how to Prove that the set of fixed points of a Hamiltonian action of a torus on a symplectic manifold is a...












0












$begingroup$


who can explain how to Prove that the set of fixed points of a Hamiltonian action of a torus on a symplectic manifold is a symplectic submanifold?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What have you tried? Questions without context or visible effort tend to get downvoted and closed.
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    Jan 23 at 18:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think this is true in the case where a compact Lie group $G$ acts by symplectomorphisms on a symplectic manifold $M$. In this case, a connected component of the fixed point subspace $M^G$ is a symplectic submanifold of $M$
    $endgroup$
    – C. Zhihao
    Jan 23 at 19:03
















0












$begingroup$


who can explain how to Prove that the set of fixed points of a Hamiltonian action of a torus on a symplectic manifold is a symplectic submanifold?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What have you tried? Questions without context or visible effort tend to get downvoted and closed.
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    Jan 23 at 18:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think this is true in the case where a compact Lie group $G$ acts by symplectomorphisms on a symplectic manifold $M$. In this case, a connected component of the fixed point subspace $M^G$ is a symplectic submanifold of $M$
    $endgroup$
    – C. Zhihao
    Jan 23 at 19:03














0












0








0





$begingroup$


who can explain how to Prove that the set of fixed points of a Hamiltonian action of a torus on a symplectic manifold is a symplectic submanifold?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




who can explain how to Prove that the set of fixed points of a Hamiltonian action of a torus on a symplectic manifold is a symplectic submanifold?







symplectic-geometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 23 at 18:16









user220607user220607

42




42












  • $begingroup$
    What have you tried? Questions without context or visible effort tend to get downvoted and closed.
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    Jan 23 at 18:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think this is true in the case where a compact Lie group $G$ acts by symplectomorphisms on a symplectic manifold $M$. In this case, a connected component of the fixed point subspace $M^G$ is a symplectic submanifold of $M$
    $endgroup$
    – C. Zhihao
    Jan 23 at 19:03


















  • $begingroup$
    What have you tried? Questions without context or visible effort tend to get downvoted and closed.
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    Jan 23 at 18:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think this is true in the case where a compact Lie group $G$ acts by symplectomorphisms on a symplectic manifold $M$. In this case, a connected component of the fixed point subspace $M^G$ is a symplectic submanifold of $M$
    $endgroup$
    – C. Zhihao
    Jan 23 at 19:03
















$begingroup$
What have you tried? Questions without context or visible effort tend to get downvoted and closed.
$endgroup$
– postmortes
Jan 23 at 18:29




$begingroup$
What have you tried? Questions without context or visible effort tend to get downvoted and closed.
$endgroup$
– postmortes
Jan 23 at 18:29




1




1




$begingroup$
I think this is true in the case where a compact Lie group $G$ acts by symplectomorphisms on a symplectic manifold $M$. In this case, a connected component of the fixed point subspace $M^G$ is a symplectic submanifold of $M$
$endgroup$
– C. Zhihao
Jan 23 at 19:03




$begingroup$
I think this is true in the case where a compact Lie group $G$ acts by symplectomorphisms on a symplectic manifold $M$. In this case, a connected component of the fixed point subspace $M^G$ is a symplectic submanifold of $M$
$endgroup$
– C. Zhihao
Jan 23 at 19:03










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

I am aware of one way to see this, which I saw in McDuff and Salamons book introduction to symplectic geometry.



We can find a compatible almost complex structure which is invariant by the torus action (This basically follows from Gromov's result that a symplectic manifold always has a compatible almost complex structure plus an averaging argument). Note that together with the symplectic structure we also get an invariant Riemannian metric.



Now consider a point $p$ which is fixed by the action, note that $T_{p}M$ inherits the structure of a complex representation of the torus $mathbb{T}^n$. The points close to $p$ which are fixed by the action are the image under the exponential map at $p$ of the fixed point set of this representation say $V = Fix(mathbb{T}^n ) subset T_p M$. Note that $$ V = cap_{g in mathbb{T}^n} Fix(g)$$ where $Fix(g)$ is the fixed point set of the linear transformation associated to $g$.



Now note that since the representation is complex linear, each $Fix(g)$ is a complex subspace (since it is the eigenspace for the eigenvalue 1), and hence $V$ is a complex subspace. This shows that that the fixed point set is locally an almost complex submanifold and hence symplectic.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084856%2fhow-to-prove-that-the-set-of-fixed-points-of-a-hamiltonian-action-of-a-torus-on%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    I am aware of one way to see this, which I saw in McDuff and Salamons book introduction to symplectic geometry.



    We can find a compatible almost complex structure which is invariant by the torus action (This basically follows from Gromov's result that a symplectic manifold always has a compatible almost complex structure plus an averaging argument). Note that together with the symplectic structure we also get an invariant Riemannian metric.



    Now consider a point $p$ which is fixed by the action, note that $T_{p}M$ inherits the structure of a complex representation of the torus $mathbb{T}^n$. The points close to $p$ which are fixed by the action are the image under the exponential map at $p$ of the fixed point set of this representation say $V = Fix(mathbb{T}^n ) subset T_p M$. Note that $$ V = cap_{g in mathbb{T}^n} Fix(g)$$ where $Fix(g)$ is the fixed point set of the linear transformation associated to $g$.



    Now note that since the representation is complex linear, each $Fix(g)$ is a complex subspace (since it is the eigenspace for the eigenvalue 1), and hence $V$ is a complex subspace. This shows that that the fixed point set is locally an almost complex submanifold and hence symplectic.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      I am aware of one way to see this, which I saw in McDuff and Salamons book introduction to symplectic geometry.



      We can find a compatible almost complex structure which is invariant by the torus action (This basically follows from Gromov's result that a symplectic manifold always has a compatible almost complex structure plus an averaging argument). Note that together with the symplectic structure we also get an invariant Riemannian metric.



      Now consider a point $p$ which is fixed by the action, note that $T_{p}M$ inherits the structure of a complex representation of the torus $mathbb{T}^n$. The points close to $p$ which are fixed by the action are the image under the exponential map at $p$ of the fixed point set of this representation say $V = Fix(mathbb{T}^n ) subset T_p M$. Note that $$ V = cap_{g in mathbb{T}^n} Fix(g)$$ where $Fix(g)$ is the fixed point set of the linear transformation associated to $g$.



      Now note that since the representation is complex linear, each $Fix(g)$ is a complex subspace (since it is the eigenspace for the eigenvalue 1), and hence $V$ is a complex subspace. This shows that that the fixed point set is locally an almost complex submanifold and hence symplectic.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        I am aware of one way to see this, which I saw in McDuff and Salamons book introduction to symplectic geometry.



        We can find a compatible almost complex structure which is invariant by the torus action (This basically follows from Gromov's result that a symplectic manifold always has a compatible almost complex structure plus an averaging argument). Note that together with the symplectic structure we also get an invariant Riemannian metric.



        Now consider a point $p$ which is fixed by the action, note that $T_{p}M$ inherits the structure of a complex representation of the torus $mathbb{T}^n$. The points close to $p$ which are fixed by the action are the image under the exponential map at $p$ of the fixed point set of this representation say $V = Fix(mathbb{T}^n ) subset T_p M$. Note that $$ V = cap_{g in mathbb{T}^n} Fix(g)$$ where $Fix(g)$ is the fixed point set of the linear transformation associated to $g$.



        Now note that since the representation is complex linear, each $Fix(g)$ is a complex subspace (since it is the eigenspace for the eigenvalue 1), and hence $V$ is a complex subspace. This shows that that the fixed point set is locally an almost complex submanifold and hence symplectic.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        I am aware of one way to see this, which I saw in McDuff and Salamons book introduction to symplectic geometry.



        We can find a compatible almost complex structure which is invariant by the torus action (This basically follows from Gromov's result that a symplectic manifold always has a compatible almost complex structure plus an averaging argument). Note that together with the symplectic structure we also get an invariant Riemannian metric.



        Now consider a point $p$ which is fixed by the action, note that $T_{p}M$ inherits the structure of a complex representation of the torus $mathbb{T}^n$. The points close to $p$ which are fixed by the action are the image under the exponential map at $p$ of the fixed point set of this representation say $V = Fix(mathbb{T}^n ) subset T_p M$. Note that $$ V = cap_{g in mathbb{T}^n} Fix(g)$$ where $Fix(g)$ is the fixed point set of the linear transformation associated to $g$.



        Now note that since the representation is complex linear, each $Fix(g)$ is a complex subspace (since it is the eigenspace for the eigenvalue 1), and hence $V$ is a complex subspace. This shows that that the fixed point set is locally an almost complex submanifold and hence symplectic.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 23 at 22:07









        Nick LNick L

        1,294210




        1,294210






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084856%2fhow-to-prove-that-the-set-of-fixed-points-of-a-hamiltonian-action-of-a-torus-on%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

            How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter