Does $mathbb{Z}_n$ contain a subfield?
$begingroup$
Is it true that $mathbb{Z}_n$ doesn't contain a proper subring which is a field?
I have a contradiction that shows that this isn't true. Take the ring $mathbb{Z}_{10}$ and the proper subring $langle 2 rangle = { 0,2,4,6,8 }$ which is clearly a field under the same addition and multiplication modulo 10.
But I've come across a statement that says that for a positive integer $n$, $mathbb{Z}_n$ actually doesn't contain a proper subring which is a field. If it is so, then this should contradict the example that I've given above. How can this be possible? Is there any information that I'm missing?
abstract-algebra ring-theory field-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it true that $mathbb{Z}_n$ doesn't contain a proper subring which is a field?
I have a contradiction that shows that this isn't true. Take the ring $mathbb{Z}_{10}$ and the proper subring $langle 2 rangle = { 0,2,4,6,8 }$ which is clearly a field under the same addition and multiplication modulo 10.
But I've come across a statement that says that for a positive integer $n$, $mathbb{Z}_n$ actually doesn't contain a proper subring which is a field. If it is so, then this should contradict the example that I've given above. How can this be possible? Is there any information that I'm missing?
abstract-algebra ring-theory field-theory
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Multiplicative identity?
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Jan 24 at 18:06
2
$begingroup$
@ThomasShelby: $6$ is a multiplicative identity.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Jan 24 at 18:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it true that $mathbb{Z}_n$ doesn't contain a proper subring which is a field?
I have a contradiction that shows that this isn't true. Take the ring $mathbb{Z}_{10}$ and the proper subring $langle 2 rangle = { 0,2,4,6,8 }$ which is clearly a field under the same addition and multiplication modulo 10.
But I've come across a statement that says that for a positive integer $n$, $mathbb{Z}_n$ actually doesn't contain a proper subring which is a field. If it is so, then this should contradict the example that I've given above. How can this be possible? Is there any information that I'm missing?
abstract-algebra ring-theory field-theory
$endgroup$
Is it true that $mathbb{Z}_n$ doesn't contain a proper subring which is a field?
I have a contradiction that shows that this isn't true. Take the ring $mathbb{Z}_{10}$ and the proper subring $langle 2 rangle = { 0,2,4,6,8 }$ which is clearly a field under the same addition and multiplication modulo 10.
But I've come across a statement that says that for a positive integer $n$, $mathbb{Z}_n$ actually doesn't contain a proper subring which is a field. If it is so, then this should contradict the example that I've given above. How can this be possible? Is there any information that I'm missing?
abstract-algebra ring-theory field-theory
abstract-algebra ring-theory field-theory
edited Jan 24 at 18:50
Fozoro
1265
1265
asked Jan 24 at 18:02
Minto PMinto P
667
667
2
$begingroup$
Multiplicative identity?
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Jan 24 at 18:06
2
$begingroup$
@ThomasShelby: $6$ is a multiplicative identity.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Jan 24 at 18:27
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Multiplicative identity?
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Jan 24 at 18:06
2
$begingroup$
@ThomasShelby: $6$ is a multiplicative identity.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Jan 24 at 18:27
2
2
$begingroup$
Multiplicative identity?
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Jan 24 at 18:06
$begingroup$
Multiplicative identity?
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Jan 24 at 18:06
2
2
$begingroup$
@ThomasShelby: $6$ is a multiplicative identity.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Jan 24 at 18:27
$begingroup$
@ThomasShelby: $6$ is a multiplicative identity.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Jan 24 at 18:27
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It depends what you consider a ring (and hence, a subring). Many authors include the identity in the definition of a ring. Under this definition, a subring of a ring must contain the original identity. In this case, ${bf Z}_n$ has no proper subrings, so if it is not a field itself, it has no subrings which are fields.
Otherwise, if your rings are not necessarily unital, a subring may not contain the original identity, in which case your example is indeed correct (with $6$ as the multiplicative identity). An easier example is just ${0,5}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086186%2fdoes-mathbbz-n-contain-a-subfield%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It depends what you consider a ring (and hence, a subring). Many authors include the identity in the definition of a ring. Under this definition, a subring of a ring must contain the original identity. In this case, ${bf Z}_n$ has no proper subrings, so if it is not a field itself, it has no subrings which are fields.
Otherwise, if your rings are not necessarily unital, a subring may not contain the original identity, in which case your example is indeed correct (with $6$ as the multiplicative identity). An easier example is just ${0,5}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It depends what you consider a ring (and hence, a subring). Many authors include the identity in the definition of a ring. Under this definition, a subring of a ring must contain the original identity. In this case, ${bf Z}_n$ has no proper subrings, so if it is not a field itself, it has no subrings which are fields.
Otherwise, if your rings are not necessarily unital, a subring may not contain the original identity, in which case your example is indeed correct (with $6$ as the multiplicative identity). An easier example is just ${0,5}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It depends what you consider a ring (and hence, a subring). Many authors include the identity in the definition of a ring. Under this definition, a subring of a ring must contain the original identity. In this case, ${bf Z}_n$ has no proper subrings, so if it is not a field itself, it has no subrings which are fields.
Otherwise, if your rings are not necessarily unital, a subring may not contain the original identity, in which case your example is indeed correct (with $6$ as the multiplicative identity). An easier example is just ${0,5}$.
$endgroup$
It depends what you consider a ring (and hence, a subring). Many authors include the identity in the definition of a ring. Under this definition, a subring of a ring must contain the original identity. In this case, ${bf Z}_n$ has no proper subrings, so if it is not a field itself, it has no subrings which are fields.
Otherwise, if your rings are not necessarily unital, a subring may not contain the original identity, in which case your example is indeed correct (with $6$ as the multiplicative identity). An easier example is just ${0,5}$.
answered Jan 24 at 18:27
tomasztomasz
23.9k23482
23.9k23482
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086186%2fdoes-mathbbz-n-contain-a-subfield%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Multiplicative identity?
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Jan 24 at 18:06
2
$begingroup$
@ThomasShelby: $6$ is a multiplicative identity.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Jan 24 at 18:27