Green's function modified Helmholtz operator in square periodic domain












0












$begingroup$


My question is motivated by point vortex dynamics. The motion of $N$ point vortices, each of circulation $Gamma_i$ and located at $mathbf{x}_i$, is induced for a given elliptic operator (e.g. Laplace and modified Helmholtz operators) by its Green's function $G(mathbf{x}, mathbf{x}')$ for the domain under consideration. Point vortex motion is a Hamiltonian system with Hamiltonian



$$ H = frac{1}{2} sum_{i=1}^N sum_{j=1atop jneq i} ^N Gamma_i Gamma_j G(mathbf{x}_i, mathbf{x}_j), $$



$$Gamma_i frac{mathrm{d} x_i}{mathrm{d} t} = -frac{partial H } { partial y_i}; hspace{1cm} Gamma_i frac{mathrm{d} y_i}{mathrm{d} t} = frac{partial H } { partial x_i} . $$



Periodic domains are commonly studied in numerical simulations since the avoid boundary effects. The Green's function for the Laplacian operator $nabla^2$ in a square periodic domain $[0,2pi]^2$ (torus) can be computed by tiling $mathbb{R}^2$ with infinitely many copies of the domain and summing over the contributions from each copy, using that the Green's function of the Laplacian in $mathbb{R}^2$ is $G(mathbf{x},mathbf{x}') = frac {1}{2pi} log(|mathbf{x}-mathbf{x}'|)$.



The result is:
$$
G(mathbf{x},mathbf{x}') = frac{1}{4pi} left( left[sum_{m=-infty}^infty logleft( frac{cosh(x-x'-2pi m)-cos(y-y')}{cosh(2pi m)}right) right] - frac{(x-x')^2}{2pi} + G_{o} right),
$$

where $G_o$ is an additive constant (see this article by G. Esler, formula B1, for instance). This function is $2pi$-periodic in $x-x'$ and $y-y'$. The great advantage of this result is that the remaning infinite series is very rapidly converging and may be evaluated very cheaply numerically.



The way this has been computed for the first time, namely in this article by McWilliams and Weiss is by summing up the velocity field (simple ratios which may be summed relatively easily) and then integrating back up to get the Hamiltonian and the Green's function.



Now, if one considers the modified Helmholtz operator $nabla^2-lambda^2$ (corresponding to plasma flows, for instance), how can one calculate the Greens function for the periodic domain?
The Green's function in $mathbb{R}^2$ is $G(mathbf{x},mathbf{x}')=frac{1}{2pi} K_0(lambda |mathbf{x} -mathbf{x}'|)$. It seems like a relatively standard problem, but so far I haven't managed to do it. Thanks for your help!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    My question is motivated by point vortex dynamics. The motion of $N$ point vortices, each of circulation $Gamma_i$ and located at $mathbf{x}_i$, is induced for a given elliptic operator (e.g. Laplace and modified Helmholtz operators) by its Green's function $G(mathbf{x}, mathbf{x}')$ for the domain under consideration. Point vortex motion is a Hamiltonian system with Hamiltonian



    $$ H = frac{1}{2} sum_{i=1}^N sum_{j=1atop jneq i} ^N Gamma_i Gamma_j G(mathbf{x}_i, mathbf{x}_j), $$



    $$Gamma_i frac{mathrm{d} x_i}{mathrm{d} t} = -frac{partial H } { partial y_i}; hspace{1cm} Gamma_i frac{mathrm{d} y_i}{mathrm{d} t} = frac{partial H } { partial x_i} . $$



    Periodic domains are commonly studied in numerical simulations since the avoid boundary effects. The Green's function for the Laplacian operator $nabla^2$ in a square periodic domain $[0,2pi]^2$ (torus) can be computed by tiling $mathbb{R}^2$ with infinitely many copies of the domain and summing over the contributions from each copy, using that the Green's function of the Laplacian in $mathbb{R}^2$ is $G(mathbf{x},mathbf{x}') = frac {1}{2pi} log(|mathbf{x}-mathbf{x}'|)$.



    The result is:
    $$
    G(mathbf{x},mathbf{x}') = frac{1}{4pi} left( left[sum_{m=-infty}^infty logleft( frac{cosh(x-x'-2pi m)-cos(y-y')}{cosh(2pi m)}right) right] - frac{(x-x')^2}{2pi} + G_{o} right),
    $$

    where $G_o$ is an additive constant (see this article by G. Esler, formula B1, for instance). This function is $2pi$-periodic in $x-x'$ and $y-y'$. The great advantage of this result is that the remaning infinite series is very rapidly converging and may be evaluated very cheaply numerically.



    The way this has been computed for the first time, namely in this article by McWilliams and Weiss is by summing up the velocity field (simple ratios which may be summed relatively easily) and then integrating back up to get the Hamiltonian and the Green's function.



    Now, if one considers the modified Helmholtz operator $nabla^2-lambda^2$ (corresponding to plasma flows, for instance), how can one calculate the Greens function for the periodic domain?
    The Green's function in $mathbb{R}^2$ is $G(mathbf{x},mathbf{x}')=frac{1}{2pi} K_0(lambda |mathbf{x} -mathbf{x}'|)$. It seems like a relatively standard problem, but so far I haven't managed to do it. Thanks for your help!










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      My question is motivated by point vortex dynamics. The motion of $N$ point vortices, each of circulation $Gamma_i$ and located at $mathbf{x}_i$, is induced for a given elliptic operator (e.g. Laplace and modified Helmholtz operators) by its Green's function $G(mathbf{x}, mathbf{x}')$ for the domain under consideration. Point vortex motion is a Hamiltonian system with Hamiltonian



      $$ H = frac{1}{2} sum_{i=1}^N sum_{j=1atop jneq i} ^N Gamma_i Gamma_j G(mathbf{x}_i, mathbf{x}_j), $$



      $$Gamma_i frac{mathrm{d} x_i}{mathrm{d} t} = -frac{partial H } { partial y_i}; hspace{1cm} Gamma_i frac{mathrm{d} y_i}{mathrm{d} t} = frac{partial H } { partial x_i} . $$



      Periodic domains are commonly studied in numerical simulations since the avoid boundary effects. The Green's function for the Laplacian operator $nabla^2$ in a square periodic domain $[0,2pi]^2$ (torus) can be computed by tiling $mathbb{R}^2$ with infinitely many copies of the domain and summing over the contributions from each copy, using that the Green's function of the Laplacian in $mathbb{R}^2$ is $G(mathbf{x},mathbf{x}') = frac {1}{2pi} log(|mathbf{x}-mathbf{x}'|)$.



      The result is:
      $$
      G(mathbf{x},mathbf{x}') = frac{1}{4pi} left( left[sum_{m=-infty}^infty logleft( frac{cosh(x-x'-2pi m)-cos(y-y')}{cosh(2pi m)}right) right] - frac{(x-x')^2}{2pi} + G_{o} right),
      $$

      where $G_o$ is an additive constant (see this article by G. Esler, formula B1, for instance). This function is $2pi$-periodic in $x-x'$ and $y-y'$. The great advantage of this result is that the remaning infinite series is very rapidly converging and may be evaluated very cheaply numerically.



      The way this has been computed for the first time, namely in this article by McWilliams and Weiss is by summing up the velocity field (simple ratios which may be summed relatively easily) and then integrating back up to get the Hamiltonian and the Green's function.



      Now, if one considers the modified Helmholtz operator $nabla^2-lambda^2$ (corresponding to plasma flows, for instance), how can one calculate the Greens function for the periodic domain?
      The Green's function in $mathbb{R}^2$ is $G(mathbf{x},mathbf{x}')=frac{1}{2pi} K_0(lambda |mathbf{x} -mathbf{x}'|)$. It seems like a relatively standard problem, but so far I haven't managed to do it. Thanks for your help!










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      My question is motivated by point vortex dynamics. The motion of $N$ point vortices, each of circulation $Gamma_i$ and located at $mathbf{x}_i$, is induced for a given elliptic operator (e.g. Laplace and modified Helmholtz operators) by its Green's function $G(mathbf{x}, mathbf{x}')$ for the domain under consideration. Point vortex motion is a Hamiltonian system with Hamiltonian



      $$ H = frac{1}{2} sum_{i=1}^N sum_{j=1atop jneq i} ^N Gamma_i Gamma_j G(mathbf{x}_i, mathbf{x}_j), $$



      $$Gamma_i frac{mathrm{d} x_i}{mathrm{d} t} = -frac{partial H } { partial y_i}; hspace{1cm} Gamma_i frac{mathrm{d} y_i}{mathrm{d} t} = frac{partial H } { partial x_i} . $$



      Periodic domains are commonly studied in numerical simulations since the avoid boundary effects. The Green's function for the Laplacian operator $nabla^2$ in a square periodic domain $[0,2pi]^2$ (torus) can be computed by tiling $mathbb{R}^2$ with infinitely many copies of the domain and summing over the contributions from each copy, using that the Green's function of the Laplacian in $mathbb{R}^2$ is $G(mathbf{x},mathbf{x}') = frac {1}{2pi} log(|mathbf{x}-mathbf{x}'|)$.



      The result is:
      $$
      G(mathbf{x},mathbf{x}') = frac{1}{4pi} left( left[sum_{m=-infty}^infty logleft( frac{cosh(x-x'-2pi m)-cos(y-y')}{cosh(2pi m)}right) right] - frac{(x-x')^2}{2pi} + G_{o} right),
      $$

      where $G_o$ is an additive constant (see this article by G. Esler, formula B1, for instance). This function is $2pi$-periodic in $x-x'$ and $y-y'$. The great advantage of this result is that the remaning infinite series is very rapidly converging and may be evaluated very cheaply numerically.



      The way this has been computed for the first time, namely in this article by McWilliams and Weiss is by summing up the velocity field (simple ratios which may be summed relatively easily) and then integrating back up to get the Hamiltonian and the Green's function.



      Now, if one considers the modified Helmholtz operator $nabla^2-lambda^2$ (corresponding to plasma flows, for instance), how can one calculate the Greens function for the periodic domain?
      The Green's function in $mathbb{R}^2$ is $G(mathbf{x},mathbf{x}')=frac{1}{2pi} K_0(lambda |mathbf{x} -mathbf{x}'|)$. It seems like a relatively standard problem, but so far I haven't managed to do it. Thanks for your help!







      greens-function






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 24 at 13:18







      Cyclone

















      asked Jan 24 at 13:11









      CycloneCyclone

      1,301717




      1,301717






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085861%2fgreens-function-modified-helmholtz-operator-in-square-periodic-domain%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085861%2fgreens-function-modified-helmholtz-operator-in-square-periodic-domain%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

          Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory