If $ frac{y}{x-z} = frac{x+y}{z} = frac{x}{y} $ find the ratio of $x$, $y$ and $ z$












0












$begingroup$


I have this question from higher algebra by Hall and Knight:



if $ frac{y}{x-z} = frac{x+y}{z} = frac{x}{y} $ then find the ratio of x,y and z?
There are two answers given for this question, the first is $frac x4 =frac y2 =frac z3$ and the second is $frac x1 =frac y{-1} =frac z0 $. Now I solve this question in the following manner:



Adding numerator and denominator gives $ frac{y}{x-z} = frac{x+y}{z} = frac{x}{y}= 2frac{x+y}{x+y} =2$ (when x+y is not zero).This gives the first answer.



When (x+y ) is zero => $ y= -x $ that is $frac xy = -1$ and now there are two things



(i)If I put these values in the original expression I get $ frac{y}{x-z} =frac 0z= -1$ this implies 0= 1 where am I making the mistake?



(ii)Also from the original expression I have$ frac{x+y}{z} = frac{x}{y}$ multiplying by z I get $ x+y =zfrac xy$. This implies that z=0 and x:y:z =x:-x:0 = 1:-1:0 and this gives the second answer.But the problem is how z can be zero when it appears in the denominator in the expression



I think these things are very basic but still I am stuck.Could anyone please help me in knowing where the mistake is?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I have this question from higher algebra by Hall and Knight:



    if $ frac{y}{x-z} = frac{x+y}{z} = frac{x}{y} $ then find the ratio of x,y and z?
    There are two answers given for this question, the first is $frac x4 =frac y2 =frac z3$ and the second is $frac x1 =frac y{-1} =frac z0 $. Now I solve this question in the following manner:



    Adding numerator and denominator gives $ frac{y}{x-z} = frac{x+y}{z} = frac{x}{y}= 2frac{x+y}{x+y} =2$ (when x+y is not zero).This gives the first answer.



    When (x+y ) is zero => $ y= -x $ that is $frac xy = -1$ and now there are two things



    (i)If I put these values in the original expression I get $ frac{y}{x-z} =frac 0z= -1$ this implies 0= 1 where am I making the mistake?



    (ii)Also from the original expression I have$ frac{x+y}{z} = frac{x}{y}$ multiplying by z I get $ x+y =zfrac xy$. This implies that z=0 and x:y:z =x:-x:0 = 1:-1:0 and this gives the second answer.But the problem is how z can be zero when it appears in the denominator in the expression



    I think these things are very basic but still I am stuck.Could anyone please help me in knowing where the mistake is?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I have this question from higher algebra by Hall and Knight:



      if $ frac{y}{x-z} = frac{x+y}{z} = frac{x}{y} $ then find the ratio of x,y and z?
      There are two answers given for this question, the first is $frac x4 =frac y2 =frac z3$ and the second is $frac x1 =frac y{-1} =frac z0 $. Now I solve this question in the following manner:



      Adding numerator and denominator gives $ frac{y}{x-z} = frac{x+y}{z} = frac{x}{y}= 2frac{x+y}{x+y} =2$ (when x+y is not zero).This gives the first answer.



      When (x+y ) is zero => $ y= -x $ that is $frac xy = -1$ and now there are two things



      (i)If I put these values in the original expression I get $ frac{y}{x-z} =frac 0z= -1$ this implies 0= 1 where am I making the mistake?



      (ii)Also from the original expression I have$ frac{x+y}{z} = frac{x}{y}$ multiplying by z I get $ x+y =zfrac xy$. This implies that z=0 and x:y:z =x:-x:0 = 1:-1:0 and this gives the second answer.But the problem is how z can be zero when it appears in the denominator in the expression



      I think these things are very basic but still I am stuck.Could anyone please help me in knowing where the mistake is?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I have this question from higher algebra by Hall and Knight:



      if $ frac{y}{x-z} = frac{x+y}{z} = frac{x}{y} $ then find the ratio of x,y and z?
      There are two answers given for this question, the first is $frac x4 =frac y2 =frac z3$ and the second is $frac x1 =frac y{-1} =frac z0 $. Now I solve this question in the following manner:



      Adding numerator and denominator gives $ frac{y}{x-z} = frac{x+y}{z} = frac{x}{y}= 2frac{x+y}{x+y} =2$ (when x+y is not zero).This gives the first answer.



      When (x+y ) is zero => $ y= -x $ that is $frac xy = -1$ and now there are two things



      (i)If I put these values in the original expression I get $ frac{y}{x-z} =frac 0z= -1$ this implies 0= 1 where am I making the mistake?



      (ii)Also from the original expression I have$ frac{x+y}{z} = frac{x}{y}$ multiplying by z I get $ x+y =zfrac xy$. This implies that z=0 and x:y:z =x:-x:0 = 1:-1:0 and this gives the second answer.But the problem is how z can be zero when it appears in the denominator in the expression



      I think these things are very basic but still I am stuck.Could anyone please help me in knowing where the mistake is?







      algebra-precalculus ratio






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 14 '15 at 5:51







      user147263

















      asked Nov 14 '15 at 5:49









      Sanjeev VermaSanjeev Verma

      63




      63






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          I too am concerned about an answer of $frac{z}{0}$ being listed. That is a poor way of writing that $z$ is not related to $x$ and $y$ (if that is actually what it means).



          What the second answer should say is "If both $x$ and $y$ are zero then $z$ can be any value." Asking this as a ratio question makes it very awkward.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Yes Miller i agree but i am worried because it is from a very reputed book
            $endgroup$
            – Sanjeev Verma
            Nov 14 '15 at 6:05










          • $begingroup$
            I think answer should be "if x+y is zero then z can be any value"
            $endgroup$
            – Sanjeev Verma
            Nov 14 '15 at 6:36










          • $begingroup$
            The more I think about it the more I feel that second answer is nonsense. If $x+y=0$ from the first equality then $y=0$ and by the second $x=0$ but then that makes the third fraction undefined.
            $endgroup$
            – Ian Miller
            Nov 14 '15 at 8:27





















          -2












          $begingroup$

          y/(x-z)=(y+x)/z=x/y = be k



          y= kx - kz ..... 1
          y+x = kz ...... 2
          x=yk ................3



          Add 1 & 2 , 2y+ x = kx , substitute 3 , 2y+ yk = k *yk



          2 +k = k² , k²- k - 2 = 0 , k= 2 or k = -1
          for k = 2 , x = 2y , substitute in 2 , 3y = 2z
          x:y:z = 2y:y:3y/2 = 4:2: 3






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Please use MathJax in the future when posting answers. As it stands this looks very confusing and difficult to comprehend.
            $endgroup$
            – Rumplestillskin
            Jun 16 '17 at 6:42











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1528191%2fif-fracyx-z-fracxyz-fracxy-find-the-ratio-of-x-y-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          I too am concerned about an answer of $frac{z}{0}$ being listed. That is a poor way of writing that $z$ is not related to $x$ and $y$ (if that is actually what it means).



          What the second answer should say is "If both $x$ and $y$ are zero then $z$ can be any value." Asking this as a ratio question makes it very awkward.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Yes Miller i agree but i am worried because it is from a very reputed book
            $endgroup$
            – Sanjeev Verma
            Nov 14 '15 at 6:05










          • $begingroup$
            I think answer should be "if x+y is zero then z can be any value"
            $endgroup$
            – Sanjeev Verma
            Nov 14 '15 at 6:36










          • $begingroup$
            The more I think about it the more I feel that second answer is nonsense. If $x+y=0$ from the first equality then $y=0$ and by the second $x=0$ but then that makes the third fraction undefined.
            $endgroup$
            – Ian Miller
            Nov 14 '15 at 8:27


















          0












          $begingroup$

          I too am concerned about an answer of $frac{z}{0}$ being listed. That is a poor way of writing that $z$ is not related to $x$ and $y$ (if that is actually what it means).



          What the second answer should say is "If both $x$ and $y$ are zero then $z$ can be any value." Asking this as a ratio question makes it very awkward.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Yes Miller i agree but i am worried because it is from a very reputed book
            $endgroup$
            – Sanjeev Verma
            Nov 14 '15 at 6:05










          • $begingroup$
            I think answer should be "if x+y is zero then z can be any value"
            $endgroup$
            – Sanjeev Verma
            Nov 14 '15 at 6:36










          • $begingroup$
            The more I think about it the more I feel that second answer is nonsense. If $x+y=0$ from the first equality then $y=0$ and by the second $x=0$ but then that makes the third fraction undefined.
            $endgroup$
            – Ian Miller
            Nov 14 '15 at 8:27
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          I too am concerned about an answer of $frac{z}{0}$ being listed. That is a poor way of writing that $z$ is not related to $x$ and $y$ (if that is actually what it means).



          What the second answer should say is "If both $x$ and $y$ are zero then $z$ can be any value." Asking this as a ratio question makes it very awkward.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          I too am concerned about an answer of $frac{z}{0}$ being listed. That is a poor way of writing that $z$ is not related to $x$ and $y$ (if that is actually what it means).



          What the second answer should say is "If both $x$ and $y$ are zero then $z$ can be any value." Asking this as a ratio question makes it very awkward.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 14 '15 at 5:58









          Ian MillerIan Miller

          10.5k11438




          10.5k11438












          • $begingroup$
            Yes Miller i agree but i am worried because it is from a very reputed book
            $endgroup$
            – Sanjeev Verma
            Nov 14 '15 at 6:05










          • $begingroup$
            I think answer should be "if x+y is zero then z can be any value"
            $endgroup$
            – Sanjeev Verma
            Nov 14 '15 at 6:36










          • $begingroup$
            The more I think about it the more I feel that second answer is nonsense. If $x+y=0$ from the first equality then $y=0$ and by the second $x=0$ but then that makes the third fraction undefined.
            $endgroup$
            – Ian Miller
            Nov 14 '15 at 8:27




















          • $begingroup$
            Yes Miller i agree but i am worried because it is from a very reputed book
            $endgroup$
            – Sanjeev Verma
            Nov 14 '15 at 6:05










          • $begingroup$
            I think answer should be "if x+y is zero then z can be any value"
            $endgroup$
            – Sanjeev Verma
            Nov 14 '15 at 6:36










          • $begingroup$
            The more I think about it the more I feel that second answer is nonsense. If $x+y=0$ from the first equality then $y=0$ and by the second $x=0$ but then that makes the third fraction undefined.
            $endgroup$
            – Ian Miller
            Nov 14 '15 at 8:27


















          $begingroup$
          Yes Miller i agree but i am worried because it is from a very reputed book
          $endgroup$
          – Sanjeev Verma
          Nov 14 '15 at 6:05




          $begingroup$
          Yes Miller i agree but i am worried because it is from a very reputed book
          $endgroup$
          – Sanjeev Verma
          Nov 14 '15 at 6:05












          $begingroup$
          I think answer should be "if x+y is zero then z can be any value"
          $endgroup$
          – Sanjeev Verma
          Nov 14 '15 at 6:36




          $begingroup$
          I think answer should be "if x+y is zero then z can be any value"
          $endgroup$
          – Sanjeev Verma
          Nov 14 '15 at 6:36












          $begingroup$
          The more I think about it the more I feel that second answer is nonsense. If $x+y=0$ from the first equality then $y=0$ and by the second $x=0$ but then that makes the third fraction undefined.
          $endgroup$
          – Ian Miller
          Nov 14 '15 at 8:27






          $begingroup$
          The more I think about it the more I feel that second answer is nonsense. If $x+y=0$ from the first equality then $y=0$ and by the second $x=0$ but then that makes the third fraction undefined.
          $endgroup$
          – Ian Miller
          Nov 14 '15 at 8:27













          -2












          $begingroup$

          y/(x-z)=(y+x)/z=x/y = be k



          y= kx - kz ..... 1
          y+x = kz ...... 2
          x=yk ................3



          Add 1 & 2 , 2y+ x = kx , substitute 3 , 2y+ yk = k *yk



          2 +k = k² , k²- k - 2 = 0 , k= 2 or k = -1
          for k = 2 , x = 2y , substitute in 2 , 3y = 2z
          x:y:z = 2y:y:3y/2 = 4:2: 3






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Please use MathJax in the future when posting answers. As it stands this looks very confusing and difficult to comprehend.
            $endgroup$
            – Rumplestillskin
            Jun 16 '17 at 6:42
















          -2












          $begingroup$

          y/(x-z)=(y+x)/z=x/y = be k



          y= kx - kz ..... 1
          y+x = kz ...... 2
          x=yk ................3



          Add 1 & 2 , 2y+ x = kx , substitute 3 , 2y+ yk = k *yk



          2 +k = k² , k²- k - 2 = 0 , k= 2 or k = -1
          for k = 2 , x = 2y , substitute in 2 , 3y = 2z
          x:y:z = 2y:y:3y/2 = 4:2: 3






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Please use MathJax in the future when posting answers. As it stands this looks very confusing and difficult to comprehend.
            $endgroup$
            – Rumplestillskin
            Jun 16 '17 at 6:42














          -2












          -2








          -2





          $begingroup$

          y/(x-z)=(y+x)/z=x/y = be k



          y= kx - kz ..... 1
          y+x = kz ...... 2
          x=yk ................3



          Add 1 & 2 , 2y+ x = kx , substitute 3 , 2y+ yk = k *yk



          2 +k = k² , k²- k - 2 = 0 , k= 2 or k = -1
          for k = 2 , x = 2y , substitute in 2 , 3y = 2z
          x:y:z = 2y:y:3y/2 = 4:2: 3






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          y/(x-z)=(y+x)/z=x/y = be k



          y= kx - kz ..... 1
          y+x = kz ...... 2
          x=yk ................3



          Add 1 & 2 , 2y+ x = kx , substitute 3 , 2y+ yk = k *yk



          2 +k = k² , k²- k - 2 = 0 , k= 2 or k = -1
          for k = 2 , x = 2y , substitute in 2 , 3y = 2z
          x:y:z = 2y:y:3y/2 = 4:2: 3







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jun 16 '17 at 6:10









          user455479user455479

          1




          1












          • $begingroup$
            Please use MathJax in the future when posting answers. As it stands this looks very confusing and difficult to comprehend.
            $endgroup$
            – Rumplestillskin
            Jun 16 '17 at 6:42


















          • $begingroup$
            Please use MathJax in the future when posting answers. As it stands this looks very confusing and difficult to comprehend.
            $endgroup$
            – Rumplestillskin
            Jun 16 '17 at 6:42
















          $begingroup$
          Please use MathJax in the future when posting answers. As it stands this looks very confusing and difficult to comprehend.
          $endgroup$
          – Rumplestillskin
          Jun 16 '17 at 6:42




          $begingroup$
          Please use MathJax in the future when posting answers. As it stands this looks very confusing and difficult to comprehend.
          $endgroup$
          – Rumplestillskin
          Jun 16 '17 at 6:42


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1528191%2fif-fracyx-z-fracxyz-fracxy-find-the-ratio-of-x-y-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

          Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory