Positive definite quadratic form over positive integer vectors












0












$begingroup$


Let $mathcal{M}$ denote the set of $d times d$ positive definite matrices with real entries for some positive integer $d$. Now consider the set



$$
mathcal{N}={A in M_n(mathbb{R}): z^TAz > 0, z in (mathbb{N} cup{0})^d - {mathbb{0}}}.
$$



Certainly we have $mathcal{M} subset mathcal{N}$, however these sets are not equivalent - for example, when $d=2$, the quadratic form generating $x^2 + y^2 + 3xy in mathcal{N}$ but not in $mathcal{M}$. What additional conditions need to be imposed on quadratic forms to guarantee that they're in the set $mathcal{N}$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let $mathcal{M}$ denote the set of $d times d$ positive definite matrices with real entries for some positive integer $d$. Now consider the set



    $$
    mathcal{N}={A in M_n(mathbb{R}): z^TAz > 0, z in (mathbb{N} cup{0})^d - {mathbb{0}}}.
    $$



    Certainly we have $mathcal{M} subset mathcal{N}$, however these sets are not equivalent - for example, when $d=2$, the quadratic form generating $x^2 + y^2 + 3xy in mathcal{N}$ but not in $mathcal{M}$. What additional conditions need to be imposed on quadratic forms to guarantee that they're in the set $mathcal{N}$?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let $mathcal{M}$ denote the set of $d times d$ positive definite matrices with real entries for some positive integer $d$. Now consider the set



      $$
      mathcal{N}={A in M_n(mathbb{R}): z^TAz > 0, z in (mathbb{N} cup{0})^d - {mathbb{0}}}.
      $$



      Certainly we have $mathcal{M} subset mathcal{N}$, however these sets are not equivalent - for example, when $d=2$, the quadratic form generating $x^2 + y^2 + 3xy in mathcal{N}$ but not in $mathcal{M}$. What additional conditions need to be imposed on quadratic forms to guarantee that they're in the set $mathcal{N}$?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $mathcal{M}$ denote the set of $d times d$ positive definite matrices with real entries for some positive integer $d$. Now consider the set



      $$
      mathcal{N}={A in M_n(mathbb{R}): z^TAz > 0, z in (mathbb{N} cup{0})^d - {mathbb{0}}}.
      $$



      Certainly we have $mathcal{M} subset mathcal{N}$, however these sets are not equivalent - for example, when $d=2$, the quadratic form generating $x^2 + y^2 + 3xy in mathcal{N}$ but not in $mathcal{M}$. What additional conditions need to be imposed on quadratic forms to guarantee that they're in the set $mathcal{N}$?







      linear-algebra matrices quadratic-forms






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 24 at 17:16









      ChrisChris

      341112




      341112






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Of course, $mathcal{N}$ contains all matrices with $>0$ entries.



          On the other hand, changing $A$ into $A+A^T$, the problem reduces to symmetric matrices $A$.



          Consider the case $n=2$ (in fact, it was your business) and $A=begin{pmatrix}a&b\b&cend{pmatrix}$. The condition is $ax^2+cy^2+2bxy>0$ when $(x,y)in mathbb{N}^2setminus {0,0}$; necessarily $a>0,c>0$; moreover, $at^2+2bt+c>0$ for every $tinmathbb{Q}^+$.



          That is, $at^2+2bt+c>0$ for every $tgeq 0$ OR



          $(*)$ $at^2+2bt+c$ admits a double root in $t_0>0$ a non-rational number.



          That implies that, in general, the roots of our polynomial are $<0$ or non-real.



          In the first case, the entries of $A$ are $>0$ and, in the second one, $A$ is symmetric $>0$.



          An example of the exceptional case $(*)$: $A=begin{pmatrix}1&-pi\-pi&pi^2end{pmatrix}$. Note that $A$ is only symmetric $geq 0$.



          Now, have a look at a generalization, for $n>2$, of the previous result.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            This is a very clever way of approaching the problem - however, I am having troubles reducing a general quadratic form to a single variable polynomial for n>2.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris
            Jan 25 at 17:22










          • $begingroup$
            Actually, never mind - I think I know how to solve the problem now. Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Chris
            Jan 25 at 17:31











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086139%2fpositive-definite-quadratic-form-over-positive-integer-vectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          Of course, $mathcal{N}$ contains all matrices with $>0$ entries.



          On the other hand, changing $A$ into $A+A^T$, the problem reduces to symmetric matrices $A$.



          Consider the case $n=2$ (in fact, it was your business) and $A=begin{pmatrix}a&b\b&cend{pmatrix}$. The condition is $ax^2+cy^2+2bxy>0$ when $(x,y)in mathbb{N}^2setminus {0,0}$; necessarily $a>0,c>0$; moreover, $at^2+2bt+c>0$ for every $tinmathbb{Q}^+$.



          That is, $at^2+2bt+c>0$ for every $tgeq 0$ OR



          $(*)$ $at^2+2bt+c$ admits a double root in $t_0>0$ a non-rational number.



          That implies that, in general, the roots of our polynomial are $<0$ or non-real.



          In the first case, the entries of $A$ are $>0$ and, in the second one, $A$ is symmetric $>0$.



          An example of the exceptional case $(*)$: $A=begin{pmatrix}1&-pi\-pi&pi^2end{pmatrix}$. Note that $A$ is only symmetric $geq 0$.



          Now, have a look at a generalization, for $n>2$, of the previous result.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            This is a very clever way of approaching the problem - however, I am having troubles reducing a general quadratic form to a single variable polynomial for n>2.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris
            Jan 25 at 17:22










          • $begingroup$
            Actually, never mind - I think I know how to solve the problem now. Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Chris
            Jan 25 at 17:31
















          1












          $begingroup$

          Of course, $mathcal{N}$ contains all matrices with $>0$ entries.



          On the other hand, changing $A$ into $A+A^T$, the problem reduces to symmetric matrices $A$.



          Consider the case $n=2$ (in fact, it was your business) and $A=begin{pmatrix}a&b\b&cend{pmatrix}$. The condition is $ax^2+cy^2+2bxy>0$ when $(x,y)in mathbb{N}^2setminus {0,0}$; necessarily $a>0,c>0$; moreover, $at^2+2bt+c>0$ for every $tinmathbb{Q}^+$.



          That is, $at^2+2bt+c>0$ for every $tgeq 0$ OR



          $(*)$ $at^2+2bt+c$ admits a double root in $t_0>0$ a non-rational number.



          That implies that, in general, the roots of our polynomial are $<0$ or non-real.



          In the first case, the entries of $A$ are $>0$ and, in the second one, $A$ is symmetric $>0$.



          An example of the exceptional case $(*)$: $A=begin{pmatrix}1&-pi\-pi&pi^2end{pmatrix}$. Note that $A$ is only symmetric $geq 0$.



          Now, have a look at a generalization, for $n>2$, of the previous result.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            This is a very clever way of approaching the problem - however, I am having troubles reducing a general quadratic form to a single variable polynomial for n>2.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris
            Jan 25 at 17:22










          • $begingroup$
            Actually, never mind - I think I know how to solve the problem now. Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Chris
            Jan 25 at 17:31














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Of course, $mathcal{N}$ contains all matrices with $>0$ entries.



          On the other hand, changing $A$ into $A+A^T$, the problem reduces to symmetric matrices $A$.



          Consider the case $n=2$ (in fact, it was your business) and $A=begin{pmatrix}a&b\b&cend{pmatrix}$. The condition is $ax^2+cy^2+2bxy>0$ when $(x,y)in mathbb{N}^2setminus {0,0}$; necessarily $a>0,c>0$; moreover, $at^2+2bt+c>0$ for every $tinmathbb{Q}^+$.



          That is, $at^2+2bt+c>0$ for every $tgeq 0$ OR



          $(*)$ $at^2+2bt+c$ admits a double root in $t_0>0$ a non-rational number.



          That implies that, in general, the roots of our polynomial are $<0$ or non-real.



          In the first case, the entries of $A$ are $>0$ and, in the second one, $A$ is symmetric $>0$.



          An example of the exceptional case $(*)$: $A=begin{pmatrix}1&-pi\-pi&pi^2end{pmatrix}$. Note that $A$ is only symmetric $geq 0$.



          Now, have a look at a generalization, for $n>2$, of the previous result.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Of course, $mathcal{N}$ contains all matrices with $>0$ entries.



          On the other hand, changing $A$ into $A+A^T$, the problem reduces to symmetric matrices $A$.



          Consider the case $n=2$ (in fact, it was your business) and $A=begin{pmatrix}a&b\b&cend{pmatrix}$. The condition is $ax^2+cy^2+2bxy>0$ when $(x,y)in mathbb{N}^2setminus {0,0}$; necessarily $a>0,c>0$; moreover, $at^2+2bt+c>0$ for every $tinmathbb{Q}^+$.



          That is, $at^2+2bt+c>0$ for every $tgeq 0$ OR



          $(*)$ $at^2+2bt+c$ admits a double root in $t_0>0$ a non-rational number.



          That implies that, in general, the roots of our polynomial are $<0$ or non-real.



          In the first case, the entries of $A$ are $>0$ and, in the second one, $A$ is symmetric $>0$.



          An example of the exceptional case $(*)$: $A=begin{pmatrix}1&-pi\-pi&pi^2end{pmatrix}$. Note that $A$ is only symmetric $geq 0$.



          Now, have a look at a generalization, for $n>2$, of the previous result.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 25 at 12:30









          loup blancloup blanc

          23.7k21851




          23.7k21851












          • $begingroup$
            This is a very clever way of approaching the problem - however, I am having troubles reducing a general quadratic form to a single variable polynomial for n>2.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris
            Jan 25 at 17:22










          • $begingroup$
            Actually, never mind - I think I know how to solve the problem now. Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Chris
            Jan 25 at 17:31


















          • $begingroup$
            This is a very clever way of approaching the problem - however, I am having troubles reducing a general quadratic form to a single variable polynomial for n>2.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris
            Jan 25 at 17:22










          • $begingroup$
            Actually, never mind - I think I know how to solve the problem now. Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Chris
            Jan 25 at 17:31
















          $begingroup$
          This is a very clever way of approaching the problem - however, I am having troubles reducing a general quadratic form to a single variable polynomial for n>2.
          $endgroup$
          – Chris
          Jan 25 at 17:22




          $begingroup$
          This is a very clever way of approaching the problem - however, I am having troubles reducing a general quadratic form to a single variable polynomial for n>2.
          $endgroup$
          – Chris
          Jan 25 at 17:22












          $begingroup$
          Actually, never mind - I think I know how to solve the problem now. Thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – Chris
          Jan 25 at 17:31




          $begingroup$
          Actually, never mind - I think I know how to solve the problem now. Thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – Chris
          Jan 25 at 17:31


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086139%2fpositive-definite-quadratic-form-over-positive-integer-vectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

          How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter