What exactly is a non-linear orthogonal projection?












4












$begingroup$


In a Hilbert space of bounded integrable functions, let $P$ be an operator such that



$$P(f(x)) = frac{f(x)+|f(x)|}{2}$$



The complement of $P$ can be written as $Q = I - P$, hence



$$Q(f(x)) = frac{f(x)-|f(x)|}{2}$$



Both $P$ and $Q$ are idempotent. However, in contrary to many textbook examples, $P$ and $Q$ are not linear, nor are they Hermitian. Still



$$langle P(f(x))|Q(f(x))rangle = 0$$



holds. Are we allowed to call $P$ an orthogonal projection and $Q$ its orthogonal complement?



(Sorry for my inaccurate wording, I am a physicist, not a mathematician.)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No. The term projection in this context is reserved for linear maps
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Jan 29 at 21:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would call them like 'nonlinear projections'.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 29 at 21:57










  • $begingroup$
    Moreover, the "space of bounded intregrable functions" isn't (in most cases) a Hilbert space with the usual $L^2$-norm, since it is not complete. Example: $f_n(x) = x^{-1/4} 1_{[1/n,1]}$ converges in $L^2(0,1)$ to $f(x) = x^{-1/4}$.
    $endgroup$
    – p4sch
    Jan 30 at 16:53












  • $begingroup$
    @p4sch Please see my answer below. In fact, any normed vector space will be sufficient to define an orthogonal projection, need not be $L^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – user3609959
    Feb 1 at 9:52
















4












$begingroup$


In a Hilbert space of bounded integrable functions, let $P$ be an operator such that



$$P(f(x)) = frac{f(x)+|f(x)|}{2}$$



The complement of $P$ can be written as $Q = I - P$, hence



$$Q(f(x)) = frac{f(x)-|f(x)|}{2}$$



Both $P$ and $Q$ are idempotent. However, in contrary to many textbook examples, $P$ and $Q$ are not linear, nor are they Hermitian. Still



$$langle P(f(x))|Q(f(x))rangle = 0$$



holds. Are we allowed to call $P$ an orthogonal projection and $Q$ its orthogonal complement?



(Sorry for my inaccurate wording, I am a physicist, not a mathematician.)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No. The term projection in this context is reserved for linear maps
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Jan 29 at 21:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would call them like 'nonlinear projections'.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 29 at 21:57










  • $begingroup$
    Moreover, the "space of bounded intregrable functions" isn't (in most cases) a Hilbert space with the usual $L^2$-norm, since it is not complete. Example: $f_n(x) = x^{-1/4} 1_{[1/n,1]}$ converges in $L^2(0,1)$ to $f(x) = x^{-1/4}$.
    $endgroup$
    – p4sch
    Jan 30 at 16:53












  • $begingroup$
    @p4sch Please see my answer below. In fact, any normed vector space will be sufficient to define an orthogonal projection, need not be $L^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – user3609959
    Feb 1 at 9:52














4












4








4





$begingroup$


In a Hilbert space of bounded integrable functions, let $P$ be an operator such that



$$P(f(x)) = frac{f(x)+|f(x)|}{2}$$



The complement of $P$ can be written as $Q = I - P$, hence



$$Q(f(x)) = frac{f(x)-|f(x)|}{2}$$



Both $P$ and $Q$ are idempotent. However, in contrary to many textbook examples, $P$ and $Q$ are not linear, nor are they Hermitian. Still



$$langle P(f(x))|Q(f(x))rangle = 0$$



holds. Are we allowed to call $P$ an orthogonal projection and $Q$ its orthogonal complement?



(Sorry for my inaccurate wording, I am a physicist, not a mathematician.)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




In a Hilbert space of bounded integrable functions, let $P$ be an operator such that



$$P(f(x)) = frac{f(x)+|f(x)|}{2}$$



The complement of $P$ can be written as $Q = I - P$, hence



$$Q(f(x)) = frac{f(x)-|f(x)|}{2}$$



Both $P$ and $Q$ are idempotent. However, in contrary to many textbook examples, $P$ and $Q$ are not linear, nor are they Hermitian. Still



$$langle P(f(x))|Q(f(x))rangle = 0$$



holds. Are we allowed to call $P$ an orthogonal projection and $Q$ its orthogonal complement?



(Sorry for my inaccurate wording, I am a physicist, not a mathematician.)







hilbert-spaces projection






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 1 at 9:38







user3609959

















asked Jan 29 at 20:56









user3609959user3609959

212




212








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No. The term projection in this context is reserved for linear maps
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Jan 29 at 21:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would call them like 'nonlinear projections'.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 29 at 21:57










  • $begingroup$
    Moreover, the "space of bounded intregrable functions" isn't (in most cases) a Hilbert space with the usual $L^2$-norm, since it is not complete. Example: $f_n(x) = x^{-1/4} 1_{[1/n,1]}$ converges in $L^2(0,1)$ to $f(x) = x^{-1/4}$.
    $endgroup$
    – p4sch
    Jan 30 at 16:53












  • $begingroup$
    @p4sch Please see my answer below. In fact, any normed vector space will be sufficient to define an orthogonal projection, need not be $L^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – user3609959
    Feb 1 at 9:52














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No. The term projection in this context is reserved for linear maps
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Jan 29 at 21:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would call them like 'nonlinear projections'.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 29 at 21:57










  • $begingroup$
    Moreover, the "space of bounded intregrable functions" isn't (in most cases) a Hilbert space with the usual $L^2$-norm, since it is not complete. Example: $f_n(x) = x^{-1/4} 1_{[1/n,1]}$ converges in $L^2(0,1)$ to $f(x) = x^{-1/4}$.
    $endgroup$
    – p4sch
    Jan 30 at 16:53












  • $begingroup$
    @p4sch Please see my answer below. In fact, any normed vector space will be sufficient to define an orthogonal projection, need not be $L^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – user3609959
    Feb 1 at 9:52








2




2




$begingroup$
No. The term projection in this context is reserved for linear maps
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 29 at 21:13




$begingroup$
No. The term projection in this context is reserved for linear maps
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 29 at 21:13




1




1




$begingroup$
I would call them like 'nonlinear projections'.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Jan 29 at 21:57




$begingroup$
I would call them like 'nonlinear projections'.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Jan 29 at 21:57












$begingroup$
Moreover, the "space of bounded intregrable functions" isn't (in most cases) a Hilbert space with the usual $L^2$-norm, since it is not complete. Example: $f_n(x) = x^{-1/4} 1_{[1/n,1]}$ converges in $L^2(0,1)$ to $f(x) = x^{-1/4}$.
$endgroup$
– p4sch
Jan 30 at 16:53






$begingroup$
Moreover, the "space of bounded intregrable functions" isn't (in most cases) a Hilbert space with the usual $L^2$-norm, since it is not complete. Example: $f_n(x) = x^{-1/4} 1_{[1/n,1]}$ converges in $L^2(0,1)$ to $f(x) = x^{-1/4}$.
$endgroup$
– p4sch
Jan 30 at 16:53














$begingroup$
@p4sch Please see my answer below. In fact, any normed vector space will be sufficient to define an orthogonal projection, need not be $L^2$.
$endgroup$
– user3609959
Feb 1 at 9:52




$begingroup$
@p4sch Please see my answer below. In fact, any normed vector space will be sufficient to define an orthogonal projection, need not be $L^2$.
$endgroup$
– user3609959
Feb 1 at 9:52










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

After a lot of Googling, I am able to come up with an answer myself. There is a well-known definition of non-linear orthogonal projections. Roughly, the procedure is as follows:




  • In a metric space (e.g. a Hilbert space $H$), choose any non-empty subset $M$, which typically might be a manifold, but need not necessarily be a linear subspace.

  • For each element $h in H$, define a so-called distance function $$rho(h,M)=inf_{m in M} ||h-m||$$.

  • In the domain of all $h$ that have a unique $m$ (i.e. a perpendicular foot point in $M$), we can define a projection $P$ such that $P(h) = m$.


To point it out explicitly, the properties of $P$ totally depend on the norm $||cdot||$ and on the choice of $M$. As a simple example, let $M$ be the unit circle in the complex plain. Then $P(z)=z/|z|$.



If, as a special case, $M$ is a closed linear subspace of $H$, then $P$ turns out to be a linear orthogonal projection.



For more details, see e.g. http://matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/apm/apm59/apm5911.pdf.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3092710%2fwhat-exactly-is-a-non-linear-orthogonal-projection%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    After a lot of Googling, I am able to come up with an answer myself. There is a well-known definition of non-linear orthogonal projections. Roughly, the procedure is as follows:




    • In a metric space (e.g. a Hilbert space $H$), choose any non-empty subset $M$, which typically might be a manifold, but need not necessarily be a linear subspace.

    • For each element $h in H$, define a so-called distance function $$rho(h,M)=inf_{m in M} ||h-m||$$.

    • In the domain of all $h$ that have a unique $m$ (i.e. a perpendicular foot point in $M$), we can define a projection $P$ such that $P(h) = m$.


    To point it out explicitly, the properties of $P$ totally depend on the norm $||cdot||$ and on the choice of $M$. As a simple example, let $M$ be the unit circle in the complex plain. Then $P(z)=z/|z|$.



    If, as a special case, $M$ is a closed linear subspace of $H$, then $P$ turns out to be a linear orthogonal projection.



    For more details, see e.g. http://matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/apm/apm59/apm5911.pdf.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      After a lot of Googling, I am able to come up with an answer myself. There is a well-known definition of non-linear orthogonal projections. Roughly, the procedure is as follows:




      • In a metric space (e.g. a Hilbert space $H$), choose any non-empty subset $M$, which typically might be a manifold, but need not necessarily be a linear subspace.

      • For each element $h in H$, define a so-called distance function $$rho(h,M)=inf_{m in M} ||h-m||$$.

      • In the domain of all $h$ that have a unique $m$ (i.e. a perpendicular foot point in $M$), we can define a projection $P$ such that $P(h) = m$.


      To point it out explicitly, the properties of $P$ totally depend on the norm $||cdot||$ and on the choice of $M$. As a simple example, let $M$ be the unit circle in the complex plain. Then $P(z)=z/|z|$.



      If, as a special case, $M$ is a closed linear subspace of $H$, then $P$ turns out to be a linear orthogonal projection.



      For more details, see e.g. http://matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/apm/apm59/apm5911.pdf.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        After a lot of Googling, I am able to come up with an answer myself. There is a well-known definition of non-linear orthogonal projections. Roughly, the procedure is as follows:




        • In a metric space (e.g. a Hilbert space $H$), choose any non-empty subset $M$, which typically might be a manifold, but need not necessarily be a linear subspace.

        • For each element $h in H$, define a so-called distance function $$rho(h,M)=inf_{m in M} ||h-m||$$.

        • In the domain of all $h$ that have a unique $m$ (i.e. a perpendicular foot point in $M$), we can define a projection $P$ such that $P(h) = m$.


        To point it out explicitly, the properties of $P$ totally depend on the norm $||cdot||$ and on the choice of $M$. As a simple example, let $M$ be the unit circle in the complex plain. Then $P(z)=z/|z|$.



        If, as a special case, $M$ is a closed linear subspace of $H$, then $P$ turns out to be a linear orthogonal projection.



        For more details, see e.g. http://matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/apm/apm59/apm5911.pdf.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        After a lot of Googling, I am able to come up with an answer myself. There is a well-known definition of non-linear orthogonal projections. Roughly, the procedure is as follows:




        • In a metric space (e.g. a Hilbert space $H$), choose any non-empty subset $M$, which typically might be a manifold, but need not necessarily be a linear subspace.

        • For each element $h in H$, define a so-called distance function $$rho(h,M)=inf_{m in M} ||h-m||$$.

        • In the domain of all $h$ that have a unique $m$ (i.e. a perpendicular foot point in $M$), we can define a projection $P$ such that $P(h) = m$.


        To point it out explicitly, the properties of $P$ totally depend on the norm $||cdot||$ and on the choice of $M$. As a simple example, let $M$ be the unit circle in the complex plain. Then $P(z)=z/|z|$.



        If, as a special case, $M$ is a closed linear subspace of $H$, then $P$ turns out to be a linear orthogonal projection.



        For more details, see e.g. http://matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/apm/apm59/apm5911.pdf.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Feb 3 at 10:25

























        answered Feb 1 at 9:05









        user3609959user3609959

        212




        212






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3092710%2fwhat-exactly-is-a-non-linear-orthogonal-projection%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

            Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory