Are all matrices almost diagonalizable?












0












$begingroup$


Every real $2$ by $2$ matrix that is not diagonalizable is similar to the $2$ by $2$ jordan canonical form,



$$
J_2=begin{bmatrix}s&1\0&send{bmatrix},
$$



where $s$ is the eigenvalue (with multiplicity $2$). My question: Is $J_2$ almost diagonalizable? I mean is it similar to



$$
begin{bmatrix}s&epsilon\0&send{bmatrix}
$$



for every $epsilon>0$ no matter how small? And what happens in higher dimensions, is every matrix similar to an arbitrarily close to diagonal matrix?



My guess is yes but I just can't find the similarity transformation. It could be something very simple.



Thanks in advance, all ideas welcome.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Every real $2$ by $2$ matrix that is not diagonalizable is similar to the $2$ by $2$ jordan canonical form,



    $$
    J_2=begin{bmatrix}s&1\0&send{bmatrix},
    $$



    where $s$ is the eigenvalue (with multiplicity $2$). My question: Is $J_2$ almost diagonalizable? I mean is it similar to



    $$
    begin{bmatrix}s&epsilon\0&send{bmatrix}
    $$



    for every $epsilon>0$ no matter how small? And what happens in higher dimensions, is every matrix similar to an arbitrarily close to diagonal matrix?



    My guess is yes but I just can't find the similarity transformation. It could be something very simple.



    Thanks in advance, all ideas welcome.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Every real $2$ by $2$ matrix that is not diagonalizable is similar to the $2$ by $2$ jordan canonical form,



      $$
      J_2=begin{bmatrix}s&1\0&send{bmatrix},
      $$



      where $s$ is the eigenvalue (with multiplicity $2$). My question: Is $J_2$ almost diagonalizable? I mean is it similar to



      $$
      begin{bmatrix}s&epsilon\0&send{bmatrix}
      $$



      for every $epsilon>0$ no matter how small? And what happens in higher dimensions, is every matrix similar to an arbitrarily close to diagonal matrix?



      My guess is yes but I just can't find the similarity transformation. It could be something very simple.



      Thanks in advance, all ideas welcome.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Every real $2$ by $2$ matrix that is not diagonalizable is similar to the $2$ by $2$ jordan canonical form,



      $$
      J_2=begin{bmatrix}s&1\0&send{bmatrix},
      $$



      where $s$ is the eigenvalue (with multiplicity $2$). My question: Is $J_2$ almost diagonalizable? I mean is it similar to



      $$
      begin{bmatrix}s&epsilon\0&send{bmatrix}
      $$



      for every $epsilon>0$ no matter how small? And what happens in higher dimensions, is every matrix similar to an arbitrarily close to diagonal matrix?



      My guess is yes but I just can't find the similarity transformation. It could be something very simple.



      Thanks in advance, all ideas welcome.







      linear-algebra matrices geometry eigenvalues-eigenvectors diagonalization






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 18 at 10:47









      Rodrigo de Azevedo

      13.1k41959




      13.1k41959










      asked Jan 18 at 10:17









      plus1plus1

      3911




      3911






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Yes, this is true and you gave the answer almost by yourself. The key is the Jordan normal form. To get $epsilon$ instead of $1$, you just need to take the Jordan normal form of $frac{1}{epsilon}A$ and then multiply by $epsilon$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Nice one! thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – plus1
            Jan 18 at 10:34



















          1












          $begingroup$

          Not all real matrices are close to matrices diagonalizable over $mathbb{R}$; there are open sets on which every matrix has irreducible quadratic factors.



          For example, $begin{bmatrix}0&1\-1&0end{bmatrix}$ is not diagonalizable over $mathbb{R}$, because its characteristic polynomial $x^2+1$ doesn't factor. Moreover, adding anything with coefficients less than $frac13$ won't change that; the discriminant will still be negative.



          Over $mathbb{C}$, where every polynomial factors, the answer is yes; we can perturb the matrix slightly by adding small random elements to the diagonal so that the eigenvalues all become different.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            Yes, it is true. For every $ntimes n$ matrix $A$ and for every $varepsilon>0$, there is some diagonal matrix $D$ such that $A$ is similar to a matrix $D^star$ such that $lVert D-D^starrVert<varepsilon$. Here$$lVert MrVert=sqrt{sum_{i,j=1}^nlvert m_{ij}rvert^2},$$if $M=(m_{ij})_{1leqslant i,jleqslant n}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              I guess it's also true for any other norm. I buy that but how do you prove it?
              $endgroup$
              – plus1
              Jan 18 at 10:35












            • $begingroup$
              On a finite dimensional real vector space, all norms are equivalente. So, yes, if it holds for one of them, it holds for all of them. Concerning a proof, your idea is good: consider Jordan matrices with the $1$'s above the main diagonal replaced by a tiny real number.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              Jan 18 at 10:45











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3078056%2fare-all-matrices-almost-diagonalizable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Yes, this is true and you gave the answer almost by yourself. The key is the Jordan normal form. To get $epsilon$ instead of $1$, you just need to take the Jordan normal form of $frac{1}{epsilon}A$ and then multiply by $epsilon$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Nice one! thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – plus1
              Jan 18 at 10:34
















            2












            $begingroup$

            Yes, this is true and you gave the answer almost by yourself. The key is the Jordan normal form. To get $epsilon$ instead of $1$, you just need to take the Jordan normal form of $frac{1}{epsilon}A$ and then multiply by $epsilon$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Nice one! thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – plus1
              Jan 18 at 10:34














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Yes, this is true and you gave the answer almost by yourself. The key is the Jordan normal form. To get $epsilon$ instead of $1$, you just need to take the Jordan normal form of $frac{1}{epsilon}A$ and then multiply by $epsilon$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Yes, this is true and you gave the answer almost by yourself. The key is the Jordan normal form. To get $epsilon$ instead of $1$, you just need to take the Jordan normal form of $frac{1}{epsilon}A$ and then multiply by $epsilon$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jan 18 at 10:20









            KlausKlaus

            2,0099




            2,0099












            • $begingroup$
              Nice one! thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – plus1
              Jan 18 at 10:34


















            • $begingroup$
              Nice one! thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – plus1
              Jan 18 at 10:34
















            $begingroup$
            Nice one! thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – plus1
            Jan 18 at 10:34




            $begingroup$
            Nice one! thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – plus1
            Jan 18 at 10:34











            1












            $begingroup$

            Not all real matrices are close to matrices diagonalizable over $mathbb{R}$; there are open sets on which every matrix has irreducible quadratic factors.



            For example, $begin{bmatrix}0&1\-1&0end{bmatrix}$ is not diagonalizable over $mathbb{R}$, because its characteristic polynomial $x^2+1$ doesn't factor. Moreover, adding anything with coefficients less than $frac13$ won't change that; the discriminant will still be negative.



            Over $mathbb{C}$, where every polynomial factors, the answer is yes; we can perturb the matrix slightly by adding small random elements to the diagonal so that the eigenvalues all become different.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Not all real matrices are close to matrices diagonalizable over $mathbb{R}$; there are open sets on which every matrix has irreducible quadratic factors.



              For example, $begin{bmatrix}0&1\-1&0end{bmatrix}$ is not diagonalizable over $mathbb{R}$, because its characteristic polynomial $x^2+1$ doesn't factor. Moreover, adding anything with coefficients less than $frac13$ won't change that; the discriminant will still be negative.



              Over $mathbb{C}$, where every polynomial factors, the answer is yes; we can perturb the matrix slightly by adding small random elements to the diagonal so that the eigenvalues all become different.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Not all real matrices are close to matrices diagonalizable over $mathbb{R}$; there are open sets on which every matrix has irreducible quadratic factors.



                For example, $begin{bmatrix}0&1\-1&0end{bmatrix}$ is not diagonalizable over $mathbb{R}$, because its characteristic polynomial $x^2+1$ doesn't factor. Moreover, adding anything with coefficients less than $frac13$ won't change that; the discriminant will still be negative.



                Over $mathbb{C}$, where every polynomial factors, the answer is yes; we can perturb the matrix slightly by adding small random elements to the diagonal so that the eigenvalues all become different.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Not all real matrices are close to matrices diagonalizable over $mathbb{R}$; there are open sets on which every matrix has irreducible quadratic factors.



                For example, $begin{bmatrix}0&1\-1&0end{bmatrix}$ is not diagonalizable over $mathbb{R}$, because its characteristic polynomial $x^2+1$ doesn't factor. Moreover, adding anything with coefficients less than $frac13$ won't change that; the discriminant will still be negative.



                Over $mathbb{C}$, where every polynomial factors, the answer is yes; we can perturb the matrix slightly by adding small random elements to the diagonal so that the eigenvalues all become different.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 18 at 10:52









                jmerryjmerry

                10.8k1225




                10.8k1225























                    0












                    $begingroup$

                    Yes, it is true. For every $ntimes n$ matrix $A$ and for every $varepsilon>0$, there is some diagonal matrix $D$ such that $A$ is similar to a matrix $D^star$ such that $lVert D-D^starrVert<varepsilon$. Here$$lVert MrVert=sqrt{sum_{i,j=1}^nlvert m_{ij}rvert^2},$$if $M=(m_{ij})_{1leqslant i,jleqslant n}$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      I guess it's also true for any other norm. I buy that but how do you prove it?
                      $endgroup$
                      – plus1
                      Jan 18 at 10:35












                    • $begingroup$
                      On a finite dimensional real vector space, all norms are equivalente. So, yes, if it holds for one of them, it holds for all of them. Concerning a proof, your idea is good: consider Jordan matrices with the $1$'s above the main diagonal replaced by a tiny real number.
                      $endgroup$
                      – José Carlos Santos
                      Jan 18 at 10:45
















                    0












                    $begingroup$

                    Yes, it is true. For every $ntimes n$ matrix $A$ and for every $varepsilon>0$, there is some diagonal matrix $D$ such that $A$ is similar to a matrix $D^star$ such that $lVert D-D^starrVert<varepsilon$. Here$$lVert MrVert=sqrt{sum_{i,j=1}^nlvert m_{ij}rvert^2},$$if $M=(m_{ij})_{1leqslant i,jleqslant n}$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      I guess it's also true for any other norm. I buy that but how do you prove it?
                      $endgroup$
                      – plus1
                      Jan 18 at 10:35












                    • $begingroup$
                      On a finite dimensional real vector space, all norms are equivalente. So, yes, if it holds for one of them, it holds for all of them. Concerning a proof, your idea is good: consider Jordan matrices with the $1$'s above the main diagonal replaced by a tiny real number.
                      $endgroup$
                      – José Carlos Santos
                      Jan 18 at 10:45














                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    Yes, it is true. For every $ntimes n$ matrix $A$ and for every $varepsilon>0$, there is some diagonal matrix $D$ such that $A$ is similar to a matrix $D^star$ such that $lVert D-D^starrVert<varepsilon$. Here$$lVert MrVert=sqrt{sum_{i,j=1}^nlvert m_{ij}rvert^2},$$if $M=(m_{ij})_{1leqslant i,jleqslant n}$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    Yes, it is true. For every $ntimes n$ matrix $A$ and for every $varepsilon>0$, there is some diagonal matrix $D$ such that $A$ is similar to a matrix $D^star$ such that $lVert D-D^starrVert<varepsilon$. Here$$lVert MrVert=sqrt{sum_{i,j=1}^nlvert m_{ij}rvert^2},$$if $M=(m_{ij})_{1leqslant i,jleqslant n}$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Jan 18 at 10:26









                    José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

                    164k22131234




                    164k22131234












                    • $begingroup$
                      I guess it's also true for any other norm. I buy that but how do you prove it?
                      $endgroup$
                      – plus1
                      Jan 18 at 10:35












                    • $begingroup$
                      On a finite dimensional real vector space, all norms are equivalente. So, yes, if it holds for one of them, it holds for all of them. Concerning a proof, your idea is good: consider Jordan matrices with the $1$'s above the main diagonal replaced by a tiny real number.
                      $endgroup$
                      – José Carlos Santos
                      Jan 18 at 10:45


















                    • $begingroup$
                      I guess it's also true for any other norm. I buy that but how do you prove it?
                      $endgroup$
                      – plus1
                      Jan 18 at 10:35












                    • $begingroup$
                      On a finite dimensional real vector space, all norms are equivalente. So, yes, if it holds for one of them, it holds for all of them. Concerning a proof, your idea is good: consider Jordan matrices with the $1$'s above the main diagonal replaced by a tiny real number.
                      $endgroup$
                      – José Carlos Santos
                      Jan 18 at 10:45
















                    $begingroup$
                    I guess it's also true for any other norm. I buy that but how do you prove it?
                    $endgroup$
                    – plus1
                    Jan 18 at 10:35






                    $begingroup$
                    I guess it's also true for any other norm. I buy that but how do you prove it?
                    $endgroup$
                    – plus1
                    Jan 18 at 10:35














                    $begingroup$
                    On a finite dimensional real vector space, all norms are equivalente. So, yes, if it holds for one of them, it holds for all of them. Concerning a proof, your idea is good: consider Jordan matrices with the $1$'s above the main diagonal replaced by a tiny real number.
                    $endgroup$
                    – José Carlos Santos
                    Jan 18 at 10:45




                    $begingroup$
                    On a finite dimensional real vector space, all norms are equivalente. So, yes, if it holds for one of them, it holds for all of them. Concerning a proof, your idea is good: consider Jordan matrices with the $1$'s above the main diagonal replaced by a tiny real number.
                    $endgroup$
                    – José Carlos Santos
                    Jan 18 at 10:45


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3078056%2fare-all-matrices-almost-diagonalizable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                    How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                    in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith