If $X$ is a real normed linear space, then $B(0,r)=r B(0,1)$












0












$begingroup$


If $X$ is a real normed linear space, I want to prove that $$B_{r}(0)=r B_{1}(0)$$



My proof



Let $zin rB(0,1)$, there exists $xin B(0,1)$ such that $z=rx$.



$$|z-0|=|rx-0|=r|x-0|<r$$
So, $zin B(0,r)$ and $$rB(0,1)subseteq B(0,r).$$
On the other hand, let $zin B(0,r)$, then $|z-0|<r$. This implies that
$$bigg|dfrac{z}{r}-0bigg|<1.$$
Thus, $dfrac{z}{r}in B(0,1)$ and there exists $xin B(0,1)$ such that
$$dfrac{z}{r}=xiff z=rx in rB(0,1)$$
Hence, $$ B(0,r) subseteq rB(0,1).$$
Therefore,
$$ B(0,r) = rB(0,1).$$



Question



Kindly help check if my proof is correct.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    If $X$ is a real normed linear space, I want to prove that $$B_{r}(0)=r B_{1}(0)$$



    My proof



    Let $zin rB(0,1)$, there exists $xin B(0,1)$ such that $z=rx$.



    $$|z-0|=|rx-0|=r|x-0|<r$$
    So, $zin B(0,r)$ and $$rB(0,1)subseteq B(0,r).$$
    On the other hand, let $zin B(0,r)$, then $|z-0|<r$. This implies that
    $$bigg|dfrac{z}{r}-0bigg|<1.$$
    Thus, $dfrac{z}{r}in B(0,1)$ and there exists $xin B(0,1)$ such that
    $$dfrac{z}{r}=xiff z=rx in rB(0,1)$$
    Hence, $$ B(0,r) subseteq rB(0,1).$$
    Therefore,
    $$ B(0,r) = rB(0,1).$$



    Question



    Kindly help check if my proof is correct.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0


      1



      $begingroup$


      If $X$ is a real normed linear space, I want to prove that $$B_{r}(0)=r B_{1}(0)$$



      My proof



      Let $zin rB(0,1)$, there exists $xin B(0,1)$ such that $z=rx$.



      $$|z-0|=|rx-0|=r|x-0|<r$$
      So, $zin B(0,r)$ and $$rB(0,1)subseteq B(0,r).$$
      On the other hand, let $zin B(0,r)$, then $|z-0|<r$. This implies that
      $$bigg|dfrac{z}{r}-0bigg|<1.$$
      Thus, $dfrac{z}{r}in B(0,1)$ and there exists $xin B(0,1)$ such that
      $$dfrac{z}{r}=xiff z=rx in rB(0,1)$$
      Hence, $$ B(0,r) subseteq rB(0,1).$$
      Therefore,
      $$ B(0,r) = rB(0,1).$$



      Question



      Kindly help check if my proof is correct.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      If $X$ is a real normed linear space, I want to prove that $$B_{r}(0)=r B_{1}(0)$$



      My proof



      Let $zin rB(0,1)$, there exists $xin B(0,1)$ such that $z=rx$.



      $$|z-0|=|rx-0|=r|x-0|<r$$
      So, $zin B(0,r)$ and $$rB(0,1)subseteq B(0,r).$$
      On the other hand, let $zin B(0,r)$, then $|z-0|<r$. This implies that
      $$bigg|dfrac{z}{r}-0bigg|<1.$$
      Thus, $dfrac{z}{r}in B(0,1)$ and there exists $xin B(0,1)$ such that
      $$dfrac{z}{r}=xiff z=rx in rB(0,1)$$
      Hence, $$ B(0,r) subseteq rB(0,1).$$
      Therefore,
      $$ B(0,r) = rB(0,1).$$



      Question



      Kindly help check if my proof is correct.







      general-topology functional-analysis metric-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 18 at 14:02







      Omojola Micheal

















      asked Jan 18 at 11:30









      Omojola MichealOmojola Micheal

      1,918324




      1,918324






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          The proof is totally fine. I would have written it thusly:



          Suppose $r>0$.
          Let $x in B_r(0)$. Then define $y=frac{1}{r}cdot x$. Then



          $$|y-0| = |y|=frac{1}{r}|x|= frac{1}{r}|x-0|< frac{1}{r} cdot r = 1$$



          so that $y in B_1(0)$ and as $rcdot y = r cdot (frac{1}{r}cdot x)= (r frac{1}{r}) cdot x = 1cdot x = x$, we have that $x in rB_1(0)$. So $B_r(0) subseteq rB_1(0)$.



          On the other hand, if $xin rB_1(0)$ then $x=ry$ for some $y in B_1(0)$ and then



          $$|x-0|=|x|=|ry| = r|y| < r cdot 1= r$$ and so $x in B_r(0)$. So the other inclusion $rB_1(0) subseteq B_r(0)$ also holds.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks a lot, Henno Brandsma! (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – Omojola Micheal
            Jan 18 at 20:23



















          3












          $begingroup$

          Your proof is fine. Everything is O.K.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks a lot (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – Omojola Micheal
            Jan 18 at 15:05











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3078126%2fif-x-is-a-real-normed-linear-space-then-b0-r-r-b0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          The proof is totally fine. I would have written it thusly:



          Suppose $r>0$.
          Let $x in B_r(0)$. Then define $y=frac{1}{r}cdot x$. Then



          $$|y-0| = |y|=frac{1}{r}|x|= frac{1}{r}|x-0|< frac{1}{r} cdot r = 1$$



          so that $y in B_1(0)$ and as $rcdot y = r cdot (frac{1}{r}cdot x)= (r frac{1}{r}) cdot x = 1cdot x = x$, we have that $x in rB_1(0)$. So $B_r(0) subseteq rB_1(0)$.



          On the other hand, if $xin rB_1(0)$ then $x=ry$ for some $y in B_1(0)$ and then



          $$|x-0|=|x|=|ry| = r|y| < r cdot 1= r$$ and so $x in B_r(0)$. So the other inclusion $rB_1(0) subseteq B_r(0)$ also holds.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks a lot, Henno Brandsma! (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – Omojola Micheal
            Jan 18 at 20:23
















          1












          $begingroup$

          The proof is totally fine. I would have written it thusly:



          Suppose $r>0$.
          Let $x in B_r(0)$. Then define $y=frac{1}{r}cdot x$. Then



          $$|y-0| = |y|=frac{1}{r}|x|= frac{1}{r}|x-0|< frac{1}{r} cdot r = 1$$



          so that $y in B_1(0)$ and as $rcdot y = r cdot (frac{1}{r}cdot x)= (r frac{1}{r}) cdot x = 1cdot x = x$, we have that $x in rB_1(0)$. So $B_r(0) subseteq rB_1(0)$.



          On the other hand, if $xin rB_1(0)$ then $x=ry$ for some $y in B_1(0)$ and then



          $$|x-0|=|x|=|ry| = r|y| < r cdot 1= r$$ and so $x in B_r(0)$. So the other inclusion $rB_1(0) subseteq B_r(0)$ also holds.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks a lot, Henno Brandsma! (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – Omojola Micheal
            Jan 18 at 20:23














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          The proof is totally fine. I would have written it thusly:



          Suppose $r>0$.
          Let $x in B_r(0)$. Then define $y=frac{1}{r}cdot x$. Then



          $$|y-0| = |y|=frac{1}{r}|x|= frac{1}{r}|x-0|< frac{1}{r} cdot r = 1$$



          so that $y in B_1(0)$ and as $rcdot y = r cdot (frac{1}{r}cdot x)= (r frac{1}{r}) cdot x = 1cdot x = x$, we have that $x in rB_1(0)$. So $B_r(0) subseteq rB_1(0)$.



          On the other hand, if $xin rB_1(0)$ then $x=ry$ for some $y in B_1(0)$ and then



          $$|x-0|=|x|=|ry| = r|y| < r cdot 1= r$$ and so $x in B_r(0)$. So the other inclusion $rB_1(0) subseteq B_r(0)$ also holds.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The proof is totally fine. I would have written it thusly:



          Suppose $r>0$.
          Let $x in B_r(0)$. Then define $y=frac{1}{r}cdot x$. Then



          $$|y-0| = |y|=frac{1}{r}|x|= frac{1}{r}|x-0|< frac{1}{r} cdot r = 1$$



          so that $y in B_1(0)$ and as $rcdot y = r cdot (frac{1}{r}cdot x)= (r frac{1}{r}) cdot x = 1cdot x = x$, we have that $x in rB_1(0)$. So $B_r(0) subseteq rB_1(0)$.



          On the other hand, if $xin rB_1(0)$ then $x=ry$ for some $y in B_1(0)$ and then



          $$|x-0|=|x|=|ry| = r|y| < r cdot 1= r$$ and so $x in B_r(0)$. So the other inclusion $rB_1(0) subseteq B_r(0)$ also holds.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 18 at 18:05









          Henno BrandsmaHenno Brandsma

          111k348118




          111k348118












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks a lot, Henno Brandsma! (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – Omojola Micheal
            Jan 18 at 20:23


















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks a lot, Henno Brandsma! (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – Omojola Micheal
            Jan 18 at 20:23
















          $begingroup$
          Thanks a lot, Henno Brandsma! (+1)
          $endgroup$
          – Omojola Micheal
          Jan 18 at 20:23




          $begingroup$
          Thanks a lot, Henno Brandsma! (+1)
          $endgroup$
          – Omojola Micheal
          Jan 18 at 20:23











          3












          $begingroup$

          Your proof is fine. Everything is O.K.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks a lot (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – Omojola Micheal
            Jan 18 at 15:05
















          3












          $begingroup$

          Your proof is fine. Everything is O.K.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks a lot (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – Omojola Micheal
            Jan 18 at 15:05














          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Your proof is fine. Everything is O.K.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Your proof is fine. Everything is O.K.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 18 at 11:45









          FredFred

          47k1848




          47k1848












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks a lot (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – Omojola Micheal
            Jan 18 at 15:05


















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks a lot (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – Omojola Micheal
            Jan 18 at 15:05
















          $begingroup$
          Thanks a lot (+1)
          $endgroup$
          – Omojola Micheal
          Jan 18 at 15:05




          $begingroup$
          Thanks a lot (+1)
          $endgroup$
          – Omojola Micheal
          Jan 18 at 15:05


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3078126%2fif-x-is-a-real-normed-linear-space-then-b0-r-r-b0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

          in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith