Summation of Stirling numbers of second kind












0












$begingroup$


Evaluate:
begin{equation}
n^{n-ell} cdot sumlimits_{k=1}^ell dbinom{n}{k} k! begin{Bmatrix} ell \ k end{Bmatrix}
end{equation}



I used my primitive math skills along with the some formulas given in "Close Encounters with the Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind" by KHRISTO N. BOYADZHIEV to simplify the above equation to $n^n$. Am I correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hi and welcome to MSE. Showing your work will help us to correct the mistakes, if there are any.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Jan 18 at 15:37






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See the answers here math.stackexchange.com/questions/3076215/… ... Send me a message if you need more help.
    $endgroup$
    – Donald Splutterwit
    Jan 18 at 20:16










  • $begingroup$
    @DonaldSplutterwit Perfect, many thanks!! Can you please give me some reference to read more about the relation that you mentioned in your answer, namely $k! begin{Bmatrix} n\ k end{Bmatrix} = n! [x^n]:(e^x -1)^k$?
    $endgroup$
    – Singh
    Jan 18 at 20:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $5^{th}$ formula here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… and also look at mathworld.wolfram.com/StirlingNumberoftheSecondKind.html ... the first two that come up when you google @Stirling numbers of the second knid.
    $endgroup$
    – Donald Splutterwit
    Jan 18 at 20:33










  • $begingroup$
    @DonaldSplutterwit From your answer, I wondered what squaring of the Stirling number in the given expression leads to? I asked that question 3 days back and have been working on it myself since then; but to no avail. Link to my question: math.stackexchange.com/q/3081960.
    $endgroup$
    – Singh
    Jan 25 at 4:24
















0












$begingroup$


Evaluate:
begin{equation}
n^{n-ell} cdot sumlimits_{k=1}^ell dbinom{n}{k} k! begin{Bmatrix} ell \ k end{Bmatrix}
end{equation}



I used my primitive math skills along with the some formulas given in "Close Encounters with the Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind" by KHRISTO N. BOYADZHIEV to simplify the above equation to $n^n$. Am I correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hi and welcome to MSE. Showing your work will help us to correct the mistakes, if there are any.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Jan 18 at 15:37






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See the answers here math.stackexchange.com/questions/3076215/… ... Send me a message if you need more help.
    $endgroup$
    – Donald Splutterwit
    Jan 18 at 20:16










  • $begingroup$
    @DonaldSplutterwit Perfect, many thanks!! Can you please give me some reference to read more about the relation that you mentioned in your answer, namely $k! begin{Bmatrix} n\ k end{Bmatrix} = n! [x^n]:(e^x -1)^k$?
    $endgroup$
    – Singh
    Jan 18 at 20:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $5^{th}$ formula here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… and also look at mathworld.wolfram.com/StirlingNumberoftheSecondKind.html ... the first two that come up when you google @Stirling numbers of the second knid.
    $endgroup$
    – Donald Splutterwit
    Jan 18 at 20:33










  • $begingroup$
    @DonaldSplutterwit From your answer, I wondered what squaring of the Stirling number in the given expression leads to? I asked that question 3 days back and have been working on it myself since then; but to no avail. Link to my question: math.stackexchange.com/q/3081960.
    $endgroup$
    – Singh
    Jan 25 at 4:24














0












0








0


2



$begingroup$


Evaluate:
begin{equation}
n^{n-ell} cdot sumlimits_{k=1}^ell dbinom{n}{k} k! begin{Bmatrix} ell \ k end{Bmatrix}
end{equation}



I used my primitive math skills along with the some formulas given in "Close Encounters with the Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind" by KHRISTO N. BOYADZHIEV to simplify the above equation to $n^n$. Am I correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Evaluate:
begin{equation}
n^{n-ell} cdot sumlimits_{k=1}^ell dbinom{n}{k} k! begin{Bmatrix} ell \ k end{Bmatrix}
end{equation}



I used my primitive math skills along with the some formulas given in "Close Encounters with the Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind" by KHRISTO N. BOYADZHIEV to simplify the above equation to $n^n$. Am I correct?







combinatorics binomial-coefficients stirling-numbers






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 18 at 15:19







Singh

















asked Jan 18 at 15:12









SinghSingh

454




454








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hi and welcome to MSE. Showing your work will help us to correct the mistakes, if there are any.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Jan 18 at 15:37






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See the answers here math.stackexchange.com/questions/3076215/… ... Send me a message if you need more help.
    $endgroup$
    – Donald Splutterwit
    Jan 18 at 20:16










  • $begingroup$
    @DonaldSplutterwit Perfect, many thanks!! Can you please give me some reference to read more about the relation that you mentioned in your answer, namely $k! begin{Bmatrix} n\ k end{Bmatrix} = n! [x^n]:(e^x -1)^k$?
    $endgroup$
    – Singh
    Jan 18 at 20:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $5^{th}$ formula here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… and also look at mathworld.wolfram.com/StirlingNumberoftheSecondKind.html ... the first two that come up when you google @Stirling numbers of the second knid.
    $endgroup$
    – Donald Splutterwit
    Jan 18 at 20:33










  • $begingroup$
    @DonaldSplutterwit From your answer, I wondered what squaring of the Stirling number in the given expression leads to? I asked that question 3 days back and have been working on it myself since then; but to no avail. Link to my question: math.stackexchange.com/q/3081960.
    $endgroup$
    – Singh
    Jan 25 at 4:24














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hi and welcome to MSE. Showing your work will help us to correct the mistakes, if there are any.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Jan 18 at 15:37






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See the answers here math.stackexchange.com/questions/3076215/… ... Send me a message if you need more help.
    $endgroup$
    – Donald Splutterwit
    Jan 18 at 20:16










  • $begingroup$
    @DonaldSplutterwit Perfect, many thanks!! Can you please give me some reference to read more about the relation that you mentioned in your answer, namely $k! begin{Bmatrix} n\ k end{Bmatrix} = n! [x^n]:(e^x -1)^k$?
    $endgroup$
    – Singh
    Jan 18 at 20:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $5^{th}$ formula here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… and also look at mathworld.wolfram.com/StirlingNumberoftheSecondKind.html ... the first two that come up when you google @Stirling numbers of the second knid.
    $endgroup$
    – Donald Splutterwit
    Jan 18 at 20:33










  • $begingroup$
    @DonaldSplutterwit From your answer, I wondered what squaring of the Stirling number in the given expression leads to? I asked that question 3 days back and have been working on it myself since then; but to no avail. Link to my question: math.stackexchange.com/q/3081960.
    $endgroup$
    – Singh
    Jan 25 at 4:24








1




1




$begingroup$
Hi and welcome to MSE. Showing your work will help us to correct the mistakes, if there are any.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Jan 18 at 15:37




$begingroup$
Hi and welcome to MSE. Showing your work will help us to correct the mistakes, if there are any.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Jan 18 at 15:37




1




1




$begingroup$
See the answers here math.stackexchange.com/questions/3076215/… ... Send me a message if you need more help.
$endgroup$
– Donald Splutterwit
Jan 18 at 20:16




$begingroup$
See the answers here math.stackexchange.com/questions/3076215/… ... Send me a message if you need more help.
$endgroup$
– Donald Splutterwit
Jan 18 at 20:16












$begingroup$
@DonaldSplutterwit Perfect, many thanks!! Can you please give me some reference to read more about the relation that you mentioned in your answer, namely $k! begin{Bmatrix} n\ k end{Bmatrix} = n! [x^n]:(e^x -1)^k$?
$endgroup$
– Singh
Jan 18 at 20:28




$begingroup$
@DonaldSplutterwit Perfect, many thanks!! Can you please give me some reference to read more about the relation that you mentioned in your answer, namely $k! begin{Bmatrix} n\ k end{Bmatrix} = n! [x^n]:(e^x -1)^k$?
$endgroup$
– Singh
Jan 18 at 20:28




1




1




$begingroup$
$5^{th}$ formula here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… and also look at mathworld.wolfram.com/StirlingNumberoftheSecondKind.html ... the first two that come up when you google @Stirling numbers of the second knid.
$endgroup$
– Donald Splutterwit
Jan 18 at 20:33




$begingroup$
$5^{th}$ formula here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… and also look at mathworld.wolfram.com/StirlingNumberoftheSecondKind.html ... the first two that come up when you google @Stirling numbers of the second knid.
$endgroup$
– Donald Splutterwit
Jan 18 at 20:33












$begingroup$
@DonaldSplutterwit From your answer, I wondered what squaring of the Stirling number in the given expression leads to? I asked that question 3 days back and have been working on it myself since then; but to no avail. Link to my question: math.stackexchange.com/q/3081960.
$endgroup$
– Singh
Jan 25 at 4:24




$begingroup$
@DonaldSplutterwit From your answer, I wondered what squaring of the Stirling number in the given expression leads to? I asked that question 3 days back and have been working on it myself since then; but to no avail. Link to my question: math.stackexchange.com/q/3081960.
$endgroup$
– Singh
Jan 25 at 4:24










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

If you're familiar with combinatorics, this being equal to $n^n$ means it counts functions $f:[n]to[n]$ ($[n]$ denoting the set ${1,2,ldots,n}$, since each of the $n$ elements in the domain have $n$ choices of image in the codomain.



I'll give you the idea of a proof and let you fill in the details. The given expression counts functions from $[n]$ to $[n]$ with some fixed subset $S$ of size $ell$ of $[n]$. The term $n^{n-ell}$ counts functions from $[n]-S$ to $[n]$, since each of the $n-ell$ elements in the domain have $n$ choices o image in the codomain. The remaining sum $sum_{k=1}^ell binom{n}{k}k! begin{Bmatrix} ell \ k end{Bmatrix}$ determines the image of $S$, where each $k$ corresponds to a possible size of $f(S)$. In other words, for each $k$, $binom{n}{k}k! begin{Bmatrix} ell \ k end{Bmatrix}$ counts the number of functions $f:Sto [n]$ where $|f(S)|=k$.



The only other major fact you need is that $k! begin{Bmatrix} ell \ k end{Bmatrix}$ counts surjections $f:[ell]to[k]$. The Stirling number of the second kind counts partitions of $[ell]$ into $k$ parts. There are $k!$ ways to associate each block with an element of $[k]$, creating a surjection from $[ell]$ onto $[k]$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3078367%2fsummation-of-stirling-numbers-of-second-kind%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    If you're familiar with combinatorics, this being equal to $n^n$ means it counts functions $f:[n]to[n]$ ($[n]$ denoting the set ${1,2,ldots,n}$, since each of the $n$ elements in the domain have $n$ choices of image in the codomain.



    I'll give you the idea of a proof and let you fill in the details. The given expression counts functions from $[n]$ to $[n]$ with some fixed subset $S$ of size $ell$ of $[n]$. The term $n^{n-ell}$ counts functions from $[n]-S$ to $[n]$, since each of the $n-ell$ elements in the domain have $n$ choices o image in the codomain. The remaining sum $sum_{k=1}^ell binom{n}{k}k! begin{Bmatrix} ell \ k end{Bmatrix}$ determines the image of $S$, where each $k$ corresponds to a possible size of $f(S)$. In other words, for each $k$, $binom{n}{k}k! begin{Bmatrix} ell \ k end{Bmatrix}$ counts the number of functions $f:Sto [n]$ where $|f(S)|=k$.



    The only other major fact you need is that $k! begin{Bmatrix} ell \ k end{Bmatrix}$ counts surjections $f:[ell]to[k]$. The Stirling number of the second kind counts partitions of $[ell]$ into $k$ parts. There are $k!$ ways to associate each block with an element of $[k]$, creating a surjection from $[ell]$ onto $[k]$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      3












      $begingroup$

      If you're familiar with combinatorics, this being equal to $n^n$ means it counts functions $f:[n]to[n]$ ($[n]$ denoting the set ${1,2,ldots,n}$, since each of the $n$ elements in the domain have $n$ choices of image in the codomain.



      I'll give you the idea of a proof and let you fill in the details. The given expression counts functions from $[n]$ to $[n]$ with some fixed subset $S$ of size $ell$ of $[n]$. The term $n^{n-ell}$ counts functions from $[n]-S$ to $[n]$, since each of the $n-ell$ elements in the domain have $n$ choices o image in the codomain. The remaining sum $sum_{k=1}^ell binom{n}{k}k! begin{Bmatrix} ell \ k end{Bmatrix}$ determines the image of $S$, where each $k$ corresponds to a possible size of $f(S)$. In other words, for each $k$, $binom{n}{k}k! begin{Bmatrix} ell \ k end{Bmatrix}$ counts the number of functions $f:Sto [n]$ where $|f(S)|=k$.



      The only other major fact you need is that $k! begin{Bmatrix} ell \ k end{Bmatrix}$ counts surjections $f:[ell]to[k]$. The Stirling number of the second kind counts partitions of $[ell]$ into $k$ parts. There are $k!$ ways to associate each block with an element of $[k]$, creating a surjection from $[ell]$ onto $[k]$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        If you're familiar with combinatorics, this being equal to $n^n$ means it counts functions $f:[n]to[n]$ ($[n]$ denoting the set ${1,2,ldots,n}$, since each of the $n$ elements in the domain have $n$ choices of image in the codomain.



        I'll give you the idea of a proof and let you fill in the details. The given expression counts functions from $[n]$ to $[n]$ with some fixed subset $S$ of size $ell$ of $[n]$. The term $n^{n-ell}$ counts functions from $[n]-S$ to $[n]$, since each of the $n-ell$ elements in the domain have $n$ choices o image in the codomain. The remaining sum $sum_{k=1}^ell binom{n}{k}k! begin{Bmatrix} ell \ k end{Bmatrix}$ determines the image of $S$, where each $k$ corresponds to a possible size of $f(S)$. In other words, for each $k$, $binom{n}{k}k! begin{Bmatrix} ell \ k end{Bmatrix}$ counts the number of functions $f:Sto [n]$ where $|f(S)|=k$.



        The only other major fact you need is that $k! begin{Bmatrix} ell \ k end{Bmatrix}$ counts surjections $f:[ell]to[k]$. The Stirling number of the second kind counts partitions of $[ell]$ into $k$ parts. There are $k!$ ways to associate each block with an element of $[k]$, creating a surjection from $[ell]$ onto $[k]$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        If you're familiar with combinatorics, this being equal to $n^n$ means it counts functions $f:[n]to[n]$ ($[n]$ denoting the set ${1,2,ldots,n}$, since each of the $n$ elements in the domain have $n$ choices of image in the codomain.



        I'll give you the idea of a proof and let you fill in the details. The given expression counts functions from $[n]$ to $[n]$ with some fixed subset $S$ of size $ell$ of $[n]$. The term $n^{n-ell}$ counts functions from $[n]-S$ to $[n]$, since each of the $n-ell$ elements in the domain have $n$ choices o image in the codomain. The remaining sum $sum_{k=1}^ell binom{n}{k}k! begin{Bmatrix} ell \ k end{Bmatrix}$ determines the image of $S$, where each $k$ corresponds to a possible size of $f(S)$. In other words, for each $k$, $binom{n}{k}k! begin{Bmatrix} ell \ k end{Bmatrix}$ counts the number of functions $f:Sto [n]$ where $|f(S)|=k$.



        The only other major fact you need is that $k! begin{Bmatrix} ell \ k end{Bmatrix}$ counts surjections $f:[ell]to[k]$. The Stirling number of the second kind counts partitions of $[ell]$ into $k$ parts. There are $k!$ ways to associate each block with an element of $[k]$, creating a surjection from $[ell]$ onto $[k]$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 18 at 20:39









        Kevin LongKevin Long

        3,57121431




        3,57121431






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3078367%2fsummation-of-stirling-numbers-of-second-kind%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith