Solving the Airy Equation using Laplace Transform












1












$begingroup$


I have been trying to read the book Airy Functions and Applications to Physics, Olivier Vallee & Manuel Soares, for research on the Airy Functions, but I am stuck on using the Laplace transform to solve the Airy equation to get the function in the correct form.



The book states (pg 5):




We consider the following homogeneous second order differential equation called the Airy's equation $$y''-xy=0.$$ This differential equation may be solved by the method of Laplace, i.e. in seeking a solution as an integral $$y=int_C e^{xz}v(z)dz,$$ this is equivalent to solve the first order differential equation $$ v'+z^2v=0.$$ We thus obtain the solution to the Airy's equation, except a normalisation constant, $$y=int_C e^{xz-z^3/3}dz.$$




Below is my working:



Using the suggestion to find a solution to the Airy Equation $y''-xy=0$ in the form $y=int_Ce^{xz}v(z)dz$, the first step would be to differentiate the expression for $y$ to find $y'$ & $y''$:



$$frac{dy}{dx}=int ze^{xz}v(z)dz,$$
$$frac{d^2y}{dx^2}=int z^2e^{xz}v(z)dz.$$



Then,



$$int z^2e^{xz}v(z)dz-xint e^{xz}v(z)dz=0,$$ so
$$int e^{xz}v(z)(z^2-x)dz=0.$$



Then I tried to use integration by parts with $u=(z^2-x)v(z)=z^2v(z)-xv(z)$, so $frac{du}{dz}=2zv(z)+z^2v'(z)-xv'(z)=2zv(z)+v'(z)(z^2-x)$, and $frac{dv}{dz}=e^{xz}$, so $v=frac{1}{z}e^{xz}$.
Following through with this gives:



$$v(z)(z^2-x)frac{1}{z}e^{xz}-int(2zv(z)+v'(z)(z^2-x))frac{1}{z}e^{xz}dz=0.$$



This (sort of) simplified to:



$$v(z)frac{left(z^2-xright)e^{xz}}{z}-int 2v(z)e^{xz}+v'(z)frac{left(z^2-xright)e^{xz}}{z}dz=0.$$



At this point, I tried to differentiate this expression to reach the form $v'+z^2v=0$:



$$frac{d}{dz}left(zv(z)e^{xz}-frac{xv(z)e^{xz}}{z}-int 2v(z)e^{xz}dz-int zv'(z)e^{xz}dz+intfrac{xv'(z)e^{xz}}{z}dzright)=0,$$



which gives



$$v(z)e^{xz}+zv'(z)e^{xz}+xzv(z)e^{xz}-frac{xv(z)e^{xz}}{z^2}-frac{xv'(x)e^{xz}}{z}-frac{x^2v(z)e^{xz}}{z}-2v(z)e^{xz}-zv'(z)e^{xz}+frac{xv'(z)e^{xz}}{z}=0.$$



The $e^{xz}$ terms all cancel through, leaving:



$$v(z)+zv'(z)+xzv(z)-frac{xv(z)}{z^2}-frac{xv'(z)}{z}-frac{x^2v(z)}{z}-2v(z)-zv'(z)+frac{xv'(z)}{z}=0.$$



From here, I removed the fractions:



$$z^2v(z)+z^3v'(z)+xz^3v(z)-xv(z)-xzv'(z)-x^2zv(z)-2z^2v(z)-z^3v'(z)+xzv'(z)=0,$$



and collected the $v(z)$ and $v'(z)$ terms:



$$v(z)left(z^2+xz^3-x-x^2z-2z^2right)+v'(z)left(z^3-xz-z^3+xzright)=0,$$



which leaves:



$$left(xz^3-z^2-x^2z-xright)v(z)=0.$$



This clearly does not match the form given from the book ($v'+z^2v=0$), but I cannot see where I have made the mistake.



Is my mistake something obvious I am missing, could it be due to the nature of the complex function (and if so, what), or is my error deeper? Any help would be much appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I have been trying to read the book Airy Functions and Applications to Physics, Olivier Vallee & Manuel Soares, for research on the Airy Functions, but I am stuck on using the Laplace transform to solve the Airy equation to get the function in the correct form.



    The book states (pg 5):




    We consider the following homogeneous second order differential equation called the Airy's equation $$y''-xy=0.$$ This differential equation may be solved by the method of Laplace, i.e. in seeking a solution as an integral $$y=int_C e^{xz}v(z)dz,$$ this is equivalent to solve the first order differential equation $$ v'+z^2v=0.$$ We thus obtain the solution to the Airy's equation, except a normalisation constant, $$y=int_C e^{xz-z^3/3}dz.$$




    Below is my working:



    Using the suggestion to find a solution to the Airy Equation $y''-xy=0$ in the form $y=int_Ce^{xz}v(z)dz$, the first step would be to differentiate the expression for $y$ to find $y'$ & $y''$:



    $$frac{dy}{dx}=int ze^{xz}v(z)dz,$$
    $$frac{d^2y}{dx^2}=int z^2e^{xz}v(z)dz.$$



    Then,



    $$int z^2e^{xz}v(z)dz-xint e^{xz}v(z)dz=0,$$ so
    $$int e^{xz}v(z)(z^2-x)dz=0.$$



    Then I tried to use integration by parts with $u=(z^2-x)v(z)=z^2v(z)-xv(z)$, so $frac{du}{dz}=2zv(z)+z^2v'(z)-xv'(z)=2zv(z)+v'(z)(z^2-x)$, and $frac{dv}{dz}=e^{xz}$, so $v=frac{1}{z}e^{xz}$.
    Following through with this gives:



    $$v(z)(z^2-x)frac{1}{z}e^{xz}-int(2zv(z)+v'(z)(z^2-x))frac{1}{z}e^{xz}dz=0.$$



    This (sort of) simplified to:



    $$v(z)frac{left(z^2-xright)e^{xz}}{z}-int 2v(z)e^{xz}+v'(z)frac{left(z^2-xright)e^{xz}}{z}dz=0.$$



    At this point, I tried to differentiate this expression to reach the form $v'+z^2v=0$:



    $$frac{d}{dz}left(zv(z)e^{xz}-frac{xv(z)e^{xz}}{z}-int 2v(z)e^{xz}dz-int zv'(z)e^{xz}dz+intfrac{xv'(z)e^{xz}}{z}dzright)=0,$$



    which gives



    $$v(z)e^{xz}+zv'(z)e^{xz}+xzv(z)e^{xz}-frac{xv(z)e^{xz}}{z^2}-frac{xv'(x)e^{xz}}{z}-frac{x^2v(z)e^{xz}}{z}-2v(z)e^{xz}-zv'(z)e^{xz}+frac{xv'(z)e^{xz}}{z}=0.$$



    The $e^{xz}$ terms all cancel through, leaving:



    $$v(z)+zv'(z)+xzv(z)-frac{xv(z)}{z^2}-frac{xv'(z)}{z}-frac{x^2v(z)}{z}-2v(z)-zv'(z)+frac{xv'(z)}{z}=0.$$



    From here, I removed the fractions:



    $$z^2v(z)+z^3v'(z)+xz^3v(z)-xv(z)-xzv'(z)-x^2zv(z)-2z^2v(z)-z^3v'(z)+xzv'(z)=0,$$



    and collected the $v(z)$ and $v'(z)$ terms:



    $$v(z)left(z^2+xz^3-x-x^2z-2z^2right)+v'(z)left(z^3-xz-z^3+xzright)=0,$$



    which leaves:



    $$left(xz^3-z^2-x^2z-xright)v(z)=0.$$



    This clearly does not match the form given from the book ($v'+z^2v=0$), but I cannot see where I have made the mistake.



    Is my mistake something obvious I am missing, could it be due to the nature of the complex function (and if so, what), or is my error deeper? Any help would be much appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$


      I have been trying to read the book Airy Functions and Applications to Physics, Olivier Vallee & Manuel Soares, for research on the Airy Functions, but I am stuck on using the Laplace transform to solve the Airy equation to get the function in the correct form.



      The book states (pg 5):




      We consider the following homogeneous second order differential equation called the Airy's equation $$y''-xy=0.$$ This differential equation may be solved by the method of Laplace, i.e. in seeking a solution as an integral $$y=int_C e^{xz}v(z)dz,$$ this is equivalent to solve the first order differential equation $$ v'+z^2v=0.$$ We thus obtain the solution to the Airy's equation, except a normalisation constant, $$y=int_C e^{xz-z^3/3}dz.$$




      Below is my working:



      Using the suggestion to find a solution to the Airy Equation $y''-xy=0$ in the form $y=int_Ce^{xz}v(z)dz$, the first step would be to differentiate the expression for $y$ to find $y'$ & $y''$:



      $$frac{dy}{dx}=int ze^{xz}v(z)dz,$$
      $$frac{d^2y}{dx^2}=int z^2e^{xz}v(z)dz.$$



      Then,



      $$int z^2e^{xz}v(z)dz-xint e^{xz}v(z)dz=0,$$ so
      $$int e^{xz}v(z)(z^2-x)dz=0.$$



      Then I tried to use integration by parts with $u=(z^2-x)v(z)=z^2v(z)-xv(z)$, so $frac{du}{dz}=2zv(z)+z^2v'(z)-xv'(z)=2zv(z)+v'(z)(z^2-x)$, and $frac{dv}{dz}=e^{xz}$, so $v=frac{1}{z}e^{xz}$.
      Following through with this gives:



      $$v(z)(z^2-x)frac{1}{z}e^{xz}-int(2zv(z)+v'(z)(z^2-x))frac{1}{z}e^{xz}dz=0.$$



      This (sort of) simplified to:



      $$v(z)frac{left(z^2-xright)e^{xz}}{z}-int 2v(z)e^{xz}+v'(z)frac{left(z^2-xright)e^{xz}}{z}dz=0.$$



      At this point, I tried to differentiate this expression to reach the form $v'+z^2v=0$:



      $$frac{d}{dz}left(zv(z)e^{xz}-frac{xv(z)e^{xz}}{z}-int 2v(z)e^{xz}dz-int zv'(z)e^{xz}dz+intfrac{xv'(z)e^{xz}}{z}dzright)=0,$$



      which gives



      $$v(z)e^{xz}+zv'(z)e^{xz}+xzv(z)e^{xz}-frac{xv(z)e^{xz}}{z^2}-frac{xv'(x)e^{xz}}{z}-frac{x^2v(z)e^{xz}}{z}-2v(z)e^{xz}-zv'(z)e^{xz}+frac{xv'(z)e^{xz}}{z}=0.$$



      The $e^{xz}$ terms all cancel through, leaving:



      $$v(z)+zv'(z)+xzv(z)-frac{xv(z)}{z^2}-frac{xv'(z)}{z}-frac{x^2v(z)}{z}-2v(z)-zv'(z)+frac{xv'(z)}{z}=0.$$



      From here, I removed the fractions:



      $$z^2v(z)+z^3v'(z)+xz^3v(z)-xv(z)-xzv'(z)-x^2zv(z)-2z^2v(z)-z^3v'(z)+xzv'(z)=0,$$



      and collected the $v(z)$ and $v'(z)$ terms:



      $$v(z)left(z^2+xz^3-x-x^2z-2z^2right)+v'(z)left(z^3-xz-z^3+xzright)=0,$$



      which leaves:



      $$left(xz^3-z^2-x^2z-xright)v(z)=0.$$



      This clearly does not match the form given from the book ($v'+z^2v=0$), but I cannot see where I have made the mistake.



      Is my mistake something obvious I am missing, could it be due to the nature of the complex function (and if so, what), or is my error deeper? Any help would be much appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I have been trying to read the book Airy Functions and Applications to Physics, Olivier Vallee & Manuel Soares, for research on the Airy Functions, but I am stuck on using the Laplace transform to solve the Airy equation to get the function in the correct form.



      The book states (pg 5):




      We consider the following homogeneous second order differential equation called the Airy's equation $$y''-xy=0.$$ This differential equation may be solved by the method of Laplace, i.e. in seeking a solution as an integral $$y=int_C e^{xz}v(z)dz,$$ this is equivalent to solve the first order differential equation $$ v'+z^2v=0.$$ We thus obtain the solution to the Airy's equation, except a normalisation constant, $$y=int_C e^{xz-z^3/3}dz.$$




      Below is my working:



      Using the suggestion to find a solution to the Airy Equation $y''-xy=0$ in the form $y=int_Ce^{xz}v(z)dz$, the first step would be to differentiate the expression for $y$ to find $y'$ & $y''$:



      $$frac{dy}{dx}=int ze^{xz}v(z)dz,$$
      $$frac{d^2y}{dx^2}=int z^2e^{xz}v(z)dz.$$



      Then,



      $$int z^2e^{xz}v(z)dz-xint e^{xz}v(z)dz=0,$$ so
      $$int e^{xz}v(z)(z^2-x)dz=0.$$



      Then I tried to use integration by parts with $u=(z^2-x)v(z)=z^2v(z)-xv(z)$, so $frac{du}{dz}=2zv(z)+z^2v'(z)-xv'(z)=2zv(z)+v'(z)(z^2-x)$, and $frac{dv}{dz}=e^{xz}$, so $v=frac{1}{z}e^{xz}$.
      Following through with this gives:



      $$v(z)(z^2-x)frac{1}{z}e^{xz}-int(2zv(z)+v'(z)(z^2-x))frac{1}{z}e^{xz}dz=0.$$



      This (sort of) simplified to:



      $$v(z)frac{left(z^2-xright)e^{xz}}{z}-int 2v(z)e^{xz}+v'(z)frac{left(z^2-xright)e^{xz}}{z}dz=0.$$



      At this point, I tried to differentiate this expression to reach the form $v'+z^2v=0$:



      $$frac{d}{dz}left(zv(z)e^{xz}-frac{xv(z)e^{xz}}{z}-int 2v(z)e^{xz}dz-int zv'(z)e^{xz}dz+intfrac{xv'(z)e^{xz}}{z}dzright)=0,$$



      which gives



      $$v(z)e^{xz}+zv'(z)e^{xz}+xzv(z)e^{xz}-frac{xv(z)e^{xz}}{z^2}-frac{xv'(x)e^{xz}}{z}-frac{x^2v(z)e^{xz}}{z}-2v(z)e^{xz}-zv'(z)e^{xz}+frac{xv'(z)e^{xz}}{z}=0.$$



      The $e^{xz}$ terms all cancel through, leaving:



      $$v(z)+zv'(z)+xzv(z)-frac{xv(z)}{z^2}-frac{xv'(z)}{z}-frac{x^2v(z)}{z}-2v(z)-zv'(z)+frac{xv'(z)}{z}=0.$$



      From here, I removed the fractions:



      $$z^2v(z)+z^3v'(z)+xz^3v(z)-xv(z)-xzv'(z)-x^2zv(z)-2z^2v(z)-z^3v'(z)+xzv'(z)=0,$$



      and collected the $v(z)$ and $v'(z)$ terms:



      $$v(z)left(z^2+xz^3-x-x^2z-2z^2right)+v'(z)left(z^3-xz-z^3+xzright)=0,$$



      which leaves:



      $$left(xz^3-z^2-x^2z-xright)v(z)=0.$$



      This clearly does not match the form given from the book ($v'+z^2v=0$), but I cannot see where I have made the mistake.



      Is my mistake something obvious I am missing, could it be due to the nature of the complex function (and if so, what), or is my error deeper? Any help would be much appreciated.







      ordinary-differential-equations laplace-transform homogeneous-equation airy-functions






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 14 at 19:07









      FatsFats

      468




      468






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          You are overthinking it. Starting from the beginning



          $$ int_C z^2 e^{xz} v(z) dz - int_C xe^{xz} v(z) dz = 0 $$



          Integration by parts gives



          $$ int_C xe^{xz} v(z) dz = e^{xz}v(z) Big vert_C - int_C e^{xz} v'(z) dz $$



          Here $C$ is a vertical line on the complex plane, such that all singularities of $v(z)$ lies on the left of it. If we hand-wave away that the first term goes to $0$, we can simplify



          $$ int_C e^{xz}(z^2 v(z) + v'(z)) dz = 0 $$



          Notice the LHS is a function of $x$ but the RHS is identically $0$, so it must follow that



          $$ v'(z) + z^2 v(z) = 0 $$



          Which can be solved by separation of variables



          $$ v(z) = e^{-z^3/3} $$



          up to a multiplicative constant.



          This answer doesn't justify everything, but hopefully it can explain some things.





          It should also be noted that this text uses a less accessible form of the inverse Laplace transform which uses complex analysis. A more common definition is the forward transform



          $$ v(z) = int_0^{infty} e^{-zx} y(x) dx $$



          Applying the forward transform to the original equation, and using integration by parts, we can show that



          begin{align}
          int_0^infty e^{-zx} y''(x) dx &= -y'(0) + int_0^infty ze^{-zx} y'(x) dx \
          &= -y'(0) - zy(0) + int_0^infty z^2e^{-zx}y(x) dx \ &= -zy(0) - y'(0) + z^2v(z) \
          int_0^infty e^{-zx} xy dx &= -int_0^infty frac{d}{dz} e^{-zx} y(x) dx \
          &= -v'(z)
          end{align}



          where the second result is justified by differentiation under the integral. Then



          $$ v'(z) + z^2v(z) = zy(0) + y'(0) $$



          Letting $y(0) = y'(0) = 0$ leads to the given result.





          Edit: Your mistake is in the very first integration by parts:



          $$frac{dv}{dz}=e^{xz} implies v=frac{1}{color{red}{x}}e^{xz}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I knew the main bulk of my error would be something trivial, which I couldn't see, so thank you for pointing that out! And, thank you for the second method with the forward transform - I think it's much easier to follow (and less likely for me to get wrong again). The one part I am slightly confused about is how I would know the $C$ is a vertical line on the complex plane, as it wasn't stated in the book.
            $endgroup$
            – Fats
            Jan 16 at 16:04










          • $begingroup$
            I'm not entirely sure why they would do this. Maybe physicists do things differently? In every differential equations class, they will generally teach you the forward transform, give a look-up table to go backwards, and not even mention the inverse transform at all.
            $endgroup$
            – Dylan
            Jan 16 at 17:52










          • $begingroup$
            Another follow up, how then could I use the forward transform and $v(z)=e^{-z^3/3}$ to find $y(x)$?
            $endgroup$
            – Fats
            Jan 17 at 15:20












          • $begingroup$
            The Airy function is non-elementary, so you'll just have to leave it as an integral.
            $endgroup$
            – Dylan
            Jan 17 at 17:33











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073608%2fsolving-the-airy-equation-using-laplace-transform%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          You are overthinking it. Starting from the beginning



          $$ int_C z^2 e^{xz} v(z) dz - int_C xe^{xz} v(z) dz = 0 $$



          Integration by parts gives



          $$ int_C xe^{xz} v(z) dz = e^{xz}v(z) Big vert_C - int_C e^{xz} v'(z) dz $$



          Here $C$ is a vertical line on the complex plane, such that all singularities of $v(z)$ lies on the left of it. If we hand-wave away that the first term goes to $0$, we can simplify



          $$ int_C e^{xz}(z^2 v(z) + v'(z)) dz = 0 $$



          Notice the LHS is a function of $x$ but the RHS is identically $0$, so it must follow that



          $$ v'(z) + z^2 v(z) = 0 $$



          Which can be solved by separation of variables



          $$ v(z) = e^{-z^3/3} $$



          up to a multiplicative constant.



          This answer doesn't justify everything, but hopefully it can explain some things.





          It should also be noted that this text uses a less accessible form of the inverse Laplace transform which uses complex analysis. A more common definition is the forward transform



          $$ v(z) = int_0^{infty} e^{-zx} y(x) dx $$



          Applying the forward transform to the original equation, and using integration by parts, we can show that



          begin{align}
          int_0^infty e^{-zx} y''(x) dx &= -y'(0) + int_0^infty ze^{-zx} y'(x) dx \
          &= -y'(0) - zy(0) + int_0^infty z^2e^{-zx}y(x) dx \ &= -zy(0) - y'(0) + z^2v(z) \
          int_0^infty e^{-zx} xy dx &= -int_0^infty frac{d}{dz} e^{-zx} y(x) dx \
          &= -v'(z)
          end{align}



          where the second result is justified by differentiation under the integral. Then



          $$ v'(z) + z^2v(z) = zy(0) + y'(0) $$



          Letting $y(0) = y'(0) = 0$ leads to the given result.





          Edit: Your mistake is in the very first integration by parts:



          $$frac{dv}{dz}=e^{xz} implies v=frac{1}{color{red}{x}}e^{xz}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I knew the main bulk of my error would be something trivial, which I couldn't see, so thank you for pointing that out! And, thank you for the second method with the forward transform - I think it's much easier to follow (and less likely for me to get wrong again). The one part I am slightly confused about is how I would know the $C$ is a vertical line on the complex plane, as it wasn't stated in the book.
            $endgroup$
            – Fats
            Jan 16 at 16:04










          • $begingroup$
            I'm not entirely sure why they would do this. Maybe physicists do things differently? In every differential equations class, they will generally teach you the forward transform, give a look-up table to go backwards, and not even mention the inverse transform at all.
            $endgroup$
            – Dylan
            Jan 16 at 17:52










          • $begingroup$
            Another follow up, how then could I use the forward transform and $v(z)=e^{-z^3/3}$ to find $y(x)$?
            $endgroup$
            – Fats
            Jan 17 at 15:20












          • $begingroup$
            The Airy function is non-elementary, so you'll just have to leave it as an integral.
            $endgroup$
            – Dylan
            Jan 17 at 17:33
















          2












          $begingroup$

          You are overthinking it. Starting from the beginning



          $$ int_C z^2 e^{xz} v(z) dz - int_C xe^{xz} v(z) dz = 0 $$



          Integration by parts gives



          $$ int_C xe^{xz} v(z) dz = e^{xz}v(z) Big vert_C - int_C e^{xz} v'(z) dz $$



          Here $C$ is a vertical line on the complex plane, such that all singularities of $v(z)$ lies on the left of it. If we hand-wave away that the first term goes to $0$, we can simplify



          $$ int_C e^{xz}(z^2 v(z) + v'(z)) dz = 0 $$



          Notice the LHS is a function of $x$ but the RHS is identically $0$, so it must follow that



          $$ v'(z) + z^2 v(z) = 0 $$



          Which can be solved by separation of variables



          $$ v(z) = e^{-z^3/3} $$



          up to a multiplicative constant.



          This answer doesn't justify everything, but hopefully it can explain some things.





          It should also be noted that this text uses a less accessible form of the inverse Laplace transform which uses complex analysis. A more common definition is the forward transform



          $$ v(z) = int_0^{infty} e^{-zx} y(x) dx $$



          Applying the forward transform to the original equation, and using integration by parts, we can show that



          begin{align}
          int_0^infty e^{-zx} y''(x) dx &= -y'(0) + int_0^infty ze^{-zx} y'(x) dx \
          &= -y'(0) - zy(0) + int_0^infty z^2e^{-zx}y(x) dx \ &= -zy(0) - y'(0) + z^2v(z) \
          int_0^infty e^{-zx} xy dx &= -int_0^infty frac{d}{dz} e^{-zx} y(x) dx \
          &= -v'(z)
          end{align}



          where the second result is justified by differentiation under the integral. Then



          $$ v'(z) + z^2v(z) = zy(0) + y'(0) $$



          Letting $y(0) = y'(0) = 0$ leads to the given result.





          Edit: Your mistake is in the very first integration by parts:



          $$frac{dv}{dz}=e^{xz} implies v=frac{1}{color{red}{x}}e^{xz}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I knew the main bulk of my error would be something trivial, which I couldn't see, so thank you for pointing that out! And, thank you for the second method with the forward transform - I think it's much easier to follow (and less likely for me to get wrong again). The one part I am slightly confused about is how I would know the $C$ is a vertical line on the complex plane, as it wasn't stated in the book.
            $endgroup$
            – Fats
            Jan 16 at 16:04










          • $begingroup$
            I'm not entirely sure why they would do this. Maybe physicists do things differently? In every differential equations class, they will generally teach you the forward transform, give a look-up table to go backwards, and not even mention the inverse transform at all.
            $endgroup$
            – Dylan
            Jan 16 at 17:52










          • $begingroup$
            Another follow up, how then could I use the forward transform and $v(z)=e^{-z^3/3}$ to find $y(x)$?
            $endgroup$
            – Fats
            Jan 17 at 15:20












          • $begingroup$
            The Airy function is non-elementary, so you'll just have to leave it as an integral.
            $endgroup$
            – Dylan
            Jan 17 at 17:33














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          You are overthinking it. Starting from the beginning



          $$ int_C z^2 e^{xz} v(z) dz - int_C xe^{xz} v(z) dz = 0 $$



          Integration by parts gives



          $$ int_C xe^{xz} v(z) dz = e^{xz}v(z) Big vert_C - int_C e^{xz} v'(z) dz $$



          Here $C$ is a vertical line on the complex plane, such that all singularities of $v(z)$ lies on the left of it. If we hand-wave away that the first term goes to $0$, we can simplify



          $$ int_C e^{xz}(z^2 v(z) + v'(z)) dz = 0 $$



          Notice the LHS is a function of $x$ but the RHS is identically $0$, so it must follow that



          $$ v'(z) + z^2 v(z) = 0 $$



          Which can be solved by separation of variables



          $$ v(z) = e^{-z^3/3} $$



          up to a multiplicative constant.



          This answer doesn't justify everything, but hopefully it can explain some things.





          It should also be noted that this text uses a less accessible form of the inverse Laplace transform which uses complex analysis. A more common definition is the forward transform



          $$ v(z) = int_0^{infty} e^{-zx} y(x) dx $$



          Applying the forward transform to the original equation, and using integration by parts, we can show that



          begin{align}
          int_0^infty e^{-zx} y''(x) dx &= -y'(0) + int_0^infty ze^{-zx} y'(x) dx \
          &= -y'(0) - zy(0) + int_0^infty z^2e^{-zx}y(x) dx \ &= -zy(0) - y'(0) + z^2v(z) \
          int_0^infty e^{-zx} xy dx &= -int_0^infty frac{d}{dz} e^{-zx} y(x) dx \
          &= -v'(z)
          end{align}



          where the second result is justified by differentiation under the integral. Then



          $$ v'(z) + z^2v(z) = zy(0) + y'(0) $$



          Letting $y(0) = y'(0) = 0$ leads to the given result.





          Edit: Your mistake is in the very first integration by parts:



          $$frac{dv}{dz}=e^{xz} implies v=frac{1}{color{red}{x}}e^{xz}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          You are overthinking it. Starting from the beginning



          $$ int_C z^2 e^{xz} v(z) dz - int_C xe^{xz} v(z) dz = 0 $$



          Integration by parts gives



          $$ int_C xe^{xz} v(z) dz = e^{xz}v(z) Big vert_C - int_C e^{xz} v'(z) dz $$



          Here $C$ is a vertical line on the complex plane, such that all singularities of $v(z)$ lies on the left of it. If we hand-wave away that the first term goes to $0$, we can simplify



          $$ int_C e^{xz}(z^2 v(z) + v'(z)) dz = 0 $$



          Notice the LHS is a function of $x$ but the RHS is identically $0$, so it must follow that



          $$ v'(z) + z^2 v(z) = 0 $$



          Which can be solved by separation of variables



          $$ v(z) = e^{-z^3/3} $$



          up to a multiplicative constant.



          This answer doesn't justify everything, but hopefully it can explain some things.





          It should also be noted that this text uses a less accessible form of the inverse Laplace transform which uses complex analysis. A more common definition is the forward transform



          $$ v(z) = int_0^{infty} e^{-zx} y(x) dx $$



          Applying the forward transform to the original equation, and using integration by parts, we can show that



          begin{align}
          int_0^infty e^{-zx} y''(x) dx &= -y'(0) + int_0^infty ze^{-zx} y'(x) dx \
          &= -y'(0) - zy(0) + int_0^infty z^2e^{-zx}y(x) dx \ &= -zy(0) - y'(0) + z^2v(z) \
          int_0^infty e^{-zx} xy dx &= -int_0^infty frac{d}{dz} e^{-zx} y(x) dx \
          &= -v'(z)
          end{align}



          where the second result is justified by differentiation under the integral. Then



          $$ v'(z) + z^2v(z) = zy(0) + y'(0) $$



          Letting $y(0) = y'(0) = 0$ leads to the given result.





          Edit: Your mistake is in the very first integration by parts:



          $$frac{dv}{dz}=e^{xz} implies v=frac{1}{color{red}{x}}e^{xz}$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 16 at 17:45

























          answered Jan 15 at 6:35









          DylanDylan

          12.9k31027




          12.9k31027












          • $begingroup$
            I knew the main bulk of my error would be something trivial, which I couldn't see, so thank you for pointing that out! And, thank you for the second method with the forward transform - I think it's much easier to follow (and less likely for me to get wrong again). The one part I am slightly confused about is how I would know the $C$ is a vertical line on the complex plane, as it wasn't stated in the book.
            $endgroup$
            – Fats
            Jan 16 at 16:04










          • $begingroup$
            I'm not entirely sure why they would do this. Maybe physicists do things differently? In every differential equations class, they will generally teach you the forward transform, give a look-up table to go backwards, and not even mention the inverse transform at all.
            $endgroup$
            – Dylan
            Jan 16 at 17:52










          • $begingroup$
            Another follow up, how then could I use the forward transform and $v(z)=e^{-z^3/3}$ to find $y(x)$?
            $endgroup$
            – Fats
            Jan 17 at 15:20












          • $begingroup$
            The Airy function is non-elementary, so you'll just have to leave it as an integral.
            $endgroup$
            – Dylan
            Jan 17 at 17:33


















          • $begingroup$
            I knew the main bulk of my error would be something trivial, which I couldn't see, so thank you for pointing that out! And, thank you for the second method with the forward transform - I think it's much easier to follow (and less likely for me to get wrong again). The one part I am slightly confused about is how I would know the $C$ is a vertical line on the complex plane, as it wasn't stated in the book.
            $endgroup$
            – Fats
            Jan 16 at 16:04










          • $begingroup$
            I'm not entirely sure why they would do this. Maybe physicists do things differently? In every differential equations class, they will generally teach you the forward transform, give a look-up table to go backwards, and not even mention the inverse transform at all.
            $endgroup$
            – Dylan
            Jan 16 at 17:52










          • $begingroup$
            Another follow up, how then could I use the forward transform and $v(z)=e^{-z^3/3}$ to find $y(x)$?
            $endgroup$
            – Fats
            Jan 17 at 15:20












          • $begingroup$
            The Airy function is non-elementary, so you'll just have to leave it as an integral.
            $endgroup$
            – Dylan
            Jan 17 at 17:33
















          $begingroup$
          I knew the main bulk of my error would be something trivial, which I couldn't see, so thank you for pointing that out! And, thank you for the second method with the forward transform - I think it's much easier to follow (and less likely for me to get wrong again). The one part I am slightly confused about is how I would know the $C$ is a vertical line on the complex plane, as it wasn't stated in the book.
          $endgroup$
          – Fats
          Jan 16 at 16:04




          $begingroup$
          I knew the main bulk of my error would be something trivial, which I couldn't see, so thank you for pointing that out! And, thank you for the second method with the forward transform - I think it's much easier to follow (and less likely for me to get wrong again). The one part I am slightly confused about is how I would know the $C$ is a vertical line on the complex plane, as it wasn't stated in the book.
          $endgroup$
          – Fats
          Jan 16 at 16:04












          $begingroup$
          I'm not entirely sure why they would do this. Maybe physicists do things differently? In every differential equations class, they will generally teach you the forward transform, give a look-up table to go backwards, and not even mention the inverse transform at all.
          $endgroup$
          – Dylan
          Jan 16 at 17:52




          $begingroup$
          I'm not entirely sure why they would do this. Maybe physicists do things differently? In every differential equations class, they will generally teach you the forward transform, give a look-up table to go backwards, and not even mention the inverse transform at all.
          $endgroup$
          – Dylan
          Jan 16 at 17:52












          $begingroup$
          Another follow up, how then could I use the forward transform and $v(z)=e^{-z^3/3}$ to find $y(x)$?
          $endgroup$
          – Fats
          Jan 17 at 15:20






          $begingroup$
          Another follow up, how then could I use the forward transform and $v(z)=e^{-z^3/3}$ to find $y(x)$?
          $endgroup$
          – Fats
          Jan 17 at 15:20














          $begingroup$
          The Airy function is non-elementary, so you'll just have to leave it as an integral.
          $endgroup$
          – Dylan
          Jan 17 at 17:33




          $begingroup$
          The Airy function is non-elementary, so you'll just have to leave it as an integral.
          $endgroup$
          – Dylan
          Jan 17 at 17:33


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073608%2fsolving-the-airy-equation-using-laplace-transform%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          The term 'EXEC' is not recognized as the name of a cmdlet Powershell

          NPM command prompt closes immediately [closed]

          Error binding properties and functions in emscripten