Apostol proof for $mathbb{Q}$ being countable.












0












$begingroup$


I am trying to understand a proof from Mathematical Analysis by Apostol for the following theorem:




The set of rationals $mathbb{Q}$ is countable.




Here is the proof (I rewrote a few things):




Let $A_n$ be the set of positive rational numbers that have denominator $n$. Then the following is true: $$mathbb{Q}^+=bigcup_{i=1}^infty A_i$$ Since each $A_i$ is countable, $mathbb{Q}^+$ is countable. Similarly for $mathbb{Q}^-$ and ${0}$. Then $mathbb{Q}=mathbb{Q}^-cup{0}cupmathbb{Q}^+$ is countable.




For some reason, I cannot understand the bold part. How is that each $A_{i}$ is countable?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Think about A_2 for concreteness. There is one element of A_2 for every positive integer that you put in the denominator (or zero, if you don't want to count non-reduced fractions, but it doesn't matter either way). Explicitly, the elements of A_2 are 1/2, 2/2, 3/2, 4/2, 5/2, and so on
    $endgroup$
    – Brennan Vincent
    Jan 7 at 4:07
















0












$begingroup$


I am trying to understand a proof from Mathematical Analysis by Apostol for the following theorem:




The set of rationals $mathbb{Q}$ is countable.




Here is the proof (I rewrote a few things):




Let $A_n$ be the set of positive rational numbers that have denominator $n$. Then the following is true: $$mathbb{Q}^+=bigcup_{i=1}^infty A_i$$ Since each $A_i$ is countable, $mathbb{Q}^+$ is countable. Similarly for $mathbb{Q}^-$ and ${0}$. Then $mathbb{Q}=mathbb{Q}^-cup{0}cupmathbb{Q}^+$ is countable.




For some reason, I cannot understand the bold part. How is that each $A_{i}$ is countable?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Think about A_2 for concreteness. There is one element of A_2 for every positive integer that you put in the denominator (or zero, if you don't want to count non-reduced fractions, but it doesn't matter either way). Explicitly, the elements of A_2 are 1/2, 2/2, 3/2, 4/2, 5/2, and so on
    $endgroup$
    – Brennan Vincent
    Jan 7 at 4:07














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I am trying to understand a proof from Mathematical Analysis by Apostol for the following theorem:




The set of rationals $mathbb{Q}$ is countable.




Here is the proof (I rewrote a few things):




Let $A_n$ be the set of positive rational numbers that have denominator $n$. Then the following is true: $$mathbb{Q}^+=bigcup_{i=1}^infty A_i$$ Since each $A_i$ is countable, $mathbb{Q}^+$ is countable. Similarly for $mathbb{Q}^-$ and ${0}$. Then $mathbb{Q}=mathbb{Q}^-cup{0}cupmathbb{Q}^+$ is countable.




For some reason, I cannot understand the bold part. How is that each $A_{i}$ is countable?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am trying to understand a proof from Mathematical Analysis by Apostol for the following theorem:




The set of rationals $mathbb{Q}$ is countable.




Here is the proof (I rewrote a few things):




Let $A_n$ be the set of positive rational numbers that have denominator $n$. Then the following is true: $$mathbb{Q}^+=bigcup_{i=1}^infty A_i$$ Since each $A_i$ is countable, $mathbb{Q}^+$ is countable. Similarly for $mathbb{Q}^-$ and ${0}$. Then $mathbb{Q}=mathbb{Q}^-cup{0}cupmathbb{Q}^+$ is countable.




For some reason, I cannot understand the bold part. How is that each $A_{i}$ is countable?







real-analysis elementary-set-theory proof-explanation rational-numbers






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 7 at 15:19









Andrés E. Caicedo

65.2k8158247




65.2k8158247










asked Jan 7 at 3:46









numericalorangenumericalorange

1,735311




1,735311












  • $begingroup$
    Think about A_2 for concreteness. There is one element of A_2 for every positive integer that you put in the denominator (or zero, if you don't want to count non-reduced fractions, but it doesn't matter either way). Explicitly, the elements of A_2 are 1/2, 2/2, 3/2, 4/2, 5/2, and so on
    $endgroup$
    – Brennan Vincent
    Jan 7 at 4:07


















  • $begingroup$
    Think about A_2 for concreteness. There is one element of A_2 for every positive integer that you put in the denominator (or zero, if you don't want to count non-reduced fractions, but it doesn't matter either way). Explicitly, the elements of A_2 are 1/2, 2/2, 3/2, 4/2, 5/2, and so on
    $endgroup$
    – Brennan Vincent
    Jan 7 at 4:07
















$begingroup$
Think about A_2 for concreteness. There is one element of A_2 for every positive integer that you put in the denominator (or zero, if you don't want to count non-reduced fractions, but it doesn't matter either way). Explicitly, the elements of A_2 are 1/2, 2/2, 3/2, 4/2, 5/2, and so on
$endgroup$
– Brennan Vincent
Jan 7 at 4:07




$begingroup$
Think about A_2 for concreteness. There is one element of A_2 for every positive integer that you put in the denominator (or zero, if you don't want to count non-reduced fractions, but it doesn't matter either way). Explicitly, the elements of A_2 are 1/2, 2/2, 3/2, 4/2, 5/2, and so on
$endgroup$
– Brennan Vincent
Jan 7 at 4:07










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Consider the map $f_i:A_irightarrow mathbb{N}$ defined by $f({aover i})=a$, it is injective. This implies that $A_i$ has a cardinality of a subset of $mathbb{N}$ so it is countable.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    Rephrasing:



    Fix $i$ , $i in mathbb{Z^+}$.



    $A_i= ${$1/i,2/i,3/i,.......$}.



    $f(mathbb{Z^+}) rightarrow A_i,$



    $f(n)= n/i$, $i$ fixed, is a bijection.



    $A_i$ is countable.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064640%2fapostol-proof-for-mathbbq-being-countable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      Consider the map $f_i:A_irightarrow mathbb{N}$ defined by $f({aover i})=a$, it is injective. This implies that $A_i$ has a cardinality of a subset of $mathbb{N}$ so it is countable.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        4












        $begingroup$

        Consider the map $f_i:A_irightarrow mathbb{N}$ defined by $f({aover i})=a$, it is injective. This implies that $A_i$ has a cardinality of a subset of $mathbb{N}$ so it is countable.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          Consider the map $f_i:A_irightarrow mathbb{N}$ defined by $f({aover i})=a$, it is injective. This implies that $A_i$ has a cardinality of a subset of $mathbb{N}$ so it is countable.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Consider the map $f_i:A_irightarrow mathbb{N}$ defined by $f({aover i})=a$, it is injective. This implies that $A_i$ has a cardinality of a subset of $mathbb{N}$ so it is countable.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 7 at 3:49









          Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide

          57.3k11444




          57.3k11444























              2












              $begingroup$

              Rephrasing:



              Fix $i$ , $i in mathbb{Z^+}$.



              $A_i= ${$1/i,2/i,3/i,.......$}.



              $f(mathbb{Z^+}) rightarrow A_i,$



              $f(n)= n/i$, $i$ fixed, is a bijection.



              $A_i$ is countable.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                Rephrasing:



                Fix $i$ , $i in mathbb{Z^+}$.



                $A_i= ${$1/i,2/i,3/i,.......$}.



                $f(mathbb{Z^+}) rightarrow A_i,$



                $f(n)= n/i$, $i$ fixed, is a bijection.



                $A_i$ is countable.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  Rephrasing:



                  Fix $i$ , $i in mathbb{Z^+}$.



                  $A_i= ${$1/i,2/i,3/i,.......$}.



                  $f(mathbb{Z^+}) rightarrow A_i,$



                  $f(n)= n/i$, $i$ fixed, is a bijection.



                  $A_i$ is countable.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Rephrasing:



                  Fix $i$ , $i in mathbb{Z^+}$.



                  $A_i= ${$1/i,2/i,3/i,.......$}.



                  $f(mathbb{Z^+}) rightarrow A_i,$



                  $f(n)= n/i$, $i$ fixed, is a bijection.



                  $A_i$ is countable.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 7 at 7:19

























                  answered Jan 7 at 6:52









                  Peter SzilasPeter Szilas

                  11.1k2821




                  11.1k2821






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064640%2fapostol-proof-for-mathbbq-being-countable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

                      android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

                      WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]