Does $mathbb{Z}_n$ contain a subfield?












3












$begingroup$


Is it true that $mathbb{Z}_n$ doesn't contain a proper subring which is a field?



I have a contradiction that shows that this isn't true. Take the ring $mathbb{Z}_{10}$ and the proper subring $langle 2 rangle = { 0,2,4,6,8 }$ which is clearly a field under the same addition and multiplication modulo 10.



But I've come across a statement that says that for a positive integer $n$, $mathbb{Z}_n$ actually doesn't contain a proper subring which is a field. If it is so, then this should contradict the example that I've given above. How can this be possible? Is there any information that I'm missing?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Multiplicative identity?
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Jan 24 at 18:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @ThomasShelby: $6$ is a multiplicative identity.
    $endgroup$
    – tomasz
    Jan 24 at 18:27
















3












$begingroup$


Is it true that $mathbb{Z}_n$ doesn't contain a proper subring which is a field?



I have a contradiction that shows that this isn't true. Take the ring $mathbb{Z}_{10}$ and the proper subring $langle 2 rangle = { 0,2,4,6,8 }$ which is clearly a field under the same addition and multiplication modulo 10.



But I've come across a statement that says that for a positive integer $n$, $mathbb{Z}_n$ actually doesn't contain a proper subring which is a field. If it is so, then this should contradict the example that I've given above. How can this be possible? Is there any information that I'm missing?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Multiplicative identity?
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Jan 24 at 18:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @ThomasShelby: $6$ is a multiplicative identity.
    $endgroup$
    – tomasz
    Jan 24 at 18:27














3












3








3





$begingroup$


Is it true that $mathbb{Z}_n$ doesn't contain a proper subring which is a field?



I have a contradiction that shows that this isn't true. Take the ring $mathbb{Z}_{10}$ and the proper subring $langle 2 rangle = { 0,2,4,6,8 }$ which is clearly a field under the same addition and multiplication modulo 10.



But I've come across a statement that says that for a positive integer $n$, $mathbb{Z}_n$ actually doesn't contain a proper subring which is a field. If it is so, then this should contradict the example that I've given above. How can this be possible? Is there any information that I'm missing?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Is it true that $mathbb{Z}_n$ doesn't contain a proper subring which is a field?



I have a contradiction that shows that this isn't true. Take the ring $mathbb{Z}_{10}$ and the proper subring $langle 2 rangle = { 0,2,4,6,8 }$ which is clearly a field under the same addition and multiplication modulo 10.



But I've come across a statement that says that for a positive integer $n$, $mathbb{Z}_n$ actually doesn't contain a proper subring which is a field. If it is so, then this should contradict the example that I've given above. How can this be possible? Is there any information that I'm missing?







abstract-algebra ring-theory field-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 24 at 18:50









Fozoro

1265




1265










asked Jan 24 at 18:02









Minto PMinto P

667




667








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Multiplicative identity?
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Jan 24 at 18:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @ThomasShelby: $6$ is a multiplicative identity.
    $endgroup$
    – tomasz
    Jan 24 at 18:27














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Multiplicative identity?
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Jan 24 at 18:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @ThomasShelby: $6$ is a multiplicative identity.
    $endgroup$
    – tomasz
    Jan 24 at 18:27








2




2




$begingroup$
Multiplicative identity?
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Jan 24 at 18:06




$begingroup$
Multiplicative identity?
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Jan 24 at 18:06




2




2




$begingroup$
@ThomasShelby: $6$ is a multiplicative identity.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Jan 24 at 18:27




$begingroup$
@ThomasShelby: $6$ is a multiplicative identity.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Jan 24 at 18:27










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

It depends what you consider a ring (and hence, a subring). Many authors include the identity in the definition of a ring. Under this definition, a subring of a ring must contain the original identity. In this case, ${bf Z}_n$ has no proper subrings, so if it is not a field itself, it has no subrings which are fields.



Otherwise, if your rings are not necessarily unital, a subring may not contain the original identity, in which case your example is indeed correct (with $6$ as the multiplicative identity). An easier example is just ${0,5}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086186%2fdoes-mathbbz-n-contain-a-subfield%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6












    $begingroup$

    It depends what you consider a ring (and hence, a subring). Many authors include the identity in the definition of a ring. Under this definition, a subring of a ring must contain the original identity. In this case, ${bf Z}_n$ has no proper subrings, so if it is not a field itself, it has no subrings which are fields.



    Otherwise, if your rings are not necessarily unital, a subring may not contain the original identity, in which case your example is indeed correct (with $6$ as the multiplicative identity). An easier example is just ${0,5}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      6












      $begingroup$

      It depends what you consider a ring (and hence, a subring). Many authors include the identity in the definition of a ring. Under this definition, a subring of a ring must contain the original identity. In this case, ${bf Z}_n$ has no proper subrings, so if it is not a field itself, it has no subrings which are fields.



      Otherwise, if your rings are not necessarily unital, a subring may not contain the original identity, in which case your example is indeed correct (with $6$ as the multiplicative identity). An easier example is just ${0,5}$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        6












        6








        6





        $begingroup$

        It depends what you consider a ring (and hence, a subring). Many authors include the identity in the definition of a ring. Under this definition, a subring of a ring must contain the original identity. In this case, ${bf Z}_n$ has no proper subrings, so if it is not a field itself, it has no subrings which are fields.



        Otherwise, if your rings are not necessarily unital, a subring may not contain the original identity, in which case your example is indeed correct (with $6$ as the multiplicative identity). An easier example is just ${0,5}$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        It depends what you consider a ring (and hence, a subring). Many authors include the identity in the definition of a ring. Under this definition, a subring of a ring must contain the original identity. In this case, ${bf Z}_n$ has no proper subrings, so if it is not a field itself, it has no subrings which are fields.



        Otherwise, if your rings are not necessarily unital, a subring may not contain the original identity, in which case your example is indeed correct (with $6$ as the multiplicative identity). An easier example is just ${0,5}$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 24 at 18:27









        tomasztomasz

        23.9k23482




        23.9k23482






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086186%2fdoes-mathbbz-n-contain-a-subfield%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith