Projective-invariant differential operator












3












$begingroup$


This question has been cross-posted to MathOverflow.



Suppose we want a differential operator $T$ acting on functions $mathbb{R}^n rightarrow mathbb{R}^n$ such that



begin{align*}
&T(g) = 0 Longleftrightarrow g in G \
&g in G Longrightarrow T(g circ f) = T(f)
end{align*}



where $G = text{Aff}(n, mathbb{R})$ is the affine group. Consider the operator



$$T(f) = (nabla f)^{-1} cdot nabla nabla f$$



where $nabla f$ is the gradient of $f$ and $nabla nabla f$ is its Hessian. This seems to satisfy the criteria since



$$nabla nabla f = 0 Longleftrightarrow f(x) = A cdot x + b$$



and



begin{align*}
T(A cdot f + b)
&= (nabla (A cdot f + b))^{-1} cdot nabla nabla (A cdot f + b) \
&= (nabla A cdot f)^{-1} cdot nabla nabla A cdot f \
&= (A cdot nabla f)^{-1} cdot nabla A cdot nabla f \
&= (nabla f)^{-1} cdot A^{-1} cdot A cdot nabla nabla f \
&= (nabla f)^{-1} cdot nabla nabla f \
&= T(f)
end{align*}



My question is this: Is there a similar operator that is invariant under the projective group $G = text{PGL}(n, mathbb{R})$? For $G = text{PGL}(1,mathbb{R})$, an example is the Schwarzian derivative



$$S(f) = frac{f'''}{f'} - frac{3}{2} left(frac{f''}{f'}right)^2$$



Projective differential geometry old and new by Ovsienko and Tabachnikov states in chapter 1.3 page 10 that $S(g) = 0$ iff $g$ is a projective transformation and $S(g circ f) = S(f)$ if $g$ is a projective transformation. They also give a multidimensional generalization of the Schwarzian derivative in equation 7.1.6 page 191:



$$L(f)_{ij}^k = sum_ell frac{partial^2 f^ell}{partial x^i partial x^j} frac{partial x^k}{partial f^ell} - frac{1}{n+1} left(delta_j^k frac{partial}{partial x^i} + delta_i^k frac{partial}{partial x^j}right) log J_f$$



where $J_f = det frac{partial f^i}{partial x^j}$ is the Jacobian. However, Schwarps by Pizarro et al. states in section 3.3 page 97 that this "cannot be used to ensure infinitesimally homographic warps as it also vanishes for other functions than homographies" (are there examples?). Instead, they give a system of 2D Schwarzian equations that "vanish if and only if the warp is a homography" (page 94). These are given in section 4.2 equation 29 page 98:



begin{align*}
S_1[eta] &= eta^x_{uu} eta^y_u - eta^y_{uu} eta^x_u \
S_2[eta] &= eta^x_{vv} eta^y_v - eta^y_{vv} eta^x_v \
S_3[eta] &= (eta^x_{uu} eta^y_v - eta^y_{uu} eta^x_v) + 2(eta^x_{uv} eta^y_u - eta^y_{uv} eta^x_u) \
S_4[eta] &= (eta^x_{vv} eta^y_u - eta^y_{vv} eta^x_u) + 2(eta^x_{uv} eta^y_v - eta^y_{uv} eta^x_v)
end{align*}



What is the geometric intuition behind these equations? Can they be stated more compactly/concisely? Also, how can we normalize them so that $S_i[eta]$ is actually invariant under projective transformations of $eta$?



Finally, is there a compact expression for the $n$-dimensional generalization of this derivative?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In your first equations, you state that $gin GLongrightarrow T(gcirc f)=T(f)$. May I ask what this $f$ stands for, an element in $G$ or an arbitrary $mathbb{R}^n$-valued function? Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – hypernova
    Jan 8 at 23:53












  • $begingroup$
    In that expression, $f$ is an arbitrary function $mathbb{R}^n rightarrow mathbb{R}^n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user76284
    Jan 9 at 0:04










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your clarification.
    $endgroup$
    – hypernova
    Jan 9 at 0:09
















3












$begingroup$


This question has been cross-posted to MathOverflow.



Suppose we want a differential operator $T$ acting on functions $mathbb{R}^n rightarrow mathbb{R}^n$ such that



begin{align*}
&T(g) = 0 Longleftrightarrow g in G \
&g in G Longrightarrow T(g circ f) = T(f)
end{align*}



where $G = text{Aff}(n, mathbb{R})$ is the affine group. Consider the operator



$$T(f) = (nabla f)^{-1} cdot nabla nabla f$$



where $nabla f$ is the gradient of $f$ and $nabla nabla f$ is its Hessian. This seems to satisfy the criteria since



$$nabla nabla f = 0 Longleftrightarrow f(x) = A cdot x + b$$



and



begin{align*}
T(A cdot f + b)
&= (nabla (A cdot f + b))^{-1} cdot nabla nabla (A cdot f + b) \
&= (nabla A cdot f)^{-1} cdot nabla nabla A cdot f \
&= (A cdot nabla f)^{-1} cdot nabla A cdot nabla f \
&= (nabla f)^{-1} cdot A^{-1} cdot A cdot nabla nabla f \
&= (nabla f)^{-1} cdot nabla nabla f \
&= T(f)
end{align*}



My question is this: Is there a similar operator that is invariant under the projective group $G = text{PGL}(n, mathbb{R})$? For $G = text{PGL}(1,mathbb{R})$, an example is the Schwarzian derivative



$$S(f) = frac{f'''}{f'} - frac{3}{2} left(frac{f''}{f'}right)^2$$



Projective differential geometry old and new by Ovsienko and Tabachnikov states in chapter 1.3 page 10 that $S(g) = 0$ iff $g$ is a projective transformation and $S(g circ f) = S(f)$ if $g$ is a projective transformation. They also give a multidimensional generalization of the Schwarzian derivative in equation 7.1.6 page 191:



$$L(f)_{ij}^k = sum_ell frac{partial^2 f^ell}{partial x^i partial x^j} frac{partial x^k}{partial f^ell} - frac{1}{n+1} left(delta_j^k frac{partial}{partial x^i} + delta_i^k frac{partial}{partial x^j}right) log J_f$$



where $J_f = det frac{partial f^i}{partial x^j}$ is the Jacobian. However, Schwarps by Pizarro et al. states in section 3.3 page 97 that this "cannot be used to ensure infinitesimally homographic warps as it also vanishes for other functions than homographies" (are there examples?). Instead, they give a system of 2D Schwarzian equations that "vanish if and only if the warp is a homography" (page 94). These are given in section 4.2 equation 29 page 98:



begin{align*}
S_1[eta] &= eta^x_{uu} eta^y_u - eta^y_{uu} eta^x_u \
S_2[eta] &= eta^x_{vv} eta^y_v - eta^y_{vv} eta^x_v \
S_3[eta] &= (eta^x_{uu} eta^y_v - eta^y_{uu} eta^x_v) + 2(eta^x_{uv} eta^y_u - eta^y_{uv} eta^x_u) \
S_4[eta] &= (eta^x_{vv} eta^y_u - eta^y_{vv} eta^x_u) + 2(eta^x_{uv} eta^y_v - eta^y_{uv} eta^x_v)
end{align*}



What is the geometric intuition behind these equations? Can they be stated more compactly/concisely? Also, how can we normalize them so that $S_i[eta]$ is actually invariant under projective transformations of $eta$?



Finally, is there a compact expression for the $n$-dimensional generalization of this derivative?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In your first equations, you state that $gin GLongrightarrow T(gcirc f)=T(f)$. May I ask what this $f$ stands for, an element in $G$ or an arbitrary $mathbb{R}^n$-valued function? Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – hypernova
    Jan 8 at 23:53












  • $begingroup$
    In that expression, $f$ is an arbitrary function $mathbb{R}^n rightarrow mathbb{R}^n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user76284
    Jan 9 at 0:04










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your clarification.
    $endgroup$
    – hypernova
    Jan 9 at 0:09














3












3








3


2



$begingroup$


This question has been cross-posted to MathOverflow.



Suppose we want a differential operator $T$ acting on functions $mathbb{R}^n rightarrow mathbb{R}^n$ such that



begin{align*}
&T(g) = 0 Longleftrightarrow g in G \
&g in G Longrightarrow T(g circ f) = T(f)
end{align*}



where $G = text{Aff}(n, mathbb{R})$ is the affine group. Consider the operator



$$T(f) = (nabla f)^{-1} cdot nabla nabla f$$



where $nabla f$ is the gradient of $f$ and $nabla nabla f$ is its Hessian. This seems to satisfy the criteria since



$$nabla nabla f = 0 Longleftrightarrow f(x) = A cdot x + b$$



and



begin{align*}
T(A cdot f + b)
&= (nabla (A cdot f + b))^{-1} cdot nabla nabla (A cdot f + b) \
&= (nabla A cdot f)^{-1} cdot nabla nabla A cdot f \
&= (A cdot nabla f)^{-1} cdot nabla A cdot nabla f \
&= (nabla f)^{-1} cdot A^{-1} cdot A cdot nabla nabla f \
&= (nabla f)^{-1} cdot nabla nabla f \
&= T(f)
end{align*}



My question is this: Is there a similar operator that is invariant under the projective group $G = text{PGL}(n, mathbb{R})$? For $G = text{PGL}(1,mathbb{R})$, an example is the Schwarzian derivative



$$S(f) = frac{f'''}{f'} - frac{3}{2} left(frac{f''}{f'}right)^2$$



Projective differential geometry old and new by Ovsienko and Tabachnikov states in chapter 1.3 page 10 that $S(g) = 0$ iff $g$ is a projective transformation and $S(g circ f) = S(f)$ if $g$ is a projective transformation. They also give a multidimensional generalization of the Schwarzian derivative in equation 7.1.6 page 191:



$$L(f)_{ij}^k = sum_ell frac{partial^2 f^ell}{partial x^i partial x^j} frac{partial x^k}{partial f^ell} - frac{1}{n+1} left(delta_j^k frac{partial}{partial x^i} + delta_i^k frac{partial}{partial x^j}right) log J_f$$



where $J_f = det frac{partial f^i}{partial x^j}$ is the Jacobian. However, Schwarps by Pizarro et al. states in section 3.3 page 97 that this "cannot be used to ensure infinitesimally homographic warps as it also vanishes for other functions than homographies" (are there examples?). Instead, they give a system of 2D Schwarzian equations that "vanish if and only if the warp is a homography" (page 94). These are given in section 4.2 equation 29 page 98:



begin{align*}
S_1[eta] &= eta^x_{uu} eta^y_u - eta^y_{uu} eta^x_u \
S_2[eta] &= eta^x_{vv} eta^y_v - eta^y_{vv} eta^x_v \
S_3[eta] &= (eta^x_{uu} eta^y_v - eta^y_{uu} eta^x_v) + 2(eta^x_{uv} eta^y_u - eta^y_{uv} eta^x_u) \
S_4[eta] &= (eta^x_{vv} eta^y_u - eta^y_{vv} eta^x_u) + 2(eta^x_{uv} eta^y_v - eta^y_{uv} eta^x_v)
end{align*}



What is the geometric intuition behind these equations? Can they be stated more compactly/concisely? Also, how can we normalize them so that $S_i[eta]$ is actually invariant under projective transformations of $eta$?



Finally, is there a compact expression for the $n$-dimensional generalization of this derivative?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




This question has been cross-posted to MathOverflow.



Suppose we want a differential operator $T$ acting on functions $mathbb{R}^n rightarrow mathbb{R}^n$ such that



begin{align*}
&T(g) = 0 Longleftrightarrow g in G \
&g in G Longrightarrow T(g circ f) = T(f)
end{align*}



where $G = text{Aff}(n, mathbb{R})$ is the affine group. Consider the operator



$$T(f) = (nabla f)^{-1} cdot nabla nabla f$$



where $nabla f$ is the gradient of $f$ and $nabla nabla f$ is its Hessian. This seems to satisfy the criteria since



$$nabla nabla f = 0 Longleftrightarrow f(x) = A cdot x + b$$



and



begin{align*}
T(A cdot f + b)
&= (nabla (A cdot f + b))^{-1} cdot nabla nabla (A cdot f + b) \
&= (nabla A cdot f)^{-1} cdot nabla nabla A cdot f \
&= (A cdot nabla f)^{-1} cdot nabla A cdot nabla f \
&= (nabla f)^{-1} cdot A^{-1} cdot A cdot nabla nabla f \
&= (nabla f)^{-1} cdot nabla nabla f \
&= T(f)
end{align*}



My question is this: Is there a similar operator that is invariant under the projective group $G = text{PGL}(n, mathbb{R})$? For $G = text{PGL}(1,mathbb{R})$, an example is the Schwarzian derivative



$$S(f) = frac{f'''}{f'} - frac{3}{2} left(frac{f''}{f'}right)^2$$



Projective differential geometry old and new by Ovsienko and Tabachnikov states in chapter 1.3 page 10 that $S(g) = 0$ iff $g$ is a projective transformation and $S(g circ f) = S(f)$ if $g$ is a projective transformation. They also give a multidimensional generalization of the Schwarzian derivative in equation 7.1.6 page 191:



$$L(f)_{ij}^k = sum_ell frac{partial^2 f^ell}{partial x^i partial x^j} frac{partial x^k}{partial f^ell} - frac{1}{n+1} left(delta_j^k frac{partial}{partial x^i} + delta_i^k frac{partial}{partial x^j}right) log J_f$$



where $J_f = det frac{partial f^i}{partial x^j}$ is the Jacobian. However, Schwarps by Pizarro et al. states in section 3.3 page 97 that this "cannot be used to ensure infinitesimally homographic warps as it also vanishes for other functions than homographies" (are there examples?). Instead, they give a system of 2D Schwarzian equations that "vanish if and only if the warp is a homography" (page 94). These are given in section 4.2 equation 29 page 98:



begin{align*}
S_1[eta] &= eta^x_{uu} eta^y_u - eta^y_{uu} eta^x_u \
S_2[eta] &= eta^x_{vv} eta^y_v - eta^y_{vv} eta^x_v \
S_3[eta] &= (eta^x_{uu} eta^y_v - eta^y_{uu} eta^x_v) + 2(eta^x_{uv} eta^y_u - eta^y_{uv} eta^x_u) \
S_4[eta] &= (eta^x_{vv} eta^y_u - eta^y_{vv} eta^x_u) + 2(eta^x_{uv} eta^y_v - eta^y_{uv} eta^x_v)
end{align*}



What is the geometric intuition behind these equations? Can they be stated more compactly/concisely? Also, how can we normalize them so that $S_i[eta]$ is actually invariant under projective transformations of $eta$?



Finally, is there a compact expression for the $n$-dimensional generalization of this derivative?







differential-geometry projective-geometry affine-geometry differential-operators invariance






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 10 at 20:15







user76284

















asked Jan 6 at 22:43









user76284user76284

1,2031126




1,2031126












  • $begingroup$
    In your first equations, you state that $gin GLongrightarrow T(gcirc f)=T(f)$. May I ask what this $f$ stands for, an element in $G$ or an arbitrary $mathbb{R}^n$-valued function? Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – hypernova
    Jan 8 at 23:53












  • $begingroup$
    In that expression, $f$ is an arbitrary function $mathbb{R}^n rightarrow mathbb{R}^n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user76284
    Jan 9 at 0:04










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your clarification.
    $endgroup$
    – hypernova
    Jan 9 at 0:09


















  • $begingroup$
    In your first equations, you state that $gin GLongrightarrow T(gcirc f)=T(f)$. May I ask what this $f$ stands for, an element in $G$ or an arbitrary $mathbb{R}^n$-valued function? Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – hypernova
    Jan 8 at 23:53












  • $begingroup$
    In that expression, $f$ is an arbitrary function $mathbb{R}^n rightarrow mathbb{R}^n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user76284
    Jan 9 at 0:04










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your clarification.
    $endgroup$
    – hypernova
    Jan 9 at 0:09
















$begingroup$
In your first equations, you state that $gin GLongrightarrow T(gcirc f)=T(f)$. May I ask what this $f$ stands for, an element in $G$ or an arbitrary $mathbb{R}^n$-valued function? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– hypernova
Jan 8 at 23:53






$begingroup$
In your first equations, you state that $gin GLongrightarrow T(gcirc f)=T(f)$. May I ask what this $f$ stands for, an element in $G$ or an arbitrary $mathbb{R}^n$-valued function? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– hypernova
Jan 8 at 23:53














$begingroup$
In that expression, $f$ is an arbitrary function $mathbb{R}^n rightarrow mathbb{R}^n$.
$endgroup$
– user76284
Jan 9 at 0:04




$begingroup$
In that expression, $f$ is an arbitrary function $mathbb{R}^n rightarrow mathbb{R}^n$.
$endgroup$
– user76284
Jan 9 at 0:04












$begingroup$
Thank you for your clarification.
$endgroup$
– hypernova
Jan 9 at 0:09




$begingroup$
Thank you for your clarification.
$endgroup$
– hypernova
Jan 9 at 0:09










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064470%2fprojective-invariant-differential-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064470%2fprojective-invariant-differential-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith