Let $A$ be bounded below, and $B = {b in R : b$ is a lower bound for $A}$. Show that $sup B = inf A$.












2












$begingroup$


This is Exercise 1.3.3 (a) from "Understanding Analysis" by Stephen Abbot, , page 17:




Let $A$ be bounded below, and define $B = {b in R : b$ is a lower bound for $A}$. Show that $sup B = inf A$.




Please check my proof:



Suppose $A$ be bound below, it exist number $Nleq n$ for every $nin mathbb R$ in the set and $N$ is $inf{A}$. Then $B={b in mathbb R:b$ is a lower bound for $A}$. It exist number $b$ in the set, since it contains only lower bound of $A$ then it has number $bleq M$ for every $b$ and $M$ is $sup$ of $B$. But $b$ is lower bound of $A$ and $A$ has $N$ as $sup$, $N$ is in $B$. $N$ is automatically is sup of $b$ therefore $M=N$ or $sup {B}=inf {A}$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    wait ,why edited my question ?
    $endgroup$
    – Lingnoi401
    Jan 16 '17 at 11:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @juniven exercise from Understanding Analysis by Stephen Abbot
    $endgroup$
    – Lingnoi401
    Jan 16 '17 at 11:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    it is in page 17
    $endgroup$
    – Lingnoi401
    Jan 16 '17 at 11:09








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There I see Exercise 1.3.3 (a) Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – ΘΣΦGenSan
    Jan 16 '17 at 11:13






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You question was edited as your typesetting was a bit unusual. Moreover, the body of the post should be self-contained and not depend on the content of the title (which in turn was/is a tad on the too complicated side for a title).
    $endgroup$
    – quid
    Jan 16 '17 at 12:23


















2












$begingroup$


This is Exercise 1.3.3 (a) from "Understanding Analysis" by Stephen Abbot, , page 17:




Let $A$ be bounded below, and define $B = {b in R : b$ is a lower bound for $A}$. Show that $sup B = inf A$.




Please check my proof:



Suppose $A$ be bound below, it exist number $Nleq n$ for every $nin mathbb R$ in the set and $N$ is $inf{A}$. Then $B={b in mathbb R:b$ is a lower bound for $A}$. It exist number $b$ in the set, since it contains only lower bound of $A$ then it has number $bleq M$ for every $b$ and $M$ is $sup$ of $B$. But $b$ is lower bound of $A$ and $A$ has $N$ as $sup$, $N$ is in $B$. $N$ is automatically is sup of $b$ therefore $M=N$ or $sup {B}=inf {A}$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    wait ,why edited my question ?
    $endgroup$
    – Lingnoi401
    Jan 16 '17 at 11:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @juniven exercise from Understanding Analysis by Stephen Abbot
    $endgroup$
    – Lingnoi401
    Jan 16 '17 at 11:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    it is in page 17
    $endgroup$
    – Lingnoi401
    Jan 16 '17 at 11:09








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There I see Exercise 1.3.3 (a) Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – ΘΣΦGenSan
    Jan 16 '17 at 11:13






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You question was edited as your typesetting was a bit unusual. Moreover, the body of the post should be self-contained and not depend on the content of the title (which in turn was/is a tad on the too complicated side for a title).
    $endgroup$
    – quid
    Jan 16 '17 at 12:23
















2












2








2





$begingroup$


This is Exercise 1.3.3 (a) from "Understanding Analysis" by Stephen Abbot, , page 17:




Let $A$ be bounded below, and define $B = {b in R : b$ is a lower bound for $A}$. Show that $sup B = inf A$.




Please check my proof:



Suppose $A$ be bound below, it exist number $Nleq n$ for every $nin mathbb R$ in the set and $N$ is $inf{A}$. Then $B={b in mathbb R:b$ is a lower bound for $A}$. It exist number $b$ in the set, since it contains only lower bound of $A$ then it has number $bleq M$ for every $b$ and $M$ is $sup$ of $B$. But $b$ is lower bound of $A$ and $A$ has $N$ as $sup$, $N$ is in $B$. $N$ is automatically is sup of $b$ therefore $M=N$ or $sup {B}=inf {A}$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




This is Exercise 1.3.3 (a) from "Understanding Analysis" by Stephen Abbot, , page 17:




Let $A$ be bounded below, and define $B = {b in R : b$ is a lower bound for $A}$. Show that $sup B = inf A$.




Please check my proof:



Suppose $A$ be bound below, it exist number $Nleq n$ for every $nin mathbb R$ in the set and $N$ is $inf{A}$. Then $B={b in mathbb R:b$ is a lower bound for $A}$. It exist number $b$ in the set, since it contains only lower bound of $A$ then it has number $bleq M$ for every $b$ and $M$ is $sup$ of $B$. But $b$ is lower bound of $A$ and $A$ has $N$ as $sup$, $N$ is in $B$. $N$ is automatically is sup of $b$ therefore $M=N$ or $sup {B}=inf {A}$.







real-analysis proof-verification supremum-and-infimum






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 16 '17 at 12:20









Martin Sleziak

44.9k10121274




44.9k10121274










asked Jan 16 '17 at 10:50









Lingnoi401Lingnoi401

925520




925520








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    wait ,why edited my question ?
    $endgroup$
    – Lingnoi401
    Jan 16 '17 at 11:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @juniven exercise from Understanding Analysis by Stephen Abbot
    $endgroup$
    – Lingnoi401
    Jan 16 '17 at 11:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    it is in page 17
    $endgroup$
    – Lingnoi401
    Jan 16 '17 at 11:09








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There I see Exercise 1.3.3 (a) Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – ΘΣΦGenSan
    Jan 16 '17 at 11:13






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You question was edited as your typesetting was a bit unusual. Moreover, the body of the post should be self-contained and not depend on the content of the title (which in turn was/is a tad on the too complicated side for a title).
    $endgroup$
    – quid
    Jan 16 '17 at 12:23
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    wait ,why edited my question ?
    $endgroup$
    – Lingnoi401
    Jan 16 '17 at 11:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @juniven exercise from Understanding Analysis by Stephen Abbot
    $endgroup$
    – Lingnoi401
    Jan 16 '17 at 11:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    it is in page 17
    $endgroup$
    – Lingnoi401
    Jan 16 '17 at 11:09








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There I see Exercise 1.3.3 (a) Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – ΘΣΦGenSan
    Jan 16 '17 at 11:13






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You question was edited as your typesetting was a bit unusual. Moreover, the body of the post should be self-contained and not depend on the content of the title (which in turn was/is a tad on the too complicated side for a title).
    $endgroup$
    – quid
    Jan 16 '17 at 12:23










1




1




$begingroup$
wait ,why edited my question ?
$endgroup$
– Lingnoi401
Jan 16 '17 at 11:00




$begingroup$
wait ,why edited my question ?
$endgroup$
– Lingnoi401
Jan 16 '17 at 11:00




1




1




$begingroup$
@juniven exercise from Understanding Analysis by Stephen Abbot
$endgroup$
– Lingnoi401
Jan 16 '17 at 11:08




$begingroup$
@juniven exercise from Understanding Analysis by Stephen Abbot
$endgroup$
– Lingnoi401
Jan 16 '17 at 11:08




1




1




$begingroup$
it is in page 17
$endgroup$
– Lingnoi401
Jan 16 '17 at 11:09






$begingroup$
it is in page 17
$endgroup$
– Lingnoi401
Jan 16 '17 at 11:09






1




1




$begingroup$
There I see Exercise 1.3.3 (a) Thank you.
$endgroup$
– ΘΣΦGenSan
Jan 16 '17 at 11:13




$begingroup$
There I see Exercise 1.3.3 (a) Thank you.
$endgroup$
– ΘΣΦGenSan
Jan 16 '17 at 11:13




2




2




$begingroup$
You question was edited as your typesetting was a bit unusual. Moreover, the body of the post should be self-contained and not depend on the content of the title (which in turn was/is a tad on the too complicated side for a title).
$endgroup$
– quid
Jan 16 '17 at 12:23






$begingroup$
You question was edited as your typesetting was a bit unusual. Moreover, the body of the post should be self-contained and not depend on the content of the title (which in turn was/is a tad on the too complicated side for a title).
$endgroup$
– quid
Jan 16 '17 at 12:23












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

$inf A$ is defined as the biggest lower bound of $A$. So it is in particular a lower bound of $A$. But that means it is an element of $B$, which is defined as the set of all lower bounds of $A$. Thus $inf Ain B$. But it is also the biggest lower bound of $A$, so for every $bin B$ follows $bleqinf A$. This gives us $inf A=max B$. But if a set has a maximum, this maximum is also its supremum. Thus $inf A=max B=sup B$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2099966%2flet-a-be-bounded-below-and-b-b-in-r-b-is-a-lower-bound-for-a-sh%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    $inf A$ is defined as the biggest lower bound of $A$. So it is in particular a lower bound of $A$. But that means it is an element of $B$, which is defined as the set of all lower bounds of $A$. Thus $inf Ain B$. But it is also the biggest lower bound of $A$, so for every $bin B$ follows $bleqinf A$. This gives us $inf A=max B$. But if a set has a maximum, this maximum is also its supremum. Thus $inf A=max B=sup B$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      $inf A$ is defined as the biggest lower bound of $A$. So it is in particular a lower bound of $A$. But that means it is an element of $B$, which is defined as the set of all lower bounds of $A$. Thus $inf Ain B$. But it is also the biggest lower bound of $A$, so for every $bin B$ follows $bleqinf A$. This gives us $inf A=max B$. But if a set has a maximum, this maximum is also its supremum. Thus $inf A=max B=sup B$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        $inf A$ is defined as the biggest lower bound of $A$. So it is in particular a lower bound of $A$. But that means it is an element of $B$, which is defined as the set of all lower bounds of $A$. Thus $inf Ain B$. But it is also the biggest lower bound of $A$, so for every $bin B$ follows $bleqinf A$. This gives us $inf A=max B$. But if a set has a maximum, this maximum is also its supremum. Thus $inf A=max B=sup B$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        $inf A$ is defined as the biggest lower bound of $A$. So it is in particular a lower bound of $A$. But that means it is an element of $B$, which is defined as the set of all lower bounds of $A$. Thus $inf Ain B$. But it is also the biggest lower bound of $A$, so for every $bin B$ follows $bleqinf A$. This gives us $inf A=max B$. But if a set has a maximum, this maximum is also its supremum. Thus $inf A=max B=sup B$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 14 '18 at 11:39









        BentapairBentapair

        1




        1






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2099966%2flet-a-be-bounded-below-and-b-b-in-r-b-is-a-lower-bound-for-a-sh%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

            Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

            A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$