Mixing
![ML inequality on $|int_{gamma} e^{iaz^{2}}dz|$ such that $z=Re^{itheta},theta in [0,frac{pi}{4}]$](https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-sYpzeV_8PBE/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/AKxrwcbk1g2zIzm1JIuLLwweO1-3_zCyFg/s72-c-mo/photo.jpg?sz=32)
Initialize list of constructor objects
I am learning kotlin and I want to find out how to implement the following code from java to kotlin:
private Question questions = new Question {
new Question(R.string.question_a, true)
new Question(R.string.question_b, false)
};
public class Question {
private int resultId;
private boolean answerT;
public Question(int resId, boolean theAnswer) {
resultId = resId;
answerT = theAnswer'
}
}
kotlin:
class Question {
private var resultId:Int = 0
private var answerT:Boolean = false
fun Question(resId:Int, theAnswer:Boolean) {
resultId = resId
answerT = theAnswer
}
}
....
private val questions:List<Question> {
Question(R.string.question_a, true),
Question(R.string.question_b, false)
}
I am not sure how to initialize in kotlin.
kotlin
edited Nov 19 '18 at 15:01
Zoe
11.1k73776
asked Nov 19 '18 at 14:51
George
2,763749112
add a comment |
I am learning kotlin and I want to find out how to implement the following code from java to kotlin:
private Question questions = new Question {
new Question(R.string.question_a, true)
new Question(R.string.question_b, false)
};
public class Question {
private int resultId;
private boolean answerT;
public Question(int resId, boolean theAnswer) {
resultId = resId;
answerT = theAnswer'
}
}
kotlin:
class Question {
private var resultId:Int = 0
private var answerT:Boolean = false
fun Question(resId:Int, theAnswer:Boolean) {
resultId = resId
answerT = theAnswer
}
}
....
private val questions:List<Question> {
Question(R.string.question_a, true),
Question(R.string.question_b, false)
}
I am not sure how to initialize in kotlin.
kotlin
edited Nov 19 '18 at 15:01
Zoe
11.1k73776
asked Nov 19 '18 at 14:51
George
2,763749112
add a comment |
I am learning kotlin and I want to find out how to implement the following code from java to kotlin:
private Question questions = new Question {
new Question(R.string.question_a, true)
new Question(R.string.question_b, false)
};
public class Question {
private int resultId;
private boolean answerT;
public Question(int resId, boolean theAnswer) {
resultId = resId;
answerT = theAnswer'
}
}
kotlin:
class Question {
private var resultId:Int = 0
private var answerT:Boolean = false
fun Question(resId:Int, theAnswer:Boolean) {
resultId = resId
answerT = theAnswer
}
}
....
private val questions:List<Question> {
Question(R.string.question_a, true),
Question(R.string.question_b, false)
}
I am not sure how to initialize in kotlin.
kotlin
edited Nov 19 '18 at 15:01
Zoe
11.1k73776
asked Nov 19 '18 at 14:51
George
2,763749112
I am learning kotlin and I want to find out how to implement the following code from java to kotlin:
private Question questions = new Question {
new Question(R.string.question_a, true)
new Question(R.string.question_b, false)
};
public class Question {
private int resultId;
private boolean answerT;
public Question(int resId, boolean theAnswer) {
resultId = resId;
answerT = theAnswer'
}
}
kotlin:
class Question {
private var resultId:Int = 0
private var answerT:Boolean = false
fun Question(resId:Int, theAnswer:Boolean) {
resultId = resId
answerT = theAnswer
}
}
....
private val questions:List<Question> {
Question(R.string.question_a, true),
Question(R.string.question_b, false)
}
I am not sure how to initialize in kotlin.
kotlin
kotlin
edited Nov 19 '18 at 15:01
Zoe
11.1k73776
asked Nov 19 '18 at 14:51
George
2,763749112
edited Nov 19 '18 at 15:01
Zoe
11.1k73776
asked Nov 19 '18 at 14:51
George
2,763749112
edited Nov 19 '18 at 15:01
Zoe
11.1k73776
edited Nov 19 '18 at 15:01
Zoe
11.1k73776
edited Nov 19 '18 at 15:01
Zoe
11.1k73776
11.1k73776
asked Nov 19 '18 at 14:51
George
2,763749112
asked Nov 19 '18 at 14:51
George
2,763749112
asked Nov 19 '18 at 14:51
George
2,763749112
2,763749112
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
You can use the listOf method:
private val questions: List<Question> = listOf(
Question(R.string.question_a, true),
Question(R.string.question_b, false))
edited Nov 19 '18 at 14:57
yole
58.6k11142139
answered Nov 19 '18 at 14:54
Jesper
151k34247290
add a comment |
First of all, you're using Java-style constructors. Kotlin constructors are denoted by the constructor keyword, or by using primary constructors (parenthesis after the class name). fun ClassName is not how constructors are declared in Kotlin.
The reason I'm pointing this out is because you won't be able to initialize your class properly if you don't have the constructors right.
You have two options: First is using secondary constructors:
constructor(resId: Int, theAnswer: Boolean) {
resultId = resId
answerT = theAnswer
}
The second is using primary:
class Question(var resId: Int, var theAnswer: Boolean) { // these might be val instead; change these if you don't change the vars. you can also remove the brackets if you don't have a class body.
}
Using var or val in primary constructors also declares them for the class. If you don't use var or val, they're only available in the init block, or for variable initialization (until the initialization of the class is done, just like in constructors). You can compare using var or val to also adding this.someField = someField, where as without it's just used in the constructor.
Also note that secondary constructors are required to call the primary constructor if one exists. You'll also need primary constructors for some classes that require passing specific fields that you can't initialize directly, whether it is because it requires a specific instance to work, or it's a singleton implementation of an abstract class or an interface.
As for the list, it depends on how you want to do it. Your Java code uses arrays, and not lists. For lists though, you use listOf(items), and for arrays, you can use arrayOf. arrayOf() works exactly like listOf, except it returns Question, and not a List<Question>. The correct initialization of a list (or array) is like this:
val questions = listOf(Question(R.string.question_a, true), ...)
listOf takes a vararg argument of items, so you can also create empty lists or arrays like that (Though for empty arrays, that's kinda pointless).
Types are automatically inferred too, so you don't need to explicitly type : List<Question>, or listOf<Question>(...). You need to explicitly declare them if you don't pass any arguments.
There's also the option to manually add it if you feel like that. You can for an instance initialize lists directly and call .add on those.
answered Nov 19 '18 at 14:55
Zoe
11.1k73776
:Hi, I wanted to ask you.If I want to do this from java:int question = questions[some_index]?How can I do it in kotlin?Something like :var question:Int = questions[some_index], but it expectsIntand i hasquestionsand it doesn't work.Thanks!
– George
Nov 20 '18 at 10:53
@George thequestionslist is a List of questions. Lists, maps, and arrays in Kotlin have anoperator fun get, which enables the indexing operator. The code you have there simply gets a Question. If you want the resultId, you have to doquestions[index].resultId. If you want to convert theList<Question>into aList<Int>, you can usequestions.map { it.resultId }. But if you're getting them individually, just calling the field is easy. Also, you can use the indexing operator on any class with anoperator fun get.
– Zoe
Nov 20 '18 at 10:57
:Hmm.I am bit confused how to use theoperator fun.Something like this?operator fun question:Int = questions[some_index].Note, that the.resultIddoes not appear as an option.
– George
Nov 20 '18 at 11:03
@George you don't use it like that. A class declares it. You use it by callingsomeClassInstanceWithAnOperatorFunGet[someArg].list.get(index)==list[index]. If the field is private, you can't access it. Fields in Kotlin automatically generate getters and setters, which meansprivate varcan't be accessed outside the class. Depending on what you want, you can either make it public (which gives access to a public getter and setter), or you can make it public and change the access of the setter. You can see this for more details on that: stackoverflow.com/a/46376746/6296561
– Zoe
Nov 20 '18 at 11:09
1
:Thanks for the info!I will study.For the moment, I removed the private as you said and it works fine:var question:Int = questions[some_index].resultId
– George
Nov 20 '18 at 11:15
|
show 1 more comment
Why can't you go with enum class ?
enum class Question(val resultId:Int, val answerT:Boolean) {
A(R.string.question_a, true),
B(R.string.question_b, false)
}
or equivalent code for kotlin (I can think of),
class Question(val resultId:Int, val answerT:Boolean)
val questionList = listOf(Question(R.string.question_a,true), Question(R.string.question_b, false))
answered Nov 19 '18 at 15:06
Suryavel TR
2,39311418
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53377154%2finitialize-list-of-constructor-objects%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can use the listOf method:
private val questions: List<Question> = listOf(
Question(R.string.question_a, true),
Question(R.string.question_b, false))
edited Nov 19 '18 at 14:57
yole
58.6k11142139
answered Nov 19 '18 at 14:54
Jesper
151k34247290
add a comment |
You can use the listOf method:
private val questions: List<Question> = listOf(
Question(R.string.question_a, true),
Question(R.string.question_b, false))
edited Nov 19 '18 at 14:57
yole
58.6k11142139
answered Nov 19 '18 at 14:54
Jesper
151k34247290
add a comment |
You can use the listOf method:
private val questions: List<Question> = listOf(
Question(R.string.question_a, true),
Question(R.string.question_b, false))
edited Nov 19 '18 at 14:57
yole
58.6k11142139
answered Nov 19 '18 at 14:54
Jesper
151k34247290
You can use the listOf method:
private val questions: List<Question> = listOf(
Question(R.string.question_a, true),
Question(R.string.question_b, false))
edited Nov 19 '18 at 14:57
yole
58.6k11142139
answered Nov 19 '18 at 14:54
Jesper
151k34247290
edited Nov 19 '18 at 14:57
yole
58.6k11142139
edited Nov 19 '18 at 14:57
yole
58.6k11142139
edited Nov 19 '18 at 14:57
yole
58.6k11142139
58.6k11142139
answered Nov 19 '18 at 14:54
Jesper
151k34247290
answered Nov 19 '18 at 14:54
Jesper
151k34247290
answered Nov 19 '18 at 14:54
Jesper
151k34247290
151k34247290
add a comment |
add a comment |
First of all, you're using Java-style constructors. Kotlin constructors are denoted by the constructor keyword, or by using primary constructors (parenthesis after the class name). fun ClassName is not how constructors are declared in Kotlin.
The reason I'm pointing this out is because you won't be able to initialize your class properly if you don't have the constructors right.
You have two options: First is using secondary constructors:
constructor(resId: Int, theAnswer: Boolean) {
resultId = resId
answerT = theAnswer
}
The second is using primary:
class Question(var resId: Int, var theAnswer: Boolean) { // these might be val instead; change these if you don't change the vars. you can also remove the brackets if you don't have a class body.
}
Using var or val in primary constructors also declares them for the class. If you don't use var or val, they're only available in the init block, or for variable initialization (until the initialization of the class is done, just like in constructors). You can compare using var or val to also adding this.someField = someField, where as without it's just used in the constructor.
Also note that secondary constructors are required to call the primary constructor if one exists. You'll also need primary constructors for some classes that require passing specific fields that you can't initialize directly, whether it is because it requires a specific instance to work, or it's a singleton implementation of an abstract class or an interface.
As for the list, it depends on how you want to do it. Your Java code uses arrays, and not lists. For lists though, you use listOf(items), and for arrays, you can use arrayOf. arrayOf() works exactly like listOf, except it returns Question, and not a List<Question>. The correct initialization of a list (or array) is like this:
val questions = listOf(Question(R.string.question_a, true), ...)
listOf takes a vararg argument of items, so you can also create empty lists or arrays like that (Though for empty arrays, that's kinda pointless).
Types are automatically inferred too, so you don't need to explicitly type : List<Question>, or listOf<Question>(...). You need to explicitly declare them if you don't pass any arguments.
There's also the option to manually add it if you feel like that. You can for an instance initialize lists directly and call .add on those.
answered Nov 19 '18 at 14:55
Zoe
11.1k73776
:Hi, I wanted to ask you.If I want to do this from java:int question = questions[some_index]?How can I do it in kotlin?Something like :var question:Int = questions[some_index], but it expectsIntand i hasquestionsand it doesn't work.Thanks!
– George
Nov 20 '18 at 10:53
@George thequestionslist is a List of questions. Lists, maps, and arrays in Kotlin have anoperator fun get, which enables the indexing operator. The code you have there simply gets a Question. If you want the resultId, you have to doquestions[index].resultId. If you want to convert theList<Question>into aList<Int>, you can usequestions.map { it.resultId }. But if you're getting them individually, just calling the field is easy. Also, you can use the indexing operator on any class with anoperator fun get.
– Zoe
Nov 20 '18 at 10:57
:Hmm.I am bit confused how to use theoperator fun.Something like this?operator fun question:Int = questions[some_index].Note, that the.resultIddoes not appear as an option.
– George
Nov 20 '18 at 11:03
@George you don't use it like that. A class declares it. You use it by callingsomeClassInstanceWithAnOperatorFunGet[someArg].list.get(index)==list[index]. If the field is private, you can't access it. Fields in Kotlin automatically generate getters and setters, which meansprivate varcan't be accessed outside the class. Depending on what you want, you can either make it public (which gives access to a public getter and setter), or you can make it public and change the access of the setter. You can see this for more details on that: stackoverflow.com/a/46376746/6296561
– Zoe
Nov 20 '18 at 11:09
1
:Thanks for the info!I will study.For the moment, I removed the private as you said and it works fine:var question:Int = questions[some_index].resultId
– George
Nov 20 '18 at 11:15
|
show 1 more comment
First of all, you're using Java-style constructors. Kotlin constructors are denoted by the constructor keyword, or by using primary constructors (parenthesis after the class name). fun ClassName is not how constructors are declared in Kotlin.
The reason I'm pointing this out is because you won't be able to initialize your class properly if you don't have the constructors right.
You have two options: First is using secondary constructors:
constructor(resId: Int, theAnswer: Boolean) {
resultId = resId
answerT = theAnswer
}
The second is using primary:
class Question(var resId: Int, var theAnswer: Boolean) { // these might be val instead; change these if you don't change the vars. you can also remove the brackets if you don't have a class body.
}
Using var or val in primary constructors also declares them for the class. If you don't use var or val, they're only available in the init block, or for variable initialization (until the initialization of the class is done, just like in constructors). You can compare using var or val to also adding this.someField = someField, where as without it's just used in the constructor.
Also note that secondary constructors are required to call the primary constructor if one exists. You'll also need primary constructors for some classes that require passing specific fields that you can't initialize directly, whether it is because it requires a specific instance to work, or it's a singleton implementation of an abstract class or an interface.
As for the list, it depends on how you want to do it. Your Java code uses arrays, and not lists. For lists though, you use listOf(items), and for arrays, you can use arrayOf. arrayOf() works exactly like listOf, except it returns Question, and not a List<Question>. The correct initialization of a list (or array) is like this:
val questions = listOf(Question(R.string.question_a, true), ...)
listOf takes a vararg argument of items, so you can also create empty lists or arrays like that (Though for empty arrays, that's kinda pointless).
Types are automatically inferred too, so you don't need to explicitly type : List<Question>, or listOf<Question>(...). You need to explicitly declare them if you don't pass any arguments.
There's also the option to manually add it if you feel like that. You can for an instance initialize lists directly and call .add on those.
answered Nov 19 '18 at 14:55
Zoe
11.1k73776
:Hi, I wanted to ask you.If I want to do this from java:int question = questions[some_index]?How can I do it in kotlin?Something like :var question:Int = questions[some_index], but it expectsIntand i hasquestionsand it doesn't work.Thanks!
– George
Nov 20 '18 at 10:53
@George thequestionslist is a List of questions. Lists, maps, and arrays in Kotlin have anoperator fun get, which enables the indexing operator. The code you have there simply gets a Question. If you want the resultId, you have to doquestions[index].resultId. If you want to convert theList<Question>into aList<Int>, you can usequestions.map { it.resultId }. But if you're getting them individually, just calling the field is easy. Also, you can use the indexing operator on any class with anoperator fun get.
– Zoe
Nov 20 '18 at 10:57
:Hmm.I am bit confused how to use theoperator fun.Something like this?operator fun question:Int = questions[some_index].Note, that the.resultIddoes not appear as an option.
– George
Nov 20 '18 at 11:03
@George you don't use it like that. A class declares it. You use it by callingsomeClassInstanceWithAnOperatorFunGet[someArg].list.get(index)==list[index]. If the field is private, you can't access it. Fields in Kotlin automatically generate getters and setters, which meansprivate varcan't be accessed outside the class. Depending on what you want, you can either make it public (which gives access to a public getter and setter), or you can make it public and change the access of the setter. You can see this for more details on that: stackoverflow.com/a/46376746/6296561
– Zoe
Nov 20 '18 at 11:09
1
:Thanks for the info!I will study.For the moment, I removed the private as you said and it works fine:var question:Int = questions[some_index].resultId
– George
Nov 20 '18 at 11:15
|
show 1 more comment
First of all, you're using Java-style constructors. Kotlin constructors are denoted by the constructor keyword, or by using primary constructors (parenthesis after the class name). fun ClassName is not how constructors are declared in Kotlin.
The reason I'm pointing this out is because you won't be able to initialize your class properly if you don't have the constructors right.
You have two options: First is using secondary constructors:
constructor(resId: Int, theAnswer: Boolean) {
resultId = resId
answerT = theAnswer
}
The second is using primary:
class Question(var resId: Int, var theAnswer: Boolean) { // these might be val instead; change these if you don't change the vars. you can also remove the brackets if you don't have a class body.
}
Using var or val in primary constructors also declares them for the class. If you don't use var or val, they're only available in the init block, or for variable initialization (until the initialization of the class is done, just like in constructors). You can compare using var or val to also adding this.someField = someField, where as without it's just used in the constructor.
Also note that secondary constructors are required to call the primary constructor if one exists. You'll also need primary constructors for some classes that require passing specific fields that you can't initialize directly, whether it is because it requires a specific instance to work, or it's a singleton implementation of an abstract class or an interface.
As for the list, it depends on how you want to do it. Your Java code uses arrays, and not lists. For lists though, you use listOf(items), and for arrays, you can use arrayOf. arrayOf() works exactly like listOf, except it returns Question, and not a List<Question>. The correct initialization of a list (or array) is like this:
val questions = listOf(Question(R.string.question_a, true), ...)
listOf takes a vararg argument of items, so you can also create empty lists or arrays like that (Though for empty arrays, that's kinda pointless).
Types are automatically inferred too, so you don't need to explicitly type : List<Question>, or listOf<Question>(...). You need to explicitly declare them if you don't pass any arguments.
There's also the option to manually add it if you feel like that. You can for an instance initialize lists directly and call .add on those.
answered Nov 19 '18 at 14:55
Zoe
11.1k73776
First of all, you're using Java-style constructors. Kotlin constructors are denoted by the constructor keyword, or by using primary constructors (parenthesis after the class name). fun ClassName is not how constructors are declared in Kotlin.
The reason I'm pointing this out is because you won't be able to initialize your class properly if you don't have the constructors right.
You have two options: First is using secondary constructors:
constructor(resId: Int, theAnswer: Boolean) {
resultId = resId
answerT = theAnswer
}
The second is using primary:
class Question(var resId: Int, var theAnswer: Boolean) { // these might be val instead; change these if you don't change the vars. you can also remove the brackets if you don't have a class body.
}
Using var or val in primary constructors also declares them for the class. If you don't use var or val, they're only available in the init block, or for variable initialization (until the initialization of the class is done, just like in constructors). You can compare using var or val to also adding this.someField = someField, where as without it's just used in the constructor.
Also note that secondary constructors are required to call the primary constructor if one exists. You'll also need primary constructors for some classes that require passing specific fields that you can't initialize directly, whether it is because it requires a specific instance to work, or it's a singleton implementation of an abstract class or an interface.
As for the list, it depends on how you want to do it. Your Java code uses arrays, and not lists. For lists though, you use listOf(items), and for arrays, you can use arrayOf. arrayOf() works exactly like listOf, except it returns Question, and not a List<Question>. The correct initialization of a list (or array) is like this:
val questions = listOf(Question(R.string.question_a, true), ...)
listOf takes a vararg argument of items, so you can also create empty lists or arrays like that (Though for empty arrays, that's kinda pointless).
Types are automatically inferred too, so you don't need to explicitly type : List<Question>, or listOf<Question>(...). You need to explicitly declare them if you don't pass any arguments.
There's also the option to manually add it if you feel like that. You can for an instance initialize lists directly and call .add on those.
answered Nov 19 '18 at 14:55
Zoe
11.1k73776
edited Nov 19 '18 at 18:41
answered Nov 19 '18 at 14:55
Zoe
11.1k73776
answered Nov 19 '18 at 14:55
Zoe
11.1k73776
answered Nov 19 '18 at 14:55
Zoe
11.1k73776
11.1k73776
:Hi, I wanted to ask you.If I want to do this from java:int question = questions[some_index]?How can I do it in kotlin?Something like :var question:Int = questions[some_index], but it expectsIntand i hasquestionsand it doesn't work.Thanks!
– George
Nov 20 '18 at 10:53
@George thequestionslist is a List of questions. Lists, maps, and arrays in Kotlin have anoperator fun get, which enables the indexing operator. The code you have there simply gets a Question. If you want the resultId, you have to doquestions[index].resultId. If you want to convert theList<Question>into aList<Int>, you can usequestions.map { it.resultId }. But if you're getting them individually, just calling the field is easy. Also, you can use the indexing operator on any class with anoperator fun get.
– Zoe
Nov 20 '18 at 10:57
:Hmm.I am bit confused how to use theoperator fun.Something like this?operator fun question:Int = questions[some_index].Note, that the.resultIddoes not appear as an option.
– George
Nov 20 '18 at 11:03
@George you don't use it like that. A class declares it. You use it by callingsomeClassInstanceWithAnOperatorFunGet[someArg].list.get(index)==list[index]. If the field is private, you can't access it. Fields in Kotlin automatically generate getters and setters, which meansprivate varcan't be accessed outside the class. Depending on what you want, you can either make it public (which gives access to a public getter and setter), or you can make it public and change the access of the setter. You can see this for more details on that: stackoverflow.com/a/46376746/6296561
– Zoe
Nov 20 '18 at 11:09
1
:Thanks for the info!I will study.For the moment, I removed the private as you said and it works fine:var question:Int = questions[some_index].resultId
– George
Nov 20 '18 at 11:15
|
show 1 more comment
:Hi, I wanted to ask you.If I want to do this from java:int question = questions[some_index]?How can I do it in kotlin?Something like :var question:Int = questions[some_index], but it expectsIntand i hasquestionsand it doesn't work.Thanks!
– George
Nov 20 '18 at 10:53
@George thequestionslist is a List of questions. Lists, maps, and arrays in Kotlin have anoperator fun get, which enables the indexing operator. The code you have there simply gets a Question. If you want the resultId, you have to doquestions[index].resultId. If you want to convert theList<Question>into aList<Int>, you can usequestions.map { it.resultId }. But if you're getting them individually, just calling the field is easy. Also, you can use the indexing operator on any class with anoperator fun get.
– Zoe
Nov 20 '18 at 10:57
:Hmm.I am bit confused how to use theoperator fun.Something like this?operator fun question:Int = questions[some_index].Note, that the.resultIddoes not appear as an option.
– George
Nov 20 '18 at 11:03
@George you don't use it like that. A class declares it. You use it by callingsomeClassInstanceWithAnOperatorFunGet[someArg].list.get(index)==list[index]. If the field is private, you can't access it. Fields in Kotlin automatically generate getters and setters, which meansprivate varcan't be accessed outside the class. Depending on what you want, you can either make it public (which gives access to a public getter and setter), or you can make it public and change the access of the setter. You can see this for more details on that: stackoverflow.com/a/46376746/6296561
– Zoe
Nov 20 '18 at 11:09
1
:Thanks for the info!I will study.For the moment, I removed the private as you said and it works fine:var question:Int = questions[some_index].resultId
– George
Nov 20 '18 at 11:15
:Hi, I wanted to ask you.If I want to do this from java:
int question = questions[some_index]?How can I do it in kotlin?Something like : var question:Int = questions[some_index], but it expects Int and i has questions and it doesn't work.Thanks!– George
Nov 20 '18 at 10:53
:Hi, I wanted to ask you.If I want to do this from java:
int question = questions[some_index]?How can I do it in kotlin?Something like : var question:Int = questions[some_index], but it expects Int and i has questions and it doesn't work.Thanks!– George
Nov 20 '18 at 10:53
@George the
questions list is a List of questions. Lists, maps, and arrays in Kotlin have an operator fun get, which enables the indexing operator. The code you have there simply gets a Question. If you want the resultId, you have to do questions[index].resultId. If you want to convert the List<Question> into a List<Int>, you can use questions.map { it.resultId }. But if you're getting them individually, just calling the field is easy. Also, you can use the indexing operator on any class with an operator fun get.– Zoe
Nov 20 '18 at 10:57
@George the
questions list is a List of questions. Lists, maps, and arrays in Kotlin have an operator fun get, which enables the indexing operator. The code you have there simply gets a Question. If you want the resultId, you have to do questions[index].resultId. If you want to convert the List<Question> into a List<Int>, you can use questions.map { it.resultId }. But if you're getting them individually, just calling the field is easy. Also, you can use the indexing operator on any class with an operator fun get.– Zoe
Nov 20 '18 at 10:57
:Hmm.I am bit confused how to use the
operator fun.Something like this? operator fun question:Int = questions[some_index].Note, that the .resultId does not appear as an option.– George
Nov 20 '18 at 11:03
:Hmm.I am bit confused how to use the
operator fun.Something like this? operator fun question:Int = questions[some_index].Note, that the .resultId does not appear as an option.– George
Nov 20 '18 at 11:03
@George you don't use it like that. A class declares it. You use it by calling
someClassInstanceWithAnOperatorFunGet[someArg]. list.get(index) == list[index]. If the field is private, you can't access it. Fields in Kotlin automatically generate getters and setters, which means private var can't be accessed outside the class. Depending on what you want, you can either make it public (which gives access to a public getter and setter), or you can make it public and change the access of the setter. You can see this for more details on that: stackoverflow.com/a/46376746/6296561– Zoe
Nov 20 '18 at 11:09
@George you don't use it like that. A class declares it. You use it by calling
someClassInstanceWithAnOperatorFunGet[someArg]. list.get(index) == list[index]. If the field is private, you can't access it. Fields in Kotlin automatically generate getters and setters, which means private var can't be accessed outside the class. Depending on what you want, you can either make it public (which gives access to a public getter and setter), or you can make it public and change the access of the setter. You can see this for more details on that: stackoverflow.com/a/46376746/6296561– Zoe
Nov 20 '18 at 11:09
1
1
:Thanks for the info!I will study.For the moment, I removed the private as you said and it works fine:
var question:Int = questions[some_index].resultId– George
Nov 20 '18 at 11:15
:Thanks for the info!I will study.For the moment, I removed the private as you said and it works fine:
var question:Int = questions[some_index].resultId– George
Nov 20 '18 at 11:15
|
show 1 more comment
Why can't you go with enum class ?
enum class Question(val resultId:Int, val answerT:Boolean) {
A(R.string.question_a, true),
B(R.string.question_b, false)
}
or equivalent code for kotlin (I can think of),
class Question(val resultId:Int, val answerT:Boolean)
val questionList = listOf(Question(R.string.question_a,true), Question(R.string.question_b, false))
answered Nov 19 '18 at 15:06
Suryavel TR
2,39311418
add a comment |
Why can't you go with enum class ?
enum class Question(val resultId:Int, val answerT:Boolean) {
A(R.string.question_a, true),
B(R.string.question_b, false)
}
or equivalent code for kotlin (I can think of),
class Question(val resultId:Int, val answerT:Boolean)
val questionList = listOf(Question(R.string.question_a,true), Question(R.string.question_b, false))
answered Nov 19 '18 at 15:06
Suryavel TR
2,39311418
add a comment |
Why can't you go with enum class ?
enum class Question(val resultId:Int, val answerT:Boolean) {
A(R.string.question_a, true),
B(R.string.question_b, false)
}
or equivalent code for kotlin (I can think of),
class Question(val resultId:Int, val answerT:Boolean)
val questionList = listOf(Question(R.string.question_a,true), Question(R.string.question_b, false))
answered Nov 19 '18 at 15:06
Suryavel TR
2,39311418
Why can't you go with enum class ?
enum class Question(val resultId:Int, val answerT:Boolean) {
A(R.string.question_a, true),
B(R.string.question_b, false)
}
or equivalent code for kotlin (I can think of),
class Question(val resultId:Int, val answerT:Boolean)
val questionList = listOf(Question(R.string.question_a,true), Question(R.string.question_b, false))
answered Nov 19 '18 at 15:06
Suryavel TR
2,39311418
answered Nov 19 '18 at 15:06
Suryavel TR
2,39311418
answered Nov 19 '18 at 15:06
Suryavel TR
2,39311418
answered Nov 19 '18 at 15:06
Suryavel TR
2,39311418
2,39311418
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53377154%2finitialize-list-of-constructor-objects%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
