You see a row of 5 trees, each one 20 meters from the next. How long is the row?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm thinking of this problem in 2 ways.
There's 5 trees, each the same width $X$. This leaves 4 inner "gaps" of $20$ meters in length? So, my answer would be $(20 times 4) + (5times X)$ or rather $80 + 5x$
If there's 2 trees, from each end including the inner gap is $20$ meters. If there's 3 trees, then it from tree one to tree three would be $40$ meters. Going by this 4 trees would be $60$ meters, and 5 trees would be $80$ meters. Not sure what this would be in the form of an equation.
Thoughts on what is more valid? And any tips regarding how to interpret similar questions?
problem-solving
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm thinking of this problem in 2 ways.
There's 5 trees, each the same width $X$. This leaves 4 inner "gaps" of $20$ meters in length? So, my answer would be $(20 times 4) + (5times X)$ or rather $80 + 5x$
If there's 2 trees, from each end including the inner gap is $20$ meters. If there's 3 trees, then it from tree one to tree three would be $40$ meters. Going by this 4 trees would be $60$ meters, and 5 trees would be $80$ meters. Not sure what this would be in the form of an equation.
Thoughts on what is more valid? And any tips regarding how to interpret similar questions?
problem-solving
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm thinking of this problem in 2 ways.
There's 5 trees, each the same width $X$. This leaves 4 inner "gaps" of $20$ meters in length? So, my answer would be $(20 times 4) + (5times X)$ or rather $80 + 5x$
If there's 2 trees, from each end including the inner gap is $20$ meters. If there's 3 trees, then it from tree one to tree three would be $40$ meters. Going by this 4 trees would be $60$ meters, and 5 trees would be $80$ meters. Not sure what this would be in the form of an equation.
Thoughts on what is more valid? And any tips regarding how to interpret similar questions?
problem-solving
I'm thinking of this problem in 2 ways.
There's 5 trees, each the same width $X$. This leaves 4 inner "gaps" of $20$ meters in length? So, my answer would be $(20 times 4) + (5times X)$ or rather $80 + 5x$
If there's 2 trees, from each end including the inner gap is $20$ meters. If there's 3 trees, then it from tree one to tree three would be $40$ meters. Going by this 4 trees would be $60$ meters, and 5 trees would be $80$ meters. Not sure what this would be in the form of an equation.
Thoughts on what is more valid? And any tips regarding how to interpret similar questions?
problem-solving
problem-solving
asked yesterday
Ludwigthestud
757
757
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You get the same answer in both cases - 80 meters - except in one case you account for the width of the trees, and in the other you don't.
The question as stated isn't clear how it counts the width of the trees, and as stated it probably assumes it's negligible compared to the width of the gaps (a reasonable assumption in reality as well).
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You get the same answer in both cases - 80 meters - except in one case you account for the width of the trees, and in the other you don't.
The question as stated isn't clear how it counts the width of the trees, and as stated it probably assumes it's negligible compared to the width of the gaps (a reasonable assumption in reality as well).
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You get the same answer in both cases - 80 meters - except in one case you account for the width of the trees, and in the other you don't.
The question as stated isn't clear how it counts the width of the trees, and as stated it probably assumes it's negligible compared to the width of the gaps (a reasonable assumption in reality as well).
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You get the same answer in both cases - 80 meters - except in one case you account for the width of the trees, and in the other you don't.
The question as stated isn't clear how it counts the width of the trees, and as stated it probably assumes it's negligible compared to the width of the gaps (a reasonable assumption in reality as well).
You get the same answer in both cases - 80 meters - except in one case you account for the width of the trees, and in the other you don't.
The question as stated isn't clear how it counts the width of the trees, and as stated it probably assumes it's negligible compared to the width of the gaps (a reasonable assumption in reality as well).
answered yesterday
Y. Forman
11.3k423
11.3k423
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005246%2fyou-see-a-row-of-5-trees-each-one-20-meters-from-the-next-how-long-is-the-row%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown