Python: Represent directory structure tree as list of lists












2















I have a list of directories extracted from os.walk. I removed the files because I don't need them.



.
|____A
|____G
|____H
|____K
|____L
|____B
|____I
|____J
|____C
|____D
|____E
|____F
|____M


So it looks like this:



['.', ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F']], ['A', ['G', 'H']], ['A\G', ], ['A\H', ['K', 'L']], ['A\G\K', ], ['A\G\L', ], ['B', ['I', 'J']], ['B\I', ], ['B\J', ], ['C', ], ['D', ], ['E', ], ['F', ['M']], ['F\M', ]


What I actually need is a real representation of the tree structure in a list like so:



['.', ['A' ['G', 'H' ['K', 'L']], ['B' ['I', 'J']], 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F' ['M']] 


ty ;)










share|improve this question




















  • 2





    'H' ['K', 'L'], 'F' ['M'] is not valid syntax. Do you mean ['H', ['K', 'L']], ['F', ['M']]?

    – Ajax1234
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:57











  • hm i am not sure... i mean to represent the structure shown at the top

    – zwusel
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:02


















2















I have a list of directories extracted from os.walk. I removed the files because I don't need them.



.
|____A
|____G
|____H
|____K
|____L
|____B
|____I
|____J
|____C
|____D
|____E
|____F
|____M


So it looks like this:



['.', ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F']], ['A', ['G', 'H']], ['A\G', ], ['A\H', ['K', 'L']], ['A\G\K', ], ['A\G\L', ], ['B', ['I', 'J']], ['B\I', ], ['B\J', ], ['C', ], ['D', ], ['E', ], ['F', ['M']], ['F\M', ]


What I actually need is a real representation of the tree structure in a list like so:



['.', ['A' ['G', 'H' ['K', 'L']], ['B' ['I', 'J']], 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F' ['M']] 


ty ;)










share|improve this question




















  • 2





    'H' ['K', 'L'], 'F' ['M'] is not valid syntax. Do you mean ['H', ['K', 'L']], ['F', ['M']]?

    – Ajax1234
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:57











  • hm i am not sure... i mean to represent the structure shown at the top

    – zwusel
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:02
















2












2








2








I have a list of directories extracted from os.walk. I removed the files because I don't need them.



.
|____A
|____G
|____H
|____K
|____L
|____B
|____I
|____J
|____C
|____D
|____E
|____F
|____M


So it looks like this:



['.', ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F']], ['A', ['G', 'H']], ['A\G', ], ['A\H', ['K', 'L']], ['A\G\K', ], ['A\G\L', ], ['B', ['I', 'J']], ['B\I', ], ['B\J', ], ['C', ], ['D', ], ['E', ], ['F', ['M']], ['F\M', ]


What I actually need is a real representation of the tree structure in a list like so:



['.', ['A' ['G', 'H' ['K', 'L']], ['B' ['I', 'J']], 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F' ['M']] 


ty ;)










share|improve this question
















I have a list of directories extracted from os.walk. I removed the files because I don't need them.



.
|____A
|____G
|____H
|____K
|____L
|____B
|____I
|____J
|____C
|____D
|____E
|____F
|____M


So it looks like this:



['.', ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F']], ['A', ['G', 'H']], ['A\G', ], ['A\H', ['K', 'L']], ['A\G\K', ], ['A\G\L', ], ['B', ['I', 'J']], ['B\I', ], ['B\J', ], ['C', ], ['D', ], ['E', ], ['F', ['M']], ['F\M', ]


What I actually need is a real representation of the tree structure in a list like so:



['.', ['A' ['G', 'H' ['K', 'L']], ['B' ['I', 'J']], 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F' ['M']] 


ty ;)







python list directory treeview






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 20 '18 at 16:05







zwusel

















asked Nov 20 '18 at 15:50









zwuselzwusel

568




568








  • 2





    'H' ['K', 'L'], 'F' ['M'] is not valid syntax. Do you mean ['H', ['K', 'L']], ['F', ['M']]?

    – Ajax1234
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:57











  • hm i am not sure... i mean to represent the structure shown at the top

    – zwusel
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:02
















  • 2





    'H' ['K', 'L'], 'F' ['M'] is not valid syntax. Do you mean ['H', ['K', 'L']], ['F', ['M']]?

    – Ajax1234
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:57











  • hm i am not sure... i mean to represent the structure shown at the top

    – zwusel
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:02










2




2





'H' ['K', 'L'], 'F' ['M'] is not valid syntax. Do you mean ['H', ['K', 'L']], ['F', ['M']]?

– Ajax1234
Nov 20 '18 at 15:57





'H' ['K', 'L'], 'F' ['M'] is not valid syntax. Do you mean ['H', ['K', 'L']], ['F', ['M']]?

– Ajax1234
Nov 20 '18 at 15:57













hm i am not sure... i mean to represent the structure shown at the top

– zwusel
Nov 20 '18 at 16:02







hm i am not sure... i mean to represent the structure shown at the top

– zwusel
Nov 20 '18 at 16:02














2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














You can construct a dictionary from the flattened values, and then use recursion:



import re
d = ['.', ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F']], ['A', ['G', 'H']], ['A\G', ], ['A\H', ['K', 'L']], ['A\G\K', ], ['A\G\L', ], ['B', ['I', 'J']], ['B\I', ], ['B\J', ], ['C', ], ['D', ], ['E', ], ['F', ['M']], ['F\M', ]
new_d = {re.findall('.$', a)[0]:b for a, b in d}
def _tree(_start):
if not new_d[_start]:
return _start
_c = [_tree(i) for i in new_d[_start]]
return [_start, *(_c if any(not isinstance(i, str) for i in _c) else [_c])]

print(_tree('.'))


Output:



['.', ['A', 'G', ['H', ['K', 'L']]], ['B', ['I', 'J']], 'C', 'D', 'E', ['F', ['M']]]


Edit: Python2 version:



import re
d = ['.', ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F']], ['A', ['G', 'H']], ['A\G', ], ['A\H', ['K', 'L']], ['A\G\K', ], ['A\G\L', ], ['B', ['I', 'J']], ['B\I', ], ['B\J', ], ['C', ], ['D', ], ['E', ], ['F', ['M']], ['F\M', ]
new_d = {re.findall('.$', a)[0]:b for a, b in d}
def _tree(_start):
if not new_d[_start]:
return _start
_c = [_tree(i) for i in new_d[_start]]
return [_start]+(_c if any(not isinstance(i, str) for i in _c) else [_c])

print(_tree('.'))





share|improve this answer


























  • ty for the input. Sadly i am working with python 2.7 so i can not use starred expressions :(

    – zwusel
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:10











  • @zwusel Please see my recent edit for a Python2-compatible solution.

    – Ajax1234
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:12





















1














this does not return the datatype you are looking for but a nested dictionary (as this feels more natural to me as a tree structure):



from collections import defaultdict

lst = (['.', ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F']],
['A', ['G', 'H']], ['A\G', ],
['A\H', ['K', 'L']], ['A\G\K', ], ['A\G\L', ],
['B', ['I', 'J']], ['B\I', ], ['B\J', ], ['C', ],
['D', ], ['E', ], ['F', ['M']], ['F\M', ])

def rec_dd():
""""recursive default dict"""
return defaultdict(rec_dd)

tree = rec_dd()
for here, dirs in lst:
if not here.startswith('.'):
cur_tree = tree['.']
else:
cur_tree = tree
for key in here.split('\'):
cur_tree = cur_tree[key]

for d in dirs:
cur_tree[d] = rec_dd()


you can pretty print it this way:



import json
print(json.dumps(tree, sort_keys=True, indent=4))


and the result is:



{
".": {
"A": {
"G": {
"K": {},
"L": {}
},
"H": {
"K": {},
"L": {}
}
},
"B": {
"I": {},
"J": {}
},
"C": {},
"D": {},
"E": {},
"F": {
"M": {}
}
}
}





share|improve this answer


























  • Ty, maybe i will change my datatype of choice to a dict...seems to make more sense ;)

    – zwusel
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:41











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53396710%2fpython-represent-directory-structure-tree-as-list-of-lists%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














You can construct a dictionary from the flattened values, and then use recursion:



import re
d = ['.', ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F']], ['A', ['G', 'H']], ['A\G', ], ['A\H', ['K', 'L']], ['A\G\K', ], ['A\G\L', ], ['B', ['I', 'J']], ['B\I', ], ['B\J', ], ['C', ], ['D', ], ['E', ], ['F', ['M']], ['F\M', ]
new_d = {re.findall('.$', a)[0]:b for a, b in d}
def _tree(_start):
if not new_d[_start]:
return _start
_c = [_tree(i) for i in new_d[_start]]
return [_start, *(_c if any(not isinstance(i, str) for i in _c) else [_c])]

print(_tree('.'))


Output:



['.', ['A', 'G', ['H', ['K', 'L']]], ['B', ['I', 'J']], 'C', 'D', 'E', ['F', ['M']]]


Edit: Python2 version:



import re
d = ['.', ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F']], ['A', ['G', 'H']], ['A\G', ], ['A\H', ['K', 'L']], ['A\G\K', ], ['A\G\L', ], ['B', ['I', 'J']], ['B\I', ], ['B\J', ], ['C', ], ['D', ], ['E', ], ['F', ['M']], ['F\M', ]
new_d = {re.findall('.$', a)[0]:b for a, b in d}
def _tree(_start):
if not new_d[_start]:
return _start
_c = [_tree(i) for i in new_d[_start]]
return [_start]+(_c if any(not isinstance(i, str) for i in _c) else [_c])

print(_tree('.'))





share|improve this answer


























  • ty for the input. Sadly i am working with python 2.7 so i can not use starred expressions :(

    – zwusel
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:10











  • @zwusel Please see my recent edit for a Python2-compatible solution.

    – Ajax1234
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:12


















3














You can construct a dictionary from the flattened values, and then use recursion:



import re
d = ['.', ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F']], ['A', ['G', 'H']], ['A\G', ], ['A\H', ['K', 'L']], ['A\G\K', ], ['A\G\L', ], ['B', ['I', 'J']], ['B\I', ], ['B\J', ], ['C', ], ['D', ], ['E', ], ['F', ['M']], ['F\M', ]
new_d = {re.findall('.$', a)[0]:b for a, b in d}
def _tree(_start):
if not new_d[_start]:
return _start
_c = [_tree(i) for i in new_d[_start]]
return [_start, *(_c if any(not isinstance(i, str) for i in _c) else [_c])]

print(_tree('.'))


Output:



['.', ['A', 'G', ['H', ['K', 'L']]], ['B', ['I', 'J']], 'C', 'D', 'E', ['F', ['M']]]


Edit: Python2 version:



import re
d = ['.', ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F']], ['A', ['G', 'H']], ['A\G', ], ['A\H', ['K', 'L']], ['A\G\K', ], ['A\G\L', ], ['B', ['I', 'J']], ['B\I', ], ['B\J', ], ['C', ], ['D', ], ['E', ], ['F', ['M']], ['F\M', ]
new_d = {re.findall('.$', a)[0]:b for a, b in d}
def _tree(_start):
if not new_d[_start]:
return _start
_c = [_tree(i) for i in new_d[_start]]
return [_start]+(_c if any(not isinstance(i, str) for i in _c) else [_c])

print(_tree('.'))





share|improve this answer


























  • ty for the input. Sadly i am working with python 2.7 so i can not use starred expressions :(

    – zwusel
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:10











  • @zwusel Please see my recent edit for a Python2-compatible solution.

    – Ajax1234
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:12
















3












3








3







You can construct a dictionary from the flattened values, and then use recursion:



import re
d = ['.', ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F']], ['A', ['G', 'H']], ['A\G', ], ['A\H', ['K', 'L']], ['A\G\K', ], ['A\G\L', ], ['B', ['I', 'J']], ['B\I', ], ['B\J', ], ['C', ], ['D', ], ['E', ], ['F', ['M']], ['F\M', ]
new_d = {re.findall('.$', a)[0]:b for a, b in d}
def _tree(_start):
if not new_d[_start]:
return _start
_c = [_tree(i) for i in new_d[_start]]
return [_start, *(_c if any(not isinstance(i, str) for i in _c) else [_c])]

print(_tree('.'))


Output:



['.', ['A', 'G', ['H', ['K', 'L']]], ['B', ['I', 'J']], 'C', 'D', 'E', ['F', ['M']]]


Edit: Python2 version:



import re
d = ['.', ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F']], ['A', ['G', 'H']], ['A\G', ], ['A\H', ['K', 'L']], ['A\G\K', ], ['A\G\L', ], ['B', ['I', 'J']], ['B\I', ], ['B\J', ], ['C', ], ['D', ], ['E', ], ['F', ['M']], ['F\M', ]
new_d = {re.findall('.$', a)[0]:b for a, b in d}
def _tree(_start):
if not new_d[_start]:
return _start
_c = [_tree(i) for i in new_d[_start]]
return [_start]+(_c if any(not isinstance(i, str) for i in _c) else [_c])

print(_tree('.'))





share|improve this answer















You can construct a dictionary from the flattened values, and then use recursion:



import re
d = ['.', ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F']], ['A', ['G', 'H']], ['A\G', ], ['A\H', ['K', 'L']], ['A\G\K', ], ['A\G\L', ], ['B', ['I', 'J']], ['B\I', ], ['B\J', ], ['C', ], ['D', ], ['E', ], ['F', ['M']], ['F\M', ]
new_d = {re.findall('.$', a)[0]:b for a, b in d}
def _tree(_start):
if not new_d[_start]:
return _start
_c = [_tree(i) for i in new_d[_start]]
return [_start, *(_c if any(not isinstance(i, str) for i in _c) else [_c])]

print(_tree('.'))


Output:



['.', ['A', 'G', ['H', ['K', 'L']]], ['B', ['I', 'J']], 'C', 'D', 'E', ['F', ['M']]]


Edit: Python2 version:



import re
d = ['.', ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F']], ['A', ['G', 'H']], ['A\G', ], ['A\H', ['K', 'L']], ['A\G\K', ], ['A\G\L', ], ['B', ['I', 'J']], ['B\I', ], ['B\J', ], ['C', ], ['D', ], ['E', ], ['F', ['M']], ['F\M', ]
new_d = {re.findall('.$', a)[0]:b for a, b in d}
def _tree(_start):
if not new_d[_start]:
return _start
_c = [_tree(i) for i in new_d[_start]]
return [_start]+(_c if any(not isinstance(i, str) for i in _c) else [_c])

print(_tree('.'))






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 20 '18 at 16:12

























answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:05









Ajax1234Ajax1234

41k42853




41k42853













  • ty for the input. Sadly i am working with python 2.7 so i can not use starred expressions :(

    – zwusel
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:10











  • @zwusel Please see my recent edit for a Python2-compatible solution.

    – Ajax1234
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:12





















  • ty for the input. Sadly i am working with python 2.7 so i can not use starred expressions :(

    – zwusel
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:10











  • @zwusel Please see my recent edit for a Python2-compatible solution.

    – Ajax1234
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:12



















ty for the input. Sadly i am working with python 2.7 so i can not use starred expressions :(

– zwusel
Nov 20 '18 at 16:10





ty for the input. Sadly i am working with python 2.7 so i can not use starred expressions :(

– zwusel
Nov 20 '18 at 16:10













@zwusel Please see my recent edit for a Python2-compatible solution.

– Ajax1234
Nov 20 '18 at 16:12







@zwusel Please see my recent edit for a Python2-compatible solution.

– Ajax1234
Nov 20 '18 at 16:12















1














this does not return the datatype you are looking for but a nested dictionary (as this feels more natural to me as a tree structure):



from collections import defaultdict

lst = (['.', ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F']],
['A', ['G', 'H']], ['A\G', ],
['A\H', ['K', 'L']], ['A\G\K', ], ['A\G\L', ],
['B', ['I', 'J']], ['B\I', ], ['B\J', ], ['C', ],
['D', ], ['E', ], ['F', ['M']], ['F\M', ])

def rec_dd():
""""recursive default dict"""
return defaultdict(rec_dd)

tree = rec_dd()
for here, dirs in lst:
if not here.startswith('.'):
cur_tree = tree['.']
else:
cur_tree = tree
for key in here.split('\'):
cur_tree = cur_tree[key]

for d in dirs:
cur_tree[d] = rec_dd()


you can pretty print it this way:



import json
print(json.dumps(tree, sort_keys=True, indent=4))


and the result is:



{
".": {
"A": {
"G": {
"K": {},
"L": {}
},
"H": {
"K": {},
"L": {}
}
},
"B": {
"I": {},
"J": {}
},
"C": {},
"D": {},
"E": {},
"F": {
"M": {}
}
}
}





share|improve this answer


























  • Ty, maybe i will change my datatype of choice to a dict...seems to make more sense ;)

    – zwusel
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:41
















1














this does not return the datatype you are looking for but a nested dictionary (as this feels more natural to me as a tree structure):



from collections import defaultdict

lst = (['.', ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F']],
['A', ['G', 'H']], ['A\G', ],
['A\H', ['K', 'L']], ['A\G\K', ], ['A\G\L', ],
['B', ['I', 'J']], ['B\I', ], ['B\J', ], ['C', ],
['D', ], ['E', ], ['F', ['M']], ['F\M', ])

def rec_dd():
""""recursive default dict"""
return defaultdict(rec_dd)

tree = rec_dd()
for here, dirs in lst:
if not here.startswith('.'):
cur_tree = tree['.']
else:
cur_tree = tree
for key in here.split('\'):
cur_tree = cur_tree[key]

for d in dirs:
cur_tree[d] = rec_dd()


you can pretty print it this way:



import json
print(json.dumps(tree, sort_keys=True, indent=4))


and the result is:



{
".": {
"A": {
"G": {
"K": {},
"L": {}
},
"H": {
"K": {},
"L": {}
}
},
"B": {
"I": {},
"J": {}
},
"C": {},
"D": {},
"E": {},
"F": {
"M": {}
}
}
}





share|improve this answer


























  • Ty, maybe i will change my datatype of choice to a dict...seems to make more sense ;)

    – zwusel
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:41














1












1








1







this does not return the datatype you are looking for but a nested dictionary (as this feels more natural to me as a tree structure):



from collections import defaultdict

lst = (['.', ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F']],
['A', ['G', 'H']], ['A\G', ],
['A\H', ['K', 'L']], ['A\G\K', ], ['A\G\L', ],
['B', ['I', 'J']], ['B\I', ], ['B\J', ], ['C', ],
['D', ], ['E', ], ['F', ['M']], ['F\M', ])

def rec_dd():
""""recursive default dict"""
return defaultdict(rec_dd)

tree = rec_dd()
for here, dirs in lst:
if not here.startswith('.'):
cur_tree = tree['.']
else:
cur_tree = tree
for key in here.split('\'):
cur_tree = cur_tree[key]

for d in dirs:
cur_tree[d] = rec_dd()


you can pretty print it this way:



import json
print(json.dumps(tree, sort_keys=True, indent=4))


and the result is:



{
".": {
"A": {
"G": {
"K": {},
"L": {}
},
"H": {
"K": {},
"L": {}
}
},
"B": {
"I": {},
"J": {}
},
"C": {},
"D": {},
"E": {},
"F": {
"M": {}
}
}
}





share|improve this answer















this does not return the datatype you are looking for but a nested dictionary (as this feels more natural to me as a tree structure):



from collections import defaultdict

lst = (['.', ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F']],
['A', ['G', 'H']], ['A\G', ],
['A\H', ['K', 'L']], ['A\G\K', ], ['A\G\L', ],
['B', ['I', 'J']], ['B\I', ], ['B\J', ], ['C', ],
['D', ], ['E', ], ['F', ['M']], ['F\M', ])

def rec_dd():
""""recursive default dict"""
return defaultdict(rec_dd)

tree = rec_dd()
for here, dirs in lst:
if not here.startswith('.'):
cur_tree = tree['.']
else:
cur_tree = tree
for key in here.split('\'):
cur_tree = cur_tree[key]

for d in dirs:
cur_tree[d] = rec_dd()


you can pretty print it this way:



import json
print(json.dumps(tree, sort_keys=True, indent=4))


and the result is:



{
".": {
"A": {
"G": {
"K": {},
"L": {}
},
"H": {
"K": {},
"L": {}
}
},
"B": {
"I": {},
"J": {}
},
"C": {},
"D": {},
"E": {},
"F": {
"M": {}
}
}
}






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 20 '18 at 16:22

























answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:15









hiro protagonisthiro protagonist

18.4k64060




18.4k64060













  • Ty, maybe i will change my datatype of choice to a dict...seems to make more sense ;)

    – zwusel
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:41



















  • Ty, maybe i will change my datatype of choice to a dict...seems to make more sense ;)

    – zwusel
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:41

















Ty, maybe i will change my datatype of choice to a dict...seems to make more sense ;)

– zwusel
Nov 21 '18 at 7:41





Ty, maybe i will change my datatype of choice to a dict...seems to make more sense ;)

– zwusel
Nov 21 '18 at 7:41


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53396710%2fpython-represent-directory-structure-tree-as-list-of-lists%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]