Translating a sentence into a predicate formula












0












$begingroup$


Problem 3.40. (a) Translate the following sentence into a predicate formula:



There is a student who has e-mailed at most n other people in the class,
besides possibly himself.



The domain of discourse should be the set of students in the class; in addition, the only predicates that you may use are




  • equality,

  • E.x; y/, meaning that “x has sent e-mail to y.”


(b) Explain how you would use your predicate formula (or some variant of it) to
express the following two sentences.




  1. There is a student who has emailed at least n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.

  2. There is a student who has emailed exactly n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you know quantifiers ? Like e.g. $exists x$
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:18










  • $begingroup$
    How are you asked to mange the "n" ? Do you know "numerical" quantifiers ? if not, Try with the simple cases : $n=1$ and $n=2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:30












  • $begingroup$
    How we have to read "besides possibly himself" ? That we have to exclude himself from counting, I think...
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:31
















0












$begingroup$


Problem 3.40. (a) Translate the following sentence into a predicate formula:



There is a student who has e-mailed at most n other people in the class,
besides possibly himself.



The domain of discourse should be the set of students in the class; in addition, the only predicates that you may use are




  • equality,

  • E.x; y/, meaning that “x has sent e-mail to y.”


(b) Explain how you would use your predicate formula (or some variant of it) to
express the following two sentences.




  1. There is a student who has emailed at least n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.

  2. There is a student who has emailed exactly n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you know quantifiers ? Like e.g. $exists x$
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:18










  • $begingroup$
    How are you asked to mange the "n" ? Do you know "numerical" quantifiers ? if not, Try with the simple cases : $n=1$ and $n=2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:30












  • $begingroup$
    How we have to read "besides possibly himself" ? That we have to exclude himself from counting, I think...
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:31














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Problem 3.40. (a) Translate the following sentence into a predicate formula:



There is a student who has e-mailed at most n other people in the class,
besides possibly himself.



The domain of discourse should be the set of students in the class; in addition, the only predicates that you may use are




  • equality,

  • E.x; y/, meaning that “x has sent e-mail to y.”


(b) Explain how you would use your predicate formula (or some variant of it) to
express the following two sentences.




  1. There is a student who has emailed at least n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.

  2. There is a student who has emailed exactly n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Problem 3.40. (a) Translate the following sentence into a predicate formula:



There is a student who has e-mailed at most n other people in the class,
besides possibly himself.



The domain of discourse should be the set of students in the class; in addition, the only predicates that you may use are




  • equality,

  • E.x; y/, meaning that “x has sent e-mail to y.”


(b) Explain how you would use your predicate formula (or some variant of it) to
express the following two sentences.




  1. There is a student who has emailed at least n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.

  2. There is a student who has emailed exactly n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.







discrete-mathematics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 23 at 16:25









N. F. Taussig

44.7k103358




44.7k103358










asked Jan 23 at 16:16









Jinlin LIJinlin LI

1




1








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you know quantifiers ? Like e.g. $exists x$
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:18










  • $begingroup$
    How are you asked to mange the "n" ? Do you know "numerical" quantifiers ? if not, Try with the simple cases : $n=1$ and $n=2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:30












  • $begingroup$
    How we have to read "besides possibly himself" ? That we have to exclude himself from counting, I think...
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:31














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you know quantifiers ? Like e.g. $exists x$
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:18










  • $begingroup$
    How are you asked to mange the "n" ? Do you know "numerical" quantifiers ? if not, Try with the simple cases : $n=1$ and $n=2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:30












  • $begingroup$
    How we have to read "besides possibly himself" ? That we have to exclude himself from counting, I think...
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:31








1




1




$begingroup$
Do you know quantifiers ? Like e.g. $exists x$
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 23 at 16:18




$begingroup$
Do you know quantifiers ? Like e.g. $exists x$
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 23 at 16:18












$begingroup$
How are you asked to mange the "n" ? Do you know "numerical" quantifiers ? if not, Try with the simple cases : $n=1$ and $n=2$.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 23 at 16:30






$begingroup$
How are you asked to mange the "n" ? Do you know "numerical" quantifiers ? if not, Try with the simple cases : $n=1$ and $n=2$.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 23 at 16:30














$begingroup$
How we have to read "besides possibly himself" ? That we have to exclude himself from counting, I think...
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 23 at 16:31




$begingroup$
How we have to read "besides possibly himself" ? That we have to exclude himself from counting, I think...
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 23 at 16:31










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Solution to part (a):
$
exists s Big((forall u ^neg E(s, u) ) land big( exists xexists y (xne y land y ne s land x ne s) land (E(s, x) lor E(s,y)) land forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))big) Big)
$





  • $(forall u ^neg E(s, u) )$ stands for the case that s does not send any one an email.


  • $ E(s, x) lor E(s,y)$ stands for 2 people


  • $forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))$ stands for at most 2 people






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    @MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
    6 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084689%2ftranslating-a-sentence-into-a-predicate-formula%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

Solution to part (a):
$
exists s Big((forall u ^neg E(s, u) ) land big( exists xexists y (xne y land y ne s land x ne s) land (E(s, x) lor E(s,y)) land forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))big) Big)
$





  • $(forall u ^neg E(s, u) )$ stands for the case that s does not send any one an email.


  • $ E(s, x) lor E(s,y)$ stands for 2 people


  • $forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))$ stands for at most 2 people






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    @MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
    6 hours ago
















0












$begingroup$

Solution to part (a):
$
exists s Big((forall u ^neg E(s, u) ) land big( exists xexists y (xne y land y ne s land x ne s) land (E(s, x) lor E(s,y)) land forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))big) Big)
$





  • $(forall u ^neg E(s, u) )$ stands for the case that s does not send any one an email.


  • $ E(s, x) lor E(s,y)$ stands for 2 people


  • $forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))$ stands for at most 2 people






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    @MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
    6 hours ago














0












0








0





$begingroup$

Solution to part (a):
$
exists s Big((forall u ^neg E(s, u) ) land big( exists xexists y (xne y land y ne s land x ne s) land (E(s, x) lor E(s,y)) land forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))big) Big)
$





  • $(forall u ^neg E(s, u) )$ stands for the case that s does not send any one an email.


  • $ E(s, x) lor E(s,y)$ stands for 2 people


  • $forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))$ stands for at most 2 people






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Solution to part (a):
$
exists s Big((forall u ^neg E(s, u) ) land big( exists xexists y (xne y land y ne s land x ne s) land (E(s, x) lor E(s,y)) land forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))big) Big)
$





  • $(forall u ^neg E(s, u) )$ stands for the case that s does not send any one an email.


  • $ E(s, x) lor E(s,y)$ stands for 2 people


  • $forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))$ stands for at most 2 people







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 7 hours ago









王文军 or Wenjun Wang王文军 or Wenjun Wang

484




484












  • $begingroup$
    @MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
    6 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    @MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
    6 hours ago
















$begingroup$
@MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
$endgroup$
– 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
@MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
$endgroup$
– 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
6 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084689%2ftranslating-a-sentence-into-a-predicate-formula%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter