 1,2$. Then
                $$|z_1 - z_2| = 2 |sin(frac{alpha_1 - alpha_2}{2})|$$



                Let now $alpha_k = 2 beta_k$. Then $|z_1 - z_2| = 2 |sin(beta_1 - beta_2)| = 2 | sin beta_1 cos beta_2 - sin beta_2 cos beta_1|$.



                Take now $beta_k$ so that $tan frac{beta_k}{2}$ is rational. Then both
                $sin beta_k$, and $cos beta_k$ will be rational. Moreover, the distances between all these points will be rational.



                Therefore, for every $sin mathbb{Q}$ consider an angle $beta_s$ with $tan frac{beta_s}{2}= s$. Then the corresponding point on the circle will be
                $$P_s= e^{i 2 beta_s} =
                left(frac{1 - 6 s^2 + s^4}{(1 + s^2)^2}, frac{4 s (1 -s^2)}{(1 + s^2)^2}right)$$



                One can check that
                $$d(P_s ,P_t) = frac{4 |(s-t)(1+s t)|}{(1+s^2)(1+t^2)}$$



                We are taking squares of rational points on the circle. Their pairwise distances are also rational.



                $bf{Added:}$ Check a similar problem on this site at the link.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                On a unit circle, you can produce countably many points so that the mutual distances are rational. That is why they exclude the circle points in their problem.



                To explain what happens here: say $z_l= e^{ialpha_k}$, $k = 1,2$. Then
                $$|z_1 - z_2| = 2 |sin(frac{alpha_1 - alpha_2}{2})|$$



                Let now $alpha_k = 2 beta_k$. Then $|z_1 - z_2| = 2 |sin(beta_1 - beta_2)| = 2 | sin beta_1 cos beta_2 - sin beta_2 cos beta_1|$.



                Take now $beta_k$ so that $tan frac{beta_k}{2}$ is rational. Then both
                $sin beta_k$, and $cos beta_k$ will be rational. Moreover, the distances between all these points will be rational.



                Therefore, for every $sin mathbb{Q}$ consider an angle $beta_s$ with $tan frac{beta_s}{2}= s$. Then the corresponding point on the circle will be
                $$P_s= e^{i 2 beta_s} =
                left(frac{1 - 6 s^2 + s^4}{(1 + s^2)^2}, frac{4 s (1 -s^2)}{(1 + s^2)^2}right)$$



                One can check that
                $$d(P_s ,P_t) = frac{4 |(s-t)(1+s t)|}{(1+s^2)(1+t^2)}$$



                We are taking squares of rational points on the circle. Their pairwise distances are also rational.



                $bf{Added:}$ Check a similar problem on this site at the link.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Oct 23 '17 at 4:46

























                answered Oct 23 '17 at 4:23









                Orest BucicovschiOrest Bucicovschi

                28.5k31746




                28.5k31746






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2485407%2fis-it-possible-to-find-8-non-collinear-points-with-their-mutual-distances-being%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

                    android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

                    WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]