Iperf stuck in mininet custom topology
I am using mininet on a Vagrant virtual machine that emulates Ubuntu Xenial (my laptop runs Windows 10).
The topology is the following, with remote controller, static ARP and OVS Kernel Switch running in user-space:
h1---s1----s4---h3
| / |
| s3 |
| / |
h2---s2----s5---h4
and I have done it with the following Python script:
from mininet.topo import Topo
from mininet.node import Host
class MyTopo(Topo):
def __init__(self):
"Create custom topo."
Topo.__init__(self)
leftTopHost = self.addHost('h1')
leftBottomHost = self.addHost('h2')
rightTopHost = self.addHost('h3')
rightBottomHost = self.addHost('h4')
Switch1 = self.addSwitch('s1')
Switch2 = self.addSwitch('s2')
Switch3 = self.addSwitch('s3')
Switch4 = self.addSwitch('s4')
Switch5 = self.addSwitch('s5')
self.addLink(leftTopHost, Switch1)
self.addLink(Switch1, Switch2)
self.addLink(Switch1, Switch3)
self.addLink(Switch1, Switch4)
self.addLink(leftBottomHost, Switch2)
self.addLink(Switch2, Switch3)
self.addLink(Switch2, Switch5)
self.addLink(Switch3, Switch4)
self.addLink(Switch3, Switch5)
self.addLink(rightTopHost, Switch4)
self.addLink(Switch4, Switch5)
self.addLink(rightBottomHost, Switch5)
topos = {'mytopo': (lambda: MyTopo())}
The basic idea is an MPLS tunnel between h1 and h4, passing through the switches s1, s4 and s5. I include part of the Ryu app I have developed ('part' because the MPLS match and the subsequent ping h1 h4 works
fine); assume the output port numbers are the one in the code
Flow rules in s1:
#path h1->h4
...
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=1, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(4)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
#path h4->h1
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=4, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(1)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
Flow rules in s4:
#path h1->h4
...
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=1, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(4)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
#path h4->h1
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=4, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(1)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
Flow rules in s5:
#path h1->h4
...
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=3, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(4)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
#path h4->h1
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=4, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(3)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
So getting to my issue: I want to generate TCP traffic between h1 and h4 but I can't understand why, when I type the iperf h1 h4
command in the mininet prompt, it results in a connection timeout; same result if I run both the client and the server on separate terminals.
For sure I know I must add something to my code, but I can't really see where.. Any help would be much appreciated!
python virtual-machine mininet ryu
add a comment |
I am using mininet on a Vagrant virtual machine that emulates Ubuntu Xenial (my laptop runs Windows 10).
The topology is the following, with remote controller, static ARP and OVS Kernel Switch running in user-space:
h1---s1----s4---h3
| / |
| s3 |
| / |
h2---s2----s5---h4
and I have done it with the following Python script:
from mininet.topo import Topo
from mininet.node import Host
class MyTopo(Topo):
def __init__(self):
"Create custom topo."
Topo.__init__(self)
leftTopHost = self.addHost('h1')
leftBottomHost = self.addHost('h2')
rightTopHost = self.addHost('h3')
rightBottomHost = self.addHost('h4')
Switch1 = self.addSwitch('s1')
Switch2 = self.addSwitch('s2')
Switch3 = self.addSwitch('s3')
Switch4 = self.addSwitch('s4')
Switch5 = self.addSwitch('s5')
self.addLink(leftTopHost, Switch1)
self.addLink(Switch1, Switch2)
self.addLink(Switch1, Switch3)
self.addLink(Switch1, Switch4)
self.addLink(leftBottomHost, Switch2)
self.addLink(Switch2, Switch3)
self.addLink(Switch2, Switch5)
self.addLink(Switch3, Switch4)
self.addLink(Switch3, Switch5)
self.addLink(rightTopHost, Switch4)
self.addLink(Switch4, Switch5)
self.addLink(rightBottomHost, Switch5)
topos = {'mytopo': (lambda: MyTopo())}
The basic idea is an MPLS tunnel between h1 and h4, passing through the switches s1, s4 and s5. I include part of the Ryu app I have developed ('part' because the MPLS match and the subsequent ping h1 h4 works
fine); assume the output port numbers are the one in the code
Flow rules in s1:
#path h1->h4
...
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=1, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(4)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
#path h4->h1
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=4, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(1)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
Flow rules in s4:
#path h1->h4
...
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=1, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(4)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
#path h4->h1
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=4, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(1)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
Flow rules in s5:
#path h1->h4
...
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=3, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(4)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
#path h4->h1
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=4, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(3)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
So getting to my issue: I want to generate TCP traffic between h1 and h4 but I can't understand why, when I type the iperf h1 h4
command in the mininet prompt, it results in a connection timeout; same result if I run both the client and the server on separate terminals.
For sure I know I must add something to my code, but I can't really see where.. Any help would be much appreciated!
python virtual-machine mininet ryu
add a comment |
I am using mininet on a Vagrant virtual machine that emulates Ubuntu Xenial (my laptop runs Windows 10).
The topology is the following, with remote controller, static ARP and OVS Kernel Switch running in user-space:
h1---s1----s4---h3
| / |
| s3 |
| / |
h2---s2----s5---h4
and I have done it with the following Python script:
from mininet.topo import Topo
from mininet.node import Host
class MyTopo(Topo):
def __init__(self):
"Create custom topo."
Topo.__init__(self)
leftTopHost = self.addHost('h1')
leftBottomHost = self.addHost('h2')
rightTopHost = self.addHost('h3')
rightBottomHost = self.addHost('h4')
Switch1 = self.addSwitch('s1')
Switch2 = self.addSwitch('s2')
Switch3 = self.addSwitch('s3')
Switch4 = self.addSwitch('s4')
Switch5 = self.addSwitch('s5')
self.addLink(leftTopHost, Switch1)
self.addLink(Switch1, Switch2)
self.addLink(Switch1, Switch3)
self.addLink(Switch1, Switch4)
self.addLink(leftBottomHost, Switch2)
self.addLink(Switch2, Switch3)
self.addLink(Switch2, Switch5)
self.addLink(Switch3, Switch4)
self.addLink(Switch3, Switch5)
self.addLink(rightTopHost, Switch4)
self.addLink(Switch4, Switch5)
self.addLink(rightBottomHost, Switch5)
topos = {'mytopo': (lambda: MyTopo())}
The basic idea is an MPLS tunnel between h1 and h4, passing through the switches s1, s4 and s5. I include part of the Ryu app I have developed ('part' because the MPLS match and the subsequent ping h1 h4 works
fine); assume the output port numbers are the one in the code
Flow rules in s1:
#path h1->h4
...
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=1, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(4)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
#path h4->h1
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=4, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(1)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
Flow rules in s4:
#path h1->h4
...
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=1, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(4)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
#path h4->h1
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=4, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(1)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
Flow rules in s5:
#path h1->h4
...
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=3, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(4)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
#path h4->h1
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=4, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(3)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
So getting to my issue: I want to generate TCP traffic between h1 and h4 but I can't understand why, when I type the iperf h1 h4
command in the mininet prompt, it results in a connection timeout; same result if I run both the client and the server on separate terminals.
For sure I know I must add something to my code, but I can't really see where.. Any help would be much appreciated!
python virtual-machine mininet ryu
I am using mininet on a Vagrant virtual machine that emulates Ubuntu Xenial (my laptop runs Windows 10).
The topology is the following, with remote controller, static ARP and OVS Kernel Switch running in user-space:
h1---s1----s4---h3
| / |
| s3 |
| / |
h2---s2----s5---h4
and I have done it with the following Python script:
from mininet.topo import Topo
from mininet.node import Host
class MyTopo(Topo):
def __init__(self):
"Create custom topo."
Topo.__init__(self)
leftTopHost = self.addHost('h1')
leftBottomHost = self.addHost('h2')
rightTopHost = self.addHost('h3')
rightBottomHost = self.addHost('h4')
Switch1 = self.addSwitch('s1')
Switch2 = self.addSwitch('s2')
Switch3 = self.addSwitch('s3')
Switch4 = self.addSwitch('s4')
Switch5 = self.addSwitch('s5')
self.addLink(leftTopHost, Switch1)
self.addLink(Switch1, Switch2)
self.addLink(Switch1, Switch3)
self.addLink(Switch1, Switch4)
self.addLink(leftBottomHost, Switch2)
self.addLink(Switch2, Switch3)
self.addLink(Switch2, Switch5)
self.addLink(Switch3, Switch4)
self.addLink(Switch3, Switch5)
self.addLink(rightTopHost, Switch4)
self.addLink(Switch4, Switch5)
self.addLink(rightBottomHost, Switch5)
topos = {'mytopo': (lambda: MyTopo())}
The basic idea is an MPLS tunnel between h1 and h4, passing through the switches s1, s4 and s5. I include part of the Ryu app I have developed ('part' because the MPLS match and the subsequent ping h1 h4 works
fine); assume the output port numbers are the one in the code
Flow rules in s1:
#path h1->h4
...
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=1, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(4)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
#path h4->h1
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=4, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(1)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
Flow rules in s4:
#path h1->h4
...
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=1, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(4)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
#path h4->h1
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=4, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(1)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
Flow rules in s5:
#path h1->h4
...
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=3, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(4)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
#path h4->h1
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=4, eth_type=0x800, ip_proto=6)
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(3)]
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=1, match=match,
instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
So getting to my issue: I want to generate TCP traffic between h1 and h4 but I can't understand why, when I type the iperf h1 h4
command in the mininet prompt, it results in a connection timeout; same result if I run both the client and the server on separate terminals.
For sure I know I must add something to my code, but I can't really see where.. Any help would be much appreciated!
python virtual-machine mininet ryu
python virtual-machine mininet ryu
asked Nov 22 '18 at 10:59
Raffaele ViterboRaffaele Viterbo
12
12
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53429451%2fiperf-stuck-in-mininet-custom-topology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53429451%2fiperf-stuck-in-mininet-custom-topology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown