Uniform convergence for the Fourier series of $alpha$-Hölder periodic functions and continuous bounded...
$begingroup$
In the answers to this question it is proved that if $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb{C}$ is a $alpha$-Hölder $2pi$-periodic function, then the Fourier series of $f$ converges uniformly to $f$.
In the answer to this question it is proved that if $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb{C}$ is a continuous bounded variation $2pi$-periodic function, then the Fourier series of $f$ converges uniformly to $f$.
Note that since the Weierstrass function is $alpha$-Hölder continuous for every $alpha<1$ and differentiable nowhere (hence not of bounded variation), and since $xmapstofrac{1}{log(x)}$ is absolutely continuous in $[-frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2}]$ but not $alpha$-Hölder continuous for any $alphain(0,1)$, the first result doesn't imply directly the second and vice versa.
Can be both theorems be viewed as particular results of a theorem for a class of functions that contains both continuous bounded variation periodic functions and $alpha$-Hölder periodic functions?
fourier-series
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the answers to this question it is proved that if $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb{C}$ is a $alpha$-Hölder $2pi$-periodic function, then the Fourier series of $f$ converges uniformly to $f$.
In the answer to this question it is proved that if $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb{C}$ is a continuous bounded variation $2pi$-periodic function, then the Fourier series of $f$ converges uniformly to $f$.
Note that since the Weierstrass function is $alpha$-Hölder continuous for every $alpha<1$ and differentiable nowhere (hence not of bounded variation), and since $xmapstofrac{1}{log(x)}$ is absolutely continuous in $[-frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2}]$ but not $alpha$-Hölder continuous for any $alphain(0,1)$, the first result doesn't imply directly the second and vice versa.
Can be both theorems be viewed as particular results of a theorem for a class of functions that contains both continuous bounded variation periodic functions and $alpha$-Hölder periodic functions?
fourier-series
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of How to show for $alphain (0,1)$, any $fin C^alpha([0,1]/{sim})$ has a Fourier series $S_nf$ uniformly converging to $f$
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Jan 24 at 12:39
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. I'll modify the question accordingly citing your question and leaving only the second part
$endgroup$
– Bob
Jan 24 at 12:41
1
$begingroup$
Of course there's no such thing as a proof that the answer is no, but I tend to think the answer's no, just because if there were such a result I suspect I would have heard about it - people would prove the two results you mention as special cases of the general result, which they don't, as far as I've ever seen.
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Jan 24 at 13:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the answers to this question it is proved that if $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb{C}$ is a $alpha$-Hölder $2pi$-periodic function, then the Fourier series of $f$ converges uniformly to $f$.
In the answer to this question it is proved that if $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb{C}$ is a continuous bounded variation $2pi$-periodic function, then the Fourier series of $f$ converges uniformly to $f$.
Note that since the Weierstrass function is $alpha$-Hölder continuous for every $alpha<1$ and differentiable nowhere (hence not of bounded variation), and since $xmapstofrac{1}{log(x)}$ is absolutely continuous in $[-frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2}]$ but not $alpha$-Hölder continuous for any $alphain(0,1)$, the first result doesn't imply directly the second and vice versa.
Can be both theorems be viewed as particular results of a theorem for a class of functions that contains both continuous bounded variation periodic functions and $alpha$-Hölder periodic functions?
fourier-series
$endgroup$
In the answers to this question it is proved that if $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb{C}$ is a $alpha$-Hölder $2pi$-periodic function, then the Fourier series of $f$ converges uniformly to $f$.
In the answer to this question it is proved that if $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb{C}$ is a continuous bounded variation $2pi$-periodic function, then the Fourier series of $f$ converges uniformly to $f$.
Note that since the Weierstrass function is $alpha$-Hölder continuous for every $alpha<1$ and differentiable nowhere (hence not of bounded variation), and since $xmapstofrac{1}{log(x)}$ is absolutely continuous in $[-frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2}]$ but not $alpha$-Hölder continuous for any $alphain(0,1)$, the first result doesn't imply directly the second and vice versa.
Can be both theorems be viewed as particular results of a theorem for a class of functions that contains both continuous bounded variation periodic functions and $alpha$-Hölder periodic functions?
fourier-series
fourier-series
edited Jan 24 at 15:11
Bob
asked Jan 24 at 12:27


BobBob
1,7361725
1,7361725
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of How to show for $alphain (0,1)$, any $fin C^alpha([0,1]/{sim})$ has a Fourier series $S_nf$ uniformly converging to $f$
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Jan 24 at 12:39
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. I'll modify the question accordingly citing your question and leaving only the second part
$endgroup$
– Bob
Jan 24 at 12:41
1
$begingroup$
Of course there's no such thing as a proof that the answer is no, but I tend to think the answer's no, just because if there were such a result I suspect I would have heard about it - people would prove the two results you mention as special cases of the general result, which they don't, as far as I've ever seen.
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Jan 24 at 13:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of How to show for $alphain (0,1)$, any $fin C^alpha([0,1]/{sim})$ has a Fourier series $S_nf$ uniformly converging to $f$
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Jan 24 at 12:39
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. I'll modify the question accordingly citing your question and leaving only the second part
$endgroup$
– Bob
Jan 24 at 12:41
1
$begingroup$
Of course there's no such thing as a proof that the answer is no, but I tend to think the answer's no, just because if there were such a result I suspect I would have heard about it - people would prove the two results you mention as special cases of the general result, which they don't, as far as I've ever seen.
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Jan 24 at 13:38
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of How to show for $alphain (0,1)$, any $fin C^alpha([0,1]/{sim})$ has a Fourier series $S_nf$ uniformly converging to $f$
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Jan 24 at 12:39
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of How to show for $alphain (0,1)$, any $fin C^alpha([0,1]/{sim})$ has a Fourier series $S_nf$ uniformly converging to $f$
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Jan 24 at 12:39
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. I'll modify the question accordingly citing your question and leaving only the second part
$endgroup$
– Bob
Jan 24 at 12:41
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. I'll modify the question accordingly citing your question and leaving only the second part
$endgroup$
– Bob
Jan 24 at 12:41
1
1
$begingroup$
Of course there's no such thing as a proof that the answer is no, but I tend to think the answer's no, just because if there were such a result I suspect I would have heard about it - people would prove the two results you mention as special cases of the general result, which they don't, as far as I've ever seen.
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Jan 24 at 13:38
$begingroup$
Of course there's no such thing as a proof that the answer is no, but I tend to think the answer's no, just because if there were such a result I suspect I would have heard about it - people would prove the two results you mention as special cases of the general result, which they don't, as far as I've ever seen.
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Jan 24 at 13:38
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085823%2funiform-convergence-for-the-fourier-series-of-alpha-h%25c3%25b6lder-periodic-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085823%2funiform-convergence-for-the-fourier-series-of-alpha-h%25c3%25b6lder-periodic-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of How to show for $alphain (0,1)$, any $fin C^alpha([0,1]/{sim})$ has a Fourier series $S_nf$ uniformly converging to $f$
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Jan 24 at 12:39
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. I'll modify the question accordingly citing your question and leaving only the second part
$endgroup$
– Bob
Jan 24 at 12:41
1
$begingroup$
Of course there's no such thing as a proof that the answer is no, but I tend to think the answer's no, just because if there were such a result I suspect I would have heard about it - people would prove the two results you mention as special cases of the general result, which they don't, as far as I've ever seen.
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Jan 24 at 13:38