Explain why $U_{44} cong (mathbb{Z}_{10} oplus mathbb{Z}_2) $.












6












$begingroup$


Explain why $newcommand{Z}{mathbb{Z}} U_{44} cong (Z_{10} oplus Z_2) $



I know that $Z_{20} cong (Z_{10} oplus Z_2)$, so if I can show $U_{44} cong Z_{20}$, then I can conclude that $U_{44} cong (Z_{10} oplus Z_2) $ since isomorphism is transitive.



In order to show $U_{44} cong Z_{20}$, I need to show that the function $ varphi: U_{44} to Z_{20}$ is bijective and structure preserved. I know that $U_{44} text{ and } Z_{20}$ have order $20$, so the function can be bijective, but it's not enough to show $varphi: U_{44} to Z_{20} $ is bijective.



I wonder if anyone can show me how to show $ varphi: U_{44} to Z_{20} $ is bijective and structure preserving.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Actually, begin{align*} Bbb{Z}/20Bbb{Z}&congBbb{Z}/4Bbb{Z}timesBbb{Z}/5Bbb{Z}\ &notcongBbb{Z}/10Bbb{Z}timesBbb{Z}/2Bbb{Z}. end{align*} ($gcd(10,2) = 2neq 1$)
    $endgroup$
    – Stahl
    Apr 18 '13 at 0:22


















6












$begingroup$


Explain why $newcommand{Z}{mathbb{Z}} U_{44} cong (Z_{10} oplus Z_2) $



I know that $Z_{20} cong (Z_{10} oplus Z_2)$, so if I can show $U_{44} cong Z_{20}$, then I can conclude that $U_{44} cong (Z_{10} oplus Z_2) $ since isomorphism is transitive.



In order to show $U_{44} cong Z_{20}$, I need to show that the function $ varphi: U_{44} to Z_{20}$ is bijective and structure preserved. I know that $U_{44} text{ and } Z_{20}$ have order $20$, so the function can be bijective, but it's not enough to show $varphi: U_{44} to Z_{20} $ is bijective.



I wonder if anyone can show me how to show $ varphi: U_{44} to Z_{20} $ is bijective and structure preserving.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Actually, begin{align*} Bbb{Z}/20Bbb{Z}&congBbb{Z}/4Bbb{Z}timesBbb{Z}/5Bbb{Z}\ &notcongBbb{Z}/10Bbb{Z}timesBbb{Z}/2Bbb{Z}. end{align*} ($gcd(10,2) = 2neq 1$)
    $endgroup$
    – Stahl
    Apr 18 '13 at 0:22
















6












6








6


3



$begingroup$


Explain why $newcommand{Z}{mathbb{Z}} U_{44} cong (Z_{10} oplus Z_2) $



I know that $Z_{20} cong (Z_{10} oplus Z_2)$, so if I can show $U_{44} cong Z_{20}$, then I can conclude that $U_{44} cong (Z_{10} oplus Z_2) $ since isomorphism is transitive.



In order to show $U_{44} cong Z_{20}$, I need to show that the function $ varphi: U_{44} to Z_{20}$ is bijective and structure preserved. I know that $U_{44} text{ and } Z_{20}$ have order $20$, so the function can be bijective, but it's not enough to show $varphi: U_{44} to Z_{20} $ is bijective.



I wonder if anyone can show me how to show $ varphi: U_{44} to Z_{20} $ is bijective and structure preserving.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Explain why $newcommand{Z}{mathbb{Z}} U_{44} cong (Z_{10} oplus Z_2) $



I know that $Z_{20} cong (Z_{10} oplus Z_2)$, so if I can show $U_{44} cong Z_{20}$, then I can conclude that $U_{44} cong (Z_{10} oplus Z_2) $ since isomorphism is transitive.



In order to show $U_{44} cong Z_{20}$, I need to show that the function $ varphi: U_{44} to Z_{20}$ is bijective and structure preserved. I know that $U_{44} text{ and } Z_{20}$ have order $20$, so the function can be bijective, but it's not enough to show $varphi: U_{44} to Z_{20} $ is bijective.



I wonder if anyone can show me how to show $ varphi: U_{44} to Z_{20} $ is bijective and structure preserving.







abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups group-isomorphism






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 28 at 15:03









Martin Sleziak

44.9k10122276




44.9k10122276










asked Apr 17 '13 at 23:58









Diane VanderwaifDiane Vanderwaif

1,01032053




1,01032053








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Actually, begin{align*} Bbb{Z}/20Bbb{Z}&congBbb{Z}/4Bbb{Z}timesBbb{Z}/5Bbb{Z}\ &notcongBbb{Z}/10Bbb{Z}timesBbb{Z}/2Bbb{Z}. end{align*} ($gcd(10,2) = 2neq 1$)
    $endgroup$
    – Stahl
    Apr 18 '13 at 0:22
















  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Actually, begin{align*} Bbb{Z}/20Bbb{Z}&congBbb{Z}/4Bbb{Z}timesBbb{Z}/5Bbb{Z}\ &notcongBbb{Z}/10Bbb{Z}timesBbb{Z}/2Bbb{Z}. end{align*} ($gcd(10,2) = 2neq 1$)
    $endgroup$
    – Stahl
    Apr 18 '13 at 0:22










2




2




$begingroup$
Actually, begin{align*} Bbb{Z}/20Bbb{Z}&congBbb{Z}/4Bbb{Z}timesBbb{Z}/5Bbb{Z}\ &notcongBbb{Z}/10Bbb{Z}timesBbb{Z}/2Bbb{Z}. end{align*} ($gcd(10,2) = 2neq 1$)
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Apr 18 '13 at 0:22






$begingroup$
Actually, begin{align*} Bbb{Z}/20Bbb{Z}&congBbb{Z}/4Bbb{Z}timesBbb{Z}/5Bbb{Z}\ &notcongBbb{Z}/10Bbb{Z}timesBbb{Z}/2Bbb{Z}. end{align*} ($gcd(10,2) = 2neq 1$)
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Apr 18 '13 at 0:22












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

Be careful: $$quad mathbb Z_{10} times mathbb Z_2 notcong mathbb Z_{20}; quadtext{since};gcd(2, 10) = 2neq 1$$



Use the facts that




  • $U(44)= U(4cdot 11)cong U(4)times U(11)$, since $4$ and $11$ are relatively prime.

  • $U(4)cong mathbb Z_2$ and $U(11)cong mathbb Z_{10}$.


To conclude that $$U(44) cong mathbb Z_{2}times mathbb Z_{10}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    In my answer, $times$ denotes what you might know as the external direct product: $otimes$ or in the case of $mathbb Z_n times mathbb Z_m$ it denotes what some call the external direct sum: i.e., $mathbb Z_{10} otimes mathbb Z_2 notcong mathbb Z_{20},$ etc...with the conclusion that $U_{44} cong mathbb Z_2 otimes mathbb Z_{10}$. I apologize for any confusion notation may be causing!
    $endgroup$
    – Namaste
    Apr 18 '13 at 1:39












  • $begingroup$
    don't worry, I understand it perfectly, thank you very much for your answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Diane Vanderwaif
    Apr 18 '13 at 2:09



















0












$begingroup$

Hint: List the elements and compute their order. From this it should be quite clear.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    In general, for $n=p_1^{e_1}cdots p_k^{e_k}$, $U_ncong(mathbb{Z}/p_1^{e_1}mathbb{Z})^timestimescdotstimes(mathbb{Z}/p_k^{e_k}mathbb{Z})^times$ by the Chinese Remainder Theorem.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      Note that $U(44)= U(11*4)cong {mathbb Z_{10}} oplus {mathbb Z_2}$, since $gcd(11,4)=1.$



      In general, if $gcd(a,b)=1$, then $U(ab)cong {mathbb Z_a}oplus{mathbb Z_b}$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$














        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f365033%2fexplain-why-u-44-cong-mathbbz-10-oplus-mathbbz-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        7












        $begingroup$

        Be careful: $$quad mathbb Z_{10} times mathbb Z_2 notcong mathbb Z_{20}; quadtext{since};gcd(2, 10) = 2neq 1$$



        Use the facts that




        • $U(44)= U(4cdot 11)cong U(4)times U(11)$, since $4$ and $11$ are relatively prime.

        • $U(4)cong mathbb Z_2$ and $U(11)cong mathbb Z_{10}$.


        To conclude that $$U(44) cong mathbb Z_{2}times mathbb Z_{10}$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          In my answer, $times$ denotes what you might know as the external direct product: $otimes$ or in the case of $mathbb Z_n times mathbb Z_m$ it denotes what some call the external direct sum: i.e., $mathbb Z_{10} otimes mathbb Z_2 notcong mathbb Z_{20},$ etc...with the conclusion that $U_{44} cong mathbb Z_2 otimes mathbb Z_{10}$. I apologize for any confusion notation may be causing!
          $endgroup$
          – Namaste
          Apr 18 '13 at 1:39












        • $begingroup$
          don't worry, I understand it perfectly, thank you very much for your answer.
          $endgroup$
          – Diane Vanderwaif
          Apr 18 '13 at 2:09
















        7












        $begingroup$

        Be careful: $$quad mathbb Z_{10} times mathbb Z_2 notcong mathbb Z_{20}; quadtext{since};gcd(2, 10) = 2neq 1$$



        Use the facts that




        • $U(44)= U(4cdot 11)cong U(4)times U(11)$, since $4$ and $11$ are relatively prime.

        • $U(4)cong mathbb Z_2$ and $U(11)cong mathbb Z_{10}$.


        To conclude that $$U(44) cong mathbb Z_{2}times mathbb Z_{10}$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          In my answer, $times$ denotes what you might know as the external direct product: $otimes$ or in the case of $mathbb Z_n times mathbb Z_m$ it denotes what some call the external direct sum: i.e., $mathbb Z_{10} otimes mathbb Z_2 notcong mathbb Z_{20},$ etc...with the conclusion that $U_{44} cong mathbb Z_2 otimes mathbb Z_{10}$. I apologize for any confusion notation may be causing!
          $endgroup$
          – Namaste
          Apr 18 '13 at 1:39












        • $begingroup$
          don't worry, I understand it perfectly, thank you very much for your answer.
          $endgroup$
          – Diane Vanderwaif
          Apr 18 '13 at 2:09














        7












        7








        7





        $begingroup$

        Be careful: $$quad mathbb Z_{10} times mathbb Z_2 notcong mathbb Z_{20}; quadtext{since};gcd(2, 10) = 2neq 1$$



        Use the facts that




        • $U(44)= U(4cdot 11)cong U(4)times U(11)$, since $4$ and $11$ are relatively prime.

        • $U(4)cong mathbb Z_2$ and $U(11)cong mathbb Z_{10}$.


        To conclude that $$U(44) cong mathbb Z_{2}times mathbb Z_{10}$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Be careful: $$quad mathbb Z_{10} times mathbb Z_2 notcong mathbb Z_{20}; quadtext{since};gcd(2, 10) = 2neq 1$$



        Use the facts that




        • $U(44)= U(4cdot 11)cong U(4)times U(11)$, since $4$ and $11$ are relatively prime.

        • $U(4)cong mathbb Z_2$ and $U(11)cong mathbb Z_{10}$.


        To conclude that $$U(44) cong mathbb Z_{2}times mathbb Z_{10}$$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Apr 18 '13 at 0:29

























        answered Apr 18 '13 at 0:13









        NamasteNamaste

        1




        1












        • $begingroup$
          In my answer, $times$ denotes what you might know as the external direct product: $otimes$ or in the case of $mathbb Z_n times mathbb Z_m$ it denotes what some call the external direct sum: i.e., $mathbb Z_{10} otimes mathbb Z_2 notcong mathbb Z_{20},$ etc...with the conclusion that $U_{44} cong mathbb Z_2 otimes mathbb Z_{10}$. I apologize for any confusion notation may be causing!
          $endgroup$
          – Namaste
          Apr 18 '13 at 1:39












        • $begingroup$
          don't worry, I understand it perfectly, thank you very much for your answer.
          $endgroup$
          – Diane Vanderwaif
          Apr 18 '13 at 2:09


















        • $begingroup$
          In my answer, $times$ denotes what you might know as the external direct product: $otimes$ or in the case of $mathbb Z_n times mathbb Z_m$ it denotes what some call the external direct sum: i.e., $mathbb Z_{10} otimes mathbb Z_2 notcong mathbb Z_{20},$ etc...with the conclusion that $U_{44} cong mathbb Z_2 otimes mathbb Z_{10}$. I apologize for any confusion notation may be causing!
          $endgroup$
          – Namaste
          Apr 18 '13 at 1:39












        • $begingroup$
          don't worry, I understand it perfectly, thank you very much for your answer.
          $endgroup$
          – Diane Vanderwaif
          Apr 18 '13 at 2:09
















        $begingroup$
        In my answer, $times$ denotes what you might know as the external direct product: $otimes$ or in the case of $mathbb Z_n times mathbb Z_m$ it denotes what some call the external direct sum: i.e., $mathbb Z_{10} otimes mathbb Z_2 notcong mathbb Z_{20},$ etc...with the conclusion that $U_{44} cong mathbb Z_2 otimes mathbb Z_{10}$. I apologize for any confusion notation may be causing!
        $endgroup$
        – Namaste
        Apr 18 '13 at 1:39






        $begingroup$
        In my answer, $times$ denotes what you might know as the external direct product: $otimes$ or in the case of $mathbb Z_n times mathbb Z_m$ it denotes what some call the external direct sum: i.e., $mathbb Z_{10} otimes mathbb Z_2 notcong mathbb Z_{20},$ etc...with the conclusion that $U_{44} cong mathbb Z_2 otimes mathbb Z_{10}$. I apologize for any confusion notation may be causing!
        $endgroup$
        – Namaste
        Apr 18 '13 at 1:39














        $begingroup$
        don't worry, I understand it perfectly, thank you very much for your answer.
        $endgroup$
        – Diane Vanderwaif
        Apr 18 '13 at 2:09




        $begingroup$
        don't worry, I understand it perfectly, thank you very much for your answer.
        $endgroup$
        – Diane Vanderwaif
        Apr 18 '13 at 2:09











        0












        $begingroup$

        Hint: List the elements and compute their order. From this it should be quite clear.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Hint: List the elements and compute their order. From this it should be quite clear.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$
















            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Hint: List the elements and compute their order. From this it should be quite clear.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Hint: List the elements and compute their order. From this it should be quite clear.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Apr 18 '13 at 0:03









            IslandsIslands

            457213




            457213























                0












                $begingroup$

                In general, for $n=p_1^{e_1}cdots p_k^{e_k}$, $U_ncong(mathbb{Z}/p_1^{e_1}mathbb{Z})^timestimescdotstimes(mathbb{Z}/p_k^{e_k}mathbb{Z})^times$ by the Chinese Remainder Theorem.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  0












                  $begingroup$

                  In general, for $n=p_1^{e_1}cdots p_k^{e_k}$, $U_ncong(mathbb{Z}/p_1^{e_1}mathbb{Z})^timestimescdotstimes(mathbb{Z}/p_k^{e_k}mathbb{Z})^times$ by the Chinese Remainder Theorem.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    In general, for $n=p_1^{e_1}cdots p_k^{e_k}$, $U_ncong(mathbb{Z}/p_1^{e_1}mathbb{Z})^timestimescdotstimes(mathbb{Z}/p_k^{e_k}mathbb{Z})^times$ by the Chinese Remainder Theorem.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    In general, for $n=p_1^{e_1}cdots p_k^{e_k}$, $U_ncong(mathbb{Z}/p_1^{e_1}mathbb{Z})^timestimescdotstimes(mathbb{Z}/p_k^{e_k}mathbb{Z})^times$ by the Chinese Remainder Theorem.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Apr 18 '13 at 0:07









                    Warren MooreWarren Moore

                    3,2731128




                    3,2731128























                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        Note that $U(44)= U(11*4)cong {mathbb Z_{10}} oplus {mathbb Z_2}$, since $gcd(11,4)=1.$



                        In general, if $gcd(a,b)=1$, then $U(ab)cong {mathbb Z_a}oplus{mathbb Z_b}$






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          Note that $U(44)= U(11*4)cong {mathbb Z_{10}} oplus {mathbb Z_2}$, since $gcd(11,4)=1.$



                          In general, if $gcd(a,b)=1$, then $U(ab)cong {mathbb Z_a}oplus{mathbb Z_b}$






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            Note that $U(44)= U(11*4)cong {mathbb Z_{10}} oplus {mathbb Z_2}$, since $gcd(11,4)=1.$



                            In general, if $gcd(a,b)=1$, then $U(ab)cong {mathbb Z_a}oplus{mathbb Z_b}$






                            share|cite|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$



                            Note that $U(44)= U(11*4)cong {mathbb Z_{10}} oplus {mathbb Z_2}$, since $gcd(11,4)=1.$



                            In general, if $gcd(a,b)=1$, then $U(ab)cong {mathbb Z_a}oplus{mathbb Z_b}$







                            share|cite|improve this answer














                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            edited Apr 18 '13 at 0:26

























                            answered Apr 18 '13 at 0:04









                            lukeluke

                            969819




                            969819






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f365033%2fexplain-why-u-44-cong-mathbbz-10-oplus-mathbbz-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                                How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                                in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith