Docker: share data between containers in non-persistent way to allow for code upgrade












2















In a php-fpm and nginx container setup the source code usually needs to be available to both containers. In my case I'd like to dockerize Magento. In Magento the nginx is configured in such a way that it looks for the existence of files before it commits the request to the php engine.



According to the best practices from Docker for an production environment I copied the source code into the php container during the build process. My first idea to share the source code with the nginx container was to use a named volume that is mounted to the root of both containers. However, the data in named volumes persist even after editing the source code and rebuilding the php container. This comes in handy for dynamic content like file uploads etc. but how do I upgrade the source code? Should I delete the volume everytime the source code is changed? How do I persist dynamic content in this case?



In a nutshell:




  • I'd like to have non-persistent volume to share source code between php and nginx

  • A persistent volume (but still shared with nginx) for folders with dynamic content (e.g. file uploads)


For Magento that would be:




  • Non-persistent volume for files and folders like ./index.php, ./vendor/, ./app/ (except ./app/etc/env.php and ./app/etc/config.php since that are configuration files), etc.

  • Persistent volume for files and folders like ./pub/media/, ./app/etc/env.php, ./app/etc/config.php, etc.










share|improve this question

























  • any updates? :) Did you solve this?

    – pic0
    Feb 20 at 18:42








  • 1





    Somewhat: for production I copy the source code into each container and only share uploaded files etc., but the problem still persists in the development stage. For now I remove the named volume in the case that the source code of the framework changes. Here is what I came up with: github.com/zsoerenm/…

    – Soeren
    Feb 21 at 19:14
















2















In a php-fpm and nginx container setup the source code usually needs to be available to both containers. In my case I'd like to dockerize Magento. In Magento the nginx is configured in such a way that it looks for the existence of files before it commits the request to the php engine.



According to the best practices from Docker for an production environment I copied the source code into the php container during the build process. My first idea to share the source code with the nginx container was to use a named volume that is mounted to the root of both containers. However, the data in named volumes persist even after editing the source code and rebuilding the php container. This comes in handy for dynamic content like file uploads etc. but how do I upgrade the source code? Should I delete the volume everytime the source code is changed? How do I persist dynamic content in this case?



In a nutshell:




  • I'd like to have non-persistent volume to share source code between php and nginx

  • A persistent volume (but still shared with nginx) for folders with dynamic content (e.g. file uploads)


For Magento that would be:




  • Non-persistent volume for files and folders like ./index.php, ./vendor/, ./app/ (except ./app/etc/env.php and ./app/etc/config.php since that are configuration files), etc.

  • Persistent volume for files and folders like ./pub/media/, ./app/etc/env.php, ./app/etc/config.php, etc.










share|improve this question

























  • any updates? :) Did you solve this?

    – pic0
    Feb 20 at 18:42








  • 1





    Somewhat: for production I copy the source code into each container and only share uploaded files etc., but the problem still persists in the development stage. For now I remove the named volume in the case that the source code of the framework changes. Here is what I came up with: github.com/zsoerenm/…

    – Soeren
    Feb 21 at 19:14














2












2








2








In a php-fpm and nginx container setup the source code usually needs to be available to both containers. In my case I'd like to dockerize Magento. In Magento the nginx is configured in such a way that it looks for the existence of files before it commits the request to the php engine.



According to the best practices from Docker for an production environment I copied the source code into the php container during the build process. My first idea to share the source code with the nginx container was to use a named volume that is mounted to the root of both containers. However, the data in named volumes persist even after editing the source code and rebuilding the php container. This comes in handy for dynamic content like file uploads etc. but how do I upgrade the source code? Should I delete the volume everytime the source code is changed? How do I persist dynamic content in this case?



In a nutshell:




  • I'd like to have non-persistent volume to share source code between php and nginx

  • A persistent volume (but still shared with nginx) for folders with dynamic content (e.g. file uploads)


For Magento that would be:




  • Non-persistent volume for files and folders like ./index.php, ./vendor/, ./app/ (except ./app/etc/env.php and ./app/etc/config.php since that are configuration files), etc.

  • Persistent volume for files and folders like ./pub/media/, ./app/etc/env.php, ./app/etc/config.php, etc.










share|improve this question
















In a php-fpm and nginx container setup the source code usually needs to be available to both containers. In my case I'd like to dockerize Magento. In Magento the nginx is configured in such a way that it looks for the existence of files before it commits the request to the php engine.



According to the best practices from Docker for an production environment I copied the source code into the php container during the build process. My first idea to share the source code with the nginx container was to use a named volume that is mounted to the root of both containers. However, the data in named volumes persist even after editing the source code and rebuilding the php container. This comes in handy for dynamic content like file uploads etc. but how do I upgrade the source code? Should I delete the volume everytime the source code is changed? How do I persist dynamic content in this case?



In a nutshell:




  • I'd like to have non-persistent volume to share source code between php and nginx

  • A persistent volume (but still shared with nginx) for folders with dynamic content (e.g. file uploads)


For Magento that would be:




  • Non-persistent volume for files and folders like ./index.php, ./vendor/, ./app/ (except ./app/etc/env.php and ./app/etc/config.php since that are configuration files), etc.

  • Persistent volume for files and folders like ./pub/media/, ./app/etc/env.php, ./app/etc/config.php, etc.







php docker nginx docker-compose docker-volume






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 22 '18 at 9:11







Soeren

















asked Nov 22 '18 at 9:06









SoerenSoeren

112




112













  • any updates? :) Did you solve this?

    – pic0
    Feb 20 at 18:42








  • 1





    Somewhat: for production I copy the source code into each container and only share uploaded files etc., but the problem still persists in the development stage. For now I remove the named volume in the case that the source code of the framework changes. Here is what I came up with: github.com/zsoerenm/…

    – Soeren
    Feb 21 at 19:14



















  • any updates? :) Did you solve this?

    – pic0
    Feb 20 at 18:42








  • 1





    Somewhat: for production I copy the source code into each container and only share uploaded files etc., but the problem still persists in the development stage. For now I remove the named volume in the case that the source code of the framework changes. Here is what I came up with: github.com/zsoerenm/…

    – Soeren
    Feb 21 at 19:14

















any updates? :) Did you solve this?

– pic0
Feb 20 at 18:42







any updates? :) Did you solve this?

– pic0
Feb 20 at 18:42






1




1





Somewhat: for production I copy the source code into each container and only share uploaded files etc., but the problem still persists in the development stage. For now I remove the named volume in the case that the source code of the framework changes. Here is what I came up with: github.com/zsoerenm/…

– Soeren
Feb 21 at 19:14





Somewhat: for production I copy the source code into each container and only share uploaded files etc., but the problem still persists in the development stage. For now I remove the named volume in the case that the source code of the framework changes. Here is what I came up with: github.com/zsoerenm/…

– Soeren
Feb 21 at 19:14












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53427259%2fdocker-share-data-between-containers-in-non-persistent-way-to-allow-for-code-up%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53427259%2fdocker-share-data-between-containers-in-non-persistent-way-to-allow-for-code-up%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith