Can zero be any dimension?












1












$begingroup$


When I am working on the problem:



Suppose $V$ and $W$ are finite-dimensional with $text{dim }V geq text{dim }W geq 2$. Show that ${T in mathcal{L}(V,W): T text{ is not surjective}}$ is not a subspace of $mathcal{L}(V,W)$.



So, I naturally want to check if $0 in {T in mathcal{L}(V,W): T text{ is not surjective}}$. Am I correct?



My first thought was the zero map is surjective because it maps any dimension, say 2, 3, or 4 to zero in 2,3,or 4 dimension. So, range of $T$ is equal to $W$. I think there are some problem in this statement that only compare the dimension to determine whether T and W are equal. But I am not sure.



If range of $T$ is equal to $W$, then it is surjective. So it violates the additive identity properties of suspaces?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The dimension of the range of the zero map is $0$. The dimension of $W$ is not zero. Thus the two can not be equal. Generally speaking the zero map is never surjective if it maps to a nontrivial space.
    $endgroup$
    – maxmilgram
    Jan 26 at 7:45


















1












$begingroup$


When I am working on the problem:



Suppose $V$ and $W$ are finite-dimensional with $text{dim }V geq text{dim }W geq 2$. Show that ${T in mathcal{L}(V,W): T text{ is not surjective}}$ is not a subspace of $mathcal{L}(V,W)$.



So, I naturally want to check if $0 in {T in mathcal{L}(V,W): T text{ is not surjective}}$. Am I correct?



My first thought was the zero map is surjective because it maps any dimension, say 2, 3, or 4 to zero in 2,3,or 4 dimension. So, range of $T$ is equal to $W$. I think there are some problem in this statement that only compare the dimension to determine whether T and W are equal. But I am not sure.



If range of $T$ is equal to $W$, then it is surjective. So it violates the additive identity properties of suspaces?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The dimension of the range of the zero map is $0$. The dimension of $W$ is not zero. Thus the two can not be equal. Generally speaking the zero map is never surjective if it maps to a nontrivial space.
    $endgroup$
    – maxmilgram
    Jan 26 at 7:45
















1












1








1


0



$begingroup$


When I am working on the problem:



Suppose $V$ and $W$ are finite-dimensional with $text{dim }V geq text{dim }W geq 2$. Show that ${T in mathcal{L}(V,W): T text{ is not surjective}}$ is not a subspace of $mathcal{L}(V,W)$.



So, I naturally want to check if $0 in {T in mathcal{L}(V,W): T text{ is not surjective}}$. Am I correct?



My first thought was the zero map is surjective because it maps any dimension, say 2, 3, or 4 to zero in 2,3,or 4 dimension. So, range of $T$ is equal to $W$. I think there are some problem in this statement that only compare the dimension to determine whether T and W are equal. But I am not sure.



If range of $T$ is equal to $W$, then it is surjective. So it violates the additive identity properties of suspaces?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




When I am working on the problem:



Suppose $V$ and $W$ are finite-dimensional with $text{dim }V geq text{dim }W geq 2$. Show that ${T in mathcal{L}(V,W): T text{ is not surjective}}$ is not a subspace of $mathcal{L}(V,W)$.



So, I naturally want to check if $0 in {T in mathcal{L}(V,W): T text{ is not surjective}}$. Am I correct?



My first thought was the zero map is surjective because it maps any dimension, say 2, 3, or 4 to zero in 2,3,or 4 dimension. So, range of $T$ is equal to $W$. I think there are some problem in this statement that only compare the dimension to determine whether T and W are equal. But I am not sure.



If range of $T$ is equal to $W$, then it is surjective. So it violates the additive identity properties of suspaces?







linear-algebra linear-transformations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 26 at 7:37







JOHN

















asked Jan 26 at 7:34









JOHN JOHN

4279




4279












  • $begingroup$
    The dimension of the range of the zero map is $0$. The dimension of $W$ is not zero. Thus the two can not be equal. Generally speaking the zero map is never surjective if it maps to a nontrivial space.
    $endgroup$
    – maxmilgram
    Jan 26 at 7:45




















  • $begingroup$
    The dimension of the range of the zero map is $0$. The dimension of $W$ is not zero. Thus the two can not be equal. Generally speaking the zero map is never surjective if it maps to a nontrivial space.
    $endgroup$
    – maxmilgram
    Jan 26 at 7:45


















$begingroup$
The dimension of the range of the zero map is $0$. The dimension of $W$ is not zero. Thus the two can not be equal. Generally speaking the zero map is never surjective if it maps to a nontrivial space.
$endgroup$
– maxmilgram
Jan 26 at 7:45






$begingroup$
The dimension of the range of the zero map is $0$. The dimension of $W$ is not zero. Thus the two can not be equal. Generally speaking the zero map is never surjective if it maps to a nontrivial space.
$endgroup$
– maxmilgram
Jan 26 at 7:45












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

The range of the zero map ${0}$ and therefore it is surjective when and only when $W={0}$. So, since you are assuming that $dim Wgeqslant 2$, the zero map is not surjective.



Concerning the question from the title of your question: $dim{0}=0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    So, the dimension of zero vector can only be $0$? e.g. dimension of $(0,0,0,0)$ is $0$?
    $endgroup$
    – JOHN
    Jan 26 at 7:51






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    A vector has no dimension. Vector spaces do.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 26 at 7:54



















0












$begingroup$

The zero map from $mathbb{R}^{dim V}$ to $mathbb{R}^{dim W}$ is not surjective, unless $dim W=0$. So $0$ is in the subset you are examining. And this is not the avenue to pursue for proving this subset is not a subspace.



Instead, you can show a lack of additive closure. It will be possible to take two non-surjective transformations, add them together, and get a surjective transformation.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3087997%2fcan-zero-be-any-dimension%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    The range of the zero map ${0}$ and therefore it is surjective when and only when $W={0}$. So, since you are assuming that $dim Wgeqslant 2$, the zero map is not surjective.



    Concerning the question from the title of your question: $dim{0}=0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      So, the dimension of zero vector can only be $0$? e.g. dimension of $(0,0,0,0)$ is $0$?
      $endgroup$
      – JOHN
      Jan 26 at 7:51






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      A vector has no dimension. Vector spaces do.
      $endgroup$
      – José Carlos Santos
      Jan 26 at 7:54
















    2












    $begingroup$

    The range of the zero map ${0}$ and therefore it is surjective when and only when $W={0}$. So, since you are assuming that $dim Wgeqslant 2$, the zero map is not surjective.



    Concerning the question from the title of your question: $dim{0}=0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      So, the dimension of zero vector can only be $0$? e.g. dimension of $(0,0,0,0)$ is $0$?
      $endgroup$
      – JOHN
      Jan 26 at 7:51






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      A vector has no dimension. Vector spaces do.
      $endgroup$
      – José Carlos Santos
      Jan 26 at 7:54














    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    The range of the zero map ${0}$ and therefore it is surjective when and only when $W={0}$. So, since you are assuming that $dim Wgeqslant 2$, the zero map is not surjective.



    Concerning the question from the title of your question: $dim{0}=0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    The range of the zero map ${0}$ and therefore it is surjective when and only when $W={0}$. So, since you are assuming that $dim Wgeqslant 2$, the zero map is not surjective.



    Concerning the question from the title of your question: $dim{0}=0$.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Jan 26 at 7:43









    José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

    169k23132237




    169k23132237












    • $begingroup$
      So, the dimension of zero vector can only be $0$? e.g. dimension of $(0,0,0,0)$ is $0$?
      $endgroup$
      – JOHN
      Jan 26 at 7:51






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      A vector has no dimension. Vector spaces do.
      $endgroup$
      – José Carlos Santos
      Jan 26 at 7:54


















    • $begingroup$
      So, the dimension of zero vector can only be $0$? e.g. dimension of $(0,0,0,0)$ is $0$?
      $endgroup$
      – JOHN
      Jan 26 at 7:51






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      A vector has no dimension. Vector spaces do.
      $endgroup$
      – José Carlos Santos
      Jan 26 at 7:54
















    $begingroup$
    So, the dimension of zero vector can only be $0$? e.g. dimension of $(0,0,0,0)$ is $0$?
    $endgroup$
    – JOHN
    Jan 26 at 7:51




    $begingroup$
    So, the dimension of zero vector can only be $0$? e.g. dimension of $(0,0,0,0)$ is $0$?
    $endgroup$
    – JOHN
    Jan 26 at 7:51




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    A vector has no dimension. Vector spaces do.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 26 at 7:54




    $begingroup$
    A vector has no dimension. Vector spaces do.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 26 at 7:54











    0












    $begingroup$

    The zero map from $mathbb{R}^{dim V}$ to $mathbb{R}^{dim W}$ is not surjective, unless $dim W=0$. So $0$ is in the subset you are examining. And this is not the avenue to pursue for proving this subset is not a subspace.



    Instead, you can show a lack of additive closure. It will be possible to take two non-surjective transformations, add them together, and get a surjective transformation.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      The zero map from $mathbb{R}^{dim V}$ to $mathbb{R}^{dim W}$ is not surjective, unless $dim W=0$. So $0$ is in the subset you are examining. And this is not the avenue to pursue for proving this subset is not a subspace.



      Instead, you can show a lack of additive closure. It will be possible to take two non-surjective transformations, add them together, and get a surjective transformation.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        The zero map from $mathbb{R}^{dim V}$ to $mathbb{R}^{dim W}$ is not surjective, unless $dim W=0$. So $0$ is in the subset you are examining. And this is not the avenue to pursue for proving this subset is not a subspace.



        Instead, you can show a lack of additive closure. It will be possible to take two non-surjective transformations, add them together, and get a surjective transformation.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The zero map from $mathbb{R}^{dim V}$ to $mathbb{R}^{dim W}$ is not surjective, unless $dim W=0$. So $0$ is in the subset you are examining. And this is not the avenue to pursue for proving this subset is not a subspace.



        Instead, you can show a lack of additive closure. It will be possible to take two non-surjective transformations, add them together, and get a surjective transformation.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 26 at 8:20









        alex.jordanalex.jordan

        39.5k560122




        39.5k560122






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3087997%2fcan-zero-be-any-dimension%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

            Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

            A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$