What exactly do “captain”, “pilot”, “co-pilot” and “first officer” mean?












22












$begingroup$


I know the co-pilot sits beside the pilot. But it's not clear for me, who is the captain and who is the first officer?



And where they are sitting during the flight? Who is in right seat and who is in left seat, and probably who will seat behind the front seats for an aircraft with more than two flight crew?






terminology airline-pilot







share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The term co-pilot has largely fallen out of use in the industry. It’s mostly used nowadays only by the media and public.
    $endgroup$
    – TomMcW
    Jan 8 at 2:25










  • $begingroup$
    Is in jet fighter also use term captain rather then pilot?
    $endgroup$
    – AirCraft Lover
    Jan 8 at 2:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Since “captain” is a rank in the armed services, and a different rank between different branches, the pilot would only be called a captain if he/she was actually that rank. In the USAF I believe some pilots are captains. But in the navy they would not be. I’m not real familiar with military terms, so they may still use co-pilot on aircraft that have a two-pilot crew.
    $endgroup$
    – TomMcW
    Jan 8 at 2:38






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Btw, edited your question to read “flight crew.” Cabin crew would be the flight attendants, etc.
    $endgroup$
    – TomMcW
    Jan 8 at 2:40










  • $begingroup$
    Thank @TomMcW for your kindness to correct my question. As not native English speaking, I realize that my English is far from good. That the reason I always appreciated every correction that I believe will help readers to understand.
    $endgroup$
    – AirCraft Lover
    Jan 8 at 4:02


















22












$begingroup$


I know the co-pilot sits beside the pilot. But it's not clear for me, who is the captain and who is the first officer?



And where they are sitting during the flight? Who is in right seat and who is in left seat, and probably who will seat behind the front seats for an aircraft with more than two flight crew?






terminology airline-pilot







share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The term co-pilot has largely fallen out of use in the industry. It’s mostly used nowadays only by the media and public.
    $endgroup$
    – TomMcW
    Jan 8 at 2:25










  • $begingroup$
    Is in jet fighter also use term captain rather then pilot?
    $endgroup$
    – AirCraft Lover
    Jan 8 at 2:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Since “captain” is a rank in the armed services, and a different rank between different branches, the pilot would only be called a captain if he/she was actually that rank. In the USAF I believe some pilots are captains. But in the navy they would not be. I’m not real familiar with military terms, so they may still use co-pilot on aircraft that have a two-pilot crew.
    $endgroup$
    – TomMcW
    Jan 8 at 2:38






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Btw, edited your question to read “flight crew.” Cabin crew would be the flight attendants, etc.
    $endgroup$
    – TomMcW
    Jan 8 at 2:40










  • $begingroup$
    Thank @TomMcW for your kindness to correct my question. As not native English speaking, I realize that my English is far from good. That the reason I always appreciated every correction that I believe will help readers to understand.
    $endgroup$
    – AirCraft Lover
    Jan 8 at 4:02
















22












22








22


2



$begingroup$


I know the co-pilot sits beside the pilot. But it's not clear for me, who is the captain and who is the first officer?



And where they are sitting during the flight? Who is in right seat and who is in left seat, and probably who will seat behind the front seats for an aircraft with more than two flight crew?






terminology airline-pilot







share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I know the co-pilot sits beside the pilot. But it's not clear for me, who is the captain and who is the first officer?



And where they are sitting during the flight? Who is in right seat and who is in left seat, and probably who will seat behind the front seats for an aircraft with more than two flight crew?






terminology airline-pilot




terminology airline-pilot






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 8 at 2:39









TomMcW

17k765156




17k765156










asked Jan 7 at 3:36









AirCraft LoverAirCraft Lover

479113




479113








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The term co-pilot has largely fallen out of use in the industry. It’s mostly used nowadays only by the media and public.
    $endgroup$
    – TomMcW
    Jan 8 at 2:25










  • $begingroup$
    Is in jet fighter also use term captain rather then pilot?
    $endgroup$
    – AirCraft Lover
    Jan 8 at 2:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Since “captain” is a rank in the armed services, and a different rank between different branches, the pilot would only be called a captain if he/she was actually that rank. In the USAF I believe some pilots are captains. But in the navy they would not be. I’m not real familiar with military terms, so they may still use co-pilot on aircraft that have a two-pilot crew.
    $endgroup$
    – TomMcW
    Jan 8 at 2:38






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Btw, edited your question to read “flight crew.” Cabin crew would be the flight attendants, etc.
    $endgroup$
    – TomMcW
    Jan 8 at 2:40










  • $begingroup$
    Thank @TomMcW for your kindness to correct my question. As not native English speaking, I realize that my English is far from good. That the reason I always appreciated every correction that I believe will help readers to understand.
    $endgroup$
    – AirCraft Lover
    Jan 8 at 4:02
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The term co-pilot has largely fallen out of use in the industry. It’s mostly used nowadays only by the media and public.
    $endgroup$
    – TomMcW
    Jan 8 at 2:25










  • $begingroup$
    Is in jet fighter also use term captain rather then pilot?
    $endgroup$
    – AirCraft Lover
    Jan 8 at 2:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Since “captain” is a rank in the armed services, and a different rank between different branches, the pilot would only be called a captain if he/she was actually that rank. In the USAF I believe some pilots are captains. But in the navy they would not be. I’m not real familiar with military terms, so they may still use co-pilot on aircraft that have a two-pilot crew.
    $endgroup$
    – TomMcW
    Jan 8 at 2:38






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Btw, edited your question to read “flight crew.” Cabin crew would be the flight attendants, etc.
    $endgroup$
    – TomMcW
    Jan 8 at 2:40










  • $begingroup$
    Thank @TomMcW for your kindness to correct my question. As not native English speaking, I realize that my English is far from good. That the reason I always appreciated every correction that I believe will help readers to understand.
    $endgroup$
    – AirCraft Lover
    Jan 8 at 4:02










1




1




$begingroup$
The term co-pilot has largely fallen out of use in the industry. It’s mostly used nowadays only by the media and public.
$endgroup$
– TomMcW
Jan 8 at 2:25




$begingroup$
The term co-pilot has largely fallen out of use in the industry. It’s mostly used nowadays only by the media and public.
$endgroup$
– TomMcW
Jan 8 at 2:25












$begingroup$
Is in jet fighter also use term captain rather then pilot?
$endgroup$
– AirCraft Lover
Jan 8 at 2:26




$begingroup$
Is in jet fighter also use term captain rather then pilot?
$endgroup$
– AirCraft Lover
Jan 8 at 2:26




1




1




$begingroup$
Since “captain” is a rank in the armed services, and a different rank between different branches, the pilot would only be called a captain if he/she was actually that rank. In the USAF I believe some pilots are captains. But in the navy they would not be. I’m not real familiar with military terms, so they may still use co-pilot on aircraft that have a two-pilot crew.
$endgroup$
– TomMcW
Jan 8 at 2:38




$begingroup$
Since “captain” is a rank in the armed services, and a different rank between different branches, the pilot would only be called a captain if he/she was actually that rank. In the USAF I believe some pilots are captains. But in the navy they would not be. I’m not real familiar with military terms, so they may still use co-pilot on aircraft that have a two-pilot crew.
$endgroup$
– TomMcW
Jan 8 at 2:38




1




1




$begingroup$
Btw, edited your question to read “flight crew.” Cabin crew would be the flight attendants, etc.
$endgroup$
– TomMcW
Jan 8 at 2:40




$begingroup$
Btw, edited your question to read “flight crew.” Cabin crew would be the flight attendants, etc.
$endgroup$
– TomMcW
Jan 8 at 2:40












$begingroup$
Thank @TomMcW for your kindness to correct my question. As not native English speaking, I realize that my English is far from good. That the reason I always appreciated every correction that I believe will help readers to understand.
$endgroup$
– AirCraft Lover
Jan 8 at 4:02






$begingroup$
Thank @TomMcW for your kindness to correct my question. As not native English speaking, I realize that my English is far from good. That the reason I always appreciated every correction that I believe will help readers to understand.
$endgroup$
– AirCraft Lover
Jan 8 at 4:02












5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















25












$begingroup$

Capt left, 1st officer or copilot right. On older airlines with a flight engineer, he is behind and is called 2nd officer.



It's the same as a ship. Capt is boss, 1st officer is second in command, 2nd officer if on board is 3rd in command.



Capt always starts the engines and taxis the airplane since most airliners only have a steering tiller on the left, and FO usually handles radios and checklists, FMS programming etc when on the ground. FO, if it's his/her turn to fly, only controls the airplane from the start of the takeoff roll until completion of the landing roll.



On a pairing (sequence of trips over 2 or 3 or 4 days), capt and FO normally alternate on each leg of the trip as pilot flying with the other as pilot monitoring. But as I said, if FO is PF for a particular leg, he/she will still do the radios until the start of the takeoff roll, then takes control of thrust and stick once the capt has lined up, upon which capt looks after comms/FMS/button pushing, until completion of the landing roll, when the FO hands control of the airplane back to the capt and the FO (who only has rudder pedal steering and can't make sharp turns) takes over the radios again.



On an older airliner with a Flight Engineer/Second Officer, that person is type rated on the aircraft as a pilot but never actually flies the plane until he/she moves up to right seat as FO. So in the old 3 crew days a new pilot would be hired as a Flight Engineer in an airline with only 3 crew aircraft and might go several years in the 3rd seat before actually flying the plane, or if upgrading from 2 crew to 3 crew in the same airline.



Up until the 60s you also sometimes had a 4th crew, a Navigator. Don't think there were any Navigators left by 1970.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Just a note to point out that on some airlines, especially smaller ones and freight carriers, the Flight Engineer/Second Officer usually was not type rated in the airplane. Indeed they often did not have a pilot's license, but of course they had a flight engineer's license. The two 747 carriers I flew for, one a freight carrier the other a passenger carrier used this system, and additionally they required the flight engineers to have A&P licenses. The flight engineers were almost always former military flight engineers.
    $endgroup$
    – Terry
    Jan 7 at 6:31






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @AirCraft Lover - The cabin crew look after the passengers, the flight crew fly the aircraft
    $endgroup$
    – Dave Gremlin
    Jan 7 at 10:23






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @AirCraftLover The early models of the 747 had a cockpit crew of three; all recent versions (and, basically all modern passenger planes) have two, because the computers now do almost all the work that the Flight Engineer used to do.
    $endgroup$
    – David Richerby
    Jan 7 at 11:40








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why don't they ever switch seats, e.g. so that the FO can taxi? i.e. I wonder why the Capt is always on the left?
    $endgroup$
    – ChrisW
    Jan 7 at 16:27






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @JohnK Just a note, 747s have a tiller on both the left and right side and thus can be taxied from either side. Whether they do or not is a matter of airline policy and the captain's preference. Personally, it if was the FOs leg, I had them do the taxiing.
    $endgroup$
    – Terry
    Jan 7 at 18:50



















18












$begingroup$

The title of Captain designates that he(she) has final authority during the flight, and First Officer is assisting. Ultimately, a Captain may make critical decisions regarding the flight. In practice and ideally, the Captain and FO will work collaboratively, and there won't be a need to "pull rank".



The terms Pilot and Co-Pilot are actually rarely used in commercial aviation anymore. Instead, the terms "Pilot Flying" (PF) and "Pilot Monitoring" (PM) are used to designate who has actual hands on the controls, and who is overseeing the flight and providing guidance. The PM also typically handles tasks like radio traffic or setting up the computer (FMS) with proper settings.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Seems that Captain and First officer is definetely different. As I just watch a video by a captain discussing about a topic What pilot will do if there is an engine failure. He said, "The captain will talk to the first officer...". That clear that captain is not first officer.
    $endgroup$
    – AirCraft Lover
    Jan 7 at 9:16






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @AirCraft Lover - Captain and First Officer are two distinct people, both are pilots. PF and PM are roles that either the Captain or the First Officer will assume during the flight. Usually the Captain decides who is to be PF and who is PM. In fixed wing aircraft the Captain usually sits on the left and the FO on the right (in rotorcraft the Captain usually sits on the right for some reason). The Captain has four gold stripes on his sleeve, the FO has three. Co-pilot isn't a term you hear much these days, though I don't fly professionally, so don't take my word for it
    $endgroup$
    – Dave Gremlin
    Jan 7 at 10:30






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    "The titles of Captain and First Officer designate who has final authority during the flight." - This sentence is unclear, because it kind of sounds like you're saying that the title "Captain" refers to the person who has final authority, and the title "First Officer" also refers to the person who has final authority. I suggest editing this answer to clearly state that the captain has final authority and the first officer does not.
    $endgroup$
    – Tanner Swett
    Jan 7 at 18:05



















6












$begingroup$

A pilot is someone who takes direct part in flying an aircraft by manipulating flight controls.



A captain is a person who can (in the sense of is capable of and legally permitted to) act as a pilot, and who has been hired or promoted by their employer to the rank of captain. They are normally the highest-ranking working employee of the operator aboard the airplane, though exceptions exist. They can typically be recognized by having four gold bars on their shirt shoulders.



A first officer is a person who can (in the sense of is capable of and legally permitted to) act as a pilot, and who has been hired or promoted by their employer to the rank of first officer. It is the rank below captain. They can typically be recognized by having three gold bars on their shirt shoulders.



As already stated, the term co-pilot isn't widely (if at all) used in commercial aviation. Both pilots in the cockpit of a modern airliner are fully qualified pilots, and the terminology has been changed to reflect this fact.



Older airplanes typically had a flight engineer in the cockpit as well; this is a flight crew position, but it is a person that does not directly take part in directing the path of the airplane (it is a non-flying flight crew position). Older yet, they also had a separate position for a navigator, who would tell the pilots where to go. In modern airliners, both of these positions have been replaced by computers.



To answer what you didn't ask, there is another three important terms to know: Pilot Flying, Pilot Monitoring and Pilot In Command.



The Pilot Flying is the pilot that is directly operating the airplane by making control inputs to control the direction in which the airplane is going.



The Pilot Monitoring (or Pilot Not Flying) is the pilot that is keeping an eye on the Pilot Flying, and looking at the instruments, to make sure that the flight is proceeding safely. They will also usually do things at the request of the Pilot Flying. For example, the Pilot Flying may call out for a specific flap setting, or for the landing gear to be raised or lowered, or something similar; the Pilot Monitoring would usually be the one making those airplane configuration changes. The Pilot Monitoring may also be handling radio communications with Air Traffic Control.



Pilots will typically alternate who acts as Pilot Flying and who acts as Pilot Monitoring. This can even change at a moment's notice in the middle of the flight, but there will always be one pilot acting as Pilot Flying and one pilot acting as Pilot Monitoring, and there will always be a clear understanding among all involved who is acting in which role. Accidents have happened when it was not clear in the cockpit who was acting as Pilot Flying and who was Pilot Monitoring, or when the roles became intermingled by one pilot acting in parts of both roles.



The Pilot In Command is the person who is ultimately responsible for the safety of the flight. They can be regarded as the boss in the cockpit, but thanks to the advent of Cockpit Resource Management (CRM), reality is that they are more of a leader than a boss. A good pilot, whether or not they are PIC, will seek the input of their colleagues as much as possible. The PIC will typically be a captain. There is no requirement that at any given time the Pilot In Command is the Pilot Flying. (Some operators may however require in their operational procedures that, say, the PIC, or a captain, is the one performing certain maneuvers, and some aircraft may not be equipped to perform all maneuvers from either seat.)



With these (rough) definitions, we can see that there is no necessary contradiction in something like a flight crew consisting of multiple captains (with a clear understanding of who is Pilot Flying and who is Pilot Monitoring, as well as who is Pilot In Command); or a person who is a captain acting as Pilot Monitoring while another person in the cockpit (or possibly even not in the cockpit) is Pilot In Command, and quite possibly a person who is a first officer acting as Pilot Flying.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think your last paragraph is very important: on long-haul flights, it is entirely possible that, for example, the pilot-in-command is not even in the cockpit (or even awake), he may be in the Crew Rest Area, taking a nap. It is possible that two first officers are in the cockpit and the captain is sleeping. Or, two captains are in the cockpit, but neither of them is pilot-in-command, because the PIC is a third captain with more experience, who is currently resting. Also interesting: during the QF32 incident, there were no less than 5 qualified pilots inside the cockpit.
    $endgroup$
    – Jörg W Mittag
    Jan 8 at 13:09





















1












$begingroup$

In aircraft,they must have a nominated pilot who is the incharge of the aircraft, this pilot is the Captain. A newly qualified airline or private jet pilot is allocated the rank of “First Officer” then later “Senior First Officer” before they take a “Command Course” after which they can become a Captain.



The first officer is the second pilot (also referred to as the co-pilot) of an aircraft. The first officer is second-in-command of the aircraft to the captain, who is the legal commander. In the event of incapacitation of the captain, the first officer will assume command of the aircraft.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    It's possible to have a flight crew consisting of multiple captains. Captain is a rank, not a position.
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    Jan 7 at 13:48










  • $begingroup$
    Captain is absolutely a position. It's also a rank! Complexities abound.
    $endgroup$
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Jan 8 at 0:44










  • $begingroup$
    @Lightness I think A CVn's point was that, while it's usually the case, it's not always true that the guy in the right seat is a First Officer. Sometimes both seats are occupied by Captains. On U.S. carriers, generally both seats will never be operated by FOs (augmented operations require at least 2 Captains,) though 2 FOs + 1 Captain appears to be possible in Europe (AF447's flight deck was occupied by 2 FOs when things went awry, for example, and the only Captain on board was in crew rest.)
    $endgroup$
    – reirab
    Jan 8 at 7:40








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @LightnessRacesinOrbit Not really. Pilot In Command is a position. So is Pilot Flying and Pilot Monitoring, respectively. There is no contradiction in having a rank of Captain, being Pilot Monitoring, and not being Pilot In Command, all at the same time. It might be somewhat unusual, but there is no contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    Jan 8 at 9:09










  • $begingroup$
    @aCVn Exactly what I mean!
    $endgroup$
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Jan 8 at 10:38



















-3












$begingroup$


  1. Job... Pilot flies the airplane, co-pilot helps by doing radios and knobs and switches. Can sit in either seat.


  2. Rank... Captain is usually the senior person of the two, and is basically the decision-maker. Is seen as a more prestigious and higher-paid job then First Officer. Conventionally sits on the left (but there is no legal requirement for this). Thye Captain is also the 'commander' of the airplane, which is a legal position for "if it goes wrong, the buck stops here".







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You make it sound like there's a clear distinction between "flying the airplane" and "doing radios and knobs and switches"...
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    Jan 7 at 13:57










  • $begingroup$
    "Pilot flies the airplane, co-pilot helps by doing radios and knobs and switches." Both pilots take turns flying the airplane (i.e. manipulating the flight controls.) Perhaps you're thinking of the distinction between "pilot flying" and "pilot not flying" or "pilot monitoring?"
    $endgroup$
    – reirab
    Jan 7 at 19:05



















5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes








5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









25












$begingroup$

Capt left, 1st officer or copilot right. On older airlines with a flight engineer, he is behind and is called 2nd officer.



It's the same as a ship. Capt is boss, 1st officer is second in command, 2nd officer if on board is 3rd in command.



Capt always starts the engines and taxis the airplane since most airliners only have a steering tiller on the left, and FO usually handles radios and checklists, FMS programming etc when on the ground. FO, if it's his/her turn to fly, only controls the airplane from the start of the takeoff roll until completion of the landing roll.



On a pairing (sequence of trips over 2 or 3 or 4 days), capt and FO normally alternate on each leg of the trip as pilot flying with the other as pilot monitoring. But as I said, if FO is PF for a particular leg, he/she will still do the radios until the start of the takeoff roll, then takes control of thrust and stick once the capt has lined up, upon which capt looks after comms/FMS/button pushing, until completion of the landing roll, when the FO hands control of the airplane back to the capt and the FO (who only has rudder pedal steering and can't make sharp turns) takes over the radios again.



On an older airliner with a Flight Engineer/Second Officer, that person is type rated on the aircraft as a pilot but never actually flies the plane until he/she moves up to right seat as FO. So in the old 3 crew days a new pilot would be hired as a Flight Engineer in an airline with only 3 crew aircraft and might go several years in the 3rd seat before actually flying the plane, or if upgrading from 2 crew to 3 crew in the same airline.



Up until the 60s you also sometimes had a 4th crew, a Navigator. Don't think there were any Navigators left by 1970.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Just a note to point out that on some airlines, especially smaller ones and freight carriers, the Flight Engineer/Second Officer usually was not type rated in the airplane. Indeed they often did not have a pilot's license, but of course they had a flight engineer's license. The two 747 carriers I flew for, one a freight carrier the other a passenger carrier used this system, and additionally they required the flight engineers to have A&P licenses. The flight engineers were almost always former military flight engineers.
    $endgroup$
    – Terry
    Jan 7 at 6:31






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @AirCraft Lover - The cabin crew look after the passengers, the flight crew fly the aircraft
    $endgroup$
    – Dave Gremlin
    Jan 7 at 10:23






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @AirCraftLover The early models of the 747 had a cockpit crew of three; all recent versions (and, basically all modern passenger planes) have two, because the computers now do almost all the work that the Flight Engineer used to do.
    $endgroup$
    – David Richerby
    Jan 7 at 11:40








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why don't they ever switch seats, e.g. so that the FO can taxi? i.e. I wonder why the Capt is always on the left?
    $endgroup$
    – ChrisW
    Jan 7 at 16:27






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @JohnK Just a note, 747s have a tiller on both the left and right side and thus can be taxied from either side. Whether they do or not is a matter of airline policy and the captain's preference. Personally, it if was the FOs leg, I had them do the taxiing.
    $endgroup$
    – Terry
    Jan 7 at 18:50
















25












$begingroup$

Capt left, 1st officer or copilot right. On older airlines with a flight engineer, he is behind and is called 2nd officer.



It's the same as a ship. Capt is boss, 1st officer is second in command, 2nd officer if on board is 3rd in command.



Capt always starts the engines and taxis the airplane since most airliners only have a steering tiller on the left, and FO usually handles radios and checklists, FMS programming etc when on the ground. FO, if it's his/her turn to fly, only controls the airplane from the start of the takeoff roll until completion of the landing roll.



On a pairing (sequence of trips over 2 or 3 or 4 days), capt and FO normally alternate on each leg of the trip as pilot flying with the other as pilot monitoring. But as I said, if FO is PF for a particular leg, he/she will still do the radios until the start of the takeoff roll, then takes control of thrust and stick once the capt has lined up, upon which capt looks after comms/FMS/button pushing, until completion of the landing roll, when the FO hands control of the airplane back to the capt and the FO (who only has rudder pedal steering and can't make sharp turns) takes over the radios again.



On an older airliner with a Flight Engineer/Second Officer, that person is type rated on the aircraft as a pilot but never actually flies the plane until he/she moves up to right seat as FO. So in the old 3 crew days a new pilot would be hired as a Flight Engineer in an airline with only 3 crew aircraft and might go several years in the 3rd seat before actually flying the plane, or if upgrading from 2 crew to 3 crew in the same airline.



Up until the 60s you also sometimes had a 4th crew, a Navigator. Don't think there were any Navigators left by 1970.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Just a note to point out that on some airlines, especially smaller ones and freight carriers, the Flight Engineer/Second Officer usually was not type rated in the airplane. Indeed they often did not have a pilot's license, but of course they had a flight engineer's license. The two 747 carriers I flew for, one a freight carrier the other a passenger carrier used this system, and additionally they required the flight engineers to have A&P licenses. The flight engineers were almost always former military flight engineers.
    $endgroup$
    – Terry
    Jan 7 at 6:31






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @AirCraft Lover - The cabin crew look after the passengers, the flight crew fly the aircraft
    $endgroup$
    – Dave Gremlin
    Jan 7 at 10:23






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @AirCraftLover The early models of the 747 had a cockpit crew of three; all recent versions (and, basically all modern passenger planes) have two, because the computers now do almost all the work that the Flight Engineer used to do.
    $endgroup$
    – David Richerby
    Jan 7 at 11:40








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why don't they ever switch seats, e.g. so that the FO can taxi? i.e. I wonder why the Capt is always on the left?
    $endgroup$
    – ChrisW
    Jan 7 at 16:27






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @JohnK Just a note, 747s have a tiller on both the left and right side and thus can be taxied from either side. Whether they do or not is a matter of airline policy and the captain's preference. Personally, it if was the FOs leg, I had them do the taxiing.
    $endgroup$
    – Terry
    Jan 7 at 18:50














25












25








25





$begingroup$

Capt left, 1st officer or copilot right. On older airlines with a flight engineer, he is behind and is called 2nd officer.



It's the same as a ship. Capt is boss, 1st officer is second in command, 2nd officer if on board is 3rd in command.



Capt always starts the engines and taxis the airplane since most airliners only have a steering tiller on the left, and FO usually handles radios and checklists, FMS programming etc when on the ground. FO, if it's his/her turn to fly, only controls the airplane from the start of the takeoff roll until completion of the landing roll.



On a pairing (sequence of trips over 2 or 3 or 4 days), capt and FO normally alternate on each leg of the trip as pilot flying with the other as pilot monitoring. But as I said, if FO is PF for a particular leg, he/she will still do the radios until the start of the takeoff roll, then takes control of thrust and stick once the capt has lined up, upon which capt looks after comms/FMS/button pushing, until completion of the landing roll, when the FO hands control of the airplane back to the capt and the FO (who only has rudder pedal steering and can't make sharp turns) takes over the radios again.



On an older airliner with a Flight Engineer/Second Officer, that person is type rated on the aircraft as a pilot but never actually flies the plane until he/she moves up to right seat as FO. So in the old 3 crew days a new pilot would be hired as a Flight Engineer in an airline with only 3 crew aircraft and might go several years in the 3rd seat before actually flying the plane, or if upgrading from 2 crew to 3 crew in the same airline.



Up until the 60s you also sometimes had a 4th crew, a Navigator. Don't think there were any Navigators left by 1970.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Capt left, 1st officer or copilot right. On older airlines with a flight engineer, he is behind and is called 2nd officer.



It's the same as a ship. Capt is boss, 1st officer is second in command, 2nd officer if on board is 3rd in command.



Capt always starts the engines and taxis the airplane since most airliners only have a steering tiller on the left, and FO usually handles radios and checklists, FMS programming etc when on the ground. FO, if it's his/her turn to fly, only controls the airplane from the start of the takeoff roll until completion of the landing roll.



On a pairing (sequence of trips over 2 or 3 or 4 days), capt and FO normally alternate on each leg of the trip as pilot flying with the other as pilot monitoring. But as I said, if FO is PF for a particular leg, he/she will still do the radios until the start of the takeoff roll, then takes control of thrust and stick once the capt has lined up, upon which capt looks after comms/FMS/button pushing, until completion of the landing roll, when the FO hands control of the airplane back to the capt and the FO (who only has rudder pedal steering and can't make sharp turns) takes over the radios again.



On an older airliner with a Flight Engineer/Second Officer, that person is type rated on the aircraft as a pilot but never actually flies the plane until he/she moves up to right seat as FO. So in the old 3 crew days a new pilot would be hired as a Flight Engineer in an airline with only 3 crew aircraft and might go several years in the 3rd seat before actually flying the plane, or if upgrading from 2 crew to 3 crew in the same airline.



Up until the 60s you also sometimes had a 4th crew, a Navigator. Don't think there were any Navigators left by 1970.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jan 7 at 4:59









John KJohn K

16.3k11748




16.3k11748








  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Just a note to point out that on some airlines, especially smaller ones and freight carriers, the Flight Engineer/Second Officer usually was not type rated in the airplane. Indeed they often did not have a pilot's license, but of course they had a flight engineer's license. The two 747 carriers I flew for, one a freight carrier the other a passenger carrier used this system, and additionally they required the flight engineers to have A&P licenses. The flight engineers were almost always former military flight engineers.
    $endgroup$
    – Terry
    Jan 7 at 6:31






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @AirCraft Lover - The cabin crew look after the passengers, the flight crew fly the aircraft
    $endgroup$
    – Dave Gremlin
    Jan 7 at 10:23






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @AirCraftLover The early models of the 747 had a cockpit crew of three; all recent versions (and, basically all modern passenger planes) have two, because the computers now do almost all the work that the Flight Engineer used to do.
    $endgroup$
    – David Richerby
    Jan 7 at 11:40








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why don't they ever switch seats, e.g. so that the FO can taxi? i.e. I wonder why the Capt is always on the left?
    $endgroup$
    – ChrisW
    Jan 7 at 16:27






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @JohnK Just a note, 747s have a tiller on both the left and right side and thus can be taxied from either side. Whether they do or not is a matter of airline policy and the captain's preference. Personally, it if was the FOs leg, I had them do the taxiing.
    $endgroup$
    – Terry
    Jan 7 at 18:50














  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Just a note to point out that on some airlines, especially smaller ones and freight carriers, the Flight Engineer/Second Officer usually was not type rated in the airplane. Indeed they often did not have a pilot's license, but of course they had a flight engineer's license. The two 747 carriers I flew for, one a freight carrier the other a passenger carrier used this system, and additionally they required the flight engineers to have A&P licenses. The flight engineers were almost always former military flight engineers.
    $endgroup$
    – Terry
    Jan 7 at 6:31






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @AirCraft Lover - The cabin crew look after the passengers, the flight crew fly the aircraft
    $endgroup$
    – Dave Gremlin
    Jan 7 at 10:23






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @AirCraftLover The early models of the 747 had a cockpit crew of three; all recent versions (and, basically all modern passenger planes) have two, because the computers now do almost all the work that the Flight Engineer used to do.
    $endgroup$
    – David Richerby
    Jan 7 at 11:40








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why don't they ever switch seats, e.g. so that the FO can taxi? i.e. I wonder why the Capt is always on the left?
    $endgroup$
    – ChrisW
    Jan 7 at 16:27






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @JohnK Just a note, 747s have a tiller on both the left and right side and thus can be taxied from either side. Whether they do or not is a matter of airline policy and the captain's preference. Personally, it if was the FOs leg, I had them do the taxiing.
    $endgroup$
    – Terry
    Jan 7 at 18:50








7




7




$begingroup$
Just a note to point out that on some airlines, especially smaller ones and freight carriers, the Flight Engineer/Second Officer usually was not type rated in the airplane. Indeed they often did not have a pilot's license, but of course they had a flight engineer's license. The two 747 carriers I flew for, one a freight carrier the other a passenger carrier used this system, and additionally they required the flight engineers to have A&P licenses. The flight engineers were almost always former military flight engineers.
$endgroup$
– Terry
Jan 7 at 6:31




$begingroup$
Just a note to point out that on some airlines, especially smaller ones and freight carriers, the Flight Engineer/Second Officer usually was not type rated in the airplane. Indeed they often did not have a pilot's license, but of course they had a flight engineer's license. The two 747 carriers I flew for, one a freight carrier the other a passenger carrier used this system, and additionally they required the flight engineers to have A&P licenses. The flight engineers were almost always former military flight engineers.
$endgroup$
– Terry
Jan 7 at 6:31




3




3




$begingroup$
@AirCraft Lover - The cabin crew look after the passengers, the flight crew fly the aircraft
$endgroup$
– Dave Gremlin
Jan 7 at 10:23




$begingroup$
@AirCraft Lover - The cabin crew look after the passengers, the flight crew fly the aircraft
$endgroup$
– Dave Gremlin
Jan 7 at 10:23




2




2




$begingroup$
@AirCraftLover The early models of the 747 had a cockpit crew of three; all recent versions (and, basically all modern passenger planes) have two, because the computers now do almost all the work that the Flight Engineer used to do.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Jan 7 at 11:40






$begingroup$
@AirCraftLover The early models of the 747 had a cockpit crew of three; all recent versions (and, basically all modern passenger planes) have two, because the computers now do almost all the work that the Flight Engineer used to do.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Jan 7 at 11:40






1




1




$begingroup$
Why don't they ever switch seats, e.g. so that the FO can taxi? i.e. I wonder why the Capt is always on the left?
$endgroup$
– ChrisW
Jan 7 at 16:27




$begingroup$
Why don't they ever switch seats, e.g. so that the FO can taxi? i.e. I wonder why the Capt is always on the left?
$endgroup$
– ChrisW
Jan 7 at 16:27




4




4




$begingroup$
@JohnK Just a note, 747s have a tiller on both the left and right side and thus can be taxied from either side. Whether they do or not is a matter of airline policy and the captain's preference. Personally, it if was the FOs leg, I had them do the taxiing.
$endgroup$
– Terry
Jan 7 at 18:50




$begingroup$
@JohnK Just a note, 747s have a tiller on both the left and right side and thus can be taxied from either side. Whether they do or not is a matter of airline policy and the captain's preference. Personally, it if was the FOs leg, I had them do the taxiing.
$endgroup$
– Terry
Jan 7 at 18:50











18












$begingroup$

The title of Captain designates that he(she) has final authority during the flight, and First Officer is assisting. Ultimately, a Captain may make critical decisions regarding the flight. In practice and ideally, the Captain and FO will work collaboratively, and there won't be a need to "pull rank".



The terms Pilot and Co-Pilot are actually rarely used in commercial aviation anymore. Instead, the terms "Pilot Flying" (PF) and "Pilot Monitoring" (PM) are used to designate who has actual hands on the controls, and who is overseeing the flight and providing guidance. The PM also typically handles tasks like radio traffic or setting up the computer (FMS) with proper settings.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Seems that Captain and First officer is definetely different. As I just watch a video by a captain discussing about a topic What pilot will do if there is an engine failure. He said, "The captain will talk to the first officer...". That clear that captain is not first officer.
    $endgroup$
    – AirCraft Lover
    Jan 7 at 9:16






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @AirCraft Lover - Captain and First Officer are two distinct people, both are pilots. PF and PM are roles that either the Captain or the First Officer will assume during the flight. Usually the Captain decides who is to be PF and who is PM. In fixed wing aircraft the Captain usually sits on the left and the FO on the right (in rotorcraft the Captain usually sits on the right for some reason). The Captain has four gold stripes on his sleeve, the FO has three. Co-pilot isn't a term you hear much these days, though I don't fly professionally, so don't take my word for it
    $endgroup$
    – Dave Gremlin
    Jan 7 at 10:30






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    "The titles of Captain and First Officer designate who has final authority during the flight." - This sentence is unclear, because it kind of sounds like you're saying that the title "Captain" refers to the person who has final authority, and the title "First Officer" also refers to the person who has final authority. I suggest editing this answer to clearly state that the captain has final authority and the first officer does not.
    $endgroup$
    – Tanner Swett
    Jan 7 at 18:05
















18












$begingroup$

The title of Captain designates that he(she) has final authority during the flight, and First Officer is assisting. Ultimately, a Captain may make critical decisions regarding the flight. In practice and ideally, the Captain and FO will work collaboratively, and there won't be a need to "pull rank".



The terms Pilot and Co-Pilot are actually rarely used in commercial aviation anymore. Instead, the terms "Pilot Flying" (PF) and "Pilot Monitoring" (PM) are used to designate who has actual hands on the controls, and who is overseeing the flight and providing guidance. The PM also typically handles tasks like radio traffic or setting up the computer (FMS) with proper settings.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Seems that Captain and First officer is definetely different. As I just watch a video by a captain discussing about a topic What pilot will do if there is an engine failure. He said, "The captain will talk to the first officer...". That clear that captain is not first officer.
    $endgroup$
    – AirCraft Lover
    Jan 7 at 9:16






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @AirCraft Lover - Captain and First Officer are two distinct people, both are pilots. PF and PM are roles that either the Captain or the First Officer will assume during the flight. Usually the Captain decides who is to be PF and who is PM. In fixed wing aircraft the Captain usually sits on the left and the FO on the right (in rotorcraft the Captain usually sits on the right for some reason). The Captain has four gold stripes on his sleeve, the FO has three. Co-pilot isn't a term you hear much these days, though I don't fly professionally, so don't take my word for it
    $endgroup$
    – Dave Gremlin
    Jan 7 at 10:30






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    "The titles of Captain and First Officer designate who has final authority during the flight." - This sentence is unclear, because it kind of sounds like you're saying that the title "Captain" refers to the person who has final authority, and the title "First Officer" also refers to the person who has final authority. I suggest editing this answer to clearly state that the captain has final authority and the first officer does not.
    $endgroup$
    – Tanner Swett
    Jan 7 at 18:05














18












18








18





$begingroup$

The title of Captain designates that he(she) has final authority during the flight, and First Officer is assisting. Ultimately, a Captain may make critical decisions regarding the flight. In practice and ideally, the Captain and FO will work collaboratively, and there won't be a need to "pull rank".



The terms Pilot and Co-Pilot are actually rarely used in commercial aviation anymore. Instead, the terms "Pilot Flying" (PF) and "Pilot Monitoring" (PM) are used to designate who has actual hands on the controls, and who is overseeing the flight and providing guidance. The PM also typically handles tasks like radio traffic or setting up the computer (FMS) with proper settings.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The title of Captain designates that he(she) has final authority during the flight, and First Officer is assisting. Ultimately, a Captain may make critical decisions regarding the flight. In practice and ideally, the Captain and FO will work collaboratively, and there won't be a need to "pull rank".



The terms Pilot and Co-Pilot are actually rarely used in commercial aviation anymore. Instead, the terms "Pilot Flying" (PF) and "Pilot Monitoring" (PM) are used to designate who has actual hands on the controls, and who is overseeing the flight and providing guidance. The PM also typically handles tasks like radio traffic or setting up the computer (FMS) with proper settings.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jan 8 at 15:22

























answered Jan 7 at 3:42









abelenkyabelenky

21.7k963108




21.7k963108












  • $begingroup$
    Seems that Captain and First officer is definetely different. As I just watch a video by a captain discussing about a topic What pilot will do if there is an engine failure. He said, "The captain will talk to the first officer...". That clear that captain is not first officer.
    $endgroup$
    – AirCraft Lover
    Jan 7 at 9:16






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @AirCraft Lover - Captain and First Officer are two distinct people, both are pilots. PF and PM are roles that either the Captain or the First Officer will assume during the flight. Usually the Captain decides who is to be PF and who is PM. In fixed wing aircraft the Captain usually sits on the left and the FO on the right (in rotorcraft the Captain usually sits on the right for some reason). The Captain has four gold stripes on his sleeve, the FO has three. Co-pilot isn't a term you hear much these days, though I don't fly professionally, so don't take my word for it
    $endgroup$
    – Dave Gremlin
    Jan 7 at 10:30






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    "The titles of Captain and First Officer designate who has final authority during the flight." - This sentence is unclear, because it kind of sounds like you're saying that the title "Captain" refers to the person who has final authority, and the title "First Officer" also refers to the person who has final authority. I suggest editing this answer to clearly state that the captain has final authority and the first officer does not.
    $endgroup$
    – Tanner Swett
    Jan 7 at 18:05


















  • $begingroup$
    Seems that Captain and First officer is definetely different. As I just watch a video by a captain discussing about a topic What pilot will do if there is an engine failure. He said, "The captain will talk to the first officer...". That clear that captain is not first officer.
    $endgroup$
    – AirCraft Lover
    Jan 7 at 9:16






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @AirCraft Lover - Captain and First Officer are two distinct people, both are pilots. PF and PM are roles that either the Captain or the First Officer will assume during the flight. Usually the Captain decides who is to be PF and who is PM. In fixed wing aircraft the Captain usually sits on the left and the FO on the right (in rotorcraft the Captain usually sits on the right for some reason). The Captain has four gold stripes on his sleeve, the FO has three. Co-pilot isn't a term you hear much these days, though I don't fly professionally, so don't take my word for it
    $endgroup$
    – Dave Gremlin
    Jan 7 at 10:30






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    "The titles of Captain and First Officer designate who has final authority during the flight." - This sentence is unclear, because it kind of sounds like you're saying that the title "Captain" refers to the person who has final authority, and the title "First Officer" also refers to the person who has final authority. I suggest editing this answer to clearly state that the captain has final authority and the first officer does not.
    $endgroup$
    – Tanner Swett
    Jan 7 at 18:05
















$begingroup$
Seems that Captain and First officer is definetely different. As I just watch a video by a captain discussing about a topic What pilot will do if there is an engine failure. He said, "The captain will talk to the first officer...". That clear that captain is not first officer.
$endgroup$
– AirCraft Lover
Jan 7 at 9:16




$begingroup$
Seems that Captain and First officer is definetely different. As I just watch a video by a captain discussing about a topic What pilot will do if there is an engine failure. He said, "The captain will talk to the first officer...". That clear that captain is not first officer.
$endgroup$
– AirCraft Lover
Jan 7 at 9:16




5




5




$begingroup$
@AirCraft Lover - Captain and First Officer are two distinct people, both are pilots. PF and PM are roles that either the Captain or the First Officer will assume during the flight. Usually the Captain decides who is to be PF and who is PM. In fixed wing aircraft the Captain usually sits on the left and the FO on the right (in rotorcraft the Captain usually sits on the right for some reason). The Captain has four gold stripes on his sleeve, the FO has three. Co-pilot isn't a term you hear much these days, though I don't fly professionally, so don't take my word for it
$endgroup$
– Dave Gremlin
Jan 7 at 10:30




$begingroup$
@AirCraft Lover - Captain and First Officer are two distinct people, both are pilots. PF and PM are roles that either the Captain or the First Officer will assume during the flight. Usually the Captain decides who is to be PF and who is PM. In fixed wing aircraft the Captain usually sits on the left and the FO on the right (in rotorcraft the Captain usually sits on the right for some reason). The Captain has four gold stripes on his sleeve, the FO has three. Co-pilot isn't a term you hear much these days, though I don't fly professionally, so don't take my word for it
$endgroup$
– Dave Gremlin
Jan 7 at 10:30




5




5




$begingroup$
"The titles of Captain and First Officer designate who has final authority during the flight." - This sentence is unclear, because it kind of sounds like you're saying that the title "Captain" refers to the person who has final authority, and the title "First Officer" also refers to the person who has final authority. I suggest editing this answer to clearly state that the captain has final authority and the first officer does not.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
Jan 7 at 18:05




$begingroup$
"The titles of Captain and First Officer designate who has final authority during the flight." - This sentence is unclear, because it kind of sounds like you're saying that the title "Captain" refers to the person who has final authority, and the title "First Officer" also refers to the person who has final authority. I suggest editing this answer to clearly state that the captain has final authority and the first officer does not.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
Jan 7 at 18:05











6












$begingroup$

A pilot is someone who takes direct part in flying an aircraft by manipulating flight controls.



A captain is a person who can (in the sense of is capable of and legally permitted to) act as a pilot, and who has been hired or promoted by their employer to the rank of captain. They are normally the highest-ranking working employee of the operator aboard the airplane, though exceptions exist. They can typically be recognized by having four gold bars on their shirt shoulders.



A first officer is a person who can (in the sense of is capable of and legally permitted to) act as a pilot, and who has been hired or promoted by their employer to the rank of first officer. It is the rank below captain. They can typically be recognized by having three gold bars on their shirt shoulders.



As already stated, the term co-pilot isn't widely (if at all) used in commercial aviation. Both pilots in the cockpit of a modern airliner are fully qualified pilots, and the terminology has been changed to reflect this fact.



Older airplanes typically had a flight engineer in the cockpit as well; this is a flight crew position, but it is a person that does not directly take part in directing the path of the airplane (it is a non-flying flight crew position). Older yet, they also had a separate position for a navigator, who would tell the pilots where to go. In modern airliners, both of these positions have been replaced by computers.



To answer what you didn't ask, there is another three important terms to know: Pilot Flying, Pilot Monitoring and Pilot In Command.



The Pilot Flying is the pilot that is directly operating the airplane by making control inputs to control the direction in which the airplane is going.



The Pilot Monitoring (or Pilot Not Flying) is the pilot that is keeping an eye on the Pilot Flying, and looking at the instruments, to make sure that the flight is proceeding safely. They will also usually do things at the request of the Pilot Flying. For example, the Pilot Flying may call out for a specific flap setting, or for the landing gear to be raised or lowered, or something similar; the Pilot Monitoring would usually be the one making those airplane configuration changes. The Pilot Monitoring may also be handling radio communications with Air Traffic Control.



Pilots will typically alternate who acts as Pilot Flying and who acts as Pilot Monitoring. This can even change at a moment's notice in the middle of the flight, but there will always be one pilot acting as Pilot Flying and one pilot acting as Pilot Monitoring, and there will always be a clear understanding among all involved who is acting in which role. Accidents have happened when it was not clear in the cockpit who was acting as Pilot Flying and who was Pilot Monitoring, or when the roles became intermingled by one pilot acting in parts of both roles.



The Pilot In Command is the person who is ultimately responsible for the safety of the flight. They can be regarded as the boss in the cockpit, but thanks to the advent of Cockpit Resource Management (CRM), reality is that they are more of a leader than a boss. A good pilot, whether or not they are PIC, will seek the input of their colleagues as much as possible. The PIC will typically be a captain. There is no requirement that at any given time the Pilot In Command is the Pilot Flying. (Some operators may however require in their operational procedures that, say, the PIC, or a captain, is the one performing certain maneuvers, and some aircraft may not be equipped to perform all maneuvers from either seat.)



With these (rough) definitions, we can see that there is no necessary contradiction in something like a flight crew consisting of multiple captains (with a clear understanding of who is Pilot Flying and who is Pilot Monitoring, as well as who is Pilot In Command); or a person who is a captain acting as Pilot Monitoring while another person in the cockpit (or possibly even not in the cockpit) is Pilot In Command, and quite possibly a person who is a first officer acting as Pilot Flying.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think your last paragraph is very important: on long-haul flights, it is entirely possible that, for example, the pilot-in-command is not even in the cockpit (or even awake), he may be in the Crew Rest Area, taking a nap. It is possible that two first officers are in the cockpit and the captain is sleeping. Or, two captains are in the cockpit, but neither of them is pilot-in-command, because the PIC is a third captain with more experience, who is currently resting. Also interesting: during the QF32 incident, there were no less than 5 qualified pilots inside the cockpit.
    $endgroup$
    – Jörg W Mittag
    Jan 8 at 13:09


















6












$begingroup$

A pilot is someone who takes direct part in flying an aircraft by manipulating flight controls.



A captain is a person who can (in the sense of is capable of and legally permitted to) act as a pilot, and who has been hired or promoted by their employer to the rank of captain. They are normally the highest-ranking working employee of the operator aboard the airplane, though exceptions exist. They can typically be recognized by having four gold bars on their shirt shoulders.



A first officer is a person who can (in the sense of is capable of and legally permitted to) act as a pilot, and who has been hired or promoted by their employer to the rank of first officer. It is the rank below captain. They can typically be recognized by having three gold bars on their shirt shoulders.



As already stated, the term co-pilot isn't widely (if at all) used in commercial aviation. Both pilots in the cockpit of a modern airliner are fully qualified pilots, and the terminology has been changed to reflect this fact.



Older airplanes typically had a flight engineer in the cockpit as well; this is a flight crew position, but it is a person that does not directly take part in directing the path of the airplane (it is a non-flying flight crew position). Older yet, they also had a separate position for a navigator, who would tell the pilots where to go. In modern airliners, both of these positions have been replaced by computers.



To answer what you didn't ask, there is another three important terms to know: Pilot Flying, Pilot Monitoring and Pilot In Command.



The Pilot Flying is the pilot that is directly operating the airplane by making control inputs to control the direction in which the airplane is going.



The Pilot Monitoring (or Pilot Not Flying) is the pilot that is keeping an eye on the Pilot Flying, and looking at the instruments, to make sure that the flight is proceeding safely. They will also usually do things at the request of the Pilot Flying. For example, the Pilot Flying may call out for a specific flap setting, or for the landing gear to be raised or lowered, or something similar; the Pilot Monitoring would usually be the one making those airplane configuration changes. The Pilot Monitoring may also be handling radio communications with Air Traffic Control.



Pilots will typically alternate who acts as Pilot Flying and who acts as Pilot Monitoring. This can even change at a moment's notice in the middle of the flight, but there will always be one pilot acting as Pilot Flying and one pilot acting as Pilot Monitoring, and there will always be a clear understanding among all involved who is acting in which role. Accidents have happened when it was not clear in the cockpit who was acting as Pilot Flying and who was Pilot Monitoring, or when the roles became intermingled by one pilot acting in parts of both roles.



The Pilot In Command is the person who is ultimately responsible for the safety of the flight. They can be regarded as the boss in the cockpit, but thanks to the advent of Cockpit Resource Management (CRM), reality is that they are more of a leader than a boss. A good pilot, whether or not they are PIC, will seek the input of their colleagues as much as possible. The PIC will typically be a captain. There is no requirement that at any given time the Pilot In Command is the Pilot Flying. (Some operators may however require in their operational procedures that, say, the PIC, or a captain, is the one performing certain maneuvers, and some aircraft may not be equipped to perform all maneuvers from either seat.)



With these (rough) definitions, we can see that there is no necessary contradiction in something like a flight crew consisting of multiple captains (with a clear understanding of who is Pilot Flying and who is Pilot Monitoring, as well as who is Pilot In Command); or a person who is a captain acting as Pilot Monitoring while another person in the cockpit (or possibly even not in the cockpit) is Pilot In Command, and quite possibly a person who is a first officer acting as Pilot Flying.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think your last paragraph is very important: on long-haul flights, it is entirely possible that, for example, the pilot-in-command is not even in the cockpit (or even awake), he may be in the Crew Rest Area, taking a nap. It is possible that two first officers are in the cockpit and the captain is sleeping. Or, two captains are in the cockpit, but neither of them is pilot-in-command, because the PIC is a third captain with more experience, who is currently resting. Also interesting: during the QF32 incident, there were no less than 5 qualified pilots inside the cockpit.
    $endgroup$
    – Jörg W Mittag
    Jan 8 at 13:09
















6












6








6





$begingroup$

A pilot is someone who takes direct part in flying an aircraft by manipulating flight controls.



A captain is a person who can (in the sense of is capable of and legally permitted to) act as a pilot, and who has been hired or promoted by their employer to the rank of captain. They are normally the highest-ranking working employee of the operator aboard the airplane, though exceptions exist. They can typically be recognized by having four gold bars on their shirt shoulders.



A first officer is a person who can (in the sense of is capable of and legally permitted to) act as a pilot, and who has been hired or promoted by their employer to the rank of first officer. It is the rank below captain. They can typically be recognized by having three gold bars on their shirt shoulders.



As already stated, the term co-pilot isn't widely (if at all) used in commercial aviation. Both pilots in the cockpit of a modern airliner are fully qualified pilots, and the terminology has been changed to reflect this fact.



Older airplanes typically had a flight engineer in the cockpit as well; this is a flight crew position, but it is a person that does not directly take part in directing the path of the airplane (it is a non-flying flight crew position). Older yet, they also had a separate position for a navigator, who would tell the pilots where to go. In modern airliners, both of these positions have been replaced by computers.



To answer what you didn't ask, there is another three important terms to know: Pilot Flying, Pilot Monitoring and Pilot In Command.



The Pilot Flying is the pilot that is directly operating the airplane by making control inputs to control the direction in which the airplane is going.



The Pilot Monitoring (or Pilot Not Flying) is the pilot that is keeping an eye on the Pilot Flying, and looking at the instruments, to make sure that the flight is proceeding safely. They will also usually do things at the request of the Pilot Flying. For example, the Pilot Flying may call out for a specific flap setting, or for the landing gear to be raised or lowered, or something similar; the Pilot Monitoring would usually be the one making those airplane configuration changes. The Pilot Monitoring may also be handling radio communications with Air Traffic Control.



Pilots will typically alternate who acts as Pilot Flying and who acts as Pilot Monitoring. This can even change at a moment's notice in the middle of the flight, but there will always be one pilot acting as Pilot Flying and one pilot acting as Pilot Monitoring, and there will always be a clear understanding among all involved who is acting in which role. Accidents have happened when it was not clear in the cockpit who was acting as Pilot Flying and who was Pilot Monitoring, or when the roles became intermingled by one pilot acting in parts of both roles.



The Pilot In Command is the person who is ultimately responsible for the safety of the flight. They can be regarded as the boss in the cockpit, but thanks to the advent of Cockpit Resource Management (CRM), reality is that they are more of a leader than a boss. A good pilot, whether or not they are PIC, will seek the input of their colleagues as much as possible. The PIC will typically be a captain. There is no requirement that at any given time the Pilot In Command is the Pilot Flying. (Some operators may however require in their operational procedures that, say, the PIC, or a captain, is the one performing certain maneuvers, and some aircraft may not be equipped to perform all maneuvers from either seat.)



With these (rough) definitions, we can see that there is no necessary contradiction in something like a flight crew consisting of multiple captains (with a clear understanding of who is Pilot Flying and who is Pilot Monitoring, as well as who is Pilot In Command); or a person who is a captain acting as Pilot Monitoring while another person in the cockpit (or possibly even not in the cockpit) is Pilot In Command, and quite possibly a person who is a first officer acting as Pilot Flying.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



A pilot is someone who takes direct part in flying an aircraft by manipulating flight controls.



A captain is a person who can (in the sense of is capable of and legally permitted to) act as a pilot, and who has been hired or promoted by their employer to the rank of captain. They are normally the highest-ranking working employee of the operator aboard the airplane, though exceptions exist. They can typically be recognized by having four gold bars on their shirt shoulders.



A first officer is a person who can (in the sense of is capable of and legally permitted to) act as a pilot, and who has been hired or promoted by their employer to the rank of first officer. It is the rank below captain. They can typically be recognized by having three gold bars on their shirt shoulders.



As already stated, the term co-pilot isn't widely (if at all) used in commercial aviation. Both pilots in the cockpit of a modern airliner are fully qualified pilots, and the terminology has been changed to reflect this fact.



Older airplanes typically had a flight engineer in the cockpit as well; this is a flight crew position, but it is a person that does not directly take part in directing the path of the airplane (it is a non-flying flight crew position). Older yet, they also had a separate position for a navigator, who would tell the pilots where to go. In modern airliners, both of these positions have been replaced by computers.



To answer what you didn't ask, there is another three important terms to know: Pilot Flying, Pilot Monitoring and Pilot In Command.



The Pilot Flying is the pilot that is directly operating the airplane by making control inputs to control the direction in which the airplane is going.



The Pilot Monitoring (or Pilot Not Flying) is the pilot that is keeping an eye on the Pilot Flying, and looking at the instruments, to make sure that the flight is proceeding safely. They will also usually do things at the request of the Pilot Flying. For example, the Pilot Flying may call out for a specific flap setting, or for the landing gear to be raised or lowered, or something similar; the Pilot Monitoring would usually be the one making those airplane configuration changes. The Pilot Monitoring may also be handling radio communications with Air Traffic Control.



Pilots will typically alternate who acts as Pilot Flying and who acts as Pilot Monitoring. This can even change at a moment's notice in the middle of the flight, but there will always be one pilot acting as Pilot Flying and one pilot acting as Pilot Monitoring, and there will always be a clear understanding among all involved who is acting in which role. Accidents have happened when it was not clear in the cockpit who was acting as Pilot Flying and who was Pilot Monitoring, or when the roles became intermingled by one pilot acting in parts of both roles.



The Pilot In Command is the person who is ultimately responsible for the safety of the flight. They can be regarded as the boss in the cockpit, but thanks to the advent of Cockpit Resource Management (CRM), reality is that they are more of a leader than a boss. A good pilot, whether or not they are PIC, will seek the input of their colleagues as much as possible. The PIC will typically be a captain. There is no requirement that at any given time the Pilot In Command is the Pilot Flying. (Some operators may however require in their operational procedures that, say, the PIC, or a captain, is the one performing certain maneuvers, and some aircraft may not be equipped to perform all maneuvers from either seat.)



With these (rough) definitions, we can see that there is no necessary contradiction in something like a flight crew consisting of multiple captains (with a clear understanding of who is Pilot Flying and who is Pilot Monitoring, as well as who is Pilot In Command); or a person who is a captain acting as Pilot Monitoring while another person in the cockpit (or possibly even not in the cockpit) is Pilot In Command, and quite possibly a person who is a first officer acting as Pilot Flying.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jan 8 at 13:43

























answered Jan 8 at 9:39









a CVna CVn

4,22021750




4,22021750








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think your last paragraph is very important: on long-haul flights, it is entirely possible that, for example, the pilot-in-command is not even in the cockpit (or even awake), he may be in the Crew Rest Area, taking a nap. It is possible that two first officers are in the cockpit and the captain is sleeping. Or, two captains are in the cockpit, but neither of them is pilot-in-command, because the PIC is a third captain with more experience, who is currently resting. Also interesting: during the QF32 incident, there were no less than 5 qualified pilots inside the cockpit.
    $endgroup$
    – Jörg W Mittag
    Jan 8 at 13:09
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think your last paragraph is very important: on long-haul flights, it is entirely possible that, for example, the pilot-in-command is not even in the cockpit (or even awake), he may be in the Crew Rest Area, taking a nap. It is possible that two first officers are in the cockpit and the captain is sleeping. Or, two captains are in the cockpit, but neither of them is pilot-in-command, because the PIC is a third captain with more experience, who is currently resting. Also interesting: during the QF32 incident, there were no less than 5 qualified pilots inside the cockpit.
    $endgroup$
    – Jörg W Mittag
    Jan 8 at 13:09










1




1




$begingroup$
I think your last paragraph is very important: on long-haul flights, it is entirely possible that, for example, the pilot-in-command is not even in the cockpit (or even awake), he may be in the Crew Rest Area, taking a nap. It is possible that two first officers are in the cockpit and the captain is sleeping. Or, two captains are in the cockpit, but neither of them is pilot-in-command, because the PIC is a third captain with more experience, who is currently resting. Also interesting: during the QF32 incident, there were no less than 5 qualified pilots inside the cockpit.
$endgroup$
– Jörg W Mittag
Jan 8 at 13:09






$begingroup$
I think your last paragraph is very important: on long-haul flights, it is entirely possible that, for example, the pilot-in-command is not even in the cockpit (or even awake), he may be in the Crew Rest Area, taking a nap. It is possible that two first officers are in the cockpit and the captain is sleeping. Or, two captains are in the cockpit, but neither of them is pilot-in-command, because the PIC is a third captain with more experience, who is currently resting. Also interesting: during the QF32 incident, there were no less than 5 qualified pilots inside the cockpit.
$endgroup$
– Jörg W Mittag
Jan 8 at 13:09













1












$begingroup$

In aircraft,they must have a nominated pilot who is the incharge of the aircraft, this pilot is the Captain. A newly qualified airline or private jet pilot is allocated the rank of “First Officer” then later “Senior First Officer” before they take a “Command Course” after which they can become a Captain.



The first officer is the second pilot (also referred to as the co-pilot) of an aircraft. The first officer is second-in-command of the aircraft to the captain, who is the legal commander. In the event of incapacitation of the captain, the first officer will assume command of the aircraft.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    It's possible to have a flight crew consisting of multiple captains. Captain is a rank, not a position.
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    Jan 7 at 13:48










  • $begingroup$
    Captain is absolutely a position. It's also a rank! Complexities abound.
    $endgroup$
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Jan 8 at 0:44










  • $begingroup$
    @Lightness I think A CVn's point was that, while it's usually the case, it's not always true that the guy in the right seat is a First Officer. Sometimes both seats are occupied by Captains. On U.S. carriers, generally both seats will never be operated by FOs (augmented operations require at least 2 Captains,) though 2 FOs + 1 Captain appears to be possible in Europe (AF447's flight deck was occupied by 2 FOs when things went awry, for example, and the only Captain on board was in crew rest.)
    $endgroup$
    – reirab
    Jan 8 at 7:40








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @LightnessRacesinOrbit Not really. Pilot In Command is a position. So is Pilot Flying and Pilot Monitoring, respectively. There is no contradiction in having a rank of Captain, being Pilot Monitoring, and not being Pilot In Command, all at the same time. It might be somewhat unusual, but there is no contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    Jan 8 at 9:09










  • $begingroup$
    @aCVn Exactly what I mean!
    $endgroup$
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Jan 8 at 10:38
















1












$begingroup$

In aircraft,they must have a nominated pilot who is the incharge of the aircraft, this pilot is the Captain. A newly qualified airline or private jet pilot is allocated the rank of “First Officer” then later “Senior First Officer” before they take a “Command Course” after which they can become a Captain.



The first officer is the second pilot (also referred to as the co-pilot) of an aircraft. The first officer is second-in-command of the aircraft to the captain, who is the legal commander. In the event of incapacitation of the captain, the first officer will assume command of the aircraft.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    It's possible to have a flight crew consisting of multiple captains. Captain is a rank, not a position.
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    Jan 7 at 13:48










  • $begingroup$
    Captain is absolutely a position. It's also a rank! Complexities abound.
    $endgroup$
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Jan 8 at 0:44










  • $begingroup$
    @Lightness I think A CVn's point was that, while it's usually the case, it's not always true that the guy in the right seat is a First Officer. Sometimes both seats are occupied by Captains. On U.S. carriers, generally both seats will never be operated by FOs (augmented operations require at least 2 Captains,) though 2 FOs + 1 Captain appears to be possible in Europe (AF447's flight deck was occupied by 2 FOs when things went awry, for example, and the only Captain on board was in crew rest.)
    $endgroup$
    – reirab
    Jan 8 at 7:40








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @LightnessRacesinOrbit Not really. Pilot In Command is a position. So is Pilot Flying and Pilot Monitoring, respectively. There is no contradiction in having a rank of Captain, being Pilot Monitoring, and not being Pilot In Command, all at the same time. It might be somewhat unusual, but there is no contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    Jan 8 at 9:09










  • $begingroup$
    @aCVn Exactly what I mean!
    $endgroup$
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Jan 8 at 10:38














1












1








1





$begingroup$

In aircraft,they must have a nominated pilot who is the incharge of the aircraft, this pilot is the Captain. A newly qualified airline or private jet pilot is allocated the rank of “First Officer” then later “Senior First Officer” before they take a “Command Course” after which they can become a Captain.



The first officer is the second pilot (also referred to as the co-pilot) of an aircraft. The first officer is second-in-command of the aircraft to the captain, who is the legal commander. In the event of incapacitation of the captain, the first officer will assume command of the aircraft.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



In aircraft,they must have a nominated pilot who is the incharge of the aircraft, this pilot is the Captain. A newly qualified airline or private jet pilot is allocated the rank of “First Officer” then later “Senior First Officer” before they take a “Command Course” after which they can become a Captain.



The first officer is the second pilot (also referred to as the co-pilot) of an aircraft. The first officer is second-in-command of the aircraft to the captain, who is the legal commander. In the event of incapacitation of the captain, the first officer will assume command of the aircraft.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jan 7 at 12:46









Yahini priya RajaYahini priya Raja

112




112








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    It's possible to have a flight crew consisting of multiple captains. Captain is a rank, not a position.
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    Jan 7 at 13:48










  • $begingroup$
    Captain is absolutely a position. It's also a rank! Complexities abound.
    $endgroup$
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Jan 8 at 0:44










  • $begingroup$
    @Lightness I think A CVn's point was that, while it's usually the case, it's not always true that the guy in the right seat is a First Officer. Sometimes both seats are occupied by Captains. On U.S. carriers, generally both seats will never be operated by FOs (augmented operations require at least 2 Captains,) though 2 FOs + 1 Captain appears to be possible in Europe (AF447's flight deck was occupied by 2 FOs when things went awry, for example, and the only Captain on board was in crew rest.)
    $endgroup$
    – reirab
    Jan 8 at 7:40








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @LightnessRacesinOrbit Not really. Pilot In Command is a position. So is Pilot Flying and Pilot Monitoring, respectively. There is no contradiction in having a rank of Captain, being Pilot Monitoring, and not being Pilot In Command, all at the same time. It might be somewhat unusual, but there is no contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    Jan 8 at 9:09










  • $begingroup$
    @aCVn Exactly what I mean!
    $endgroup$
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Jan 8 at 10:38














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    It's possible to have a flight crew consisting of multiple captains. Captain is a rank, not a position.
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    Jan 7 at 13:48










  • $begingroup$
    Captain is absolutely a position. It's also a rank! Complexities abound.
    $endgroup$
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Jan 8 at 0:44










  • $begingroup$
    @Lightness I think A CVn's point was that, while it's usually the case, it's not always true that the guy in the right seat is a First Officer. Sometimes both seats are occupied by Captains. On U.S. carriers, generally both seats will never be operated by FOs (augmented operations require at least 2 Captains,) though 2 FOs + 1 Captain appears to be possible in Europe (AF447's flight deck was occupied by 2 FOs when things went awry, for example, and the only Captain on board was in crew rest.)
    $endgroup$
    – reirab
    Jan 8 at 7:40








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @LightnessRacesinOrbit Not really. Pilot In Command is a position. So is Pilot Flying and Pilot Monitoring, respectively. There is no contradiction in having a rank of Captain, being Pilot Monitoring, and not being Pilot In Command, all at the same time. It might be somewhat unusual, but there is no contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    Jan 8 at 9:09










  • $begingroup$
    @aCVn Exactly what I mean!
    $endgroup$
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Jan 8 at 10:38








3




3




$begingroup$
It's possible to have a flight crew consisting of multiple captains. Captain is a rank, not a position.
$endgroup$
– a CVn
Jan 7 at 13:48




$begingroup$
It's possible to have a flight crew consisting of multiple captains. Captain is a rank, not a position.
$endgroup$
– a CVn
Jan 7 at 13:48












$begingroup$
Captain is absolutely a position. It's also a rank! Complexities abound.
$endgroup$
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Jan 8 at 0:44




$begingroup$
Captain is absolutely a position. It's also a rank! Complexities abound.
$endgroup$
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Jan 8 at 0:44












$begingroup$
@Lightness I think A CVn's point was that, while it's usually the case, it's not always true that the guy in the right seat is a First Officer. Sometimes both seats are occupied by Captains. On U.S. carriers, generally both seats will never be operated by FOs (augmented operations require at least 2 Captains,) though 2 FOs + 1 Captain appears to be possible in Europe (AF447's flight deck was occupied by 2 FOs when things went awry, for example, and the only Captain on board was in crew rest.)
$endgroup$
– reirab
Jan 8 at 7:40






$begingroup$
@Lightness I think A CVn's point was that, while it's usually the case, it's not always true that the guy in the right seat is a First Officer. Sometimes both seats are occupied by Captains. On U.S. carriers, generally both seats will never be operated by FOs (augmented operations require at least 2 Captains,) though 2 FOs + 1 Captain appears to be possible in Europe (AF447's flight deck was occupied by 2 FOs when things went awry, for example, and the only Captain on board was in crew rest.)
$endgroup$
– reirab
Jan 8 at 7:40






1




1




$begingroup$
@LightnessRacesinOrbit Not really. Pilot In Command is a position. So is Pilot Flying and Pilot Monitoring, respectively. There is no contradiction in having a rank of Captain, being Pilot Monitoring, and not being Pilot In Command, all at the same time. It might be somewhat unusual, but there is no contradiction.
$endgroup$
– a CVn
Jan 8 at 9:09




$begingroup$
@LightnessRacesinOrbit Not really. Pilot In Command is a position. So is Pilot Flying and Pilot Monitoring, respectively. There is no contradiction in having a rank of Captain, being Pilot Monitoring, and not being Pilot In Command, all at the same time. It might be somewhat unusual, but there is no contradiction.
$endgroup$
– a CVn
Jan 8 at 9:09












$begingroup$
@aCVn Exactly what I mean!
$endgroup$
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Jan 8 at 10:38




$begingroup$
@aCVn Exactly what I mean!
$endgroup$
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Jan 8 at 10:38











-3












$begingroup$


  1. Job... Pilot flies the airplane, co-pilot helps by doing radios and knobs and switches. Can sit in either seat.


  2. Rank... Captain is usually the senior person of the two, and is basically the decision-maker. Is seen as a more prestigious and higher-paid job then First Officer. Conventionally sits on the left (but there is no legal requirement for this). Thye Captain is also the 'commander' of the airplane, which is a legal position for "if it goes wrong, the buck stops here".







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You make it sound like there's a clear distinction between "flying the airplane" and "doing radios and knobs and switches"...
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    Jan 7 at 13:57










  • $begingroup$
    "Pilot flies the airplane, co-pilot helps by doing radios and knobs and switches." Both pilots take turns flying the airplane (i.e. manipulating the flight controls.) Perhaps you're thinking of the distinction between "pilot flying" and "pilot not flying" or "pilot monitoring?"
    $endgroup$
    – reirab
    Jan 7 at 19:05
















-3












$begingroup$


  1. Job... Pilot flies the airplane, co-pilot helps by doing radios and knobs and switches. Can sit in either seat.


  2. Rank... Captain is usually the senior person of the two, and is basically the decision-maker. Is seen as a more prestigious and higher-paid job then First Officer. Conventionally sits on the left (but there is no legal requirement for this). Thye Captain is also the 'commander' of the airplane, which is a legal position for "if it goes wrong, the buck stops here".







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You make it sound like there's a clear distinction between "flying the airplane" and "doing radios and knobs and switches"...
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    Jan 7 at 13:57










  • $begingroup$
    "Pilot flies the airplane, co-pilot helps by doing radios and knobs and switches." Both pilots take turns flying the airplane (i.e. manipulating the flight controls.) Perhaps you're thinking of the distinction between "pilot flying" and "pilot not flying" or "pilot monitoring?"
    $endgroup$
    – reirab
    Jan 7 at 19:05














-3












-3








-3





$begingroup$


  1. Job... Pilot flies the airplane, co-pilot helps by doing radios and knobs and switches. Can sit in either seat.


  2. Rank... Captain is usually the senior person of the two, and is basically the decision-maker. Is seen as a more prestigious and higher-paid job then First Officer. Conventionally sits on the left (but there is no legal requirement for this). Thye Captain is also the 'commander' of the airplane, which is a legal position for "if it goes wrong, the buck stops here".







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




  1. Job... Pilot flies the airplane, co-pilot helps by doing radios and knobs and switches. Can sit in either seat.


  2. Rank... Captain is usually the senior person of the two, and is basically the decision-maker. Is seen as a more prestigious and higher-paid job then First Officer. Conventionally sits on the left (but there is no legal requirement for this). Thye Captain is also the 'commander' of the airplane, which is a legal position for "if it goes wrong, the buck stops here".








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jan 7 at 9:48









RACRAC

2,07548




2,07548












  • $begingroup$
    You make it sound like there's a clear distinction between "flying the airplane" and "doing radios and knobs and switches"...
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    Jan 7 at 13:57










  • $begingroup$
    "Pilot flies the airplane, co-pilot helps by doing radios and knobs and switches." Both pilots take turns flying the airplane (i.e. manipulating the flight controls.) Perhaps you're thinking of the distinction between "pilot flying" and "pilot not flying" or "pilot monitoring?"
    $endgroup$
    – reirab
    Jan 7 at 19:05


















  • $begingroup$
    You make it sound like there's a clear distinction between "flying the airplane" and "doing radios and knobs and switches"...
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    Jan 7 at 13:57










  • $begingroup$
    "Pilot flies the airplane, co-pilot helps by doing radios and knobs and switches." Both pilots take turns flying the airplane (i.e. manipulating the flight controls.) Perhaps you're thinking of the distinction between "pilot flying" and "pilot not flying" or "pilot monitoring?"
    $endgroup$
    – reirab
    Jan 7 at 19:05
















$begingroup$
You make it sound like there's a clear distinction between "flying the airplane" and "doing radios and knobs and switches"...
$endgroup$
– a CVn
Jan 7 at 13:57




$begingroup$
You make it sound like there's a clear distinction between "flying the airplane" and "doing radios and knobs and switches"...
$endgroup$
– a CVn
Jan 7 at 13:57












$begingroup$
"Pilot flies the airplane, co-pilot helps by doing radios and knobs and switches." Both pilots take turns flying the airplane (i.e. manipulating the flight controls.) Perhaps you're thinking of the distinction between "pilot flying" and "pilot not flying" or "pilot monitoring?"
$endgroup$
– reirab
Jan 7 at 19:05




$begingroup$
"Pilot flies the airplane, co-pilot helps by doing radios and knobs and switches." Both pilots take turns flying the airplane (i.e. manipulating the flight controls.) Perhaps you're thinking of the distinction between "pilot flying" and "pilot not flying" or "pilot monitoring?"
$endgroup$
– reirab
Jan 7 at 19:05



Popular posts from this blog

'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

Image
0 My application was working fine until I decided to go with lazy loading: So, my shared component looks like this: import { Component, Renderer2 } from '@angular/core'; export interface FormModel { captcha?: string; } @Component({ selector: 'app-layout', templateUrl: './app-layout.component.html', styleUrls: ['./app-layout.css'] }) export class FullLayoutComponent { } app-layout.component.ts I am using this component in my Another component say school-home.component.html like this: <app-layout> </app-layout> and it was working fine until I created a Module school-home.module.ts like this: import { NgModule } from '@angular/core'; import { CommonModule } from '@angular/common'; import { SchoolhomeRoutingModule ...
Read more

android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

Image
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 0 This is a simple project showing cubes on Unity, exported to android project and imported on Android studio. On maifest file it showed following warning: Expecting <uses-feature android:name="android.software.leanback" android:required="false" /> tag I have no information about it. And also on default emptyview android project does not use/mention this feature. I know it is required by TV's and such but why its not added by default? Why is this? And Should I concern about it? android unity3d ...
Read more

WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]

Image
up vote 0 down vote favorite This question already has an answer here: Image source URI requiring authorization 3 answers Add header to all* HTTP requests on a machine 1 answer first of all sorry for my english. Recently I added some security in the backend of my project, and now I need to send a validation code(apiKey) inside the headers to retrieve the images. I have a problem with ALL images in my project that I had attached in my UI. For example, before I had: <Image Height="90" Source="{Binding Video.Thumbnail}"/> Now I need to change my code to create a CUSTOM petition add the apiKey in the header:...
Read more