Is it true that $( forall S int_{S} A dS = 0 )implies A equiv 0 $












0












$begingroup$


Is it true that



$( forall S int_{S} A dS = 0 )implies A equiv 0 $



where $S$ is a surface and $A$ is some function which takes values on $S$?



Is there a requirement on the smoothness of $S$? (In my case it is the boundary of a region in which some function $u$ satisfies Laplace's equation.)



Does this result generalise to



$( forall R int_{R} A dR = 0) implies A equiv 0 $?



For $R$ $subset mathbb{R}^n$ with $dim(R) = k$ - some specified type of region where the integral is defined, e.g. a surface, a volume, etc.?



I have a feeling that the first is true, but I can't manage to prove it.





Given the counterexample in the answers, let's impose the restriction that A, R are continuous.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you at least have that $A$ is continuous?
    $endgroup$
    – Cocopuffs
    Mar 27 '13 at 12:38










  • $begingroup$
    Erm. Well, in my problem, yes, but I am interested in how this works in the general case, so if there is an answer which is restricted to $A in C^{n}[R]$ or $A in C^{infty}[R]$ then I would very much like to know. @Cocopuffs.
    $endgroup$
    – user27182
    Mar 27 '13 at 12:42


















0












$begingroup$


Is it true that



$( forall S int_{S} A dS = 0 )implies A equiv 0 $



where $S$ is a surface and $A$ is some function which takes values on $S$?



Is there a requirement on the smoothness of $S$? (In my case it is the boundary of a region in which some function $u$ satisfies Laplace's equation.)



Does this result generalise to



$( forall R int_{R} A dR = 0) implies A equiv 0 $?



For $R$ $subset mathbb{R}^n$ with $dim(R) = k$ - some specified type of region where the integral is defined, e.g. a surface, a volume, etc.?



I have a feeling that the first is true, but I can't manage to prove it.





Given the counterexample in the answers, let's impose the restriction that A, R are continuous.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you at least have that $A$ is continuous?
    $endgroup$
    – Cocopuffs
    Mar 27 '13 at 12:38










  • $begingroup$
    Erm. Well, in my problem, yes, but I am interested in how this works in the general case, so if there is an answer which is restricted to $A in C^{n}[R]$ or $A in C^{infty}[R]$ then I would very much like to know. @Cocopuffs.
    $endgroup$
    – user27182
    Mar 27 '13 at 12:42
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


Is it true that



$( forall S int_{S} A dS = 0 )implies A equiv 0 $



where $S$ is a surface and $A$ is some function which takes values on $S$?



Is there a requirement on the smoothness of $S$? (In my case it is the boundary of a region in which some function $u$ satisfies Laplace's equation.)



Does this result generalise to



$( forall R int_{R} A dR = 0) implies A equiv 0 $?



For $R$ $subset mathbb{R}^n$ with $dim(R) = k$ - some specified type of region where the integral is defined, e.g. a surface, a volume, etc.?



I have a feeling that the first is true, but I can't manage to prove it.





Given the counterexample in the answers, let's impose the restriction that A, R are continuous.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Is it true that



$( forall S int_{S} A dS = 0 )implies A equiv 0 $



where $S$ is a surface and $A$ is some function which takes values on $S$?



Is there a requirement on the smoothness of $S$? (In my case it is the boundary of a region in which some function $u$ satisfies Laplace's equation.)



Does this result generalise to



$( forall R int_{R} A dR = 0) implies A equiv 0 $?



For $R$ $subset mathbb{R}^n$ with $dim(R) = k$ - some specified type of region where the integral is defined, e.g. a surface, a volume, etc.?



I have a feeling that the first is true, but I can't manage to prove it.





Given the counterexample in the answers, let's impose the restriction that A, R are continuous.







calculus integration






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 27 '13 at 12:49







user27182

















asked Mar 27 '13 at 12:23









user27182user27182

1,032627




1,032627












  • $begingroup$
    Do you at least have that $A$ is continuous?
    $endgroup$
    – Cocopuffs
    Mar 27 '13 at 12:38










  • $begingroup$
    Erm. Well, in my problem, yes, but I am interested in how this works in the general case, so if there is an answer which is restricted to $A in C^{n}[R]$ or $A in C^{infty}[R]$ then I would very much like to know. @Cocopuffs.
    $endgroup$
    – user27182
    Mar 27 '13 at 12:42




















  • $begingroup$
    Do you at least have that $A$ is continuous?
    $endgroup$
    – Cocopuffs
    Mar 27 '13 at 12:38










  • $begingroup$
    Erm. Well, in my problem, yes, but I am interested in how this works in the general case, so if there is an answer which is restricted to $A in C^{n}[R]$ or $A in C^{infty}[R]$ then I would very much like to know. @Cocopuffs.
    $endgroup$
    – user27182
    Mar 27 '13 at 12:42


















$begingroup$
Do you at least have that $A$ is continuous?
$endgroup$
– Cocopuffs
Mar 27 '13 at 12:38




$begingroup$
Do you at least have that $A$ is continuous?
$endgroup$
– Cocopuffs
Mar 27 '13 at 12:38












$begingroup$
Erm. Well, in my problem, yes, but I am interested in how this works in the general case, so if there is an answer which is restricted to $A in C^{n}[R]$ or $A in C^{infty}[R]$ then I would very much like to know. @Cocopuffs.
$endgroup$
– user27182
Mar 27 '13 at 12:42






$begingroup$
Erm. Well, in my problem, yes, but I am interested in how this works in the general case, so if there is an answer which is restricted to $A in C^{n}[R]$ or $A in C^{infty}[R]$ then I would very much like to know. @Cocopuffs.
$endgroup$
– user27182
Mar 27 '13 at 12:42












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Ross B. has demonstrated a counterexample if $A$ is discontinuous.



Suppose $A ne 0$ is continuous, and let $A(x_0) > 0$ WLOG. By continuity, there is a neighborhood of $x_0$ on which $A>0;$ form a surface $S'$ from this neighborhood.



Then $int_{S'} A dS' > int_{S'} min(A) dS' = min(A)text{vol}(S') > 0,$ a contradiction. Thus $A = 0.$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    If $A$ is not continuous, for your second answer a counterexample would be the function which is $1$ at $x=0$ and $0$ everywhere else.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f342725%2fis-it-true-that-forall-s-int-s-a-ds-0-implies-a-equiv-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2












      $begingroup$

      Ross B. has demonstrated a counterexample if $A$ is discontinuous.



      Suppose $A ne 0$ is continuous, and let $A(x_0) > 0$ WLOG. By continuity, there is a neighborhood of $x_0$ on which $A>0;$ form a surface $S'$ from this neighborhood.



      Then $int_{S'} A dS' > int_{S'} min(A) dS' = min(A)text{vol}(S') > 0,$ a contradiction. Thus $A = 0.$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        2












        $begingroup$

        Ross B. has demonstrated a counterexample if $A$ is discontinuous.



        Suppose $A ne 0$ is continuous, and let $A(x_0) > 0$ WLOG. By continuity, there is a neighborhood of $x_0$ on which $A>0;$ form a surface $S'$ from this neighborhood.



        Then $int_{S'} A dS' > int_{S'} min(A) dS' = min(A)text{vol}(S') > 0,$ a contradiction. Thus $A = 0.$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Ross B. has demonstrated a counterexample if $A$ is discontinuous.



          Suppose $A ne 0$ is continuous, and let $A(x_0) > 0$ WLOG. By continuity, there is a neighborhood of $x_0$ on which $A>0;$ form a surface $S'$ from this neighborhood.



          Then $int_{S'} A dS' > int_{S'} min(A) dS' = min(A)text{vol}(S') > 0,$ a contradiction. Thus $A = 0.$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Ross B. has demonstrated a counterexample if $A$ is discontinuous.



          Suppose $A ne 0$ is continuous, and let $A(x_0) > 0$ WLOG. By continuity, there is a neighborhood of $x_0$ on which $A>0;$ form a surface $S'$ from this neighborhood.



          Then $int_{S'} A dS' > int_{S'} min(A) dS' = min(A)text{vol}(S') > 0,$ a contradiction. Thus $A = 0.$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 7 at 2:41









          Display nameDisplay name

          836314




          836314























              2












              $begingroup$

              If $A$ is not continuous, for your second answer a counterexample would be the function which is $1$ at $x=0$ and $0$ everywhere else.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                If $A$ is not continuous, for your second answer a counterexample would be the function which is $1$ at $x=0$ and $0$ everywhere else.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  If $A$ is not continuous, for your second answer a counterexample would be the function which is $1$ at $x=0$ and $0$ everywhere else.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  If $A$ is not continuous, for your second answer a counterexample would be the function which is $1$ at $x=0$ and $0$ everywhere else.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 27 '13 at 12:47









                  Ross B.Ross B.

                  1,657516




                  1,657516






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f342725%2fis-it-true-that-forall-s-int-s-a-ds-0-implies-a-equiv-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

                      android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

                      SQL update select statement