What exactly is a non-linear orthogonal projection?
$begingroup$
In a Hilbert space of bounded integrable functions, let $P$ be an operator such that
$$P(f(x)) = frac{f(x)+|f(x)|}{2}$$
The complement of $P$ can be written as $Q = I - P$, hence
$$Q(f(x)) = frac{f(x)-|f(x)|}{2}$$
Both $P$ and $Q$ are idempotent. However, in contrary to many textbook examples, $P$ and $Q$ are not linear, nor are they Hermitian. Still
$$langle P(f(x))|Q(f(x))rangle = 0$$
holds. Are we allowed to call $P$ an orthogonal projection and $Q$ its orthogonal complement?
(Sorry for my inaccurate wording, I am a physicist, not a mathematician.)
hilbert-spaces projection
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In a Hilbert space of bounded integrable functions, let $P$ be an operator such that
$$P(f(x)) = frac{f(x)+|f(x)|}{2}$$
The complement of $P$ can be written as $Q = I - P$, hence
$$Q(f(x)) = frac{f(x)-|f(x)|}{2}$$
Both $P$ and $Q$ are idempotent. However, in contrary to many textbook examples, $P$ and $Q$ are not linear, nor are they Hermitian. Still
$$langle P(f(x))|Q(f(x))rangle = 0$$
holds. Are we allowed to call $P$ an orthogonal projection and $Q$ its orthogonal complement?
(Sorry for my inaccurate wording, I am a physicist, not a mathematician.)
hilbert-spaces projection
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
No. The term projection in this context is reserved for linear maps
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 29 at 21:13
1
$begingroup$
I would call them like 'nonlinear projections'.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Jan 29 at 21:57
$begingroup$
Moreover, the "space of bounded intregrable functions" isn't (in most cases) a Hilbert space with the usual $L^2$-norm, since it is not complete. Example: $f_n(x) = x^{-1/4} 1_{[1/n,1]}$ converges in $L^2(0,1)$ to $f(x) = x^{-1/4}$.
$endgroup$
– p4sch
Jan 30 at 16:53
$begingroup$
@p4sch Please see my answer below. In fact, any normed vector space will be sufficient to define an orthogonal projection, need not be $L^2$.
$endgroup$
– user3609959
Feb 1 at 9:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In a Hilbert space of bounded integrable functions, let $P$ be an operator such that
$$P(f(x)) = frac{f(x)+|f(x)|}{2}$$
The complement of $P$ can be written as $Q = I - P$, hence
$$Q(f(x)) = frac{f(x)-|f(x)|}{2}$$
Both $P$ and $Q$ are idempotent. However, in contrary to many textbook examples, $P$ and $Q$ are not linear, nor are they Hermitian. Still
$$langle P(f(x))|Q(f(x))rangle = 0$$
holds. Are we allowed to call $P$ an orthogonal projection and $Q$ its orthogonal complement?
(Sorry for my inaccurate wording, I am a physicist, not a mathematician.)
hilbert-spaces projection
$endgroup$
In a Hilbert space of bounded integrable functions, let $P$ be an operator such that
$$P(f(x)) = frac{f(x)+|f(x)|}{2}$$
The complement of $P$ can be written as $Q = I - P$, hence
$$Q(f(x)) = frac{f(x)-|f(x)|}{2}$$
Both $P$ and $Q$ are idempotent. However, in contrary to many textbook examples, $P$ and $Q$ are not linear, nor are they Hermitian. Still
$$langle P(f(x))|Q(f(x))rangle = 0$$
holds. Are we allowed to call $P$ an orthogonal projection and $Q$ its orthogonal complement?
(Sorry for my inaccurate wording, I am a physicist, not a mathematician.)
hilbert-spaces projection
hilbert-spaces projection
edited Feb 1 at 9:38
user3609959
asked Jan 29 at 20:56
user3609959user3609959
212
212
2
$begingroup$
No. The term projection in this context is reserved for linear maps
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 29 at 21:13
1
$begingroup$
I would call them like 'nonlinear projections'.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Jan 29 at 21:57
$begingroup$
Moreover, the "space of bounded intregrable functions" isn't (in most cases) a Hilbert space with the usual $L^2$-norm, since it is not complete. Example: $f_n(x) = x^{-1/4} 1_{[1/n,1]}$ converges in $L^2(0,1)$ to $f(x) = x^{-1/4}$.
$endgroup$
– p4sch
Jan 30 at 16:53
$begingroup$
@p4sch Please see my answer below. In fact, any normed vector space will be sufficient to define an orthogonal projection, need not be $L^2$.
$endgroup$
– user3609959
Feb 1 at 9:52
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
No. The term projection in this context is reserved for linear maps
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 29 at 21:13
1
$begingroup$
I would call them like 'nonlinear projections'.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Jan 29 at 21:57
$begingroup$
Moreover, the "space of bounded intregrable functions" isn't (in most cases) a Hilbert space with the usual $L^2$-norm, since it is not complete. Example: $f_n(x) = x^{-1/4} 1_{[1/n,1]}$ converges in $L^2(0,1)$ to $f(x) = x^{-1/4}$.
$endgroup$
– p4sch
Jan 30 at 16:53
$begingroup$
@p4sch Please see my answer below. In fact, any normed vector space will be sufficient to define an orthogonal projection, need not be $L^2$.
$endgroup$
– user3609959
Feb 1 at 9:52
2
2
$begingroup$
No. The term projection in this context is reserved for linear maps
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 29 at 21:13
$begingroup$
No. The term projection in this context is reserved for linear maps
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 29 at 21:13
1
1
$begingroup$
I would call them like 'nonlinear projections'.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Jan 29 at 21:57
$begingroup$
I would call them like 'nonlinear projections'.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Jan 29 at 21:57
$begingroup$
Moreover, the "space of bounded intregrable functions" isn't (in most cases) a Hilbert space with the usual $L^2$-norm, since it is not complete. Example: $f_n(x) = x^{-1/4} 1_{[1/n,1]}$ converges in $L^2(0,1)$ to $f(x) = x^{-1/4}$.
$endgroup$
– p4sch
Jan 30 at 16:53
$begingroup$
Moreover, the "space of bounded intregrable functions" isn't (in most cases) a Hilbert space with the usual $L^2$-norm, since it is not complete. Example: $f_n(x) = x^{-1/4} 1_{[1/n,1]}$ converges in $L^2(0,1)$ to $f(x) = x^{-1/4}$.
$endgroup$
– p4sch
Jan 30 at 16:53
$begingroup$
@p4sch Please see my answer below. In fact, any normed vector space will be sufficient to define an orthogonal projection, need not be $L^2$.
$endgroup$
– user3609959
Feb 1 at 9:52
$begingroup$
@p4sch Please see my answer below. In fact, any normed vector space will be sufficient to define an orthogonal projection, need not be $L^2$.
$endgroup$
– user3609959
Feb 1 at 9:52
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
After a lot of Googling, I am able to come up with an answer myself. There is a well-known definition of non-linear orthogonal projections. Roughly, the procedure is as follows:
- In a metric space (e.g. a Hilbert space $H$), choose any non-empty subset $M$, which typically might be a manifold, but need not necessarily be a linear subspace.
- For each element $h in H$, define a so-called distance function $$rho(h,M)=inf_{m in M} ||h-m||$$.
- In the domain of all $h$ that have a unique $m$ (i.e. a perpendicular foot point in $M$), we can define a projection $P$ such that $P(h) = m$.
To point it out explicitly, the properties of $P$ totally depend on the norm $||cdot||$ and on the choice of $M$. As a simple example, let $M$ be the unit circle in the complex plain. Then $P(z)=z/|z|$.
If, as a special case, $M$ is a closed linear subspace of $H$, then $P$ turns out to be a linear orthogonal projection.
For more details, see e.g. http://matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/apm/apm59/apm5911.pdf.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3092710%2fwhat-exactly-is-a-non-linear-orthogonal-projection%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
After a lot of Googling, I am able to come up with an answer myself. There is a well-known definition of non-linear orthogonal projections. Roughly, the procedure is as follows:
- In a metric space (e.g. a Hilbert space $H$), choose any non-empty subset $M$, which typically might be a manifold, but need not necessarily be a linear subspace.
- For each element $h in H$, define a so-called distance function $$rho(h,M)=inf_{m in M} ||h-m||$$.
- In the domain of all $h$ that have a unique $m$ (i.e. a perpendicular foot point in $M$), we can define a projection $P$ such that $P(h) = m$.
To point it out explicitly, the properties of $P$ totally depend on the norm $||cdot||$ and on the choice of $M$. As a simple example, let $M$ be the unit circle in the complex plain. Then $P(z)=z/|z|$.
If, as a special case, $M$ is a closed linear subspace of $H$, then $P$ turns out to be a linear orthogonal projection.
For more details, see e.g. http://matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/apm/apm59/apm5911.pdf.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
After a lot of Googling, I am able to come up with an answer myself. There is a well-known definition of non-linear orthogonal projections. Roughly, the procedure is as follows:
- In a metric space (e.g. a Hilbert space $H$), choose any non-empty subset $M$, which typically might be a manifold, but need not necessarily be a linear subspace.
- For each element $h in H$, define a so-called distance function $$rho(h,M)=inf_{m in M} ||h-m||$$.
- In the domain of all $h$ that have a unique $m$ (i.e. a perpendicular foot point in $M$), we can define a projection $P$ such that $P(h) = m$.
To point it out explicitly, the properties of $P$ totally depend on the norm $||cdot||$ and on the choice of $M$. As a simple example, let $M$ be the unit circle in the complex plain. Then $P(z)=z/|z|$.
If, as a special case, $M$ is a closed linear subspace of $H$, then $P$ turns out to be a linear orthogonal projection.
For more details, see e.g. http://matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/apm/apm59/apm5911.pdf.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
After a lot of Googling, I am able to come up with an answer myself. There is a well-known definition of non-linear orthogonal projections. Roughly, the procedure is as follows:
- In a metric space (e.g. a Hilbert space $H$), choose any non-empty subset $M$, which typically might be a manifold, but need not necessarily be a linear subspace.
- For each element $h in H$, define a so-called distance function $$rho(h,M)=inf_{m in M} ||h-m||$$.
- In the domain of all $h$ that have a unique $m$ (i.e. a perpendicular foot point in $M$), we can define a projection $P$ such that $P(h) = m$.
To point it out explicitly, the properties of $P$ totally depend on the norm $||cdot||$ and on the choice of $M$. As a simple example, let $M$ be the unit circle in the complex plain. Then $P(z)=z/|z|$.
If, as a special case, $M$ is a closed linear subspace of $H$, then $P$ turns out to be a linear orthogonal projection.
For more details, see e.g. http://matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/apm/apm59/apm5911.pdf.
$endgroup$
After a lot of Googling, I am able to come up with an answer myself. There is a well-known definition of non-linear orthogonal projections. Roughly, the procedure is as follows:
- In a metric space (e.g. a Hilbert space $H$), choose any non-empty subset $M$, which typically might be a manifold, but need not necessarily be a linear subspace.
- For each element $h in H$, define a so-called distance function $$rho(h,M)=inf_{m in M} ||h-m||$$.
- In the domain of all $h$ that have a unique $m$ (i.e. a perpendicular foot point in $M$), we can define a projection $P$ such that $P(h) = m$.
To point it out explicitly, the properties of $P$ totally depend on the norm $||cdot||$ and on the choice of $M$. As a simple example, let $M$ be the unit circle in the complex plain. Then $P(z)=z/|z|$.
If, as a special case, $M$ is a closed linear subspace of $H$, then $P$ turns out to be a linear orthogonal projection.
For more details, see e.g. http://matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/apm/apm59/apm5911.pdf.
edited Feb 3 at 10:25
answered Feb 1 at 9:05
user3609959user3609959
212
212
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3092710%2fwhat-exactly-is-a-non-linear-orthogonal-projection%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
No. The term projection in this context is reserved for linear maps
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 29 at 21:13
1
$begingroup$
I would call them like 'nonlinear projections'.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Jan 29 at 21:57
$begingroup$
Moreover, the "space of bounded intregrable functions" isn't (in most cases) a Hilbert space with the usual $L^2$-norm, since it is not complete. Example: $f_n(x) = x^{-1/4} 1_{[1/n,1]}$ converges in $L^2(0,1)$ to $f(x) = x^{-1/4}$.
$endgroup$
– p4sch
Jan 30 at 16:53
$begingroup$
@p4sch Please see my answer below. In fact, any normed vector space will be sufficient to define an orthogonal projection, need not be $L^2$.
$endgroup$
– user3609959
Feb 1 at 9:52