What does $:=$ mean?












7












$begingroup$


What does $:=$ mean? For example:



Consider the subset $ mathbb{S} = { p in mathbb {P_4} ( mathbb{R,R} ) | P(2)=0 } $



Suppose $p$, $q$ are in $mathbb{S}$, so $p(2)=q(2)=0$. Then $r := p + q$ is also a polynomial of degree at most $4$ and $r(2) = p(2) + q(2)=0+0=0$



Is it just another notation for the $=$ sign? Or is there any significance on having a : in front of it?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    7












    $begingroup$


    What does $:=$ mean? For example:



    Consider the subset $ mathbb{S} = { p in mathbb {P_4} ( mathbb{R,R} ) | P(2)=0 } $



    Suppose $p$, $q$ are in $mathbb{S}$, so $p(2)=q(2)=0$. Then $r := p + q$ is also a polynomial of degree at most $4$ and $r(2) = p(2) + q(2)=0+0=0$



    Is it just another notation for the $=$ sign? Or is there any significance on having a : in front of it?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      7












      7








      7


      2



      $begingroup$


      What does $:=$ mean? For example:



      Consider the subset $ mathbb{S} = { p in mathbb {P_4} ( mathbb{R,R} ) | P(2)=0 } $



      Suppose $p$, $q$ are in $mathbb{S}$, so $p(2)=q(2)=0$. Then $r := p + q$ is also a polynomial of degree at most $4$ and $r(2) = p(2) + q(2)=0+0=0$



      Is it just another notation for the $=$ sign? Or is there any significance on having a : in front of it?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      What does $:=$ mean? For example:



      Consider the subset $ mathbb{S} = { p in mathbb {P_4} ( mathbb{R,R} ) | P(2)=0 } $



      Suppose $p$, $q$ are in $mathbb{S}$, so $p(2)=q(2)=0$. Then $r := p + q$ is also a polynomial of degree at most $4$ and $r(2) = p(2) + q(2)=0+0=0$



      Is it just another notation for the $=$ sign? Or is there any significance on having a : in front of it?







      notation






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Sep 5 '15 at 14:22







      Silbol

















      asked Sep 5 '15 at 13:40









      SilbolSilbol

      3613




      3613






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7












          $begingroup$

          It usually means: "we are defining what's on the left of := to be wha't on the right". This distinction originates from computer languages, where the mere equality symbol "=" denotes an assignment of one variable's value to another's. For example, in Mathematica they use "==" for being equal, and "=" for assignment.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            "to equal", to be more precise.
            $endgroup$
            – user236182
            Sep 5 '15 at 13:42










          • $begingroup$
            @user236182 could you elaborate on what you mean? I don't think I've ever heard that phrasing.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Sep 5 '15 at 13:47










          • $begingroup$
            Does this really originate from computer languages? I've always thought this myself, too (which is why I prefer it). It does seem to be used in place of $equiv$ and $triangleq$ in more modern texts, and it coincides with Maple's assignment operator.
            $endgroup$
            – Chester
            Sep 5 '15 at 13:49








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Chester -- wiki suggests that := originated with ALGOL in 1958 and was popularized by Pascal, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assignment_%28computer_science%29
            $endgroup$
            – Gregory J. Puleo
            Sep 5 '15 at 13:55










          • $begingroup$
            ...though I guess that leaves open the question whether := had prior mathematical use
            $endgroup$
            – Gregory J. Puleo
            Sep 5 '15 at 13:56



















          5












          $begingroup$

          The symbol stands for a definition. Sometimes you can also find $doteq$ or $overset{mathrm{def}}{=}$. However these two symbols are completely symmetric, so that you can't tell $a:=b$ from $a=:b$. The difference is that $b$ is known and $a$ is defined in the first case, the other way round in the second.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            5












            $begingroup$

            As others have said, the symbol $:=$ means "is defined to be", so $a := b$ means "we define $a$ to be $b$". Other symbols sometimes use include $equiv, stackrel{def}{=}, stackrel{Delta}{=},leftarrow$. In algorithms, this symbol is usually thought of as assigning a value, so that $a := b$ means that we assign the value $b$ to $a$. This is to make clear the destinction between for example
            $$x = x + 1$$
            and
            $$x := x + 1.$$
            The first, as a mathematical statement is of course wrong, whereas the second statement simply means that we increase $x$ by one.



            Outside of algorithms, the symbol is also used, but here the distinction is more subtle. Here, a statement such as $a := b$ would mean that "$a$ is equal to $b$ because this is how we define it", or simply that we use $a$ as a name for $b$, usually because $b$ is a lengthy expression and we want $a$ to be a more compact symbolism for the same thing. This is in contrast to a statement such as $a = b$, where we say that $a$ and $b$ are equal as a consequence of something else, and not merely because we say so.



            Authors who use a symbol like $:=$ to define equalities are very rarely consistent in this use, however, and do not use it every single time they define something, but only when they want to highlight that some relationship holds because it has been defined that way.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$





















              0












              $begingroup$

              “$a = b$” means “$a$ is equal to $b$” while “a := b” means “let $a$ be equal to $b$”. The pattern can be extended to some other notation: “$a :Leftrightarrow b$” means “let $a$ be equivalent to $b$”, “$x :∈ X$” means “let $x$ be an element of $X$”, “A :⊆ X” means “let $A$ be a subset of $X$”.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                });
                });
                }, "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1423039%2fwhat-does-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes








                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                7












                $begingroup$

                It usually means: "we are defining what's on the left of := to be wha't on the right". This distinction originates from computer languages, where the mere equality symbol "=" denotes an assignment of one variable's value to another's. For example, in Mathematica they use "==" for being equal, and "=" for assignment.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  "to equal", to be more precise.
                  $endgroup$
                  – user236182
                  Sep 5 '15 at 13:42










                • $begingroup$
                  @user236182 could you elaborate on what you mean? I don't think I've ever heard that phrasing.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Omnomnomnom
                  Sep 5 '15 at 13:47










                • $begingroup$
                  Does this really originate from computer languages? I've always thought this myself, too (which is why I prefer it). It does seem to be used in place of $equiv$ and $triangleq$ in more modern texts, and it coincides with Maple's assignment operator.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Chester
                  Sep 5 '15 at 13:49








                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  @Chester -- wiki suggests that := originated with ALGOL in 1958 and was popularized by Pascal, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assignment_%28computer_science%29
                  $endgroup$
                  – Gregory J. Puleo
                  Sep 5 '15 at 13:55










                • $begingroup$
                  ...though I guess that leaves open the question whether := had prior mathematical use
                  $endgroup$
                  – Gregory J. Puleo
                  Sep 5 '15 at 13:56
















                7












                $begingroup$

                It usually means: "we are defining what's on the left of := to be wha't on the right". This distinction originates from computer languages, where the mere equality symbol "=" denotes an assignment of one variable's value to another's. For example, in Mathematica they use "==" for being equal, and "=" for assignment.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  "to equal", to be more precise.
                  $endgroup$
                  – user236182
                  Sep 5 '15 at 13:42










                • $begingroup$
                  @user236182 could you elaborate on what you mean? I don't think I've ever heard that phrasing.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Omnomnomnom
                  Sep 5 '15 at 13:47










                • $begingroup$
                  Does this really originate from computer languages? I've always thought this myself, too (which is why I prefer it). It does seem to be used in place of $equiv$ and $triangleq$ in more modern texts, and it coincides with Maple's assignment operator.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Chester
                  Sep 5 '15 at 13:49








                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  @Chester -- wiki suggests that := originated with ALGOL in 1958 and was popularized by Pascal, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assignment_%28computer_science%29
                  $endgroup$
                  – Gregory J. Puleo
                  Sep 5 '15 at 13:55










                • $begingroup$
                  ...though I guess that leaves open the question whether := had prior mathematical use
                  $endgroup$
                  – Gregory J. Puleo
                  Sep 5 '15 at 13:56














                7












                7








                7





                $begingroup$

                It usually means: "we are defining what's on the left of := to be wha't on the right". This distinction originates from computer languages, where the mere equality symbol "=" denotes an assignment of one variable's value to another's. For example, in Mathematica they use "==" for being equal, and "=" for assignment.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                It usually means: "we are defining what's on the left of := to be wha't on the right". This distinction originates from computer languages, where the mere equality symbol "=" denotes an assignment of one variable's value to another's. For example, in Mathematica they use "==" for being equal, and "=" for assignment.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Sep 5 '15 at 13:43

























                answered Sep 5 '15 at 13:41









                uniquesolutionuniquesolution

                8,6061823




                8,6061823












                • $begingroup$
                  "to equal", to be more precise.
                  $endgroup$
                  – user236182
                  Sep 5 '15 at 13:42










                • $begingroup$
                  @user236182 could you elaborate on what you mean? I don't think I've ever heard that phrasing.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Omnomnomnom
                  Sep 5 '15 at 13:47










                • $begingroup$
                  Does this really originate from computer languages? I've always thought this myself, too (which is why I prefer it). It does seem to be used in place of $equiv$ and $triangleq$ in more modern texts, and it coincides with Maple's assignment operator.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Chester
                  Sep 5 '15 at 13:49








                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  @Chester -- wiki suggests that := originated with ALGOL in 1958 and was popularized by Pascal, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assignment_%28computer_science%29
                  $endgroup$
                  – Gregory J. Puleo
                  Sep 5 '15 at 13:55










                • $begingroup$
                  ...though I guess that leaves open the question whether := had prior mathematical use
                  $endgroup$
                  – Gregory J. Puleo
                  Sep 5 '15 at 13:56


















                • $begingroup$
                  "to equal", to be more precise.
                  $endgroup$
                  – user236182
                  Sep 5 '15 at 13:42










                • $begingroup$
                  @user236182 could you elaborate on what you mean? I don't think I've ever heard that phrasing.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Omnomnomnom
                  Sep 5 '15 at 13:47










                • $begingroup$
                  Does this really originate from computer languages? I've always thought this myself, too (which is why I prefer it). It does seem to be used in place of $equiv$ and $triangleq$ in more modern texts, and it coincides with Maple's assignment operator.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Chester
                  Sep 5 '15 at 13:49








                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  @Chester -- wiki suggests that := originated with ALGOL in 1958 and was popularized by Pascal, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assignment_%28computer_science%29
                  $endgroup$
                  – Gregory J. Puleo
                  Sep 5 '15 at 13:55










                • $begingroup$
                  ...though I guess that leaves open the question whether := had prior mathematical use
                  $endgroup$
                  – Gregory J. Puleo
                  Sep 5 '15 at 13:56
















                $begingroup$
                "to equal", to be more precise.
                $endgroup$
                – user236182
                Sep 5 '15 at 13:42




                $begingroup$
                "to equal", to be more precise.
                $endgroup$
                – user236182
                Sep 5 '15 at 13:42












                $begingroup$
                @user236182 could you elaborate on what you mean? I don't think I've ever heard that phrasing.
                $endgroup$
                – Omnomnomnom
                Sep 5 '15 at 13:47




                $begingroup$
                @user236182 could you elaborate on what you mean? I don't think I've ever heard that phrasing.
                $endgroup$
                – Omnomnomnom
                Sep 5 '15 at 13:47












                $begingroup$
                Does this really originate from computer languages? I've always thought this myself, too (which is why I prefer it). It does seem to be used in place of $equiv$ and $triangleq$ in more modern texts, and it coincides with Maple's assignment operator.
                $endgroup$
                – Chester
                Sep 5 '15 at 13:49






                $begingroup$
                Does this really originate from computer languages? I've always thought this myself, too (which is why I prefer it). It does seem to be used in place of $equiv$ and $triangleq$ in more modern texts, and it coincides with Maple's assignment operator.
                $endgroup$
                – Chester
                Sep 5 '15 at 13:49






                1




                1




                $begingroup$
                @Chester -- wiki suggests that := originated with ALGOL in 1958 and was popularized by Pascal, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assignment_%28computer_science%29
                $endgroup$
                – Gregory J. Puleo
                Sep 5 '15 at 13:55




                $begingroup$
                @Chester -- wiki suggests that := originated with ALGOL in 1958 and was popularized by Pascal, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assignment_%28computer_science%29
                $endgroup$
                – Gregory J. Puleo
                Sep 5 '15 at 13:55












                $begingroup$
                ...though I guess that leaves open the question whether := had prior mathematical use
                $endgroup$
                – Gregory J. Puleo
                Sep 5 '15 at 13:56




                $begingroup$
                ...though I guess that leaves open the question whether := had prior mathematical use
                $endgroup$
                – Gregory J. Puleo
                Sep 5 '15 at 13:56











                5












                $begingroup$

                The symbol stands for a definition. Sometimes you can also find $doteq$ or $overset{mathrm{def}}{=}$. However these two symbols are completely symmetric, so that you can't tell $a:=b$ from $a=:b$. The difference is that $b$ is known and $a$ is defined in the first case, the other way round in the second.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  5












                  $begingroup$

                  The symbol stands for a definition. Sometimes you can also find $doteq$ or $overset{mathrm{def}}{=}$. However these two symbols are completely symmetric, so that you can't tell $a:=b$ from $a=:b$. The difference is that $b$ is known and $a$ is defined in the first case, the other way round in the second.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    5












                    5








                    5





                    $begingroup$

                    The symbol stands for a definition. Sometimes you can also find $doteq$ or $overset{mathrm{def}}{=}$. However these two symbols are completely symmetric, so that you can't tell $a:=b$ from $a=:b$. The difference is that $b$ is known and $a$ is defined in the first case, the other way round in the second.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    The symbol stands for a definition. Sometimes you can also find $doteq$ or $overset{mathrm{def}}{=}$. However these two symbols are completely symmetric, so that you can't tell $a:=b$ from $a=:b$. The difference is that $b$ is known and $a$ is defined in the first case, the other way round in the second.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Sep 5 '15 at 13:51









                    SiminoreSiminore

                    30.4k33368




                    30.4k33368























                        5












                        $begingroup$

                        As others have said, the symbol $:=$ means "is defined to be", so $a := b$ means "we define $a$ to be $b$". Other symbols sometimes use include $equiv, stackrel{def}{=}, stackrel{Delta}{=},leftarrow$. In algorithms, this symbol is usually thought of as assigning a value, so that $a := b$ means that we assign the value $b$ to $a$. This is to make clear the destinction between for example
                        $$x = x + 1$$
                        and
                        $$x := x + 1.$$
                        The first, as a mathematical statement is of course wrong, whereas the second statement simply means that we increase $x$ by one.



                        Outside of algorithms, the symbol is also used, but here the distinction is more subtle. Here, a statement such as $a := b$ would mean that "$a$ is equal to $b$ because this is how we define it", or simply that we use $a$ as a name for $b$, usually because $b$ is a lengthy expression and we want $a$ to be a more compact symbolism for the same thing. This is in contrast to a statement such as $a = b$, where we say that $a$ and $b$ are equal as a consequence of something else, and not merely because we say so.



                        Authors who use a symbol like $:=$ to define equalities are very rarely consistent in this use, however, and do not use it every single time they define something, but only when they want to highlight that some relationship holds because it has been defined that way.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$


















                          5












                          $begingroup$

                          As others have said, the symbol $:=$ means "is defined to be", so $a := b$ means "we define $a$ to be $b$". Other symbols sometimes use include $equiv, stackrel{def}{=}, stackrel{Delta}{=},leftarrow$. In algorithms, this symbol is usually thought of as assigning a value, so that $a := b$ means that we assign the value $b$ to $a$. This is to make clear the destinction between for example
                          $$x = x + 1$$
                          and
                          $$x := x + 1.$$
                          The first, as a mathematical statement is of course wrong, whereas the second statement simply means that we increase $x$ by one.



                          Outside of algorithms, the symbol is also used, but here the distinction is more subtle. Here, a statement such as $a := b$ would mean that "$a$ is equal to $b$ because this is how we define it", or simply that we use $a$ as a name for $b$, usually because $b$ is a lengthy expression and we want $a$ to be a more compact symbolism for the same thing. This is in contrast to a statement such as $a = b$, where we say that $a$ and $b$ are equal as a consequence of something else, and not merely because we say so.



                          Authors who use a symbol like $:=$ to define equalities are very rarely consistent in this use, however, and do not use it every single time they define something, but only when they want to highlight that some relationship holds because it has been defined that way.






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$
















                            5












                            5








                            5





                            $begingroup$

                            As others have said, the symbol $:=$ means "is defined to be", so $a := b$ means "we define $a$ to be $b$". Other symbols sometimes use include $equiv, stackrel{def}{=}, stackrel{Delta}{=},leftarrow$. In algorithms, this symbol is usually thought of as assigning a value, so that $a := b$ means that we assign the value $b$ to $a$. This is to make clear the destinction between for example
                            $$x = x + 1$$
                            and
                            $$x := x + 1.$$
                            The first, as a mathematical statement is of course wrong, whereas the second statement simply means that we increase $x$ by one.



                            Outside of algorithms, the symbol is also used, but here the distinction is more subtle. Here, a statement such as $a := b$ would mean that "$a$ is equal to $b$ because this is how we define it", or simply that we use $a$ as a name for $b$, usually because $b$ is a lengthy expression and we want $a$ to be a more compact symbolism for the same thing. This is in contrast to a statement such as $a = b$, where we say that $a$ and $b$ are equal as a consequence of something else, and not merely because we say so.



                            Authors who use a symbol like $:=$ to define equalities are very rarely consistent in this use, however, and do not use it every single time they define something, but only when they want to highlight that some relationship holds because it has been defined that way.






                            share|cite|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$



                            As others have said, the symbol $:=$ means "is defined to be", so $a := b$ means "we define $a$ to be $b$". Other symbols sometimes use include $equiv, stackrel{def}{=}, stackrel{Delta}{=},leftarrow$. In algorithms, this symbol is usually thought of as assigning a value, so that $a := b$ means that we assign the value $b$ to $a$. This is to make clear the destinction between for example
                            $$x = x + 1$$
                            and
                            $$x := x + 1.$$
                            The first, as a mathematical statement is of course wrong, whereas the second statement simply means that we increase $x$ by one.



                            Outside of algorithms, the symbol is also used, but here the distinction is more subtle. Here, a statement such as $a := b$ would mean that "$a$ is equal to $b$ because this is how we define it", or simply that we use $a$ as a name for $b$, usually because $b$ is a lengthy expression and we want $a$ to be a more compact symbolism for the same thing. This is in contrast to a statement such as $a = b$, where we say that $a$ and $b$ are equal as a consequence of something else, and not merely because we say so.



                            Authors who use a symbol like $:=$ to define equalities are very rarely consistent in this use, however, and do not use it every single time they define something, but only when they want to highlight that some relationship holds because it has been defined that way.







                            share|cite|improve this answer














                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            edited Sep 24 '15 at 15:39

























                            answered Sep 5 '15 at 16:01









                            mrpmrp

                            3,79051537




                            3,79051537























                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                “$a = b$” means “$a$ is equal to $b$” while “a := b” means “let $a$ be equal to $b$”. The pattern can be extended to some other notation: “$a :Leftrightarrow b$” means “let $a$ be equivalent to $b$”, “$x :∈ X$” means “let $x$ be an element of $X$”, “A :⊆ X” means “let $A$ be a subset of $X$”.






                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$


















                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  “$a = b$” means “$a$ is equal to $b$” while “a := b” means “let $a$ be equal to $b$”. The pattern can be extended to some other notation: “$a :Leftrightarrow b$” means “let $a$ be equivalent to $b$”, “$x :∈ X$” means “let $x$ be an element of $X$”, “A :⊆ X” means “let $A$ be a subset of $X$”.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$
















                                    0












                                    0








                                    0





                                    $begingroup$

                                    “$a = b$” means “$a$ is equal to $b$” while “a := b” means “let $a$ be equal to $b$”. The pattern can be extended to some other notation: “$a :Leftrightarrow b$” means “let $a$ be equivalent to $b$”, “$x :∈ X$” means “let $x$ be an element of $X$”, “A :⊆ X” means “let $A$ be a subset of $X$”.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$



                                    “$a = b$” means “$a$ is equal to $b$” while “a := b” means “let $a$ be equal to $b$”. The pattern can be extended to some other notation: “$a :Leftrightarrow b$” means “let $a$ be equivalent to $b$”, “$x :∈ X$” means “let $x$ be an element of $X$”, “A :⊆ X” means “let $A$ be a subset of $X$”.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    answered Sep 5 '15 at 16:23









                                    user87690user87690

                                    6,5511825




                                    6,5511825






























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded




















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1423039%2fwhat-does-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                                        in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

                                        How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter