Why does $dim W = dim V$ only if $W = V$ for a vector space $V$ and its subspace $W$? Removing one element...












0












$begingroup$


Let $W$ be a subspace of a finite-dimensional vector space $V$. Then $dim W = dim V$ if and only if $W = V$.



Why is this? I understand the proof I was given (which uses the fact that any set of exactly $n$ linearly independent vectors, where $n = dim V$, in $V$ must be a basis of $V$).



But what about this reasoning: remove one element from $W$, so long as that element doesn't make up a basis of $W$ (though if there is more than one basis then even this condition isn't necessary). Now $W neq V$, but $dim W = dim V$, no?



I am guessing that the reasoning is in some way flawed. But why is it flawed/in what way?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Your reasoning is not clear. Can you spell it out?
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 19 at 22:19






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Removing one element from $W$ will (in general) not result in a vector space.
    $endgroup$
    – user1892304
    Jan 19 at 22:21










  • $begingroup$
    @user1892304 Ohhh I see, that makes sense thank you! And that would be because it would result in a linear sum or scalar multiple of one of the other items in the space to no longer be in it?
    $endgroup$
    – James Ronald
    Jan 19 at 22:22
















0












$begingroup$


Let $W$ be a subspace of a finite-dimensional vector space $V$. Then $dim W = dim V$ if and only if $W = V$.



Why is this? I understand the proof I was given (which uses the fact that any set of exactly $n$ linearly independent vectors, where $n = dim V$, in $V$ must be a basis of $V$).



But what about this reasoning: remove one element from $W$, so long as that element doesn't make up a basis of $W$ (though if there is more than one basis then even this condition isn't necessary). Now $W neq V$, but $dim W = dim V$, no?



I am guessing that the reasoning is in some way flawed. But why is it flawed/in what way?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Your reasoning is not clear. Can you spell it out?
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 19 at 22:19






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Removing one element from $W$ will (in general) not result in a vector space.
    $endgroup$
    – user1892304
    Jan 19 at 22:21










  • $begingroup$
    @user1892304 Ohhh I see, that makes sense thank you! And that would be because it would result in a linear sum or scalar multiple of one of the other items in the space to no longer be in it?
    $endgroup$
    – James Ronald
    Jan 19 at 22:22














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $W$ be a subspace of a finite-dimensional vector space $V$. Then $dim W = dim V$ if and only if $W = V$.



Why is this? I understand the proof I was given (which uses the fact that any set of exactly $n$ linearly independent vectors, where $n = dim V$, in $V$ must be a basis of $V$).



But what about this reasoning: remove one element from $W$, so long as that element doesn't make up a basis of $W$ (though if there is more than one basis then even this condition isn't necessary). Now $W neq V$, but $dim W = dim V$, no?



I am guessing that the reasoning is in some way flawed. But why is it flawed/in what way?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $W$ be a subspace of a finite-dimensional vector space $V$. Then $dim W = dim V$ if and only if $W = V$.



Why is this? I understand the proof I was given (which uses the fact that any set of exactly $n$ linearly independent vectors, where $n = dim V$, in $V$ must be a basis of $V$).



But what about this reasoning: remove one element from $W$, so long as that element doesn't make up a basis of $W$ (though if there is more than one basis then even this condition isn't necessary). Now $W neq V$, but $dim W = dim V$, no?



I am guessing that the reasoning is in some way flawed. But why is it flawed/in what way?







linear-algebra vector-spaces






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 19 at 22:33









egreg

183k1486205




183k1486205










asked Jan 19 at 22:17









James RonaldJames Ronald

1297




1297












  • $begingroup$
    Your reasoning is not clear. Can you spell it out?
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 19 at 22:19






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Removing one element from $W$ will (in general) not result in a vector space.
    $endgroup$
    – user1892304
    Jan 19 at 22:21










  • $begingroup$
    @user1892304 Ohhh I see, that makes sense thank you! And that would be because it would result in a linear sum or scalar multiple of one of the other items in the space to no longer be in it?
    $endgroup$
    – James Ronald
    Jan 19 at 22:22


















  • $begingroup$
    Your reasoning is not clear. Can you spell it out?
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 19 at 22:19






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Removing one element from $W$ will (in general) not result in a vector space.
    $endgroup$
    – user1892304
    Jan 19 at 22:21










  • $begingroup$
    @user1892304 Ohhh I see, that makes sense thank you! And that would be because it would result in a linear sum or scalar multiple of one of the other items in the space to no longer be in it?
    $endgroup$
    – James Ronald
    Jan 19 at 22:22
















$begingroup$
Your reasoning is not clear. Can you spell it out?
$endgroup$
– Berci
Jan 19 at 22:19




$begingroup$
Your reasoning is not clear. Can you spell it out?
$endgroup$
– Berci
Jan 19 at 22:19




3




3




$begingroup$
Removing one element from $W$ will (in general) not result in a vector space.
$endgroup$
– user1892304
Jan 19 at 22:21




$begingroup$
Removing one element from $W$ will (in general) not result in a vector space.
$endgroup$
– user1892304
Jan 19 at 22:21












$begingroup$
@user1892304 Ohhh I see, that makes sense thank you! And that would be because it would result in a linear sum or scalar multiple of one of the other items in the space to no longer be in it?
$endgroup$
– James Ronald
Jan 19 at 22:22




$begingroup$
@user1892304 Ohhh I see, that makes sense thank you! And that would be because it would result in a linear sum or scalar multiple of one of the other items in the space to no longer be in it?
$endgroup$
– James Ronald
Jan 19 at 22:22










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Your argument fails because after removing one element from $W$, what you get is not a vector space anymore (unless you are working over the field $mathbb{F}_2$ and $dim W=1$).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Or if the underlying field is $Bbb Z_2$ and $dim(W) = 1$
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 19 at 22:23










  • $begingroup$
    That makes sense, don't know how I didn't realize that. Thank you for the help!
    $endgroup$
    – James Ronald
    Jan 19 at 22:23






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Removing an element from $W={0}$ will not give you a vector space. The onyl working case is indeed a one-dimensional over $Bbb F_2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Jan 19 at 22:27










  • $begingroup$
    @HagenvonEitzen I've edited my answer. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 19 at 22:34











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079910%2fwhy-does-dim-w-dim-v-only-if-w-v-for-a-vector-space-v-and-its-subspa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Your argument fails because after removing one element from $W$, what you get is not a vector space anymore (unless you are working over the field $mathbb{F}_2$ and $dim W=1$).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Or if the underlying field is $Bbb Z_2$ and $dim(W) = 1$
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 19 at 22:23










  • $begingroup$
    That makes sense, don't know how I didn't realize that. Thank you for the help!
    $endgroup$
    – James Ronald
    Jan 19 at 22:23






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Removing an element from $W={0}$ will not give you a vector space. The onyl working case is indeed a one-dimensional over $Bbb F_2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Jan 19 at 22:27










  • $begingroup$
    @HagenvonEitzen I've edited my answer. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 19 at 22:34
















1












$begingroup$

Your argument fails because after removing one element from $W$, what you get is not a vector space anymore (unless you are working over the field $mathbb{F}_2$ and $dim W=1$).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Or if the underlying field is $Bbb Z_2$ and $dim(W) = 1$
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 19 at 22:23










  • $begingroup$
    That makes sense, don't know how I didn't realize that. Thank you for the help!
    $endgroup$
    – James Ronald
    Jan 19 at 22:23






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Removing an element from $W={0}$ will not give you a vector space. The onyl working case is indeed a one-dimensional over $Bbb F_2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Jan 19 at 22:27










  • $begingroup$
    @HagenvonEitzen I've edited my answer. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 19 at 22:34














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Your argument fails because after removing one element from $W$, what you get is not a vector space anymore (unless you are working over the field $mathbb{F}_2$ and $dim W=1$).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Your argument fails because after removing one element from $W$, what you get is not a vector space anymore (unless you are working over the field $mathbb{F}_2$ and $dim W=1$).







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 19 at 22:34

























answered Jan 19 at 22:22









José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

165k22132235




165k22132235








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Or if the underlying field is $Bbb Z_2$ and $dim(W) = 1$
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 19 at 22:23










  • $begingroup$
    That makes sense, don't know how I didn't realize that. Thank you for the help!
    $endgroup$
    – James Ronald
    Jan 19 at 22:23






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Removing an element from $W={0}$ will not give you a vector space. The onyl working case is indeed a one-dimensional over $Bbb F_2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Jan 19 at 22:27










  • $begingroup$
    @HagenvonEitzen I've edited my answer. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 19 at 22:34














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Or if the underlying field is $Bbb Z_2$ and $dim(W) = 1$
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 19 at 22:23










  • $begingroup$
    That makes sense, don't know how I didn't realize that. Thank you for the help!
    $endgroup$
    – James Ronald
    Jan 19 at 22:23






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Removing an element from $W={0}$ will not give you a vector space. The onyl working case is indeed a one-dimensional over $Bbb F_2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Jan 19 at 22:27










  • $begingroup$
    @HagenvonEitzen I've edited my answer. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 19 at 22:34








2




2




$begingroup$
Or if the underlying field is $Bbb Z_2$ and $dim(W) = 1$
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Jan 19 at 22:23




$begingroup$
Or if the underlying field is $Bbb Z_2$ and $dim(W) = 1$
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Jan 19 at 22:23












$begingroup$
That makes sense, don't know how I didn't realize that. Thank you for the help!
$endgroup$
– James Ronald
Jan 19 at 22:23




$begingroup$
That makes sense, don't know how I didn't realize that. Thank you for the help!
$endgroup$
– James Ronald
Jan 19 at 22:23




3




3




$begingroup$
Removing an element from $W={0}$ will not give you a vector space. The onyl working case is indeed a one-dimensional over $Bbb F_2$.
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 19 at 22:27




$begingroup$
Removing an element from $W={0}$ will not give you a vector space. The onyl working case is indeed a one-dimensional over $Bbb F_2$.
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 19 at 22:27












$begingroup$
@HagenvonEitzen I've edited my answer. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 19 at 22:34




$begingroup$
@HagenvonEitzen I've edited my answer. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 19 at 22:34


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079910%2fwhy-does-dim-w-dim-v-only-if-w-v-for-a-vector-space-v-and-its-subspa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith