Why do ideals arise naturally in ring theory in the same way that normal subgroups arise naturally in group...












0












$begingroup$


I guess my question is essentially that why being closed under multiplication by elements in $R$ for $I$ is required for $R/I$ to be a quotient ring.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    To answer the title: just as normal subgroups arise as kernels of group homomorphisms, ideals arise as kernels of ring homomorphisms. As for the body: if $x = 0$ in $R/I$, then we certainly want $rx = 0$ in $R/I$ for any $r in R$, and this is exactly what the property you mention implies.
    $endgroup$
    – André 3000
    Jan 24 at 4:35
















0












$begingroup$


I guess my question is essentially that why being closed under multiplication by elements in $R$ for $I$ is required for $R/I$ to be a quotient ring.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    To answer the title: just as normal subgroups arise as kernels of group homomorphisms, ideals arise as kernels of ring homomorphisms. As for the body: if $x = 0$ in $R/I$, then we certainly want $rx = 0$ in $R/I$ for any $r in R$, and this is exactly what the property you mention implies.
    $endgroup$
    – André 3000
    Jan 24 at 4:35














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I guess my question is essentially that why being closed under multiplication by elements in $R$ for $I$ is required for $R/I$ to be a quotient ring.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I guess my question is essentially that why being closed under multiplication by elements in $R$ for $I$ is required for $R/I$ to be a quotient ring.







abstract-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 24 at 5:47









Antonios-Alexandros Robotis

10.5k41741




10.5k41741










asked Jan 24 at 2:46









davidhdavidh

3028




3028








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    To answer the title: just as normal subgroups arise as kernels of group homomorphisms, ideals arise as kernels of ring homomorphisms. As for the body: if $x = 0$ in $R/I$, then we certainly want $rx = 0$ in $R/I$ for any $r in R$, and this is exactly what the property you mention implies.
    $endgroup$
    – André 3000
    Jan 24 at 4:35














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    To answer the title: just as normal subgroups arise as kernels of group homomorphisms, ideals arise as kernels of ring homomorphisms. As for the body: if $x = 0$ in $R/I$, then we certainly want $rx = 0$ in $R/I$ for any $r in R$, and this is exactly what the property you mention implies.
    $endgroup$
    – André 3000
    Jan 24 at 4:35








2




2




$begingroup$
To answer the title: just as normal subgroups arise as kernels of group homomorphisms, ideals arise as kernels of ring homomorphisms. As for the body: if $x = 0$ in $R/I$, then we certainly want $rx = 0$ in $R/I$ for any $r in R$, and this is exactly what the property you mention implies.
$endgroup$
– André 3000
Jan 24 at 4:35




$begingroup$
To answer the title: just as normal subgroups arise as kernels of group homomorphisms, ideals arise as kernels of ring homomorphisms. As for the body: if $x = 0$ in $R/I$, then we certainly want $rx = 0$ in $R/I$ for any $r in R$, and this is exactly what the property you mention implies.
$endgroup$
– André 3000
Jan 24 at 4:35










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Normal subgroups $Nsubseteq G$ of a group $G$ are important precisely because for $H$ a subgroup of $G$, $G/H$ has a group structure compatible with the one on $G$ if and only if $H$ is normal. More precisely, $aHcdot bH=abH$ for any pair $a,bin G$ if and only if $xH=Hx$ for all $xin G$, if and only if $xHx^{-1}=H$ if and only if $H$ is normal.



The same idea explains the importance of ideals. In ring theory, the ring $A$ in question is an abelian group under addition and so any additive subgroup is normal. So, if we fix such a subgroup $Bsubseteq A$ and we try to form a quotient space $A/B$, we notice that $A/B$ has a group structure compatible with the one on $A$. Multiplication becomes more complicated:
$$ (x+B)cdot (y+B)=xy+xB+yB+B.$$
It turns out that the latter expression is equal to $xy+B$ if and only if $xB=B$ for all $xin A$, i.e. $B$ is closed under multiplication by elements of $A$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085384%2fwhy-do-ideals-arise-naturally-in-ring-theory-in-the-same-way-that-normal-subgrou%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Normal subgroups $Nsubseteq G$ of a group $G$ are important precisely because for $H$ a subgroup of $G$, $G/H$ has a group structure compatible with the one on $G$ if and only if $H$ is normal. More precisely, $aHcdot bH=abH$ for any pair $a,bin G$ if and only if $xH=Hx$ for all $xin G$, if and only if $xHx^{-1}=H$ if and only if $H$ is normal.



    The same idea explains the importance of ideals. In ring theory, the ring $A$ in question is an abelian group under addition and so any additive subgroup is normal. So, if we fix such a subgroup $Bsubseteq A$ and we try to form a quotient space $A/B$, we notice that $A/B$ has a group structure compatible with the one on $A$. Multiplication becomes more complicated:
    $$ (x+B)cdot (y+B)=xy+xB+yB+B.$$
    It turns out that the latter expression is equal to $xy+B$ if and only if $xB=B$ for all $xin A$, i.e. $B$ is closed under multiplication by elements of $A$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Normal subgroups $Nsubseteq G$ of a group $G$ are important precisely because for $H$ a subgroup of $G$, $G/H$ has a group structure compatible with the one on $G$ if and only if $H$ is normal. More precisely, $aHcdot bH=abH$ for any pair $a,bin G$ if and only if $xH=Hx$ for all $xin G$, if and only if $xHx^{-1}=H$ if and only if $H$ is normal.



      The same idea explains the importance of ideals. In ring theory, the ring $A$ in question is an abelian group under addition and so any additive subgroup is normal. So, if we fix such a subgroup $Bsubseteq A$ and we try to form a quotient space $A/B$, we notice that $A/B$ has a group structure compatible with the one on $A$. Multiplication becomes more complicated:
      $$ (x+B)cdot (y+B)=xy+xB+yB+B.$$
      It turns out that the latter expression is equal to $xy+B$ if and only if $xB=B$ for all $xin A$, i.e. $B$ is closed under multiplication by elements of $A$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Normal subgroups $Nsubseteq G$ of a group $G$ are important precisely because for $H$ a subgroup of $G$, $G/H$ has a group structure compatible with the one on $G$ if and only if $H$ is normal. More precisely, $aHcdot bH=abH$ for any pair $a,bin G$ if and only if $xH=Hx$ for all $xin G$, if and only if $xHx^{-1}=H$ if and only if $H$ is normal.



        The same idea explains the importance of ideals. In ring theory, the ring $A$ in question is an abelian group under addition and so any additive subgroup is normal. So, if we fix such a subgroup $Bsubseteq A$ and we try to form a quotient space $A/B$, we notice that $A/B$ has a group structure compatible with the one on $A$. Multiplication becomes more complicated:
        $$ (x+B)cdot (y+B)=xy+xB+yB+B.$$
        It turns out that the latter expression is equal to $xy+B$ if and only if $xB=B$ for all $xin A$, i.e. $B$ is closed under multiplication by elements of $A$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Normal subgroups $Nsubseteq G$ of a group $G$ are important precisely because for $H$ a subgroup of $G$, $G/H$ has a group structure compatible with the one on $G$ if and only if $H$ is normal. More precisely, $aHcdot bH=abH$ for any pair $a,bin G$ if and only if $xH=Hx$ for all $xin G$, if and only if $xHx^{-1}=H$ if and only if $H$ is normal.



        The same idea explains the importance of ideals. In ring theory, the ring $A$ in question is an abelian group under addition and so any additive subgroup is normal. So, if we fix such a subgroup $Bsubseteq A$ and we try to form a quotient space $A/B$, we notice that $A/B$ has a group structure compatible with the one on $A$. Multiplication becomes more complicated:
        $$ (x+B)cdot (y+B)=xy+xB+yB+B.$$
        It turns out that the latter expression is equal to $xy+B$ if and only if $xB=B$ for all $xin A$, i.e. $B$ is closed under multiplication by elements of $A$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 24 at 5:55









        Antonios-Alexandros RobotisAntonios-Alexandros Robotis

        10.5k41741




        10.5k41741






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085384%2fwhy-do-ideals-arise-naturally-in-ring-theory-in-the-same-way-that-normal-subgrou%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

            Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

            A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$